Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Description and Evaluation of Semantic Similarity Measures Approaches

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1310.8059 v1 pith:YR2TRSYU submitted 2013-10-30 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords semanticsimilaritymeasuresapproachesevaluationknowledgemeasureseveral
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, semantic similarity measure has a great interest in Semantic Web and Natural Language Processing (NLP). Several similarity measures have been developed, being given the existence of a structured knowledge representation offered by ontologies and corpus which enable semantic interpretation of terms. Semantic similarity measures compute the similarity between concepts/terms included in knowledge sources in order to perform estimations. This paper discusses the existing semantic similarity methods based on structure, information content and feature approaches. Additionally, we present a critical evaluation of several categories of semantic similarity approaches based on two standard benchmarks. The aim of this paper is to give an efficient evaluation of all these measures which help researcher and practitioners to select the measure that best fit for their requirements.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Validation of GPU Computation in Decentralized, Trustless Networks

    cs.ET 2025-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Semantic similarity between LLM responses, with a fitted threshold of 0.5, separates same-model outputs from random responses and yields 76.5 percent held-out verification accuracy in a trusted-node setting.

Pith tools