Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 76 references

The Far-Infrared Enhanced Survey Spectrometer (FIRESS) for PRIMA: Science Drivers

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read FIRESS is proposed as a background-limited 24–235 µm spectrometer whose full-band access would let one far-infrared instrument measure protoplanetary disk gas masses, galaxy and black-hole growth, and the buildup of metals at cosmic noon.

desk verdict A well-structured instrument science-drivers paper whose quantitative claims rest on a companion design paper that is still 'TBD'—worth engaging, but the flagship HD detection figure is not an independent sensitivity prediction. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01800 v1 pith:YQYL2V34 submitted 2025-09-01 astro-ph.IM

Klaus M. Pontoppidan , Alberto Bolatto , J D Smith , C. M. (Matt) Bradford , Cara Battersby , Alexandra Pope , Tiffany Kataria , Jason Glenn
show 19 more authors
Margaret Meixner Lee Armus Jochem Baselmans Edwin A. Bergin Denis Burgurella Laure Ciesla L. Ilsedore Cleeves Anna DiGiorgio Carlotta Gruppioni Thomas Henning Brandon Hensley Willem Jellema Oliver Krause Elisabeth Mills Arielle Moullet Marc Sauvage Rachel Somerville Johannes Staguhn Steve Unwin
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords far-infraredspectroscopyPRIMAmissionprotoplanetarydiskgasmassHD1-0linegalaxy-blackholeco-evolutionPAHmetallicityrelationFouriertransformspectrometermicrowavekineticinductancedetectors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper makes the case for FIRESS, one of two instruments on the proposed PRIMA space mission, by arguing that a single 24–235 µm spectrometer can do three things no far-infrared instrument has done before: measure total gas masses of protoplanetary disks through the HD 1-0 line at 112 µm, measure star-formation and black-hole accretion rates plus cool galactic-wind outflow rates in many galaxies at z~2, and map the relation between PAH emission and metallicity at cosmic noon. The argument rests on the instrument being limited by the astrophysical background rather than by detector noise or telescope emission, with 672 spectral channels and a Fourier-transform module that delivers R~4400 resolution over the full band. If the assumed performance holds, FIRESS would be 30–200 times more sensitive than Herschel-PACS in the same exposure time, which translates to 3–4 orders of magnitude faster survey speed. The paper does not present new measurements; it presents the science case that would become possible.

What carries the argument

Fourier Transform Module (FTM): an interferometer inserted into the dispersed beam so that every grating spectral pixel records an interferogram, upgrading low-resolution grating spectra to R~4400 at 112 µm while keeping full 24–235 µm coverage; resolving power is tunable by trading scan length against sensitivity. It is the mechanism that makes high-resolution spectroscopy of HD, water, and OH lines possible without losing the full-band grasp. The other load-bearing components are the four dichroic-split grating bands (R~85–150), the 672 MKID spectral channels (336 on a point source), and the beam-steering mirror that enables chopping, nodding, and fast mapping.

What would settle it

Measure the end-to-end noise equivalent power (NEP) and stray-light rejection of a FIRESS-like MKID array in a flight-like cold environment. If the NEP exceeds the design value or stray light raises the background above the astrophysical floor, the simulated 10-hour S/N=10 HD detection at 4×10^-19 W/m^2 and the z=2 PAH detections are no longer reachable. A second check is to observe a disk with continuum brighter than ~0.3 Jy in FTM mode: the paper's own sensitivity budget says such sources pay a background-noise penalty, and the size of that penalty determines whether the high-resolution mode

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that FIRESS—a four-band grating spectrometer with a selectable Fourier Transform Module, built around microwave kinetic inductance detectors on a 1.8 m actively cooled telescope—reaches the astrophysical background limit across 24–235 µm and therefore converts far-infrared spectroscopy from a pointed, line-by-line technique into a survey technique. With 336 spectral channels on a point source and two grating settings to cover the full band, the low-resolution mode (R~85–150) is designed to detect PAH features and fine-structure lines in luminous galaxies out to z~5. The high-resolution mode (R~4400 at 112 µm, tunable to at least R~2000 at 235 µm) is designed to resolve t

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the instrument parameters used in the sensitivity calculations—detector NEP, throughput, array yield, and stray-light rejection—are accurate as assumed in the companion design paper; if the real instrument is noisier or leaks more background light, the 30–200x sensitivity gain and all three headline programs fall below detection.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 112 µm HD 1-0 line becomes a practical disk-mass survey line: a 10-hour FIRESS observation reaches S/N=10 on a 4×10^-19 W/m^2 line, enough to measure total gas mass in disks around 0.1–2 solar-mass stars and calibrate the denominator of disk C/H and O/H abundances.
  • The [Ne II] 12.8 µm and [O IV] lines, redshifted into the FIRESS band at z>1, can calibrate SED-based star-formation and black-hole accretion rates for more than 10,000 galaxies at cosmic noon, including heavily obscured Compton-thick systems.
  • Cool galactic winds can be measured at z~2 via OH lines with tuned FTM resolving power, giving mass outflow rates that current feedback models lack.
  • PAH bands redshifted into 24–235 µm at z=1.1–5 allow the first measurement of the PAH-metallicity relation at cosmic noon, when most metals formed.
  • Because two-thirds of the PRIMA General Observer science cases use FIRESS, the same full-band access becomes a multi-purpose observatory mode for cometary D/H, protostellar accretion, ice bands, and ISM energy balance.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The greatest legacy value may not be the three headline programs but the full-band archival spectra: every pointing records the entire 24–235 µm range, so a single observation contains dozens of lines and features that can be re-analyzed for questions not yet formulated.
  • The JWST-MIRI overlap at 24–28 µm could be used to transfer absolute flux calibration between the two observatories, making FIRESS broad-band spectra a cross-calibration anchor for variability studies of disks and young stars.
  • If the assumed detector performance is met, far-infrared astronomy would get its first survey-class spectrometer; the bottleneck would shift from raw sensitivity to source confusion and mapping strategy.
  • The bright-source FTM penalty above ~0.3 Jy implies the optimal high-resolution strategy may combine FIRESS FTM for faint sources with low-resolution mode or dedicated single-line instruments for bright disks.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents the science drivers for FIRESS, a far-infrared spectrometer on the PRIMA mission covering 24-235 μm with a low-resolution grating mode (R~100) and a high-resolution Fourier Transform Module (R~4400 at 112 μm). It claims that FIRESS reaches the astrophysical background limit and provides 30-200× the sensitivity of Herschel-PACS and 3-4 orders of magnitude improvement in survey speed. The three stated science objectives are: measuring protoplanetary disk gas masses via the HD 1-0 line and water vapor distributions; tracing galaxy/SMBH co-evolution via [NeII]/[OIV] fine-structure lines and OH outflow lines; and measuring the PAH-metallicity relation at cosmic noon. The paper flows these objectives into instrument requirements on spectral range, field of view, resolving power, and sensitivity, and argues that the resulting capabilities also enable a broad GO program.

Significance. If the claimed sensitivity and multiplexing are realized, PRIMA-FIRESS would be the first far-IR spectrometer capable of the proposed measurements, particularly the HD-based disk mass census, redshifted PAH spectroscopy at z~2-5, and faint OH wind lines at z~2. The paper's flow-down logic from science objective to observing mode to requirement is internally coherent, and it properly grounds the galaxy spectra in real ISO/Herschel data and the HD line flux models in multiple independent studies. The paper also discloses the FTM background penalty for bright disks, and an exposure time calculator is publicly available. These are genuine strengths. The main weakness is that the headline quantitative claims are not derived in this manuscript: they rely on instrument parameters deferred to a companion 'JATIS TBD' paper, and the HD detection simulation in Fig. 5 sets the noise to the required sensitivity, making the S/N=10 claim an assumption rather than a prediction from first principles.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.4, Fig. 5; §2.1] The HD detection that anchors the disk-mass driver is presented in Fig. 5 with noise 'set by the required FIRESS sensitivity' and 10 h integration. This is an assumed sensitivity, not a prediction from detector NEP, throughput, stray-light rejection, and the FTM multiplex penalty. Section 3.4 itself states that the FTM receives a background-noise penalty for disks brighter than ~0.3 Jy, but the penalty is not quantified and is not included in the Fig. 5 simulation. Because the S/N=10 HD line is the quantitative basis of the first science driver, this needs an independent exposure-time calculation and explicit accounting of the FTM penalty before the claim can be assessed.
  2. [§3.4] The sensitivity comparison with Herschel-PACS is not derived in the paper. The sentence 'the same coverage can be covered by FIRESS to an RMS of at least 1.4e-19 W/m2' needs a derivation from instrument parameters or a specific public ETC run, including the assumed resolving power, wavelength, band, and integration time. The factor '30-200 times' is quoted as a range but no wavelength dependence is shown. The 3-4 orders of magnitude survey-speed improvement appears to be borrowed from the mission concept paper [1] rather than computed here; as a headline claim it should be reproducible from the FIRESS parameters.
  3. [Throughout; [5]] Every quantitative science case (Figs. 4, 5, 8 and Section 3.4) depends on instrument parameters deferred to the companion design paper cited as 'JATIS TBD.' Those parameters—detector NEP, throughput, stray-light rejection, array yield—are not stated in this manuscript. Without them the reader cannot check the flow-down from science objective to requirement, which is the paper's central logic. I recommend adding an appendix with the key assumed parameters and a compact sensitivity calculation, or clearly referencing a publicly available companion document with the specifics.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 1] Typographical issues: 'one of two science instrument' and 'the second PRIMA science instruments' should be 'instruments'.
  2. [Section 3.2] The statement that FIRESS can separate disks in clusters 'out to the distance of Orion (460 pc)' is based on a 50 μm footprint in Fig. 6. Spatial resolution varies from 7.6 to 22.9 arcsec across the band; clarify whether the cluster-separation claim holds over the full 24-235 μm range.
  3. [Section 2.1] 'PRIMA obtains the total H2 disk mass from the 112 μm HD ground-state line' reads as a direct measurement. Since the H2 mass is derived from HD using the D/H ratio and thermochemical disk models, the sentence should be phrased more carefully.
  4. [Figure 4 caption] The phrase 'exposure times per setting of 4, 2, 4, and 12 hours per setting' is redundant and ambiguous. State clearly whether these are per spectral setting or total observing time, and whether the two required settings double the quoted times.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

One science-case simulation (HD S/N=10) is a requirement loop; sensitivity figures are deferred to the companion design paper and ETC, but the rest of the paper is checked against external data.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.1, Figure 5 caption]
    "The noise is set by the required FIRESS sensitivity and assumes a total integration time of 10 hours per spectral setting and a (selectable) resolving power of R = 4400 at 112 µm. In this case, the HD line has an intensity of 4 × 10−19 W m−2, and is detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of 10."

    The S/N=10 is not derived from detector NEP, telescope/background emission, throughput, and the FTM multiplex penalty; it follows by construction once the noise is set to the 'required FIRESS sensitivity.' The required sensitivity is the capability the paper is trying to establish, so the simulated detection is an assumption, not an independent prediction. The companion design paper [5] is cited only as 'JATIS TBD' with no numbers, and Section 3.4 concedes an unquantified FTM background-noise penalty for sources brighter than ~0.3 Jy, which applies to the bright-disk regime. Thus the flagship disk-mass driver is not closed by an exposure-time calculation in this paper.

full rationale

The paper validates its science cases against real external data (ISO-SWS/LWS spectra of M82, Herschel-PACS HD and water observations, Spitzer PAH studies), which prevents a high circularity burden. The sensitivity numbers in Figures 4, 5, and 8 are taken from the mission ETC and the companion FIRESS design paper [5], a normal division of labor for a science-drivers paper. The single clear case of a prediction reducing to its own input is Figure 5's HD S/N=10, where the noise is assigned from the required sensitivity rather than computed from physical instrument parameters. This is a genuine soft spot, but it is not the whole derivation chain: the resolving-power requirement R~3000 is independently motivated by radiative-transfer models [72-74] and by the three Herschel HD detections. The paper also self-discloses the FTM background-noise penalty in Section 3.4, which is a limitation but not itself a circular argument. Overall score reflects one partial requirement-loop step plus reliance on self-cited design performance, with independent external benchmarks elsewhere.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central capability claims rest on a small number of hand-set requirement thresholds and on domain assumptions about the fidelity of the tracers (HD-to-mass, [NeII]/[OIV] to SFR/AGN, PAH-to-qPAH). The instrument performance itself is axiomatically taken from companion papers. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Low-res line-to-continuum threshold (LTC >= 3%) = 3%
    In Section 3.3, R>80 is set so the [NeII]/[OIV] lines reach >3% line-to-continuum for galaxies with AGN fraction FAGN > 0.4, based on SED models [70,71]. Hand-chosen design limit.
  • High-res HD contrast requirement and resolving power = LTC >= 2.5%, R ~ 3000
    In Section 3.3, R is set so the 112 µm HD line has contrast >= 2.5% for disks above 1 MJup across a model grid; the value is calibrated on the three Herschel HD detections (contrasts 12%, 6%, 40% at R~3000).
  • Source templates for detectability simulations = HD flux 4e-19 W/m2 (Fig 5); M82 scaling (Fig 4)
    Figures 4 and 5 assume fixed representative sources (z=0.7-5 M82-like starbursts; a generic 0.5 Msun disk). The claimed S/N values inherit these assumed inputs.
  • Integration times per spectral setting = 4-12 h (Fig 4), 10 h (Fig 5)
    Chosen exposure times set the plotted S/N; they are not derived from a survey-completeness requirement.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption HD 1-0 line emission traces total H2 disk gas mass with HD/H2 fixed by the interstellar D/H abundance (~30% precision)
    The planet-formation driver and the R~3000 requirement (Section 2.1, Section 3.3) treat the 112 µm HD line as a total-mass probe [34,35,72].
  • domain assumption The calibration of [NeII] and [OIV] fine-structure line fluxes to SFR and SMBH accretion rate, and the 3% line-to-continuum requirement with FAGN>0.4, holds at z~1-2
    Sections 2.2 and 3.3 rely on local calibrations [70,71] applied to cosmic noon.
  • domain assumption PAH emission band strength, relativized to dust continuum, is a usable qPAH (small-grain abundance) tracer at z=2 after redshifting into the FIR, and the local PAH-metallicity suppression [57,58] persists
    Section 2.3 builds the heavy-element science driver on this extrapolation; the paper cites [54,55,56] as evidence PAHs exist at high z.
  • ad hoc to paper M82's spectrum is representative of 10^13 Lsun starbursts at z=0.7-5
    Figure 4 detectability claims scale the M82 spectrum [60,61]; the paper notes it is 'one of only a few complete far-infrared spectra of external galaxies', a weak anchor for the template.
  • domain assumption Background-limited operation at 24-235 µm with the stated NEP performance of MKID arrays (from companion paper [5])
    All sensitivity numbers assume the astrophysical background, not telescope self-emission or detector noise, limits the instrument (Sections 1 and 3.4).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Far-Infrared Enhanced Survey Spectrometer (FIRESS) for PRIMA: Science Drivers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YQYL2V34

@misc{pith2026250901800,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Far-Infrared Enhanced Survey Spectrometer (FIRESS) for PRIMA: Science Drivers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YQYL2V34}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01800}
}
read the original abstract

We present the science drivers for the Far-Infrared Enhanced Survey Spectrometer (FIRESS), one of two science instrument on the PRobe Infrared Mission for Astrophysics (PRIMA). FIRESS is designed to meet science objectives in the areas of the origins of planetary atmospheres, the co-evolution of galaxies and supermassive black holes, and the buildup of heavy elements in the Universe. In addition to these drivers, FIRESS is envisioned as a versatile far-infrared spectrometer, capable of addressing science questions in most areas of astrophysics and planetary astronomy as part of a dominant General Observer (GO) program with 2/3 of the current science cases using FIRESS. We summarize how the instrument design choices and parameters enable the main science drivers as well as a broad and vibrant GO program.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [5]

    Bradford, “,” JATIS TBD(TBD) (2025)

    M. Bradford, “,” JATIS TBD(TBD) (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [1]

    PRIMA mission concept,

    J. Glenn, “PRIMA mission concept,” JATIS 11(3) (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [2]

    The Spectrum of the Extragalactic Far-Infrared Background from the COBE FIRAS Observations,

    D. J. Fixsen, E. Dwek, J. C. Mather,et al., “The Spectrum of the Extragalactic Far-Infrared Background from the COBE FIRAS Observations,” ApJ 508, 123–128 (1998)

    work page 1998

  4. [3]

    The Spectrum of the Universe,

    R. Hill, K. W. Masui, and D. Scott, “The Spectrum of the Universe,”Applied Spectroscopy 72, 663–688 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [4]

    PRIMA: PRIMAger, a far-infrared hyperspectral and polarimetric instrument,

    L. Ciesla, “PRIMA: PRIMAger, a far-infrared hyperspectral and polarimetric instrument,” JATIS 11(031625) (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    The Infrared Space Observatory (ISO) mission.,

    M. F. Kessler, J. A. Steinz, M. E. Anderegg, et al., “The Infrared Space Observatory (ISO) mission.,” A&A 315, L27–L31 (1996)

    work page 1996

  7. [7]

    Herschel Space Observatory. An ESA facility for far-infrared and submillimetre astronomy,

    G. L. Pilbratt, J. R. Riedinger, T. Passvogel, et al., “Herschel Space Observatory. An ESA facility for far-infrared and submillimetre astronomy,” A&A 518, L1 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astron- omy (SOFIA),

    E. E. Becklin, A. G. G. M. Tielens, R. D. Gehrz, et al., “Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astron- omy (SOFIA),” in Infrared Spaceborne Remote Sensing and Instrumentation XV, M. Strojnik-Scholl, Ed., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series 6678, 66780A (2007)

    work page 2007

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    The Spitzer Space Telescope Mission,

    M. W. Werner, T. L. Roellig, F. J. Low, et al., “The Spitzer Space Telescope Mission,” ApJS 154, 1–9 (2004)

    2004

  2. [10]

    The James Webb Space Telescope,

    J. P. Gardner, J. C. Mather, M. Clampin, et al., “The James Webb Space Telescope,” Space Science Reviews 123, 485–606 (2006)

    2006

  3. [11]

    The ISO Long-Wavelength Spectrometer.,

    P. E. Clegg, P. A. R. Ade, C. Armand, et al., “The ISO Long-Wavelength Spectrometer.,” A&A 315, L38–L42 (1996)

    1996

  4. [12]

    Calibration and performance of the ISO Long- Wavelength Spectrometer.,

    B. M. Swinyard, P. E. Clegg, P. A. R. Ade, et al., “Calibration and performance of the ISO Long- Wavelength Spectrometer.,”A&A 315, L43–L48 (1996)

    1996

  5. [13]

    The Photodetector Array Camera and Spectrometer (PACS) on the Herschel Space Observatory,

    A. Poglitsch, C. Waelkens, N. Geis, et al., “The Photodetector Array Camera and Spectrometer (PACS) on the Herschel Space Observatory,” A&A 518, L2 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    GREAT: the SOFIA high-frequency heterodyne instru- ment,

    S. Heyminck, U. U. Graf, R. G ¨usten, et al., “GREAT: the SOFIA high-frequency heterodyne instru- ment,” A&A 542, L1 (2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    PRIMA General Observer Science Book,

    A. Moullet, T. Kataria, D. Lis, et al. , “PRIMA General Observer Science Book,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2310.20572 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    The Imprint of Exoplanet Formation History on Observable Present-day Spectra of Hot Jupiters,

    C. Mordasini, R. van Boekel, P. Molli `ere, et al., “The Imprint of Exoplanet Formation History on Observable Present-day Spectra of Hot Jupiters,” ApJ 832, 41 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    The Effects of Snowlines on C/O in Planetary Atmo- spheres,

    K. I. ¨Oberg, R. Murray-Clay, and E. A. Bergin, “The Effects of Snowlines on C/O in Planetary Atmo- spheres,” ApJL 743, L16 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    C/O Ratio as a Dimension for Characterizing Exoplanetary Atmospheres,

    N. Madhusudhan, “C/O Ratio as a Dimension for Characterizing Exoplanetary Atmospheres,” ApJ 758, 36 (2012). 12

    2012

  11. [19]

    Molecular abundances and C/O ratios in chemically evolving planet-forming disk midplanes,

    C. Eistrup, C. Walsh, and E. F. van Dishoeck, “Molecular abundances and C/O ratios in chemically evolving planet-forming disk midplanes,” A&A 613, A14 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    The Transiting Exoplanet Community Early Release Science Program for JWST,

    J. L. Bean, K. B. Stevenson, N. M. Batalha,et al., “The Transiting Exoplanet Community Early Release Science Program for JWST,” PASP 130, 114402 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Early Insights for Atmospheric Retrievals of Exo- planets Using JWST Transit Spectroscopy,

    S. Constantinou, N. Madhusudhan, and S. Gandhi, “Early Insights for Atmospheric Retrievals of Exo- planets Using JWST Transit Spectroscopy,”ApJL 943, L10 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Ice condensation as a planet formation mechanism,

    K. Ros and A. Johansen, “Ice condensation as a planet formation mechanism,”A&A 552, A137 (2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    Formation of planetary systems by pebble ac- cretion and migration. How the radial pebble flux determines a terrestrial-planet or super-Earth growth mode,

    M. Lambrechts, A. Morbidelli, S. A. Jacobson, et al., “Formation of planetary systems by pebble ac- cretion and migration. How the radial pebble flux determines a terrestrial-planet or super-Earth growth mode,” A&A 627, A83 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Hints on the origins of particle traps in protoplanetary disks given by the Mdust - M⋆ relation,

    P. Pinilla, I. Pascucci, and S. Marino, “Hints on the origins of particle traps in protoplanetary disks given by the Mdust - M⋆ relation,” A&A 635, A105 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Ring shaped dust accumulation in transition disks,

    P. Pinilla, M. Benisty, and T. Birnstiel, “Ring shaped dust accumulation in transition disks,”A&A 545, A81 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    The evolution of the flux-size relationship in proto- planetary discs by viscous evolution and radial pebble drift,

    J. Appelgren, A. Johansen, M. Lambrechts, et al., “The evolution of the flux-size relationship in proto- planetary discs by viscous evolution and radial pebble drift,”arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2501.04411 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    JWST Reveals Excess Cool Water near the Snow Line in Compact Disks, Consistent with Pebble Drift,

    A. Banzatti, K. M. Pontoppidan, J. S. Carr, et al., “JWST Reveals Excess Cool Water near the Snow Line in Compact Disks, Consistent with Pebble Drift,” ApJL 957, L22 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Retrieval of Thermally Resolved Water Vapor Distributions in Disks Observed with JWST-MIRI,

    C. E. Romero-Mirza, A. Banzatti, K. I. ¨Oberg, et al., “Retrieval of Thermally Resolved Water Vapor Distributions in Disks Observed with JWST-MIRI,”ApJ 975, 78 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    JWST/MIRI Detection of a Carbon-rich Chemistry in the Disk of a Solar Nebula Analog,

    M. J. Colmenares, E. A. Bergin, C. Salyk, et al., “JWST/MIRI Detection of a Carbon-rich Chemistry in the Disk of a Solar Nebula Analog,” ApJ 977, 173 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    MINDS. Hydrocarbons detected by JWST/MIRI in the inner disk of Sz28 consistent with a high C/O gas-phase chemistry,

    J. Kanwar, I. Kamp, H. Jang, et al., “MINDS. Hydrocarbons detected by JWST/MIRI in the inner disk of Sz28 consistent with a high C/O gas-phase chemistry,” A&A 689, A231 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    The First JWST View of a 30-Myr-old Protoplanetary Disk Reveals a Late-stage Carbon-rich Phase,

    F. Long, I. Pascucci, A. Houge, et al., “The First JWST View of a 30-Myr-old Protoplanetary Disk Reveals a Late-stage Carbon-rich Phase,” ApJL 978, L30 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    Smuggling unnoticed: Towards a 2D view of water and dust delivery to the inner regions of protoplanetary discs,

    A. Houge, S. Krijt, A. Banzatti, et al., “Smuggling unnoticed: Towards a 2D view of water and dust delivery to the inner regions of protoplanetary discs,”MNRAS (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    The warm gas atmosphere of the HD 100546 disk seen by Herschel. Evidence of a gas-rich, carbon-poor atmosphere?,

    S. Bruderer, E. F. van Dishoeck, S. D. Doty, et al., “The warm gas atmosphere of the HD 100546 disk seen by Herschel. Evidence of a gas-rich, carbon-poor atmosphere?,” A&A 541, A91 (2012)

    2012

  26. [34]

    The Disk Gas Mass and the Far-IR Revolution,

    E. Bergin, K. Pontoppidan, C. Bradford, et al., “The Disk Gas Mass and the Far-IR Revolution,”BAAS 51, 222 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Deuterium Abundance in the Local ISM and Possible Spatial Variations,

    J. L. Linsky, “Deuterium Abundance in the Local ISM and Possible Spatial Variations,”Space Science Reviews 84, 285–296 (1998)

    1998

  28. [36]

    Relations between Central Black Hole Mass and Total Galaxy Stellar Mass in the Local Universe,

    A. E. Reines and M. V olonteri, “Relations between Central Black Hole Mass and Total Galaxy Stellar Mass in the Local Universe,” ApJ 813, 82 (2015). 13

    2015

  29. [37]

    The Evolution of the IR Luminosity Function and Dust-obscured Star Formation over the Past 13 Billion Years,

    J. A. Zavala, C. M. Casey, S. M. Manning, et al., “The Evolution of the IR Luminosity Function and Dust-obscured Star Formation over the Past 13 Billion Years,”ApJ 909, 165 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Obscured Active Galactic Nuclei,

    R. C. Hickox and D. M. Alexander, “Obscured Active Galactic Nuclei,” ARA&A 56, 625–671 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Host Galaxy Properties of the Swift Bat Ultra Hard X-Ray Selected Active Galactic Nucleus,

    M. Koss, R. Mushotzky, S. Veilleux, et al., “Host Galaxy Properties of the Swift Bat Ultra Hard X-Ray Selected Active Galactic Nucleus,” ApJ 739, 57 (2011)

    2011

  32. [40]

    Compton-Thick AGN: The Dark Side of the X-Ray Background,

    A. Comastri, “Compton-Thick AGN: The Dark Side of the X-Ray Background,” in Supermassive Black Holes in the Distant Universe , A. J. Barger, Ed., Astrophysics and Space Science Library 308, 245 (2004)

    2004

  33. [41]

    Can a spherically accreting black hole radiate very near the Eddington limit?,

    M. C. Begelman, “Can a spherically accreting black hole radiate very near the Eddington limit?,” MNRAS 187, 237–251 (1979)

    1979

  34. [42]

    Mildly Super-Eddington Accretion onto Slowly Spinning Black Holes Explains the X-Ray Weakness of the Little Red Dots,

    F. Pacucci and R. Narayan, “Mildly Super-Eddington Accretion onto Slowly Spinning Black Holes Explains the X-Ray Weakness of the Little Red Dots,”ApJ 976, 96 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    GOODS-Herschel: Separating High-redshift Active Galactic Nuclei and Star-forming Galaxies Using Infrared Color Diagnostics,

    A. Kirkpatrick, A. Pope, V . Charmandaris,et al., “GOODS-Herschel: Separating High-redshift Active Galactic Nuclei and Star-forming Galaxies Using Infrared Color Diagnostics,” ApJ 763, 123 (2013)

    2013

  36. [44]

    T. T. Shimizu, R. F. Mushotzky, M. Mel ´endez, et al., “Herschel far-infrared photometry of the Swift Burst Alert Telescope active galactic nuclei sample of the local universe - III. Global star-forming properties and the lack of a connection to nuclear activity,” MNRAS 466, 3...

    2017

  37. [45]

    How gas flows shape the stellar-halo mass relation in the EAGLE simulation,

    P. D. Mitchell and J. Schaye, “How gas flows shape the stellar-halo mass relation in the EAGLE simulation,” MNRAS 511, 2948–2967 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    First results from the TNG50 simulation: galactic outflows driven by supernovae and black hole feedback,

    D. Nelson, A. Pillepich, V . Springel,et al., “First results from the TNG50 simulation: galactic outflows driven by supernovae and black hole feedback,”MNRAS 490, 3234–3261 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    Cool outflows in galaxies and their implications,

    S. Veilleux, R. Maiolino, A. D. Bolatto, et al., “Cool outflows in galaxies and their implications,” The Astronomy & Astrophysics Review 28, 2 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    The global gas and dust budget of the Large Magel- lanic Cloud: AGB stars and supernovae, and the impact on the ISM evolution,

    M. Matsuura, M. J. Barlow, A. A. Zijlstra, et al., “The global gas and dust budget of the Large Magel- lanic Cloud: AGB stars and supernovae, and the impact on the ISM evolution,”MNRAS 396, 918–934 (2009)

    2009

  41. [49]

    Presolar stardust in meteorites: recent advances and scientific frontiers,

    L. R. Nittler, “Presolar stardust in meteorites: recent advances and scientific frontiers,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters 209, 259–273 (2003)

    2003

  42. [50]

    The Dust Budget of the Small Magellanic Cloud: Are Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars the Primary Dust Source at Low Metallicity?,

    M. L. Boyer, S. Srinivasan, D. Riebel, et al., “The Dust Budget of the Small Magellanic Cloud: Are Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars the Primary Dust Source at Low Metallicity?,” ApJ 748, 40 (2012)

    2012

  43. [51]

    The dust content of galaxies from z = 0 to z = 9,

    G. Popping, R. S. Somerville, and M. Galametz, “The dust content of galaxies from z = 0 to z = 9,” MNRAS 471, 3152–3185 (2017)

    2017

  44. [52]

    The Cosmic Baryon and Metal Cycles,

    C. P ´eroux and J. C. Howk, “The Cosmic Baryon and Metal Cycles,” ARA&A 58, 363–406 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    The Mid-Infrared Spectrum of Star-forming Galaxies: Global Properties of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Emission,

    J. D. T. Smith, B. T. Draine, D. A. Dale, et al., “The Mid-Infrared Spectrum of Star-forming Galaxies: Global Properties of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Emission,” ApJ 656, 770–791 (2007)

    2007

  46. [54]

    Little Red Dots or Brown Dwarfs? NIRSpec Discovery of Three Distant Brown Dwarfs Masquerading as NIRCam-selected Highly Reddened Active Galactic Nuclei,

    D. Langeroodi and J. Hjorth, “Little Red Dots or Brown Dwarfs? NIRSpec Discovery of Three Distant Brown Dwarfs Masquerading as NIRCam-selected Highly Reddened Active Galactic Nuclei,” ApJL 957, L27 (2023). 14

    2023

  47. [55]

    Dust attenuation law in JWST galaxies at z∼ 7-8,

    V . Markov, S. Gallerani, A. Pallottini,et al., “Dust attenuation law in JWST galaxies at z∼ 7-8,” A&A 679, A12 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Spatial variations in aromatic hydrocarbon emission in a dust-rich galaxy,

    J. S. Spilker, K. A. Phadke, M. Aravena, et al., “Spatial variations in aromatic hydrocarbon emission in a dust-rich galaxy,” Nature 618, 708–711 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Metallicity Effects on Mid-Infrared Colors and the 8 µm PAH Emission in Galaxies,

    C. W. Engelbracht, K. D. Gordon, G. H. Rieke, et al., “Metallicity Effects on Mid-Infrared Colors and the 8 µm PAH Emission in Galaxies,”ApJL 628, L29–L32 (2005)

    2005

  50. [58]

    Metallicity Effects on Dust Properties in Starbursting Galaxies,

    C. W. Engelbracht, G. H. Rieke, K. D. Gordon, et al. , “Metallicity Effects on Dust Properties in Starbursting Galaxies,” ApJ 678, 804–827 (2008)

    2008

  51. [59]

    Star Formation and Molecular Gas Diagnostics with Mid- and Far-infrared Emission,

    C. M. Whitcomb, K. Sandstrom, A. Leroy, et al., “Star Formation and Molecular Gas Diagnostics with Mid- and Far-infrared Emission,” ApJ 948, 88 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    ISO LWS Spectroscopy of M82: A Unified Evolu- tionary Model,

    J. W. Colbert, M. A. Malkan, P. E. Clegg, et al., “ISO LWS Spectroscopy of M82: A Unified Evolu- tionary Model,” ApJ 511, 721–729 (1999)

    1999

  53. [61]

    ISO-SWS spectra of galaxies: Continuum and features,

    E. Sturm, D. Lutz, D. Tran, et al., “ISO-SWS spectra of galaxies: Continuum and features,” A&A 358, 481–493 (2000)

    2000

  54. [62]

    [Si II], [Fe II], [C II], and H 2 Emission from Massive Star-forming Regions,

    M. J. Kaufman, M. G. Wolfire, and D. J. Hollenbach, “[Si II], [Fe II], [C II], and H 2 Emission from Massive Star-forming Regions,”ApJ 644, 283–299 (2006)

    2006

  55. [63]

    High-contrast JWST-MIRI Spectroscopy of Planet- forming Disks for the JDISC Survey,

    K. M. Pontoppidan, C. Salyk, A. Banzatti, et al., “High-contrast JWST-MIRI Spectroscopy of Planet- forming Disks for the JDISC Survey,” ApJ 963, 158 (2024)

    2024

  56. [64]

    Measurements of Water Surface Snow Lines in Classical Protoplanetary Disks,

    S. M. Blevins, K. M. Pontoppidan, A. Banzatti, et al., “Measurements of Water Surface Snow Lines in Classical Protoplanetary Disks,” ApJ 818, 22 (2016)

    2016

  57. [65]

    The ISO spectrum of the young star HD 142527,

    K. Malfait, C. Waelkens, J. Bouwman, et al., “The ISO spectrum of the young star HD 142527,” A&A 345, 181–186 (1999)

    1999

  58. [66]

    The 69 µm forsterite band in spectra of protoplanetary disks. Results from the Herschel DIGIT programme,

    B. Sturm, J. Bouwman, T. Henning, et al., “The 69 µm forsterite band in spectra of protoplanetary disks. Results from the Herschel DIGIT programme,” A&A 553, A5 (2013)

    2013

  59. [67]

    Diagnostic value of far-IR water ice features in T Tauri disks,

    I. Kamp, A. Scheepstra, M. Min, et al., “Diagnostic value of far-IR water ice features in T Tauri disks,” A&A 617, A1 (2018)

    2018

  60. [68]

    Clustering of Young Stars in Taurus, Ophiuchus, and the Orion Trapezium,

    M. Simon, “Clustering of Young Stars in Taurus, Ophiuchus, and the Orion Trapezium,” ApJL 482, L81–L84 (1997)

    1997

  61. [69]

    Spatial Distributions of Young Stars,

    A. L. Kraus and L. A. Hillenbrand, “Spatial Distributions of Young Stars,” ApJL 686, L111 (2008)

    2008

  62. [70]

    Origins Space Telescope: Predictions for far-IR spectro- scopic surveys,

    M. Bonato, G. De Zotti, D. Leisawitz, et al., “Origins Space Telescope: Predictions for far-IR spectro- scopic surveys,” PASA 36, e017 (2019)

    2019

  63. [71]

    Tracing black hole accretion with SED decomposition and IR lines: from local galaxies to the high-z Universe,

    C. Gruppioni, S. Berta, L. Spinoglio, et al., “Tracing black hole accretion with SED decomposition and IR lines: from local galaxies to the high-z Universe,” MNRAS 458, 4297–4320 (2016)

    2016

  64. [72]

    Mass Measurements in Protoplanetary Disks from Hydrogen Deuteride,

    M. K. McClure, E. A. Bergin, L. I. Cleeves, et al., “Mass Measurements in Protoplanetary Disks from Hydrogen Deuteride,” ApJ 831, 167 (2016)

    2016

  65. [73]

    Far-infrared HD emission as a measure of protoplanetary disk mass,

    L. Trapman, A. Miotello, M. Kama, et al., “Far-infrared HD emission as a measure of protoplanetary disk mass,” A&A 605, A69 (2017). 15

    2017

  66. [74]

    Retrievals of Protoplanetary Disk Parameters Using Ther- mochemical Models. I. Disk Gas Mass from Hydrogen Deuteride Spectroscopy,

    Y . M. Seo, K. Willacy, G. Bryden, et al., “Retrievals of Protoplanetary Disk Parameters Using Ther- mochemical Models. I. Disk Gas Mass from Hydrogen Deuteride Spectroscopy,”ApJ 967, 131 (2024)

    2024

  67. [75]

    An old disk still capable of forming a planetary system,

    E. A. Bergin, L. I. Cleeves, U. Gorti, et al., “An old disk still capable of forming a planetary system,” Nature 493, 644–646 (2013)

    2013

  68. [76]

    Embedded Protostars in the Dust, Ice, and Gas In Time (DIGIT) Herschel Key Program: Continuum SEDs, and an Inventory of Characteristic Far- infrared Lines from PACS Spectroscopy,

    J. D. Green, N. J. Evans, II, J. K. Jørgensen, et al., “Embedded Protostars in the Dust, Ice, and Gas In Time (DIGIT) Herschel Key Program: Continuum SEDs, and an Inventory of Characteristic Far- infrared Lines from PACS Spectroscopy,”ApJ 770, 123 (2013). 16

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.