REVIEW 2 cited by
Action Model Learning with Guarantees
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper studies the problem of action model learning with full observability. Following the learning by search paradigm by Mitchell, we develop a theory for action model learning based on version spaces that interprets the task as search for hypothesis that are consistent with the learning examples. Our theoretical findings are instantiated in an online algorithm that maintains a compact representation of all solutions of the problem. Among these range of solutions, we bring attention to actions models approximating the actual transition system from below (sound models) and from above (complete models). We show how to manipulate the output of our learning algorithm to build deterministic and non-deterministic formulations of the sound and complete models and prove that, given enough examples, both formulations converge into the very same true model. Our experiments reveal their usefulness over a range of planning domains.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Learning Lifted STRIPS Models from Action Traces Alone: A Simple, General, and Scalable Solution
SIFT learns lifted STRIPS action models (predicates and action schemas) from action traces alone, with formal guarantees and scalability to state graphs of about 500,000 edges.
-
Learning Lifted Action Models From Traces of Incomplete Actions and States
SYNTH learns STRIPS+ action models with implicit action arguments and unobserved predicates from incomplete state-action traces, with conditional completeness guarantees and 100 percent verification in experiments.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.