Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Benchmarking AlphaFold3's protein-protein complex accuracy and machine learning prediction reliability for binding free energy changes upon mutation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.03979 v1 pith:YSRIHTGW submitted 2024-06-06 q-bio.BM math.ATq-bio.QM

Benchmarking AlphaFold3's protein-protein complex accuracy and machine learning prediction reliability for binding free energy changes upon mutation

classification q-bio.BM math.ATq-bio.QM
keywords complexstructurespredictionproteinprotein-proteinbindingchangescomplexes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

AlphaFold 3 (AF3), the latest version of protein structure prediction software, goes beyond its predecessors by predicting protein-protein complexes. It could revolutionize drug discovery and protein engineering, marking a major step towards comprehensive, automated protein structure prediction. However, independent validation of AF3's predictions is necessary. Evaluated using the SKEMPI 2.0 database which involves 317 protein-protein complexes and 8338 mutations, AF3 complex structures give rise to a very good Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.86 for predicting protein-protein binding free energy changes upon mutation, slightly less than the 0.88 achieved earlier with the Protein Data Bank (PDB) structures. Nonetheless, AF3 complex structures led to a 8.6% increase in the prediction RMSE compared to original PDB complex structures. Additionally, some of AF3's complex structures have large errors, which were not captured in its ipTM performance metric. Finally, it is found that AF3's complex structures are not reliable for intrinsically flexible regions or domains.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Antigen-specific Antibody Multi-modal Foundation Model for Functional Antibody Design

    q-bio.BM 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0

    AAMFM combines ESM3, an antigen-geometry adapter, and Cal-DPO preference optimization rewarded by AlphaFold3-style scores to design antibody CDRs and structures, reporting higher predicted binding scores than prior methods.