Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

Beam-energy dependence of charge separation along the magnetic field in Au+Au collisions at RHIC

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1404.1433 v2 pith:YQ3EHPUL submitted 2014-04-05 nucl-ex

STAR Collaboration: L. Adamczyk , J. K. Adkins , G. Agakishiev , M. M. Aggarwal , Z. Ahammed , I. Alekseev , J. Alford , C. D. Anson
show 348 more authors
A. Aparin D. Arkhipkin E. C. Aschenauer G. S. Averichev A. Banerjee D. R. Beavis R. Bellwied A. Bhasin A. K. Bhati P. Bhattarai H. Bichsel J. Bielcik J. Bielcikova L. C. Bland I. G. Bordyuzhin W. Borowski J. Bouchet A. V. Brandin S. G. Brovko S. Bültmann I. Bunzarov T. P. Burton J. Butterworth H. Caines M. Calderón de la Barca Sánchez D. Cebra R. Cendejas M. C. Cervantes P. Chaloupka Z. Chang S. Chattopadhyay H. F. Chen J. H. Chen L. Chen J. Cheng M. Cherney A. Chikanian W. Christie J. Chwastowski M. J. M. Codrington G. Contin J. G. Cramer H. J. Crawford X. Cui S. Das A. Davila Leyva L. C. De Silva R. R. Debbe T. G. Dedovich J. Deng A. A. Derevschikov R. Derradi de Souza S. Dhamija B. Di Ruzza L. Didenko C. Dilks F. Ding P. Djawotho X. Dong J. L. Drachenberg J. E. Draper C. M. Du L. E. Dunkelberger J. C. Dunlop L. G. Efimov J. Engelage K. S. Engle G. Eppley L. Eun O. Evdokimov O. Eyser R. Fatemi S. Fazio J. Fedorisin P. Filip E. Finch Y. Fisyak C. E. Flores C. A. Gagliardi D. R. Gangadharan D. Garand F. Geurts A. Gibson M. Girard S. Gliske L. Greiner D. Grosnick D. S. Gunarathne Y. Guo A. Gupta S. Gupta W. Guryn B. Haag A. Hamed L-X. Han R. Haque J. W. Harris S. Heppelmann A. Hirsch G. W. Hoffmann D. J. Hofman S. Horvat B. Huang H. Z. Huang X. Huang P. Huck T. J. Humanic G. Igo W. W. Jacobs H. Jang E. G. Judd S. Kabana D. Kalinkin K. Kang K. Kauder H. W. Ke D. Keane A. Kechechyan A. Kesich Z. H. Khan D. P. Kikola I. Kisel A. Kisiel D. D. Koetke T. Kollegger J. Konzer I. Koralt L. K. Kosarzewski L. Kotchenda A. F. Kraishan P. Kravtsov K. Krueger I. Kulakov L. Kumar R. A. Kycia M. A. C. Lamont J. M. Landgraf K. D. Landry J. Lauret A. Lebedev R. Lednicky J. H. Lee M. J. LeVine C. Li W. Li X. Li Y. Li Z. M. Li M. A. Lisa F. Liu T. Ljubicic W. J. Llope M. Lomnitz R. S. Longacre X. Luo G. L. Ma Y. G. Ma D. M. M. D. Madagodagettige Don D. P. Mahapatra R. Majka S. Margetis C. Markert H. Masui H. S. Matis D. McDonald T. S. McShane N. G. Minaev S. Mioduszewski B. Mohanty M. M. Mondal D. A. Morozov M. K. Mustafa B. K. Nandi Md. Nasim T. K. Nayak J. M. Nelson G. Nigmatkulov L. V. Nogach S. Y. Noh J. Novak S. B. Nurushev G. Odyniec A. Ogawa K. Oh A. Ohlson V. Okorokov E. W. Oldag D. L. Olvitt Jr. M. Pachr B. S. Page S. K. Pal Y. X. Pan Y. Pandit Y. Panebratsev T. Pawlak B. Pawlik H. Pei C. Perkins W. Peryt P. Pile M. Planinic J. Pluta N. Poljak K. Poniatowska J. Porter A. M. Poskanzer N. K. Pruthi M. Przybycien P. R. Pujahari J. Putschke H. Qiu A. Quintero S. Ramachandran R. Raniwala S. Raniwala R. L. Ray C. K. Riley H. G. Ritter J. B. Roberts O. V. Rogachevskiy J. L. Romero J. F. Ross A. Roy L. Ruan J. Rusnak O. Rusnakova N. R. Sahoo P. K. Sahu I. Sakrejda S. Salur J. Sandweiss E. Sangaline A. Sarkar J. Schambach R. P. Scharenberg A. M. Schmah W. B. Schmidke N. Schmitz J. Seger P. Seyboth N. Shah E. Shahaliev P. V. Shanmuganathan M. Shao B. Sharma W. Q. Shen S. S. Shi Q. Y. Shou E. P. Sichtermann R. N. Singaraju M. J. Skoby D. Smirnov N. Smirnov D. Solanki P. Sorensen H. M. Spinka B. Srivastava T. D. S. Stanislaus J. R. Stevens R. Stock M. Strikhanov B. Stringfellow M. Sumbera X. Sun X. M. Sun Y. Sun Z. Sun B. Surrow D. N. Svirida T. J. M. Symons M. A. Szelezniak J. Takahashi A. H. Tang Z. Tang T. Tarnowsky J. H. Thomas A. R. Timmins D. Tlusty M. Tokarev S. Trentalange R. E. Tribble P. Tribedy B. A. Trzeciak O. D. Tsai J. Turnau T. Ullrich D. G. Underwood G. Van Buren G. van Nieuwenhuizen M. Vandenbroucke J. A. Vanfossen Jr. R. Varma G. M. S. Vasconcelos A. N. Vasiliev R. Vertesi F. Videb{ae}k Y. P. Viyogi S. Vokal A. Vossen M. Wada F. Wang G. Wang H. Wang J. S. Wang X. L. Wang Y. Wang G. Webb J. C. Webb G. D. Westfall H. Wieman S. W. Wissink R. Witt Y. F. Wu Z. Xiao W. Xie K. Xin H. Xu J. Xu N. Xu Q. H. Xu Y. Xu Z. Xu W. Yan C. Yang Y. Yang Z. Ye P. Yepes L. Yi K. Yip I-K. Yoo N. Yu Y. Zawisza H. Zbroszczyk W. Zha J. B. Zhang J. L. Zhang S. Zhang X. P. Zhang Y. Zhang Z. P. Zhang F. Zhao J. Zhao C. Zhong X. Zhu Y. H. Zhu Y. Zoulkarneeva M. Zyzak
This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-ex
keywords chargecollisionsmagneticseparationalongbeam-energybeendependence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Local parity-odd domains are theorized to form inside a Quark-Gluon-Plasma (QGP) which has been produced in high-energy heavy-ion collisions. The local parity-odd domains manifest themselves as charge separation along the magnetic field axis via the chiral magnetic effect (CME). The experimental observation of charge separation has previously been reported for heavy-ion collisions at the top RHIC energies. In this paper, we present the results of the beam-energy dependence of the charge correlations in Au+Au collisions at midrapidity for center-of-mass energies of 7.7, 11.5, 19.6, 27, 39 and 62.4 GeV from the STAR experiment. After background subtraction, the signal gradually reduces with decreased beam energy, and tends to vanish by 7.7 GeV. The implications of these results for the CME will be discussed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lattice QCD Study of Anomalous Transport Phenomena in Strongly Interacting Matter

    hep-lat 2025-09 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    First physical-point lattice QCD calculation of the Chiral Separation Effect conductivity, a zero equilibrium Chiral Magnetic Effect with conserved currents, and a localized equilibrium CME in inhomogeneous fields.

  2. A higher-harmonic observable for the chiral magnetic effect in heavy-ion collisions

    nucl-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The hexadecapole component of Δγ(φ_pair) is proposed as a CME-sensitive and background-insensitive observable based on magnetic field fluctuations in heavy-ion collision models.

  3. Spacetime profile of electromagnetic fields in intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions produce event-averaged electromagnetic fields of order (50 MeV)^2 with a significant E·B component and a dominant electric-field spacetime volume.

  4. Influence of the neutron-skin effect on nuclear isobar collisions at RHIC

    nucl-th 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Including the neutron skin of zirconium in isobar collision simulations halves the predicted Ru/Zr magnetic-field strength difference from 10% to 5% in peripheral events.

  5. Magnetic fields in heavy ion collisions: flow and charge transport

    hep-ph 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Ideal MHD simulations of heavy-ion collisions find that a chiral magnetic field encoded in the initial conditions is transported by the expanding plasma into a late-time electric charge dipole perpendicular to the rea...

  6. Back-to-back relative-excess observable in search for the chiral magnetic effect

    nucl-th 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The back-to-back relative OS/SS pair excess r_BB(ϕ_BB) is sensitive to the chiral magnetic effect and far less affected by resonance-decay backgrounds than the standard Δγ observable.

  7. Constraining the chiral magnetic effect using spectator and participant planes across Au+Au and isobar collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm NN}}} = 200$ GeV

    nucl-th 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    AMPT simulations suggest the CME signal-to-background plane ratio b/a is 0.88±0.08 in Au+Au, closer to unity than isobar collisions (0.65±0.18), implying the two-plane CME method is more reliable in Au+Au.

  8. Experimental Search for the Chiral Magnetic Effect in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions: A Perspective

    nucl-ex 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    The chiral magnetic effect in heavy-ion collisions remains unconfirmed, with current data giving a 2.9-sigma hint in Au+Au and an upper limit near 10% in isobar collisions.

Pith tools