REVIEW 1 cited by
MoleculeQA: A Dataset to Evaluate Factual Accuracy in Molecular Comprehension
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models are playing an increasingly significant role in molecular research, yet existing models often generate erroneous information, posing challenges to accurate molecular comprehension. Traditional evaluation metrics for generated content fail to assess a model's accuracy in molecular understanding. To rectify the absence of factual evaluation, we present MoleculeQA, a novel question answering (QA) dataset which possesses 62K QA pairs over 23K molecules. Each QA pair, composed of a manual question, a positive option and three negative options, has consistent semantics with a molecular description from authoritative molecular corpus. MoleculeQA is not only the first benchmark for molecular factual bias evaluation but also the largest QA dataset for molecular research. A comprehensive evaluation on MoleculeQA for existing molecular LLMs exposes their deficiencies in specific areas and pinpoints several particularly crucial factors for molecular understanding.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Exploring the Expertise of Large Language Models in Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering
On the MaScQA benchmark, Claude-3.5-Sonnet and GPT-4o achieve about 84 percent accuracy, while the best open-source models (Llama3-70b, Phi3-14b) reach about 56 and 43 percent.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.