Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Increasing Diversity While Maintaining Accuracy: Text Data Generation with Large Language Models and Human Interventions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.04140 v1 pith:YVEK4FRA submitted 2023-06-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords datatextaccuracygenerationmodelsdiversityfoundinterventions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) can be used to generate text data for training and evaluating other models. However, creating high-quality datasets with LLMs can be challenging. In this work, we explore human-AI partnerships to facilitate high diversity and accuracy in LLM-based text data generation. We first examine two approaches to diversify text generation: 1) logit suppression, which minimizes the generation of languages that have already been frequently generated, and 2) temperature sampling, which flattens the token sampling probability. We found that diversification approaches can increase data diversity but often at the cost of data accuracy (i.e., text and labels being appropriate for the target domain). To address this issue, we examined two human interventions, 1) label replacement (LR), correcting misaligned labels, and 2) out-of-scope filtering (OOSF), removing instances that are out of the user's domain of interest or to which no considered label applies. With oracle studies, we found that LR increases the absolute accuracy of models trained with diversified datasets by 14.4%. Moreover, we found that some models trained with data generated with LR interventions outperformed LLM-based few-shot classification. In contrast, OOSF was not effective in increasing model accuracy, implying the need for future work in human-in-the-loop text data generation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Synthetic Interaction Data for Scalable Personalization in Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PersonaGym simulates noisy multi-turn user–assistant interactions to build PersonaAtlas, and PPOpt learns to rewrite user prompts from interaction history, improving judged personalization on synthetic benchmarks.

  2. Leak@$k$: Unlearning Does Not Make LLMs Forget Under Probabilistic Decoding

    cs.LG 2025-11 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM unlearning methods that pass greedy-decoding benchmarks leak forgotten facts when the model is sampled repeatedly, and the new leak@k metric quantifies this.

  3. StaAgent: An Agentic Framework for Testing Static Analyzers

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM-powered four-agent framework performs metamorphic testing on static analyzers and reports 64 faulty rule implementations across SpotBugs, SonarQube, ErrorProne, Infer, and PMD.

  4. Software Engineering for Large Language Models: Research Status, Challenges and the Road Ahead

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A literature review organizes LLM development into a six-phase software engineering lifecycle and identifies challenges and research directions for each phase.

Pith tools