REVIEW 2 cited by
Tapilot-Crossing: Benchmarking and Evolving LLMs Towards Interactive Data Analysis Agents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Interactive Data Analysis, the collaboration between humans and LLM agents, enables real-time data exploration for informed decision-making. The challenges and costs of collecting realistic interactive logs for data analysis hinder the quantitative evaluation of Large Language Model (LLM) agents in this task. To mitigate this issue, we introduce Tapilot-Crossing, a new benchmark to evaluate LLM agents on interactive data analysis. Tapilot-Crossing contains 1024 interactions, covering 4 practical scenarios: Normal, Action, Private, and Private Action. Notably, Tapilot-Crossing is constructed by an economical multi-agent environment, Decision Company, with few human efforts. We evaluate popular and advanced LLM agents in Tapilot-Crossing, which underscores the challenges of interactive data analysis. Furthermore, we propose Adaptive Interaction Reflection (AIR), a self-generated reflection strategy that guides LLM agents to learn from successful history. Experiments demonstrate that Air can evolve LLMs into effective interactive data analysis agents, achieving a relative performance improvement of up to 44.5%.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Fisher-R1: Training LLM Agents for Reliable Hypothesis Testing
P-Bench and Fisher-R1 show that small LLM agents trained with outcome-grounded reinforcement learning on synthetic hypothesis-testing tasks can outperform frontier models at statistically valid p-value reporting and d...
-
Aviary: training language agents on challenging scientific tasks
A small open-source LLM trained in the new Aviary environments with expert iteration and majority voting matches or exceeds a frontier LLM agent on SeqQA and LitQA2 at far lower inference cost.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.