Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MoleculeQA: A Dataset to Evaluate Factual Accuracy in Molecular Comprehension

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.08192 v1 pith:YV4P4TN6 submitted 2024-03-13 cs.CL q-bio.BM

classification cs.CLq-bio.BM
keywords molecularevaluationmoleculeqadatasetfactualaccuracycomprehensionexisting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models are playing an increasingly significant role in molecular research, yet existing models often generate erroneous information, posing challenges to accurate molecular comprehension. Traditional evaluation metrics for generated content fail to assess a model's accuracy in molecular understanding. To rectify the absence of factual evaluation, we present MoleculeQA, a novel question answering (QA) dataset which possesses 62K QA pairs over 23K molecules. Each QA pair, composed of a manual question, a positive option and three negative options, has consistent semantics with a molecular description from authoritative molecular corpus. MoleculeQA is not only the first benchmark for molecular factual bias evaluation but also the largest QA dataset for molecular research. A comprehensive evaluation on MoleculeQA for existing molecular LLMs exposes their deficiencies in specific areas and pinpoints several particularly crucial factors for molecular understanding.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exploring the Expertise of Large Language Models in Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering

    physics.comp-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    On the MaScQA benchmark, Claude-3.5-Sonnet and GPT-4o achieve about 84 percent accuracy, while the best open-source models (Llama3-70b, Phi3-14b) reach about 56 and 43 percent.

Pith tools