Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 25 references

Controlling Single-Pulse Magnetization Switching through Angular Momentum Reservoir Engineering

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that in Co/Gd bilayers, the speed of single-pulse all-optical magnetization reversal is set by how much angular momentum the Gd layer can hand to the Co layer during laser-induced demagnetization.

desk verdict Good systematic data and a useful framework, undercut by a direct main-text/SI contradiction on whether optical absorption explains the switching threshold. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.07272 v1 pith:YPVVCKOP submitted 2025-08-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

B. Kunyangyuen , G. Malinowski , D. Lacour , B. Seng , W. Zhang , S. Mangin , J. Hohlfeld , J. Gorchon
show 1 more author
M. Hehn
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords all-opticalswitchingangularmomentumtransferCo/Gdbilayersrare-earthtransition-metalalloysspincurrentultrafastmagnetizationdynamicsferrimagnetTR-MOKE
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that the speed of single-pulse all-optical magnetization reversal in Co/Gd bilayers is set by angular momentum transfer from the Gd layer to the Co layer. By varying Gd thickness from 0.3 to 3 nm or inserting a Pt spacer, the authors change the reversal dynamics from a few picoseconds (thick, strongly coupled Gd) to nanoseconds or longer (thin Gd or thick Pt spacer). They identify the spin current $j_\mathrm{S} = -\mathrm{d}M_\mathrm{Gd}/\mathrm{d}t$ generated during Gd demagnetization as the driving agent, and argue that Gd is the most efficient angular momentum reservoir among rare earths because of its weak spin-orbit coupling. A unified picture then connects ultrafast switching in Gd-rich systems to slow, domain-mediated reversal in Dy- and Ho-based alloys.

What carries the argument

The angular-momentum-reservoir mechanism: during laser heating, the Gd sublattice demagnetizes and emits a spin current $j_\mathrm{S} = -\mathrm{d}M_\mathrm{Gd}/\mathrm{d}t$, which is transferred through the Co/Gd interface to the Co sublattice and drives its reversal. Control knobs are the Gd layer thickness (reservoir size), a Pt spacer (interface transfer efficiency via exchange decoupling and spin scattering), and the Gd:Dy ratio in alloys (reservoir quality, set by spin-orbit coupling). The threshold fluence criterion $F_\mathrm{th} \propto j_\mathrm{S}$ links the switching window to the demagnetization rate of Gd.

What would settle it

Measure element-specific magnetization dynamics of Gd and Co (e.g., X-ray magnetic circular dichroism) across the Pt-spacer series: if the time-integrated Gd demagnetization does not track the reversal speed, or if picosecond reversal appears when Gd is magnetically decoupled from Co, the angular-momentum-reservoir mechanism is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that all-optical helicity-independent switching in rare-earth–transition-metal bilayers and alloys is governed by the availability and transfer of angular momentum from the rare-earth sublattice to the transition-metal sublattice, specifically the spin current $j_\mathrm{S} = -\mathrm{d}M_\mathrm{Gd}/\mathrm{d}t$ produced when the rare-earth demagnetizes. In Co(0.7 nm)/Gd($t_\mathrm{Gd}$) bilayers, increasing $t_\mathrm{Gd}$ from 0.3 to 3 nm changes the reversal from slower than 1.6 ns (with a long-lived demagnetized state) to complete reversal within 8 ps, crossing zero magnetization at 1 ps. Inserting a Pt spacer between Co and Gd preserves switching but progressively

Load-bearing premise

The explanation assumes that laser-induced demagnetization of Gd produces a spin current that is transferred to and reverses the Co sublattice, and that differences in this transfer—not concurrent changes in Curie temperature, anisotropy, or exchange stiffness—account for the observed speed differences.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Gd-rich compositions and strongly coupled Co/Gd interfaces are the design directions for picosecond, single-pulse all-optical switching in RE-TM systems.
  • Slow, domain-mediated reversal in Dy- and Ho-based systems and partial switching in Tb/Dy systems can be understood as the low-angular-momentum-transfer limit of the same mechanism.
  • The transition from ultrafast to nanosecond reversal can be engineered by inserting nonmagnetic spacers, enabling speed to be traded against other properties such as thermal stability.
  • The switching fluence is set in part by the angular momentum budget, not only by heating, which explains why similar optical absorption profiles give very different switching thresholds.
  • Time-resolved measurements across a thickness wedge give a direct map of reversal time versus angular momentum availability, useful for calibrating models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the spin-current picture is right, the reversal time should scale inversely with the time-integrated demagnetization of the rare-earth sublattice; a quantitative test would be to measure Gd dynamics element-specifically across the Pt-spacer series.
  • The framework suggests an angular-momentum impedance-matching problem: interfaces that transmit spin efficiently (low spin-memory loss, weak spin-orbit scattering) should make even Dy- and Ho-based systems switch faster, perhaps up to the picosecond regime.
  • One might generalize the reservoir concept to non-rare-earth elements or engineered spin sinks: any layer that can be demagnetized to produce a spin current of sufficient magnitude and duration should be able to drive all-optical switching.
  • The use of a thickness wedge to encode a continuous parameter sweep in a single sample could be extended to optimize other spintronic interfaces, since it removes sample-to-sample variations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a systematic experimental study of single-pulse all-optical helicity-independent switching (AO-HIS) in Co/Gd bilayers, Co/Pt/Gd structures, and GdDyCo alloys. The authors show that the reversal dynamics can be tuned dramatically: thick Gd layers lead to picosecond reversal, while thin Gd layers or Pt spacers slow the reversal to nanosecond or possibly longer timescales. They interpret these trends as evidence that Gd acts as an angular momentum reservoir and that the transfer of angular momentum from the demagnetized Gd sublattice to Co controls the speed and efficiency of AO-HIS. The central claim is that angular momentum availability and transfer pathways provide a unified framework for fast and slow AO-HIS in rare-earth–transition-metal systems.

Significance. If the mechanistic interpretation holds, the paper makes a useful contribution by connecting picosecond Gd-based switching to slow, domain-mediated switching in Dy/Ho-based systems, and by identifying interface engineering of the rare-earth–transition-metal coupling as a control knob. The strengths are the systematic wedge-sample approach, the three independent parameter series (Gd thickness, Pt spacer thickness, Gd/Dy ratio), and the clear TR-MOKE data showing a progressive slowing of reversal. The paper also makes falsifiable predictions about material design (favoring Gd-rich compositions). However, the central evidence for the angular-momentum mechanism is weakened by an internal inconsistency between the main text and the supplementary absorption normalization, and by the indirect nature of the inferred Gd magnetization dynamics. These issues do not invalidate the reported observations but do require substantial revision before the mechanistic claim can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Main text near Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. S2c] The main text states: 'The small difference in optical absorption between these two cases is insufficient to account for the significant changes observed in the AO-HIS state diagram (Figure 1b), further emphasizing the dominant role of angular momentum transfer over purely thermal effects.' However, Fig. S2c states that the fluences extracted from Fig. 2b, normalized by the absorbed energy in the magnetic Co/Gd layers, 'reveal that the fluence required for switching remains nearly constant across different Gd thicknesses.' These two statements are mutually inconsistent. If the normalization in S2c is correct, the Gd-thickness dependence of Fth is fully accounted for by optical absorption, removing a key piece of evidence for the angular-momentum-transfer interpretation. The TR-MOKE dynamics still show slower reversal for thinner Gd, but the state-diagram argument is undermined. The autho
  2. [Section 3, paragraph beginning 'Direct measurement of the Gd magnetic moment...'] The central mechanistic claim—that AO-HIS speed is governed by the transfer of angular momentum from the Gd sublattice, with jS = -dMGd/dt as the relevant spin current—is not directly tested. The paper explicitly states that direct measurement of the Gd moment is challenging and that AO-HIS is used as an indirect probe. Alternative explanations based on changes in effective Curie temperature, anisotropy, or exchange stiffness are acknowledged but not quantitatively excluded, especially for the direct Co/Gd thickness series where MS, TC, and anisotropy 'vary significantly' (Section 3). The Pt spacer series is helpful because it keeps those properties more constant, but the assertion that Gd magnetization is the controlled variable remains an inference. I recommend adding element-specific (XMCD) measurements of the Gd moment or a quantitative model that rules out thermal-property variation
  3. [Abstract and Fig. 2b] The claim that reversal dynamics are 'tuned over more than three orders of magnitude' is not directly supported by the presented data. For tGd = 3 nm, full reversal is achieved within 8 ps; for thinner Gd, the text states that the time to full reversal 'can exceed 1.6 ns—the maximum delay accessible.' That is a factor of about 200 (roughly two orders of magnitude). The microsecond timescale is inherited from prior CoDy/CoHo studies [16,17] and is explicitly qualified as 'possibly.' Please state the actual measured range and clearly separate measured from inferred/extrapolated regimes in the abstract and Fig. 2b.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2b caption] Define the color-coded regions and the meaning of 'crossing 5% switching' (e.g., 5% of what initial value?). Without this definition, the reader cannot interpret the color boundaries.
  2. [Fig. 1b caption] There is a formatting artifact in the caption: 'tGd ₎= 0.3 nm' should be 'tGd = 0.3 nm'.
  3. [Section 3, CoDyGd paragraph] The statement that the variation 'cannot be attributed to changes in Curie temperature, as the Co concentration is fixed across the series, and increasing the Gd content slightly raises TC' is not self-evident. If increasing Gd content raises TC, this could in principle affect switching, so please clarify why the TC change is insufficient to explain the observed speed-up.
  4. [General] Ensure consistent use of the abbreviation AO-HIS (e.g., 'all optical helicity independent switching' vs. 'all-optical helicity-independent switching') throughout the text, title, and abstract.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No construction-level circularity; the new thickness/spacer/composition measurements are independent. Score reflects reliance on the authors' own prior criterion and an internal contradiction in the thermal-exclusion argument, not a circular reduction.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 3, interpretation of Fth data near Fig. 1b]
    "According to the criteria outlined in [24], Fth scales with the temporal rate of change of the Gd magnetization, i.e., the spin current jS=-dMGd/dt. Thus, increasing the Gd thickness enhances the total angular momentum transferred to the Co sublattice, thereby reducing the fluence required to achieve switching."

    The threshold-fluence evidence for the angular-momentum mechanism is anchored by a criterion from the authors' own prior paper [24] rather than being derived in this work. If that criterion already encodes the assumption that Gd demagnetization produces the switching spin current, then the Fth interpretation is a self-citation chain. It is only partially load-bearing because the TR-MOKE dynamics and composition series are new independent data, so the central claim does not reduce entirely to the citation.

  2. other [Main text near Fig. 1b vs Supplementary Fig. S2c]
    "The small difference in optical absorption between these two cases is insufficient to account for the significant changes observed in the AO-HIS state diagram (Figure 1b)... The fluences extracted from Figure 2b were normalized by the absorbed energy in the magnetic Co/Gd layers, revealing that the fluence required for switching remains nearly constant across different Gd thicknesses."

    This is an internal-inconsistency and missing-support flag rather than a circular reduction. The main text excludes thermal absorption as the origin of the Gd-thickness dependence, but the supplementary figure shows that absorbed-energy normalization makes Fth nearly thickness-independent. If S2c is correct, the thermal explanation is not excluded and the threshold-fluence support for the spin-current model collapses; if the main text is correct, S2c is overinterpreted. Either way, this load-bearing argument is self-contradictory.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is empirical: Gd-thickness, Pt-spacer, and GdDyCo composition series are measured by TR-MOKE and static AO-HIS, and the trends are new, independent data. No parameter is fitted and then renamed a prediction, and no equation reduces a result to its input. The main interpretive premise—that Gd demagnetization generates a spin current jS=-dMGd/dt—is imported from the group's prior criterion [24] and prior slow-switching observations [16,17]; these self-citations are load-bearing for the mechanism but do not by themselves make the new measurements circular, because the dynamics are directly observed. The paper itself flags a limitation: 'Direct measurement of the Gd magnetic moment is challenging with standard techniques such as SQUID magnetometry; element specific, X-ray magnetic circular dichroism is required for reliable quantification,' and it uses AO-HIS as an indirect probe. Additionally, the state-diagram evidence against thermal effects is internally inconsistent with Fig. S2c (main text vs. supplementary caption), which is a correctness/evidence problem, not a circularity. Overall, there is no construction-level circularity; score 2 reflects the minor self-citation reliance and the unresolved absorption contradiction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted in this experimental study; the switching fluences and TR-MOKE curves are measured directly. The analysis rests on several domain assumptions about the magnetic state of Gd at room temperature, the spin-current transfer mechanism, and the relevance of prior micromagnetic simulations, none of which are directly verified in this work.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Gd magnetization is induced at room temperature in Co/Gd bilayers through exchange coupling with Co and remains antiparallel to Co across the studied thickness range.
    Gd bulk is paramagnetic at room temperature; the paper relies on interfacial ordering to treat Gd as an angular momentum reservoir (Section 3).
  • domain assumption The spin current generated by Gd demagnetization, jS = -dMGd/dt, is transferred to Co and is the mechanism that drives reversal.
    Invoked throughout; criterion cited from Ref. [24]; not directly measured in this work.
  • domain assumption Pt spacer layers reduce angular momentum transfer by weakening Co-Gd exchange coupling and increasing spin scattering.
    Used to interpret the Co/Pt/Gd series (Section 4).
  • domain assumption Micromagnetic simulations from prior work (Ref. [17]) describing domain coalescence apply to the thin-Gd and Pt-spacer slow reversal regimes.
    Invoked to explain nanosecond/microsecond reversal without new simulations.
  • domain assumption The TR-MOKE signal is dominated by the Co sublattice magnetization.
    The ultrafast dynamics and reversal are interpreted as Co reversal throughout.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Controlling Single-Pulse Magnetization Switching through Angular Momentum Reservoir Engineering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YPVVCKOP

@misc{pith2026250807272,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Controlling Single-Pulse Magnetization Switching through Angular Momentum Reservoir Engineering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YPVVCKOP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.07272}
}
read the original abstract

We report a systematic study of single pulse all optical helicity independent switching in CoGd bilayers, revealing that the magnetization reversal dynamics can be tuned over more than three orders of magnitude. By varying the Gd thickness or inserting a Pt spacer layer between Co and Gd, we control the angular momentum transferred from the rare earth sublattice to the transition metal sublattice. Our results show that when Gd is abundant and strongly coupled to Co, angular momentum is efficiently transferred during Gd demagnetization, leading to ultrafast Co reversal. In contrast, reducing the Gd thickness or introducing a Pt barrier impedes this transfer, resulting in a domain growth mediated reversal on nanosecond and possibly to microsecond timescales as previously observed in CoDy and CoHo alloys. As a result, in rare earth transition metal systems, replacing Gd with heavier rare-earth elements such as Dy or Ho slows down the switching due to a reduced angular momentum transfer towards Co upon demagnetization as demonstrated in CoGdDy alloys. Our findings establish angular momentum availability and transfer pathways as key parameters governing AO HIS dynamics, offering a unified framework for fast and slow magnetization reversal across rare earth transition metal systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A.; Ostler, T

    Radu, I.; Vahaplar, K.; Stamm, C.; Kachel, T.; Pontius, N.; Dürr, H. A.; Ostler, T. A.; Barker, J.; Evans, R. F. L.; Chantrell, R. W.; Tsukamoto, A.; Itoh, A.; Kirilyuk, A.; Rasing, Th.; Kimel, A. V. Transient ferromagnetic-like state mediating ultrafast reversal of antiferromagnetically coupled spins. Nature 2011, 472, 205

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    Ultrafast heating as a sufficient stimulus for magnetization reversal in a ferrimagnet

    Ostler, T.A.; Barker, J.; Evans, R.F.L.; Chantrell, R.W.; Atxitia, U.; Chubykalo-Fesenko, O.; El Moussaoui, S.; Le Guyader, L.; Mengotti, E.; Heyderman, L.J.; Nolting, F.; Tsukamoto, A.; Itoh, A.; Afanasiev, D.; Ivanov, B.A.; Kalashnikova, A.M.; Vahaplar, K.; Mentink, J.; Kirilyuk, A.; Rasing, Th.; Kimel, A.V. Ultrafast heating as a sufficient stimulus fo...

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    B.; Gorchon, J.; Yang, Y.; Lambert, C

    Wilson, R. B.; Gorchon, J.; Yang, Y.; Lambert, C. H.; Salahuddin, S.; Bokor, J. Ultrafast magnetic switching of GdFeCo with electronic heat currents. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 180409(R)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Ultrafast Magnetization Manipulation Using Single Femtosecond Light and Hot‐Electron Pulses

    Xu, Y.; Deb, M.; Malinowski, G.; Hehn, M.; Zhao, W.; Mangin, S. Ultrafast Magnetization Manipulation Using Single Femtosecond Light and Hot‐Electron Pulses. Advanced Materials 2017, 29, 1703474

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    B.; Gorchon, J.; Lambert, C

    Yang, Y.; Wilson, R. B.; Gorchon, J.; Lambert, C. H.; Salahuddin, S.; Bokor, J. Ultrafast magnetization reversal by picosecond electrical pulses, Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1603117

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    All-optical Helicity-Independent Switching State Diagram in Gd-Fe-Co Alloys, Phys

    Wei, J.; Zhang, B.; Hehn, M.; Zhang, W.; Malinowski, G.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, W.; Mangin, S. All-optical Helicity-Independent Switching State Diagram in Gd-Fe-Co Alloys, Phys. Rev. Applied 2021, 15, 054065

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    L.; Peeters, M

    Lalieu, M. L.; Peeters, M. J. G.; Haenen, S. R. R.; Lavrijsen, R.; Koopmans, B. Deterministic all-optical switching of synthetic ferrimagnets using single femtosecond laser pulses, Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 220411

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Seng, Master thesis, Lorraine University (2018)

    B. Seng, Master thesis, Lorraine University (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 25 references
  1. [9]

    Li, P.; Peeters, M. J. G.; van Hees, Y. L. W.; Lavrijsen, R.; Koopmans, B. Ultra-low energy threshold engineering for all-optical switching of magnetization in dielectric-coated Co/Gd based synthetic-ferrimagnet, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021, 119, 252402

    2021

  2. [10]

    J.; Koopmans, B.; Lavrijsen, R

    Li, P.; Kools, T. J.; Koopmans, B.; Lavrijsen, R. Ultrafast racetrack based on compensated Co/Gd-based synthetic ferrimagnet with all-optical switching, Adv. Electron. Mater. 2022, 8, 2200613

    2022

  3. [11]

    J.; Pezeshki, H.; Joosten, J

    Li, P.; Kools, T. J.; Pezeshki, H.; Joosten, J. M. B. E.; Li, J.; Igarashi, J.; Hohlfeld, J.; Lavrijsen, R.; Mangin S.; Malinowski, G.; Koopmans, B. Picosecond all-optical switching of Co/Gd–based synthetic ferrimagnets, Phys. Rev. B 2025, 111, 064421

    2025

  4. [12]

    Beens, M.; Lalieu, M. L. M.; Deenen, A. J. M.; Duine, R. A.; Koopmans, B. Comparing all-optical switching in synthetic-ferrimagnetic multilayers and alloys, Phys. Rev. B 2019, 100, 220409(R)

    2019

  5. [13]

    E.; Gercsi, Z.; Atcheson, G

    Banerjee, C.; Teichert, N.; Siewierska, K. E.; Gercsi, Z.; Atcheson, G. Y. P.; Stamenov, P.; Rode, K.; Coey, J. M. D.; Besbas, J. Single pulse all-optical toggle switching of magnetization without gadolinium in the ferrimagnet Mn2RuxGa, Nature Commun. 2020, 11, 4444. 13

    2020

  6. [14]

    Single-shot all-optical switching of magnetization in TbFe, J

    Jiang, C.; Liu, D.; Song, X.; Wu, Y.; Li, H.; Xu, C. Single-shot all-optical switching of magnetization in TbFe, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2024, 57, 195001

    2024

  7. [15]

    Hu, Z.; Besbas, J.; Smith, R.; Teichert, N.; Atcheson, G.; Rode, K.; Stamenov, P.; Coey, J. M. D. Single- pulse all-optical partial switching in amorphous DyxCo1−xand TbxCo1−x with random anisotropy; Appl. Phys. Lett. 2022, 120, 112401

    2022

  8. [16]

    D.; Sousa, R

    Peng, Y.; Malinowski, G.; Gorchon, J.; Hohlfeld, J.; Salomoni, D.; Buda-Prejbeanu, L. D.; Sousa, R. C.; Prejbeanu, I. L.; Lacour, D.; Mangin S.; Hehn, M. Observation of Single-shot Helicity-independent all-optical switching in Co/Ho multilayers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 2023, 20, 014068

    2023

  9. [17]

    -X.; Le Guen, Y.; Buda-Prejbeanu, L

    Kunyangyuen, B.; Malinowski, G.; Lacour, D.; Lin, J. -X.; Le Guen, Y.; Buda-Prejbeanu, L. D.; Mangin, S.; Gorchon, J.; Hohlfeld, J.; Hehn, M. Single-laser pulse toggle switching in CoHo and CoDy single layer alloys : when domain wall motion matters, arXiv 2025, 2503.22579

    2025 arXiv

  10. [18]

    X.; Huang, T

    Zhang, W.; Lin, J. X.; Huang, T. X.; Malinowski, G.; Hehn, M.; Xu, Y.; Mangin, S.; Zhao, W. S. Role of spin-lattice coupling in ultrafast demagnetization and all optical helicity-independent single-shot switching in Gd1−x−yTbyCox alloys Phys. Rev. B 2022, 105, 054410

    2022

  11. [19]

    M.; Nowak, U.; Weinelt, M

    Frietsch, B.; Donges A.; Carley, R.; Teichmann, M.; Bowlan, J.; Döbrich, K.; Carva, K.; Legut, D.; Oppeneer, P. M.; Nowak, U.; Weinelt, M. The role of ultrafast magnon generation in the magnetization dynamics of rare- earth metals, Sci Adv 2020, 6, 39

    2020

  12. [20]

    D.; Sousa, R.C.; Prejbeanu, I

    Salomoni, D.; Peng, Y.; Farcis, L.; Auffret, S.; Hehn, M.; Malinowski, G.; Mangin, S.; Dieny, B.; Buda- Prejbeanu, L. D.; Sousa, R.C.; Prejbeanu, I. L. Field-free all-optical switching and electrical read-out of Tb/Co- based magnetic tunnel junctions, Phys. Rev. Appl. 2023, 20, 034070

    2023

  13. [21]

    Mishra, K.; Blank , T. G. H.; Davies, C. S.; Prejbeanu, I. L.; Avilés-Félix, L.; Koopmans, B.; Salomoni, D.; Buda-Prejbeanu, L. D.; Sousa, R. C.; Rasing, Th.; Kimel, A. V.; Kirilyuk, A. Dynamics of all-optical single- shot switching of magnetization in Tb/Co multilayers, Phys....

    2023

  14. [22]

    D.; Gorchon, J.; Vergès, M.; Lin, J

    Peng, Y.; Salomoni, D.; Malinowski, G.; Zhang, W.; Hohlfeld, J.; Buda-Prejbeanu, L. D.; Gorchon, J.; Vergès, M.; Lin, J. X.; Sousa, R.C.; Prejbeanu, I. L.; Mangin, S.; Hehn, M. In plane reorientation induced single laser pulse magnetization reversal, Nature Comm. 2023, 14, 5000

    2023

  15. [23]

    Gd doping at the Co/Pt interfaces to induce ultra-fast all-optical switching, ACS Appl

    Petty Gweha Nyoma, D.; Hehn, M.; Malinowski, G.; Hohlfeld, J.; Gorchon, J.; Vergès, M.; Mangin, S.; Montaigne F. Gd doping at the Co/Pt interfaces to induce ultra-fast all-optical switching, ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2024, 6, 1122

    2024

  16. [24]

    X.; Lin, J

    Zhang, W.; Hohlfeld, J.; Huang, T. X.; Lin, J. X.; Hehn, M.; Le Guen, Y.; Compton-Stewart, J.; Malinowski, G.; Zhao, W. S.; Mangin, S. Criteria to observe single-shot all-optical switching in Gd-based ferrimagnetic alloys, Phys. Rev. B 2024, 109, 094412

    2024

  17. [25]

    F.; Campagna, M

    Weller, D.; Alvarado, S. F.; Campagna, M. Bulk and surface curie temperatures of Gd(0001), Physica B+C 1985, 130, 72. 14 Supplementary figures Figure S1 | Polar MOKE measurements. a) Hysteresis loops of the Si/SiO(500)/Ta(3)/Pt(3.7)/Co(0.7)/Gd(tGd)/Pt(3) wedge sample show perp...

    1985

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.