pith. sign in

arxiv: 1903.09817 · v1 · pith:YRZ6XEMTnew · submitted 2019-03-23 · 🧮 math.AP · math.OC· math.PR

Cyclically monotone non-optimal N-marginal transport plans and Smirnov-type decompositions for N-flows

classification 🧮 math.AP math.OCmath.PR
keywords counterexampleoptimaloptimalitysufficienttransportcaseconditioncyclical
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In the setting of optimal transport with $N\ge 2$ marginals, a necessary condition for transport plans to be optimal is that they are $c$-cyclically monotone. For $N=2$ there exist several proofs that in very general settings $c$-cyclical monotoncity is also sufficient for optimality, while for $N\ge 3$ this is only known under strong conditions on $c$. Here we give a counterexample which shows that $c$-cylclical monotonicity is in general not sufficient for optimality if $N\ge 3$. Comparison with the $N=2$ case shows how the main proof strategies valid for the case $N=2$ might fail for $N\ge 3$. We leave open the question of what is the optimal condition on $c$ under which $c$-cyclical monotonicity is sufficient for optimality. The new concept of an $N$-flow seems to be helpful for understanding the counterexample: our construction is based on the absence of finite-support $N$-cycles in the set where our counterexample cost $c$ is finite. To follow this idea we formulate a Smirnov-type decomposition for $N$-flows.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.