REVIEW
mathbb Qsetminusmathbb Z is diophantine over mathbb Q with 32 unknowns
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
mathbb Qsetminusmathbb Z is diophantine over mathbb Q with 32 unknowns
read the original abstract
In 2016 J. Koenigsmann refined a celebrated theorem of J. Robinson by proving that $\mathbb Q\setminus\mathbb Z$ is diophantine over $\mathbb Q$, i.e., there is a polynomial $P(t,x_1,\ldots,x_{n})\in\mathbb Z[t,x_1,\ldots,x_{n}]$ such that for any rational number $t$ we have $$t\not\in\mathbb Z\iff \exists x_1\cdots\exists x_{n}[P(t,x_1,\ldots,x_{n})=0]$$ where variables range over $\mathbb Q$, equivalently $$t\in\mathbb Z\iff \forall x_1\cdots\forall x_{n}[P(t,x_1,\ldots,x_{n})\not=0].$$ In this paper we prove that we may take $n=32$. Combining this with a result of Z.-W. Sun, we show that there is no algorithm to decide for any $f(x_1,\ldots,x_{41})\in\mathbb Z[x_1,\ldots,x_{41}]$ whether $$\forall x_1\cdots\forall x_9\exists y_1\cdots\exists y_{32}[f(x_1,\ldots,x_9,y_1,\ldots,y_{32})=0],$$ where variables range over $\mathbb Q$.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.