Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 108 references

Topological characterization of magnon-polaron bands and thermal Hall conductivity in a frustrated kagome antiferromagnet

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Coupling spins to optical phonons in a canted kagome antiferromagnet drives the magnon-polaron bands through multiple topological phases, changing the Chern-number sets as the coupling strength grows.

desk verdict Optical-phonon-induced topological transitions in a canted kagome antiferromagnet, but the key truncation of the canonical transformation is unjustified and likely comparable to the retained hopping, so the phase diagram is provisional. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.16794 v2 pith:YTEBGV2S submitted 2025-06-20 cond-mat.mes-hall

Shreya Debnath , Kuntal Bhattacharyya , Saurabh Basu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords kagomeantiferromagnetmagnon-polaronspin-phononcouplingChernnumberthermalHallconductivitytopologicalphasetransitionopticalphonons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that spin-phonon coupling alone, without changing the magnetic field or the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, can switch the topology of hybridized magnon-phonon bands (magnon polarons) in a frustrated kagome antiferromagnet. The authors treat optical phonons coupled to the exchange interactions either locally or non-locally, and decouple magnons and phonons through a canonical spin-Peierls transformation. They find that as the local coupling strength grows, the Chern-number set of the three magnon-polaron bands changes from $(3,-4,1)$ to $(1,-2,1)$ to $(-1,0,1)$, while non-local coupling produces the first transition but not the second. These transitions appear as kinks and sign changes in the thermal Hall conductivity, which the paper proposes as the experimental fingerprint for distinguishing the phases. If correct, spin-phonon coupling becomes a continuous control knob for magnon topology in a frustrated magnet, connecting phonon engineering to magnonics.

What carries the argument

The central object is the effective magnon-polaron Hamiltonian obtained from a canonical spin-Peierls transformation, a unitary decoupling $e^{R}He^{-R}$ with generators $R_l=(g_l/\hbar\omega)\sum_{\langle i,j\rangle}(\tilde b_i^\dagger-\tilde b_i)\mathbf{S}_i\cdot\mathbf{S}_j$ and their non-local analogues, followed by finite-temperature phonon averaging. This produces Holstein reduction factors $e^{-\lambda_q}$ multiplying the magnon hopping and pairing amplitudes, plus a polaronic shift $\Delta$ in the onsite energy. The competition between these two renormalizations, set by $\lambda_q$ and $\Delta$, determines which band gaps close and which Chern-number transitions occur, converting spin-phonon coupling into a tunable topological parameter without changing the classical ground state.

What would settle it

A concrete check would be to include the discarded off-site spin-phonon terms and four-magnon interactions in the transformed Hamiltonian and recompute the Chern sets as $g_l$ crosses the predicted transition lines; if the $(3,-4,1)\to(1,-2,1)\to(-1,0,1)$ sequence changes or the gap-closing points shift significantly, the claim fails. Experimentally, measuring the thermal Hall sign reversal at the predicted coupling strength in a candidate jarosite-type kagome antiferromagnet would test the same physics.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the spin-phonon coupling strength $g_l$ or $g_{nl}$ acts as a topological control parameter for the magnon-polaron bands of a canted kagome antiferromagnet. Starting from the pure-magnon Chern set $(3,-4,1)$, local spin-phonon coupling produces two bulk gap-closing events, first near the $\Gamma$ point and then near the $K$ point, so the Chern set becomes $(1,-2,1)$ and finally $(-1,0,1)$. Non-local coupling yields only the first transition, leaving the Chern sets $(3,-4,1)$ and $(1,-2,1)$. The paper further claims that these phases are reflected in chiral edge modes whose winding numbers match the bulk Chern numbers, and in the thermal Hall conductivity, which changes sign and develops kinks at the transitions; temperature and magnetic field can also drive such transitions because the phonon renormalization factors depend on phonon occupation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that off-site spin-phonon scattering terms and four-magnon interactions can be safely neglected in the canonical transformation, so the truncated non-interacting magnon-polaron Hamiltonian captures the actual topology.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For local spin-phonon coupling, increasing $g_l$ at fixed $D$ moves the Chern-number set $(3,-4,1)\to(1,-2,1)\to(-1,0,1)$, with gap closings at $\Gamma$ and then at $K$; the paper predicts these are genuine topological transitions, not merely band deformations.
  • For non-local coupling, only the first transition occurs, producing the sets $(3,-4,1)\to(1,-2,1)$; the contrast between local and non-local mechanisms is a stated result of the model.
  • The thermal Hall conductivity $\kappa_{xy}$ changes sign and shows kinks at the transition lines, providing a measurable way to tell the topological phases apart.
  • Temperature can itself act as a topological switch: at $g_l=0.4J_1$ the lower-band Chern number changes from $1$ to $-1$ across a gap-closing region, and an analogous $T_c$ transition exists for non-local coupling.
  • Bulk-boundary correspondence holds: winding numbers computed from the Chern sets match the number and chirality of the edge modes in a ribbon geometry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same unitary-decoupling construction should carry over to triangular or pyrochlore antiferromagnets with optical-phonon-modulated exchange, so the predicted mechanism is not kagome-specific; testing it there would clarify whether the three-versus-two phase contrast is generic.
  • Because the renormalization factors $\lambda_q$ grow with phonon occupation, any tuning that changes the effective phonon frequency, such as strain, isotope substitution, or lattice anharmonicity, should shift the phase boundaries in the $g_l$-$D$ plane, giving experimental handles beyond magnetic field.
  • The local versus non-local distinction may act as a microscopic diagnostic: if only one transition is observed in a candidate material, the dominant spin-phonon mechanism is likely non-local, while two transitions suggest local coupling dominates.
  • Since the thermal Hall weighting $c_2(\rho)$ emphasizes low-energy states, the kink at the $\Gamma$-point transition should be sharper than the one at the $K$-point transition, an asymmetry experiments could use to locate where a gap closes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies topological magnon-polaron bands in a frustrated kagome antiferromagnet with an out-of-plane Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and a magnetic field that cants the spins. Two spin-phonon coupling mechanisms are considered: a local coupling in which one optical phonon modulates the nearest-neighbor exchange, and a non-local coupling in which the difference of two neighboring phonon displacements modulates the exchange. A canonical spin-Peierls transformation is used to decouple magnons and phonons, leading to a renormalized non-interacting magnon-polaron Hamiltonian with coupling-dependent hopping factors and onsite shifts. The authors compute Chern numbers, bulk gap closures, ribbon edge states, winding numbers, and thermal Hall conductivity, and report topological phase transitions induced by tuning the spin-phonon coupling strength, as well as by temperature and magnetic field. For local coupling the Chern number sets (3,-4,1), (1,-2,1), and (-1,0,1) appear as g_l grows, while for non-local coupling only (3,-4,1) and (1,-2,1) are found in the same range.

Significance. If the effective non-interacting magnon-polaron Hamiltonian is a controlled reduction of the spin-phonon model, the paper identifies a new control knob for magnon-polaron topology in a frustrated magnet and connects it to measurable thermal Hall signatures. The work is systematic in its presentation: bulk Chern numbers are checked against edge-state winding numbers, both local and non-local couplings are compared, and the temperature and magnetic-field dependence of the thermal Hall conductivity is computed. The derivation is analytic and no parameter is fitted to experiment, so there is no circular fitting issue; the burden lies instead on the validity of the truncations used to obtain the effective Hamiltonian. The central claim is conditional on those truncations being quantitatively justified, which the manuscript does not presently provide.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A 1, Eq. (A5) and Sec. II C] The adjective 'solely' is stronger than what is actually shown. In Sec. III A and Figs. 3(d) and 5(a), the topological phase diagrams are presented in the (g_l, D) and (g_nl, D) planes, so the transitions occur while both the spin-phonon coupling and the DMI are varied. The text later fixes D and varies g, which is a special cut of the phase diagram, but the abstract's phrasing 'solely via tuning the spin-phonon coupling strength' should be qualified accordingly.
  2. [Sec. III A and Appendix A 2] The effective Hamiltonian depends on temperature through the phonon occupation factors in Eq. (A17), and this is used to assign temperature-dependent Chern numbers in Figs. 8(a) and 10(a). This is a legitimate feature of a thermally averaged Hamiltonian only if the underlying spin configuration remains a stable minimum over the entire parameter range considered. The manuscript assumes the classical ground state of Eq. (3) is unchanged for all reported g_l and g_nl, but no check is provided that the renormalized onsite shift Δ_{l(nl)} does not destabilize the assumed canted order for the parameter values used, especially near the transition lines where g is large. The 'magnon-polaron instability' briefly discussed in Sec. II C shows that such destabilization can occur, yet its location in the phase diagrams is not identified. If the classical ground state changes, the Holstein-Primakoff expansion from that state is no longer controlled and the reported Chern numbers lose their meaning.
  3. [Appendix A 1, last paragraph] Four-magnon quartic terms are neglected with the sentence 'we have neglected the four-magnon quartic terms such as m†_i m†_j m_i m_j (∀i,j)' and no further justification. This is not a minor omission because the commutator [R, H_s] in Eq. (A4) generically generates such terms when R contains off-diagonal quadratic magnon operators, and these terms are of the same order in g as the renormalized hopping corrections that are retained. The paper should either retain these terms and show they are small, or demonstrate that they do not affect the band topology and thermal Hall response at the reported couplings.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3(b) and Sec. III A] The parameter values are inconsistent: Fig. 3(b) uses J2 = D = 0.03J1, while the fixed parameters stated in Sec. III A and used in Figs. 4–10 are J2 = 0.03J1 and D = 0.045J1. This makes it difficult to reproduce the phase diagrams.
  2. [Sec. III A, text near Fig. 3(d)] The sentence 'varying g_l from 1 to J1' appears to contain a typo; it should presumably read 'from 0 to J1' given the range shown in the phase diagram.
  3. [Eq. (12)] The definitions of f_1(k) and f_2(k) use opposite signs of iQ, while f_3(k) uses +iQ; the reader should be told explicitly which convention is used for the sublattice hopping phases so that the Chern number computation is unambiguous.
  4. [Appendix C] The statement that high-temperature stabilization 'is effective only in the low-temperature regime' is confusing; the discussion should clarify under what conditions the thermal average in Eq. (A15) remains controlled when k_BT approaches J1S, given that magnon decay processes have been neglected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Chern numbers and thermal Hall conductivities are computed from the stated spin-phonon model rather than imported from a fit or from prior results.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: Eq. (2) defines the spin model, the linearized Holstein-Primakoff transformation (Eq. (5)) produces the magnon Hamiltonian (Eq. (6)), the spin-phonon couplings are specified in Eq. (9), and the canonical spin-Peierls transformation in Appendix A is used to obtain a phonon-averaged, renormalized magnon Hamiltonian (Eq. (A16) and Eq. (12)). Chern numbers, edge spectra, and thermal Hall conductivities are then evaluated numerically from this Hamiltonian. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then renamed a prediction; the Chern-number phase diagrams follow directly from the stated coupling strengths g_l and g_nl. The self-citations (Refs. 25, 26, 72, 73) are used for the standard Berry-curvature formula and for the Lang-Firsov-type decoupling scheme, but the central derivation is reproduced explicitly in the appendices, so these citations are not load-bearing. The approximations that are actually present, namely neglecting off-site spin-phonon scattering terms and four-magnon quartic terms (Appendix A 1), are truncations of the model rather than circular reductions; their validity is a correctness concern, not a logical circularity. The reported transitions are therefore genuine outputs of the stated model, not restatements of its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the linear spin-wave plus small-polaron truncation of the spin-phonon model. The listed parameters are chosen to stabilize the intended phase, not fitted to experimental data; the approximations are flagged in the paper but not quantified.

free parameters (5)
  • J2/J1 = 0.03
    Chosen to stabilize the Q=0 coplanar long-range order; the paper notes results for larger J2 are in Appendix B.
  • D/J1 = 0.045
    Out-of-plane DMI strength used in most calculations; selected to give a gapped topological magnon spectrum.
  • B0/Bs = 0.4
    External field value fixing the canting angle eta; the text equates this to 2.53 J1.
  • hbar omega / (J1 S) = 1
    Optical phonon frequency chosen to exceed the computed critical frequency omega_c, avoiding magnon-polaron instability and the adiabatic regime.
  • spin-phonon couplings gl and gnl = scanned over 0 to J1
    Control parameters for the topological transitions; not fitted to data but scanned across the phase diagrams.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Linearized Holstein-Primakoff transformation is valid and quadratic magnon Hamiltonian suffices.
    Used in Sec. II A to convert spin operators to bosons; neglects higher-order magnon interactions.
  • ad hoc to paper Canonical spin-Peierls or Lang-Firsov transformation completely decouples magnons and phonons, and off-site scattering terms can be neglected.
    Invoked in Sec. II C and Appendix A 1 with the statement that off-site terms 'can be safely neglected'; no quantitative error bound is given.
  • standard math Finite-temperature phonon averaging of the transformed Hamiltonian yields the effective magnon-polaron Hamiltonian with Holstein reduction factors and a polaronic shift.
    Eqs. (A10) through (A17) use standard small-polaron averaging, but assume non-interacting phonons.
  • domain assumption The classical spin configuration of Eq. (3) remains valid for finite spin-phonon coupling.
    Stability is tested via imaginary eigenvalues (critical frequency), but the classical energy is not re-minimized including spin-phonon terms.
  • domain assumption Optical phonons are momentum-independent and dispersionless with a fixed frequency.
    Sec. II B justifies this by optical modes being largely non-dispersive, but it excludes acoustic phonon coupling and phonon dispersion effects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological characterization of magnon-polaron bands and thermal Hall conductivity in a frustrated kagome antiferromagnet." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YTEBGV2S

@misc{pith2026250616794,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological characterization of magnon-polaron bands and thermal Hall conductivity in a frustrated kagome antiferromagnet},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YTEBGV2S}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.16794}
}
read the original abstract

Spin-phonon coupling and its efficacy in inducing multiple topological phase transitions in a frustrated kagome antiferromagnet have been rare in literature. To this end, we study the ramifications of invoking optical phonons in such a system via two different coupling mechanisms, namely, a local and a non-local one, which are distinct in their microscopic origin. In case of the local spin-phonon coupling, a single phonon mode affects the magnetic interactions, whereas in the non-local case, two neighbouring phonon modes are involved in the energy renormalization, and it would be worthwhile to compare and contrast between the two. To tackle these phonons, we propose an analytic approach involving a canonical spin-Peierls transformation applied to magnons. The formalism renders a hybridization between the magnons and the phonon modes, yielding magnon-polaron quasiparticles. In both the coupling regimes, validations for the topological signatures are systematically derived from the bulk and edge spectral properties of the magnon-polaron bands that are characterized by their corresponding Chern numbers. Thereafter, we investigate transitions from one topological phase to another solely via tuning the spin-phonon coupling strength. Moreover, these transitions significantly impact the behavior of the thermal Hall conductivity that aids in discerning distinct topological phases. Additionally, the explicit dependencies on the temperature and the external magnetic field are explored in inducing topological phase transitions associated with the magnon-polaron bands. Thus, our work serves as an ideal platform to probe the interplay of frustrated magnetism and polaronic physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.16794 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of a kagome antiferromagnet is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The behavior of the critical frequency ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The bulk band structures are shown at the symmetry points inside the Brillouin zone. In the absence of any spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The bulk band structures are displayed along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) A combined phase diagram based on the Chern number sets of the corresponding bands is illustrated as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The edge states of the magnon-polaron bands corre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The effects of local spin-phonon interaction on the behavior of the thermal Hall conductivity ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (c), for the lower band, we show the corresponding Berry curvature prior to the gap closing transition, where positive values of the Berry curvature are concentrated at the high-symmetry K and K′ points, and they become negative beyond the gap closing transition in [P…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The behavior of the thermal Hall conductivity ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (a) The Chern number ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. A schematic representation of a generic single unit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The combined phase diagrams are presented for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Decoupling magnon-phonon modes by canonical transformation As mentioned, we consider two distinct types of spin- phonon interactions, where the local magnons interact with both the local and non-local optical phonon modes. To incorporate the corresponding effects in the effective magnon Hamiltonian, we employ a canonical spin-Peierls transformation [95], ...

  2. [2]

    (A6)), namely eHR =⟨ eH⟩ ph.(A10) Here, eHcontains both phonon operators and magnon operators, and only the phonon operators take part in this averaging

    Reduced Hamiltonian via finite-temperature phonon averaging Now, to eliminate the phonon degrees of freedom, we take a finite-temperature phonon average of the transformed Hamiltonian (Eq. (A6)), namely eHR =⟨ eH⟩ ph.(A10) Here, eHcontains both phonon operators and magnon operators, and only the phonon operators take part in this averaging. To further ela...

  3. [3]

    andK= ( 2π 3 ,0) as seen in Fig. 3(a). Since the system preserves valley symme- try [98], the energies at the two Dirac pointsKandK ′ remain degenerate. Also, in Fig. 3(a), all the three en- ergy bands exhibit Goldstone modes at theΓpoint due to the presence of SO(3) rotational symmetry, where it is reduced to SO(2) symmetry due to the presence of an out-...

  4. [4]

    P. A. McClarty, Topological magnons: A review, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.13, 171 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    X. S. Wang and X. R. Wang, Topological magnonics, J. Appl. Phys.129, 151101 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Z.-X. Li, Y. Cao, and P. Yan, Topological insulators and semimetals in classical magnetic systems, Phys. Rep. 915, 1 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?, Mater

    P. Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?, Mater. Res. Bull.8, 153 (1973)

    1973

  8. [8]

    Lhuillier, Frustrated quantum magnets (2005), arXiv:cond-mat/0502464 [cond-mat.str-el]

    C. Lhuillier, Frustrated quantum magnets (2005), arXiv:cond-mat/0502464 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2005

Show all 108 references
  1. [9]

    Moessner and A

    R. Moessner and A. P. Ramirez, Geometrical frustra- tion, Phys. Today59, 24 (2006)

    2006

  2. [10]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    Y. Zhou, K. Kanoda, and T.-K. Ng, Quantum spin liq- uid states, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 025003 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a re- view, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 016502 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    M. R. Norman, Colloquium: Herbertsmithite and the search for the quantum spin liquid, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 041002 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Broholm, R

    C. Broholm, R. J. Cava, S. A. Kivelson, D. G. Nocera, M. R. Norman, and T. Senthil, Quantum spin liquids, Science367, eaay0668 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Matsumoto and S

    R. Matsumoto and S. Murakami, Theoretical predic- tion of a rotating magnon wave packet in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 197202 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    Matsumoto and S

    R. Matsumoto and S. Murakami, Rotational motion of magnons and the thermal hall effect, Phys. Rev. B84, 184406 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    Murakami and A

    S. Murakami and A. Okamoto, Thermal hall effect of magnons, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.86, 011010 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Katsura, N

    H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and P. A. Lee, Theory of the thermal hall effect in quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 066403 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    Onose, T

    Y. Onose, T. Ideue, H. Katsura, Y. Shiomi, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Observation of the magnon hall effect, Science329, 297 (2010)

    2010

  12. [20]

    Ideue, Y

    T. Ideue, Y. Onose, H. Katsura, Y. Shiomi, S. Ishiwata, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Effect of lattice geometry on magnon hall effect in ferromagnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. B85, 134411 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    Hirschberger, R

    M. Hirschberger, R. Chisnell, Y. S. Lee, and N. P. Ong, Thermal hall effect of spin excitations in a kagome mag- net, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 106603 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    Malki and K

    M. Malki and K. P. Schmidt, Magnetic chern bands and triplon hall effect in an extended shastry-sutherland model, Phys. Rev. B95, 195137 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    S. A. Owerre, Topological thermal hall effect in frus- trated kagome antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B95, 014422 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Laurell and G

    P. Laurell and G. A. Fiete, Magnon thermal hall effect in kagome antiferromagnets with dzyaloshinskii-moriya interactions, Phys. Rev. B98, 094419 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Akazawa, M

    M. Akazawa, M. Shimozawa, S. Kittaka, T. Sakakibara, R. Okuma, Z. Hiroi, H.-Y. Lee, N. Kawashima, J. H. Han, and M. Yamashita, Thermal hall effects of spins and phonons in kagome antiferromagnet cd-kapellasite, Phys. Rev. X10, 041059 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    dos Santos Dias, N

    M. dos Santos Dias, N. Biniskos, F. J. dos Santos, K. Schmalzl, J. Persson, F. Bourdarot, N. Marzari, S. Bl¨ ugel, T. Br¨ uckel, and S. Lounis, Topological magnons driven by the dzyaloshinskii-moriya interac- tion in the centrosymmetric ferromagnet mn5ge3, Nat. Commun.14, 7321 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    He and J.-X

    L.-W. He and J.-X. Li, Spinon quantum spin hall state in the kagome antiferromagnet with a dzyaloshinskii- moriya interaction, Phys. Rev. B110, 035131 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Debnath and S

    S. Debnath and S. Basu, Studying magnon band topol- ogy through low-energy magnon excitations: role of anisotropic dzyaloshinskii–moriya interaction, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter37, 085303 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Debnath and S

    S. Debnath and S. Basu, Magnons on a dice lattice: Topological features and transport properties, Phys. Rev. B111, 155418 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    H. Lee, J. H. Han, and P. A. Lee, Thermal hall effect of spins in a paramagnet, Phys. Rev. B91, 125413 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Hirschberger, J

    M. Hirschberger, J. W. Krizan, R. J. Cava, and N. P. Ong, Large thermal hall conductivity of neutral spin ex- citations in a frustrated quantum magnet, Science348, 106 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J

    I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J. Phys. Chem. Solids4, 241 (1958)

    1958

  25. [33]

    Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev.120, 91 (1960)

    1960

  26. [34]

    A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nat. Phys.11, 453 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    X. S. Wang, H. W. Zhang, and X. R. Wang, Topological magnonics: A paradigm for spin-wave manipulation and device design, Phys. Rev. Appl.9, 024029 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Sachdev, Kagome´- and triangular-lattice heisenberg antiferromagnets: Ordering from quantum fluctuations and quantum-disordered ground states with unconfined bosonic spinons, Phys

    S. Sachdev, Kagome´- and triangular-lattice heisenberg antiferromagnets: Ordering from quantum fluctuations and quantum-disordered ground states with unconfined bosonic spinons, Phys. Rev. B45, 12377 (1992)

    1992

  30. [38]

    S. Yan, D. A. Huse, and S. R. White, Spin-liquid ground state of the s = 1/2 kagome heisenberg antiferromagnet, Science332, 1173 (2011)

    2011

  31. [39]

    Y.-M. Lu, Y. Ran, and P. A. Lee,𭟋 2 spin liquids in thes= 1 2 heisenberg model on the kagome lattice: A projective symmetry-group study of schwinger fermion mean-field states, Phys. Rev. B83, 224413 (2011)

    2011

  32. [40]

    Depenbrock, I

    S. Depenbrock, I. P. McCulloch, and U. Schollw¨ ock, Nature of the spin-liquid ground state of thes= 1/2 heisenberg model on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 067201 (2012)

    2012

  33. [41]

    Jiang, Z

    H.-C. Jiang, Z. Wang, and L. Balents, Identifying topo- logical order by entanglement entropy, Nat. Phys.8, 902 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    Iqbal, F

    Y. Iqbal, F. Becca, S. Sorella, and D. Poilblanc, Gap- less spin-liquid phase in the kagome spin- 1 2 heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B87, 060405 (2013)

    2013

  35. [43]

    Nishimoto, N

    S. Nishimoto, N. Shibata, and C. Hotta, Controlling frustrated liquids and solids with an applied field in a kagome heisenberg antiferromagnet, Nat. Commun.4, 2287 (2013)

    2013

  36. [44]

    Mei, J.-Y

    J.-W. Mei, J.-Y. Chen, H. He, and X.-G. Wen, Gapped 20 spin liquid with𭟋 2 topological order for the kagome heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B95, 235107 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    H. J. Liao, Z. Y. Xie, J. Chen, Z. Y. Liu, H. D. Xie, R. Z. Huang, B. Normand, and T. Xiang, Gapless spin-liquid ground state in thes= 1/2 kagome antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 137202 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    Y.-C. He, M. P. Zaletel, M. Oshikawa, and F. Pollmann, Signatures of dirac cones in a dmrg study of the kagome heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. X7, 031020 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    Jiang, P

    S. Jiang, P. Kim, J. H. Han, and Y. Ran, Competing Spin Liquid Phases in the S= 1 2 Heisenberg Model on the Kagome Lattice, SciPost Phys.7, 006 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    Wang and A

    F. Wang and A. Vishwanath, Spin-liquid states on the triangular and kagom´ e lattices: A projective-symmetry- group analysis of schwinger boson states, Phys. Rev. B 74, 174423 (2006)

    2006

  41. [49]

    M. S. Block, J. D’Emidio, and R. K. Kaul, Kagome model for az 2 quantum spin liquid, Phys. Rev. B101, 020402 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Messio, S

    L. Messio, S. Bieri, C. Lhuillier, and B. Bernu, Chiral spin liquid on a kagome antiferromagnet induced by the dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 267201 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    Duri´ c, J

    T. Duri´ c, J. H. Chung, B. Yang, and P. Sengupta, Spin- 1/2 kagome heisenberg antiferromagnet: Machine learn- ing discovery of the spinon pair-density-wave ground state, Phys. Rev. X15, 011047 (2025)

    2025

  44. [52]

    Elhajal, B

    M. Elhajal, B. Canals, and C. Lacroix, Symmetry break- ing due to dzyaloshinsky-moriya interactions in the kagom´ e lattice, Phys. Rev. B66, 014422 (2002)

    2002

  45. [53]

    Matan, D

    K. Matan, D. Grohol, D. G. Nocera, T. Yildirim, A. B. Harris, S. H. Lee, S. E. Nagler, and Y. S. Lee, Spin waves in the frustrated kagom´ e lattice antiferromagnet kfe3(OH)6(so4)2, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 247201 (2006)

    2006

  46. [54]

    C´ epas, C

    O. C´ epas, C. M. Fong, P. W. Leung, and C. Lhuillier, Quantum phase transition induced by dzyaloshinskii- moriya interactions in the kagome antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B78, 140405 (2008)

    2008

  47. [55]

    Y. Huh, L. Fritz, and S. Sachdev, Quantum criticality of the kagome antiferromagnet with dzyaloshinskii-moriya interactions, Phys. Rev. B81, 144432 (2010)

    2010

  48. [56]

    Zorko, F

    A. Zorko, F. Bert, A. Ozarowski, J. van Tol, D. Boldrin, A. S. Wills, and P. Mendels, Dzyaloshinsky-moriya in- teraction in vesignieite: A route to freezing in a quan- tum kagome antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B88, 144419 (2013)

    2013

  49. [57]

    E. G. Mishchenko and O. A. Starykh, Equilibrium cur- rents in chiral systems with nonzero chern number, Phys. Rev. B90, 035114 (2014)

    2014

  50. [58]

    S.-H. Lee, C. Broholm, M. F. Collins, L. Heller, A. P. Ramirez, C. Kloc, E. Bucher, R. W. Erwin, and N. Lace- vic, Less than 50% sublattice polarization in an insulat- ings= 3 2 kagom´ e antiferromagnet att≈0, Phys. Rev. B56, 8091 (1997)

    1997

  51. [59]

    Inami, T

    T. Inami, T. Morimoto, M. Nishiyama, S. Maegawa, Y. Oka, and H. Okumura, Magnetic ordering in the kagom´ e lattice antiferromagnet kcr3(OD)6(SO4)2, Phys. Rev. B64, 054421 (2001)

    2001

  52. [60]

    Grohol, K

    D. Grohol, K. Matan, J.-H. Cho, S.-H. Lee, J. W. Lynn, D. G. Nocera, and Y. S. Lee, Spin chirality on a two-dimensional frustrated lattice, Nat. Mater.4, 323 (2005)

    2005

  53. [61]

    Laurell and G

    P. Laurell and G. A. Fiete, Topological magnon bands and unconventional superconductivity in pyrochlore iri- date thin films, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 177201 (2017)

    2017

  54. [62]

    A. S. Wills, Long-range ordering and representational analysis of the jarosites, Phys. Rev. B63, 064430 (2001)

    2001

  55. [63]

    Nishiyama, S

    M. Nishiyama, S. Maegawa, T. Inami, and Y. Oka, Magnetic ordering and spin dynamics in potassium jarosite: A heisenberg kagom´ e lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B67, 224435 (2003)

    2003

  56. [64]

    Yildirim and A

    T. Yildirim and A. B. Harris, Magnetic structure and spin waves in the kagom´ e jarosite compound Kfe3(SO4)2(OH)6, Phys. Rev. B73, 214446 (2006)

    2006

  57. [65]

    Zorko, S

    A. Zorko, S. Nellutla, J. van Tol, L. C. Brunel, F. Bert, F. Duc, J.-C. Trombe, M. A. de Vries, A. Harrison, and P. Mendels, Dzyaloshinsky-moriya anisotropy in the spin-1/2 kagome compound zncu 3(OH)6cl2, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 026405 (2008)

    2008

  58. [66]

    H. O. Jeschke, F. Salvat-Pujol, E. Gati, N. H. Hoang, B. Wolf, M. Lang, J. A. Schlueter, and R. Valent´ ı, Bar- lowite as a canted antiferromagnet: Theory and exper- iment, Phys. Rev. B92, 094417 (2015)

    2015

  59. [67]

    Verrier, F

    A. Verrier, F. Bert, J. M. Parent, M. El-Amine, J. C. Orain, D. Boldrin, A. S. Wills, P. Mendels, and J. A. Quilliam, Canted antiferromagnetic order in the kagome material sr-vesignieite, Phys. Rev. B101, 054425 (2020)

    2020

  60. [68]

    Sheng, A

    L. Sheng, A. Duvakina, H. Wang, K. Yamamoto, R. Yuan, J. Wang, P. Chen, W. He, K. Yu, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, J. Hu, S. Liu, X. Han, D. Yu, J.-P. Ansermet, S. Maekawa, D. Grundler, and H. Yu, Controlling spin currents with magnon interference in a canted antiferro- magnet (2025), a...

    2025 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Garate, Phonon-induced topological transitions and crossovers in dirac materials, Phys

    I. Garate, Phonon-induced topological transitions and crossovers in dirac materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 046402 (2013)

    2013

  62. [70]

    Li and J

    Z. Li and J. P. Carbotte, Conductivity of dirac fermions with phonon-induced topological crossover, Phys. Rev. B88, 195133 (2013)

    2013

  63. [71]

    L. M. Cangemi, A. S. Mishchenko, N. Nagaosa, V. Cataudella, and G. De Filippis, Topological quan- tum transition driven by charge-phonon coupling in the haldane chern insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 046401 (2019)

    2019

  64. [72]

    L.-H. Hu, J. Yu, I. Garate, and C.-X. Liu, Phonon he- licity induced by electronic berry curvature in dirac ma- terials, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 125901 (2021)

    2021

  65. [73]

    Medina Due˜ nas, H

    J. Medina Due˜ nas, H. L. Calvo, and L. E. F. Foa Tor- res, Copropagating edge states produced by the inter- action between electrons and chiral phonons in two- dimensional materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 066801 (2022)

    2022

  66. [74]

    C. Lu, M. Zhang, H. Wang, Q. Ai, and T. Liu, Topolog- ical quantum transition driven by charge-phonon cou- pling in higher-order topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B107, 125118 (2023)

    2023

  67. [75]

    Islam, K

    M. Islam, K. Bhattacharyya, and S. Basu, Electron- phonon coupling induced topological phase transition in anα−T 3 haldane-holstein model, Phys. Rev. B110, 045426 (2024)

    2024

  68. [76]

    Bhattacharyya, S

    K. Bhattacharyya, S. Lahiri, M. Islam, and S. Basu, Holstein polaron in a pseudospin-1 quantum spin hall system: First- and second-order topological phase tran- sitions, Phys. Rev. B110, 235432 (2024)

    2024

  69. [77]

    Takahashi and N

    R. Takahashi and N. Nagaosa, Berry curvature in magnon-phonon hybrid systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 217205 (2016). 21

    2016

  70. [78]

    K. Park, J. Oh, J. C. Leiner, J. Jeong, K. C. Rule, M. D. Le, and J.-G. Park, Magnon-phonon coupling and two-magnon continuum in the two-dimensional triangu- lar antiferromagnet cucro 2, Phys. Rev. B94, 104421 (2016)

    2016

  71. [79]

    Park and B.-J

    S. Park and B.-J. Yang, Topological magnetoelastic ex- citations in noncollinear antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 99, 174435 (2019)

    2019

  72. [80]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Ther- mal hall effect induced by magnon-phonon interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 167202 (2019)

    2019

  73. [81]

    G. Go, S. K. Kim, and K.-J. Lee, Topological magnon- phonon hybrid excitations in two-dimensional ferromag- nets with tunable chern numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 237207 (2019)

    2019

  74. [82]

    Zhang, G

    S. Zhang, G. Go, K.-J. Lee, and S. K. Kim, Su(3) topol- ogy of magnon-phonon hybridization in 2d antiferro- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 147204 (2020)

    2020

  75. [83]

    S. Bao, Z. Cai, W. Si, W. Wang, X. Wang, Y. Shang- guan, Z. Ma, Z.-Y. Dong, R. Kajimoto, K. Ikeuchi, S.-L. Yu, J. Sun, J.-X. Li, and J. Wen, Evidence for magnon- phonon coupling in the topological magnet cu 3teo6, Phys. Rev. B101, 214419 (2020)

    2020

  76. [84]

    Sheikhi, M

    B. Sheikhi, M. Kargarian, and A. Langari, Hybrid topo- logical magnon-phonon modes in ferromagnetic honey- comb and kagome lattices, Phys. Rev. B104, 045139 (2021)

    2021

  77. [85]

    S. Liu, A. Granados del ´Aguila, D. Bhowmick, C. K. Gan, T. Thu Ha Do, M. A. Prosnikov, D. Sedmidubsk´ y, Z. Sofer, P. C. M. Christianen, P. Sengupta, and Q. Xiong, Direct observation of magnon-phonon strong coupling in two-dimensional antiferromagnet at high magnetic fields, ...

    2021

  78. [86]

    T. T. Mai, K. F. Garrity, A. McCreary, J. Argo, J. R. Simpson, V. Doan-Nguyen, R. V. Aguilar, and A. R. H. Walker, Magnon-phonon hybridization in 2d antifer- romagnet mnpse¡sub¿3¡/sub¿, Sci. Adv.7, eabj3106 (2021)

    2021

  79. [87]

    Chen and Y.-P

    X.-Y. Chen and Y.-P. Wang, One-dimensional model for coupling between magnon and optical phonon, Phys. Rev. B104, 155132 (2021)

    2021

  80. [88]

    Li, Topological magnons in the honeycomb-kagome lattice, J

    K. Li, Topological magnons in the honeycomb-kagome lattice, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter34, 505801 (2022)

    2022

  81. [89]

    Ma and G

    B. Ma and G. A. Fiete, Antiferromagnetic insulators with tunable magnon-polaron chern numbers induced by in-plane optical phonons, Phys. Rev. B105, L100402 (2022)

    2022

  82. [90]

    Tiwari, D

    A. Tiwari, D. C. Kakarla, B. Poojitha, P. Sahoo, H. L. Liu, A. Dixit, C. W. Wang, T. W. Yen, M.-J. Hsieh, J.-Y. Lin, J. Krishnamurthy, Y. C. Lai, H. Chou, T. W. Kuo, A. Pal, and H. D. Yang, Spin-phonon-charge cou- pling in the two-dimensional honeycomb lattice com- pound ni 2t...

    2023

  83. [91]

    T. P. Lyons, J. Puebla, K. Yamamoto, R. S. Deacon, Y. Hwang, K. Ishibashi, S. Maekawa, and Y. Otani, Acoustically driven magnon-phonon coupling in a lay- ered antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 196701 (2023)

    2023

  84. [92]

    J. N. Kløgetvedt and A. Qaiumzadeh, Tunable topo- logical magnon-polaron states and intrinsic anomalous hall phenomena in two-dimensional ferromagnetic insu- lators, Phys. Rev. B108, 224424 (2023)

    2023

  85. [93]

    N. Li, R. R. Neumann, S. K. Guang, Q. Huang, J. Liu, K. Xia, X. Y. Yue, Y. Sun, Y. Y. Wang, Q. J. Li, Y. Jiang, J. Fang, Z. Jiang, X. Zhao, A. Mook, J. Henk, I. Mertig, H. D. Zhou, and X. F. Sun, Magnon-polaron driven thermal hall effect in a heisenberg-kitaev antifer- romagne...

    2023

  86. [94]

    J. D. Mella, L. E. F. F. Torres, and R. E. Troncoso, Chiral magnon-polaron edge states in heisenberg-kitaev magnets, Phys. Rev. B110, 104433 (2024)

    2024

  87. [95]

    T. W. J. Metzger, K. A. Grishunin, C. Reinhoffer, R. M. Dubrovin, A. Arshad, I. Ilyakov, T. V. A. G. de Oliveira, A. Ponomaryov, J.-C. Deinert, S. Kovalev, R. V. Pis- arev, M. I. Katsnelson, B. A. Ivanov, P. H. M. van Loos- drecht, A. V. Kimel, and E. A. Mashkovich, Magnon- ph...

    2024

  88. [96]

    S. Wu, L. Zhao, W. Song, M. Tan, F. Jin, T. Ying, J.-X. Yin, and Q. Zhang, Lattice dynamics and spin-phonon coupling in the kagome spin ice hoagge, Phys. Rev. B 111, 125116 (2025)

    2025

  89. [97]

    Kittel, Interaction of spin waves and ultrasonic waves in ferromagnetic crystals, Phys

    C. Kittel, Interaction of spin waves and ultrasonic waves in ferromagnetic crystals, Phys. Rev.110, 836 (1958)

    1958

  90. [98]

    Weiße, G

    A. Weiße, G. Wellein, and H. Fehske, Quantum lat- tice fluctuations in a frustrated heisenberg spin-peierls chain, Phys. Rev. B60, 6566 (1999)

    1999

  91. [99]

    U. F. P. Seifert, J. Willsher, M. Drescher, F. Pollmann, and J. Knolle, Spin-peierls instability of the u(1) dirac spin liquid, Nat. Commun.15, 7110 (2024)

    2024

  92. [100]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev.58, 1098 (1940)

    1940

  93. [101]

    M. U. Rehman, Z. Qiao, and J. Wang, Valley- symmetry-broken magnetic topological responses in (Pt/Pd)2hgse3/crgete3 and pd 2hgse3/cri3 through in- terfacial coupling, Phys. Rev. B105, 165417 (2022)

    2022

  94. [102]

    Thouless,Topological quantum numbers in nonrela- tivistic physics(World Scientific, 1998)

    D. Thouless,Topological quantum numbers in nonrela- tivistic physics(World Scientific, 1998)

    1998

  95. [103]

    A. Mook, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, Edge states in topolog- ical magnon insulators, Phys. Rev. B90, 024412 (2014)

    2014

  96. [104]

    Bhowmick and P

    D. Bhowmick and P. Sengupta, Topological magnon bands in the flux state of shastry-sutherland lattice model, Phys. Rev. B101, 214403 (2020)

    2020

  97. [105]

    Althoughω c varies withB 0 at a finite temperatureT, ℏωc remains larger thanJ 1Sfor both local and non-local coupling cases

  98. [106]

    A. Mook, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, Magnon hall effect and topology in kagome lattices: A theoretical investigation, Phys. Rev. B89, 134409 (2014)

    2014

  99. [107]

    R. J. Glauber, Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field, Phys. Rev.131, 2766 (1963)

    1963

  100. [108]

    M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy,Quantum Optics(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.