Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 118 references

High-temperature and high-pressure study on columbite structured ZnNb2O6

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Under pressures of about 10 GPa, columbite-structured zinc niobate (ZnNb2O6) undergoes a reversible first-order transition to a monoclinic P2/a phase that persists to at least 30 GPa.

desk verdict The uploaded file is the wrong manuscript, so the ZnNb2O6 results exist only as an abstract; send it back for correction before any refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.03658 v1 pith:YVFT3QQD submitted 2025-08-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

A. Tyagi , P. Botella , A. B. Garg , J. Sanchez-Martin , D. Diaz-Anichtchenko , R. Turnbull , S. Anzellini , C. Popescu
show 1 more author
D. Errandonea
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 62.50.-p61.50.Ks
keywords ZnNb2O6columbitestructurehigh-pressurephasetransitionPbcnP2/afirst-orderbulkmodulusRamanspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish how zinc niobate (ZnNb2O6), a ceramic oxide that crystallizes in the orthorhombic columbite structure, responds to heating and to extreme compression. On heating to 873 K the Pbcn structure stays put, with thermal expansion similar to its isomorphs, but under compression at room temperature the paper reports a reversible transition near 10 GPa to a monoclinic phase (space group P2/a) that remains stable up to 30 GPa. The 2.5% jump in unit-cell volume at the transition marks it as first-order, and the paper measures bulk moduli of 165(7) GPa and 230(9) GPa for the two phases. The result matters because columbite-type oxides are a widely studied family for dielectrics and as structural analogs, so a clean pressure-driven transition with known elastic parameters gives a benchmark for predicting how such crystals densify and stiffen under stress.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Pbcn columbite structure, an orthorhombic arrangement in which edge-sharing NbO6 octahedra form the framework, and its pressure-driven distortion into the monoclinic P2/a structure. The argument is carried by comparing three synchronized probes: synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction tracks lattice parameters and unit-cell volume versus pressure, Raman spectroscopy tracks the phonon-mode changes that accompany the transformation, and first-principles calculations test whether the P2/a assignment is energetically plausible. The 2.5% volume discontinuity, the kinks in the lattice-parameter curves, and the Raman-mode changes together identify the transition pressure and its first-order character.

What would settle it

Repeat the compression in a genuinely hydrostatic medium, such as a noble gas (helium or neon), and carry out full Rietveld refinement of the diffraction data across 8–12 GPa. If the volume jump disappears, the transition pressure shifts noticeably with the pressure medium, or the pattern refines better to a different space group, the reported 10 GPa P2/a transition would not stand.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that room-temperature compression of Pbcn columbite ZnNb2O6 produces a reversible, first-order phase transition at about 10 GPa into a monoclinic P2/a structure, which then remains stable to the highest pressure studied (30 GPa). Supporting evidence is drawn from synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy: the diffraction data index to P2/a above the transition, Raman modes show the accompanying changes in phonon behavior, and the lattice parameters and unit-cell volume show a discontinuous ~2.5% collapse at the transition pressure. The paper also reports that the monoclinic phase is substantially stiffer, with a bulk modulus of 230(9) GPa versus 165(7) GPa for the orthorhombic phase, and that both phases compress anisotropically. First-principles calculations are stated to be consistent with the experimental picture.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that ZnNb2O6 transforms at 10 GPa to a monoclinic P2/a phase rests on the assumption that the compression stayed close to hydrostatic up to 30 GPa and that the high-pressure diffraction patterns index unambiguously to P2/a, neither of which the abstract documents.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The monoclinic phase is measurably denser than the orthorhombic phase, and its higher bulk modulus (230(9) GPa versus 165(7) GPa) means the crystal becomes roughly forty percent stiffer after the transition.
  • Because the transition is reversible on decompression, the high-pressure P2/a form cannot be recovered at ambient pressure, so any applications would have to operate under sustained compression.
  • The persistence of the monoclinic phase to 30 GPa provides an experimentally demonstrated pressure ceiling for the stability of the ambient Pbcn structure.
  • The agreement of first-principles calculations with the measured transition behavior supports the reading of the transition as an intrinsic lattice response of this columbite rather than an artifact of the measurement conditions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One extension the paper does not make: comparing this 10 GPa transition with the compression behavior of other columbite-type niobates and tantalates could reveal whether the transition pressure tracks cation size, turning a single-compound result into a systematic predictor for the family.
  • Because this extraction is based on the abstract (the full text supplied with the record belongs to a different manuscript), the pressure-transmitting medium, pressure calibration, and refinement quality behind the P2/a assignment could not be verified, so a reader should treat those details as unconfirmed.
  • A natural follow-up experiment would be to quench compressed samples from above the transition in a large-volume press and search for a metastable monoclinic form at ambient conditions, which would allow property measurements and device-relevant tests that the present in situ study does not attempt.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The abstract describes high-temperature (to 873 K) and high-pressure (to 30 GPa) synchrotron X-ray diffraction and Raman studies of columbite-type ZnNb2O6, reporting thermal stability of the orthorhombic Pbcn phase, a reversible transition to a monoclinic P2/a phase at about 10 GPa with a 2.5% unit-cell volume discontinuity, bulk moduli of 165(7) GPa and 230(9) GPa, anisotropic compression, and consistency with first-principles calculations. The full text supplied with the submission, however, is not this study: it is the text of arXiv:2508.03659v2, a quantum Maxwell demon paper in cond-mat.mes-hall by different authors, and it contains no sample details, experimental methods, diffraction data, refinements, Raman spectra, or DFT calculations related to ZnNb2O6. As submitted, none of the abstract's central claims can be checked against the manuscript record.

Significance. If the reported results were supported by the customary experimental evidence, the claimed reversible Pbcn-to-P2/a transition at about 10 GPa with a 2.5% volume collapse would be a useful contribution to the high-pressure behavior of columbite niobates; the bulk-modulus ordering (stiffer denser monoclinic phase) and the magnitude of the volume discontinuity are internally plausible. However, the manuscript as submitted provides no verifiable basis for any of these results, so the scientific significance cannot be assessed. There are no deposited data, reproducible analysis scripts, or machine-checked derivations to credit in this record.

major comments (2)
  1. [Full text (entire manuscript body)] The body of the submission is the text of arXiv:2508.03659v2, 'Noninvasive and nonadiabatic quantum Maxwell demon,' a cond-mat.mes-hall paper with different authors and subject matter. It contains no description of the ZnNb2O6 sample, pressure cell, pressure-transmitting medium, pressure calibration, synchrotron beamline, Raman setup, diffraction-pattern indexing, Rietveld or Le Bail refinement, equation-of-state fits, or first-principles calculations that the abstract's claims require. Every load-bearing assertion — the 10 GPa phase transition, the P2/a structure assignment, the 2.5% volume discontinuity, the bulk moduli 165(7) and 230(9) GPa, and consistency with DFT — is therefore unsupported in this record. This is a load-bearing defect that cannot be repaired by revising the present body; the correct manuscript would have to be supplied in its entirety.
  2. [Abstract] Independent of the full-text mismatch, the abstract alone omits methodological details necessary to evaluate the transition claim: no pressure-transmitting medium is named, no hydrostaticity assessment is reported, no refinement agreement factors or indexing alternatives are given, and the statement that first-principles calculations 'support consistently' with experiments is made without any computational details or references. If a corrected manuscript is deposited, these details must be included for the phase-transition pressure and the P2/a assignment to be assessable.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'GPa, respectively- We' contains a stray dash and should read 'GPa, respectively. We'.
  2. [Abstract] The monoclinic space group should be typeset as P2₁/a (or explicitly defined) to avoid ambiguity with the non-symmorphic space-group symbol P2/a.
  3. [Title and abstract] The title uses 'columbite structured' while the abstract uses 'columbite-type'; the nomenclature should be made consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the claimed transition, volume discontinuity, and bulk moduli are reported as measurements, and the first-principles statement is an independent consistency check rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The abstract reports measured quantities: a reversible phase transition observed under compression at 10 GPa, a 2.5% unit-cell volume discontinuity, and bulk moduli of 165(7) and 230(9) GPa estimated from diffraction data. These are experimental observations and data reductions, not derivations from an assumed input. The closing statement that 'first-principles calculations support consistently with experimental observations' presents DFT as an independent check; nothing in the abstract indicates that the DFT results were fitted to the diffraction data or that the transition pressure was inserted as an input. There is no visible self-citation chain, uniqueness argument imported from the authors, or ansatz disguised as a first-principles result. Therefore no specific circular step can be identified from the available record. One substantial caveat is outside the circularity definition: the submitted full text is a different manuscript (a quantum Maxwell demon paper, arXiv:2508.03659v2), so the experimental methods, refinements, pressure calibration, and calculation details for the ZnNb2O6 study are absent. That is a completeness or data-integrity limitation, not a circular-reasoning defect, and it does not raise the circularity score. If the correct manuscript were supplied, the circularity pass would still need concrete equations or fit/prediction overlaps to justify any score above 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on fitted equation-of-state parameters (the two bulk moduli, which are outputs of the fit rather than inputs), on standard assumptions about hydrostaticity and diffraction indexing, and on the adequacy of the DFT functional used for the comparison. None of these can be checked because the full text is an unrelated manuscript. No invented entities appear. The ledger is necessarily incomplete relative to a full-text review.

free parameters (2)
  • Bulk modulus of orthorhombic Pbcn phase = 165(7) GPa
    Extracted by fitting an equation of state to pressure-volume data; the abstract does not state the EOS form or whether the pressure derivative was fixed.
  • Bulk modulus of monoclinic P2/a phase = 230(9) GPa
    Same EOS fit procedure applied to the high-pressure phase data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Hydrostatic or near-hydrostatic compression conditions hold up to 30 GPa.
    The transition pressure and structure assignment depend on the pressure medium staying quasi-hydrostatic; the abstract does not name the medium or calibration.
  • domain assumption The high-pressure powder diffraction patterns uniquely index to space group P2/a.
    The monoclinic assignment is asserted from 'diffraction experiments indicating a shift'; no refinement or alternative-space-group discussion is given in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The density-functional calculations use a functional adequate for phase stability of the two polymorphs.
    The claim that calculations 'support consistently' with experiment depends on the choice of exchange-correlation functional, which is not described in the abstract.
  • domain assumption An equation-of-state model (implicitly Birch-Murnaghan type) is appropriate for both phases.
    Bulk moduli are model-dependent outputs of an EOS fit; the abstract does not specify the model or the fixed parameters.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-temperature and high-pressure study on columbite structured ZnNb2O6." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YVFT3QQD

@misc{pith2026250803658,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-temperature and high-pressure study on columbite structured ZnNb2O6},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YVFT3QQD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.03658}
}
read the original abstract

High-temperature and high-pressure experiments were conducted on columbite-type ZnNb2O6, reaching temperatures up to 873 K at ambient pressure and pressures up to 30 GPa at ambient temperature, respectively. Through systematic analysis employing synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy, we examined the crystal structure and phonon behavior. Within the specified temperature range, the orthorhombic phase of ZnNb2O6 (space group: Pbcn) demonstrated notable phase stability, with a thermal expansion coefficient similar to that of isomorphic compounds. Notably, a reversible phase transition was observed under compression at 10 GPa, with diffraction experiments indicating a shift to a monoclinic structure (space group P2/a), which remained stable up to 30 GPa. Changes in Raman modes, lattice parameters, and the unit-cell volume were monitored. A significant 2.5% discontinuity in the unit-cell volume at the phase transition pressure from orthorhombic to monoclinic suggests a first-order phase transition. The bulk moduli of the orthorhombic and monoclinic phases were estimated as 165(7) GPa and 230(9) GPa, respectively- We also found that both phases exhibit an anisotropic response to pressure. Furthermore, first-principles calculations support consistently with experimental observations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Landauer, Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process, IBM J

    R. Landauer, Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process, IBM J. Res. Dev.�, 183 (1961)

    1961

  2. [2]

    C. H. Bennett, The thermodynamics of computation—a review, Int. J. Theor. Phys.��, 905 (1982)

    1982

  3. [3]

    Leff and A

    H. Leff and A. F. Rex, eds.,Maxwell’s Demon 2 En- tropy, Classical and Quantum Information, Computing (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002)

    2002

  4. [4]

    Datta, Nanodevices and Maxwell’s Demon, in Nanoscale Phenomena(Springer, New York, NY, New York, NY, USA, 2008) pp

    S. Datta, Nanodevices and Maxwell’s Demon, in Nanoscale Phenomena(Springer, New York, NY, New York, NY, USA, 2008) pp. 59–81

    2008

  5. [5]

    Maruyama, F

    K. Maruyama, F. Nori, and V. Vedral, Colloquium: The physics of Maxwell’s demon and information, Rev. Mod. Phys.��, 1 (2009)

    2009

  6. [6]

    R. S. Whitney, Illusory cracks in the second law of thermodynamics in quantum nanoelectronics, arxiv:2304.03106 (2023)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Schaller, How Small Can Maxwell’s Demon Be?, in Crossroad of Maxwell Demon(Springer, Cham, Switzer- land, 2024) pp

    G. Schaller, How Small Can Maxwell’s Demon Be?, in Crossroad of Maxwell Demon(Springer, Cham, Switzer- land, 2024) pp. 51–71

    2024

  8. [8]

    de Oliveira Junior, J

    A. de Oliveira Junior, J. B. Brask, and R. Chaves, A Friendly Guide to Exorcising Maxwell’s Demon, PRX Quantum�, 030201 (2025)

    2025

Show all 118 references
  1. [9]

    Toyabe, T

    S. Toyabe, T. Sagawa, M. Ueda, E. Muneyuki, and M. Sano, Experimental demonstration of information- to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality, Nat. Phys.�, 988 (2010)

    2010

  2. [10]

    J. V. Koski, V. F. Maisi, J. P. Pekola, and D. V. Averin, Experimental realization of a Szilard engine with a sin- gle electron, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA���, 13786 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    Chida, S

    K. Chida, S. Desai, K. Nishiguchi, and A. Fujiwara, Power generator driven by Maxwell’s demon, Nat. Com- mun.�, 15310 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Ribezzi-Crivellari and F

    M. Ribezzi-Crivellari and F. Ritort, Large work extrac- tion and the Landauer limit in a continuous Maxwell demon, Nat. Phys.��, 660 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Annby-Andersson, P

    B. Annby-Andersson, P. Samuelsson, V. F. Maisi, and P. P. Potts, Maxwell’s demon in a double quantum dot with continuous charge detection, Phys. Rev. B���, 165404 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Manzano, D

    G. Manzano, D. Subero, O. Maillet, R. Fazio, J. P. Pekola, and ´E. Rold´ an, Thermodynamics of Gambling Demons, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 080603 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Bhattacharyya and C

    D. Bhattacharyya and C. Jarzynski, From a feedback- controlled demon to an information ratchet in a double quantum dot, Phys. Rev. E���, 064101 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Annby-Andersson, D

    B. Annby-Andersson, D. Bhattacharyya, P. Bakhshinezhad, D. Holst, G. De Sousa, C. Jarzynski, P. Samuelsson, and P. P. Potts, Maxwell’s demon across the quantum-to-classical transition, Phys. Rev. Res.�, 043216 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Yan, J.-T

    L.-L. Yan, J.-T. Bu, Q. Zeng, K. Zhang, K.-F. Cui, F. Zhou, S.-L. Su, L. Chen, J. Wang, G. Chen, and M. Feng, Experimental Verification of Demon-Involved Fluctuation Theorems, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 090402 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Aggarwal, A

    K. Aggarwal, A. Rolandi, Y. Yang, J. Hickie, D. Jirovec, A. Ballabio, D. Chrastina, G. Isella, M. T. Mitchi- son, M. Perarnau-Llobet, and N. Ares, Rapid optimal work extraction from a quantum-dot information en- gine, Phys. Rev. Res.�, L032017 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    R. S. Whitney, R. S´ anchez, F. Haupt, and J. Splettstoesser, Thermoelectricity without ab- sorbing energy from the heat sources, Physica E��, 257 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Ptaszy´ nski, Autonomous quantum Maxwell’s demon based on two exchange-coupled quantum dots, Phys

    K. Ptaszy´ nski, Autonomous quantum Maxwell’s demon based on two exchange-coupled quantum dots, Phys. Rev. E��, 012116 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    S´ anchez, P

    R. S´ anchez, P. Samuelsson, and P. P. Potts, Au- tonomous conversion of information to work in quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Research�, 033066 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    I. A. Picatoste and R. S´ anchez, All-thermal reversal of heat currents using qutrits, Phys. Rev. A���, 022210 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Monsel, M

    J. Monsel, M. Acciai, R. S´ anchez, and J. Splettstoesser, Autonomous demon exploiting heat and information at the trajectory level, Phys. Rev. B���, 045419 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    S´ anchez and M

    R. S´ anchez and M. B¨ uttiker, Optimal energy quanta to current conversion, Phys. Rev. B��, 085428 (2011)

    2011

  17. [25]

    Strasberg, G

    P. Strasberg, G. Schaller, T. Brandes, and M. Esposito, Thermodynamics of a physical model implementing a Maxwell demon, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 040601 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    Strasberg, G

    P. Strasberg, G. Schaller, T. L. Schmidt, and M. Es- posito, Fermionic reaction coordinates and their appli- � cation to an autonomous Maxwell demon in the strong- coupling regime, Phys. Rev. B��, 205405 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    P. A. Erdman, B. Bhandari, R. Fazio, J. P. Pekola, and F. Taddei, Absorption refrigerators based on Coulomb- coupled single-electron systems, Phys. Rev. B��, 045433 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Poulsen, M

    K. Poulsen, M. Majland, S. Lloyd, M. Kjaergaard, and N. T. Zinner, Quantum Maxwell’s demon assisted by non-Markovian effects, Phys. Rev. E���, 044141 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Thierschmann, R

    H. Thierschmann, R. S´ anchez, B. Sothmann, F. Arnold, C. Heyn, W. Hansen, H. Buhmann, and L. W. Molenkamp, Three-terminal energy harvester with cou- pled quantum dots, Nat. Nanotechnol.��, 854 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    J. V. Koski, A. Kutvonen, I. M. Khaymovich, T. Ala- Nissila, and J. P. Pekola, On-chip Maxwell’s demon as an information-powered refrigerator, Phys. Rev. Lett. ���, 260602 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    J. M. Horowitz and M. Esposito, Thermodynamics with Continuous Information Flow, Phys. Rev. X�, 031015 (2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    Lloyd, Quantum-mechanical Maxwell’s demon, Phys

    S. Lloyd, Quantum-mechanical Maxwell’s demon, Phys. Rev. A��, 3374 (1997)

    1997

  25. [33]

    T. D. Kieu, The Second Law, Maxwell’s Demon, and Work Derivable from Quantum Heat Engines, Phys. Rev. Lett.��, 140403 (2004)

    2004

  26. [34]

    H. T. Quan, Y. D. Wang, Y.-x. Liu, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Maxwell’s Demon Assisted Thermodynamic Cycle in Superconducting Quantum Circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett.��, 180402 (2006)

    2006

  27. [35]

    H. T. Quan, Y.-x. Liu, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Quantum thermodynamic cycles and quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. E��, 031105 (2007)

    2007

  28. [36]

    Elouard, D

    C. Elouard, D. Herrera-Mart ´ ı, B. Huard, and A. Auff` eves, Extracting Work from Quantum Measure- ment in Maxwell’s Demon Engines, Phys. Rev. Lett. ���, 260603 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    Campisi, J

    M. Campisi, J. Pekola, and R. Fazio, Feedback- controlled heat transport in quantum devices: theory and solid-state experimental proposal, New J. Phys.��, 053027 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Bresque, P

    L. Bresque, P. A. Camati, S. Rogers, K. Murch, A. N. Jordan, and A. Auff` eves, Two-Qubit Engine Fueled by Entanglement and Local Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 120605 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Bhandari, R

    B. Bhandari, R. Czupryniak, P. A. Erdman, and A. N. Jordan, Measurement-Based Quantum Thermal Ma- chines with Feedback Control, Entropy��, 204 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Bresque, D

    L. Bresque, D. Das, and ´E. Rold´ an, Run-and-Tumble Exact Work Statistics in a Lazy Quantum Measurement Engine: Stochastic Information Processing, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 200402 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    P. A. Camati, J. P. S. Peterson, T. B. Batalh˜ ao, K. Mi- cadei, A. M. Souza, R. S. Sarthour, I. S. Oliveira, and R. M. Serra, Experimental Rectification of Entropy Pro- duction by Maxwell’s Demon in a Quantum System, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 240502 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    Cottet, S

    N. Cottet, S. Jezouin, L. Bretheau, P. Campagne- Ibarcq, Q. Ficheux, J. Anders, A. Auff` eves, R. Azouit, P. Rouchon, and B. Huard, Observing a quantum Maxwell demon at work, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. ���, 7561 (2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    Masuyama, K

    Y. Masuyama, K. Funo, Y. Murashita, A. Noguchi, S. Kono, Y. Tabuchi, R. Yamazaki, M. Ueda, and Y. Nakamura, Information-to-work conversion by Maxwell’s demon in a superconducting circuit quantum electrodynamical system, Nat. Commun.�, 1291 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    Najera-Santos, P

    B.-L. Najera-Santos, P. A. Camati, V. M´ etillon, M. Brune, J.-M. Raimond, A. Auff` eves, and I. Dotsenko, Autonomous Maxwell’s demon in a cavity QED system, Phys. Rev. Res.�, 032025 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Dassonneville, C

    R. Dassonneville, C. Elouard, R. Cazali, R. Assouly, A. Bienfait, A. Auff` eves, and B. Huard, Amplifying microwave pulses with a single qubit engine fueled by quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. Res.�, 013228 (2026)

    2026

  38. [46]

    A. N. Jordan and I. A. Siddiqi,Quantum Measurement (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK, 2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    G. T. Landi, M. J. Kewming, M. T. Mitchison, and P. P. Potts, Current Fluctuations in Open Quantum Systems: Bridging the Gap Between Quantum Continuous Mea- surements and Full Counting Statistics, PRX Quantum �, 020201 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Grifoni and P

    M. Grifoni and P. H¨ anggi, Driven quantum tunneling, Phys. Rep.���, 229 (1998)

    1998

  41. [49]

    W. G. van der Wiel, S. De Franceschi, J. M. Elzerman, T. Fujisawa, S. Tarucha, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Elec- tron transport through double quantum dots, Rev. Mod. Phys.��, 1 (2002)

    2002

  42. [50]

    Chatterjee, P

    A. Chatterjee, P. Stevenson, S. De Franceschi, A. Morello, N. P. de Leon, and F. Kuemmeth, Semi- conductor qubits in practice, Nat. Rev. Phys.�, 157 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Field, C

    M. Field, C. G. Smith, M. Pepper, D. A. Ritchie, J. E. F. Frost, G. A. C. Jones, and D. G. Hasko, Measurements of Coulomb blockade with a noninvasive voltage probe, Phys. Rev. Lett.��, 1311 (1993)

    1993

  44. [52]

    Fujisawa, T

    T. Fujisawa, T. Hayashi, R. Tomita, and Y. Hirayama, Bidirectional Counting of Single Electrons, Science���, 1634 (2006)

    2006

  45. [53]

    Gustavsson, R

    S. Gustavsson, R. Leturcq, B. Simoviˇ c, R. Schleser, T. Ihn, P. Studerus, K. Ensslin, D. C. Driscoll, and A. C. Gossard, Counting statistics of single electron transport in a quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett.��, 076605 (2006)

    2006

  46. [54]

    K¨ ung, C

    B. K¨ ung, C. R¨ ossler, M. Beck, M. Marthaler, D. S. Gol- ubev, Y. Utsumi, T. Ihn, and K. Ensslin, Irreversibility on the Level of Single-Electron Tunneling, Phys. Rev. X�, 011001 (2012)

    2012

  47. [55]

    Haldar, M

    S. Haldar, M. Munk, H. Havir, W. Khan, S. Lehmann, C. Thelander, K. A. Dick, P. Samuelsson, P. P. Potts, and V. F. Maisi, Coherence of an electronic two-level system under continuous charge sensing by a quantum dot detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 023601 (2025)

    2025

  48. [56]

    K. D. Petersson, C. G. Smith, D. Anderson, P. Atkinson, G. A. C. Jones, and D. A. Ritchie, Charge and Spin State Readout of a Double Quantum Dot Coupled to a Resonator, Nano Lett.��, 2789 (2010)

    2010

  49. [57]

    M. R. Delbecq, V. Schmitt, F. D. Parmentier, N. Roch, J. J. Viennot, G. F` eve, B. Huard, C. Mora, A. Cottet, and T. Kontos, Coupling a Quantum Dot, Fermionic Leads, and a Microwave Cavity on a Chip, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 256804 (2011)

    2011

  50. [58]

    T. Frey, P. J. Leek, M. Beck, A. Blais, T. Ihn, K. En- sslin, and A. Wallraff, Dipole Coupling of a Double Quantum Dot to a Microwave Resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 046807 (2012). �

    2012

  51. [59]

    K. D. Petersson, L. W. McFaul, M. D. Schroer, M. Jung, J. M. Taylor, A. A. Houck, and J. R. Petta, Circuit quantum electrodynamics with a spin qubit, Nature ���, 380 (2012)

    2012

  52. [60]

    Stehlik, Y.-Y

    J. Stehlik, Y.-Y. Liu, C. M. Quintana, C. Eichler, T. R. Hartke, and J. R. Petta, Fast Charge Sensing of a Cavity-Coupled Double Quantum Dot Using a Joseph- son Parametric Amplifier, Phys. Rev. Appl.�, 014018 (2015)

    2015

  53. [61]

    L. D. Landau, On the theory of energy transmission in collissions. II, Phys. Zs. Sowjet�, 46 (1932)

    1932

  54. [62]

    Zener, Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels, Proc

    C. Zener, Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels, Proc. R. Soc. London A���, 696 (1932)

    1932

  55. [63]

    E. C. G. Stueckelberg, Theorie der unelastischen St¨ osse zwischen Atomen, Helv. Phys. Acta�, 369 (1932)

    1932

  56. [64]

    Majorana, Atomi orientati in campo magnetico vari- abile, Nuovo Cim.�, 43 (1932)

    E. Majorana, Atomi orientati in campo magnetico vari- abile, Nuovo Cim.�, 43 (1932)

    1932

  57. [65]

    Born and V

    M. Born and V. Fock, Beweis des Adiabatensatzes, Z. Phys.��, 165 (1928)

    1928

  58. [66]

    S. N. Shevchenko, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Lan- dau–Zener–St¨ uckelberg interferometry, Phys. Rep.���, 1 (2010)

    2010

  59. [67]

    O. V. Ivakhnenko, S. N. Shevchenko, and F. Nori, Nona- diabatic Landau–Zener–St¨ uckelberg–Majorana transi- tions, dynamics, and interference, Phys. Rep.���, 1 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    Hayashi, T

    T. Hayashi, T. Fujisawa, H. D. Cheong, Y. H. Jeong, and Y. Hirayama, Coherent Manipulation of Electronic States in a Double Quantum Dot, Phys. Rev. Lett.��, 226804 (2003)

    2003

  61. [69]

    J. R. Petta, A. C. Johnson, J. M. Taylor, E. A. Laird, A. Yacoby, M. D. Lukin, C. M. Marcus, M. P. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Coherent Manipulation of Coupled Electron Spins in Semiconductor Quantum Dots, Sci- ence���, 2180 (2005)

    2005

  62. [70]

    Foletti, H

    S. Foletti, H. Bluhm, D. Mahalu, V. Umansky, and A. Yacoby, Universal quantum control of two-electron spin quantum bits using dynamic nuclear polarization, Nat. Phys.�, 903 (2009)

    2009

  63. [71]

    J. R. Petta, H. Lu, and A. C. Gossard, A Coherent Beam Splitter for Electronic Spin States, Science���, 669 (2010)

    2010

  64. [72]

    Dovzhenko, J

    Y. Dovzhenko, J. Stehlik, K. D. Petersson, J. R. Petta, H. Lu, and A. C. Gossard, Nonadiabatic quantum con- trol of a semiconductor charge qubit, Phys. Rev. B��, 161302 (2011)

    2011

  65. [73]

    S. A. Studenikin, G. C. Aers, G. Granger, L. Gau- dreau, A. Kam, P. Zawadzki, Z. R. Wasilewski, and A. S. Sachrajda, Quantum Interference between Three Two- Spin States in a Double Quantum Dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. ���, 226802 (2012)

    2012

  66. [74]

    Cao, H.-O

    G. Cao, H.-O. Li, T. Tu, L. Wang, C. Zhou, M. Xiao, G.- C. Guo, H.-W. Jiang, and G.-P. Guo, Ultrafast universal quantum control of a quantum-dot charge qubit using Landau–Zener–St¨ uckelberg interference, Nat. Commun. �, 1401 (2013)

    2013

  67. [75]

    X.-F. Liu, Y. Matsumoto, T. Fujita, A. Ludwig, A. D. Wieck, and A. Oiwa, Accelerated adiabatic passage of a single electron spin qubit in quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 027002 (2024)

    2024

  68. [76]

    T. H. Oosterkamp, T. Fujisawa, W. G. van der Wiel, K. Ishibashi, R. V. Hijman, S. Tarucha, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Microwave spectroscopy of a quantum- dot molecule, Nature���, 873 (1998)

    1998

  69. [77]

    J. R. Petta, A. C. Johnson, C. M. Marcus, M. P. Han- son, and A. C. Gossard, Manipulation of a single charge in a double quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett.��, 186802 (2004)

    2004

  70. [78]

    Stehlik, Y

    J. Stehlik, Y. Dovzhenko, J. R. Petta, J. R. Johansson, F. Nori, H. Lu, and A. C. Gossard, Landau-Zener-St¨ uck- elberg interferometry of a single electron charge qubit, Phys. Rev. B��, 121303 (2012)

    2012

  71. [79]

    Dupont-Ferrier, B

    E. Dupont-Ferrier, B. Roche, B. Voisin, X. Jehl, R. Wac- quez, M. Vinet, M. Sanquer, and S. De Franceschi, Co- herent Coupling of Two Dopants in a Silicon Nanowire Probed by Landau-Zener-St¨ uckelberg Interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 136802 (2013)

    2013

  72. [80]

    Forster, G

    F. Forster, G. Petersen, S. Manus, P. H¨ anggi, D. Schuh, W. Wegscheider, S. Kohler, and S. Ludwig, Char- acterization of Qubit Dephasing by Landau-Zener- St¨ uckelberg-Majorana Interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. ���, 116803 (2014)

    2014

  73. [81]

    M. F. Gonzalez-Zalba, S. N. Shevchenko, S. Barraud, J. R. Johansson, A. J. Ferguson, F. Nori, and A. C. Betz, Gate-Sensing Coherent Charge Oscillations in a Silicon Field-Effect Transistor, Nano Lett.��, 1614 (2016)

    2016

  74. [82]

    Hecker, L

    K. Hecker, L. Banszerus, A. Sch¨ apers, S. M¨ oller, A. Pe- ters, E. Icking, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C. Volk, and C. Stampfer, Coherent charge oscillations in a bi- layer graphene double quantum dot, Nat. Commun.��, 7911 (2023)

    2023

  75. [83]

    Nakamura, Yu

    Y. Nakamura, Yu. A. Pashkin, and J. S. Tsai, Coher- ent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single- Cooper-pair box, Nature���, 786 (1999)

    1999

  76. [84]

    W. D. Oliver, Y. Yu, J. C. Lee, K. K. Berggren, L. S. Levitov, and T. P. Orlando, Mach-Zehnder Interferom- etry in a Strongly Driven Superconducting Qubit, Sci- ence���, 1653 (2005)

    2005

  77. [85]

    Sillanp¨ a¨ a, T

    M. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, T. Lehtinen, A. Paila, Y. Makhlin, and P. Hakonen, Continuous-Time Monitoring of Landau- Zener Interference in a Cooper-Pair Box, Phys. Rev. Lett.��, 187002 (2006)

    2006

  78. [86]

    C. M. Wilson, T. Duty, F. Persson, M. Sandberg, G. Jo- hansson, and P. Delsing, Coherence Times of Dressed States of a Superconducting Qubit under Extreme Driv- ing, Phys. Rev. Lett.��, 257003 (2007)

    2007

  79. [87]

    Pothier, P

    H. Pothier, P. Lafarge, C. Urbina, D. Esteve, and M. H. Devoret, Single-Electron Pump Based on Charging Ef- fects, Europhys. Lett.��, 249 (1992)

    1992

  80. [88]

    M. R. Buitelaar, V. Kashcheyevs, P. J. Leek, V. I. Talyanskii, C. G. Smith, D. Anderson, G. A. C. Jones, J. Wei, and D. H. Cobden, Adiabatic Charge Pumping in Carbon Nanotube Quantum Dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. ���, 126803 (2008)

    2008

  81. [89]

    Roche, R.-P

    B. Roche, R.-P. Riwar, B. Voisin, E. Dupont-Ferrier, R. Wacquez, M. Vinet, M. Sanquer, J. Splettstoesser, and X. Jehl, A two-atom electron pump, Nat. Commun. �, 1581 (2013)

    2013

  82. [90]

    M. R. Connolly, K. L. Chiu, S. P. Giblin, M. Kataoka, J. D. Fletcher, C. Chua, J. P. Griffiths, G. A. C. Jones, V. I. Fal’ko, C. G. Smith, and T. J. B. M. Janssen, Giga- hertz quantized charge pumping in graphene quantum dots, Nat. Nanotechnol.�, 417–420 (2013)

    2013

  83. [91]

    Kaestner and V

    B. Kaestner and V. Kashcheyevs, Non-adiabatic quan- tized charge pumping with tunable-barrier quantum dots: a review of current progress, Rep. Prog. Phys. ��, 103901 (2015)

    2015

  84. [92]

    Juergens, F

    S. Juergens, F. Haupt, M. Moskalets, and � J. Splettstoesser, Thermoelectric performance of a driven double quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B��, 245423 (2013)

    2013

  85. [93]

    Ferreira, T

    J. Ferreira, T. Jin, J. Mannhart, T. Giamarchi, and M. Filippone, Transport and Nonreciprocity in Moni- tored Quantum Devices: An Exact Study, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 136301 (2024)

    2024

  86. [94]

    Elouard, S

    C. Elouard, S. K. Manikandan, A. N. Jordan, and G. Haack, Revealing the fuel of a quantum continu- ous measurement-based refrigerator, Phys. Rev. E���, 014134 (2026)

    2026

  87. [95]

    S´ anchez, A

    R. S´ anchez, A. N. Singh, A. N. Jordan, and B. Bhandari, Making the virtual real: Measurement-powered tunnel- ing engines, Phys. Rev. B���, 125414 (2026)

    2026

  88. [96]

    Szilard, ¨Uber die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen, Z

    L. Szilard, ¨Uber die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen, Z. Phys.��, 840 (1929); On the decrease of en- tropy in a thermodynamic system by the intervention of intelligent beings, Behav. Sci.�, 301 (1964)

    1929

  89. [97]

    Sagawa and M

    T. Sagawa and M. Ueda, Fluctuation Theorem with In- formation Exchange: Role of Correlations in Stochastic Thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 180602 (2012)

    2012

  90. [98]

    Sagawa and M

    T. Sagawa and M. Ueda, Role of mutual information in entropy production under information exchanges, New J. Phys.��, 125012 (2013)

    2013

  91. [99]

    J. M. Horowitz, T. Sagawa, and J. M. R. Parrondo, Imitating Chemical Motors with Optimal Information Motors, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 010602 (2013)

    2013

  92. [100]

    We add a subscriptγto trajectory-resolved quantities

  93. [101]

    Manzano and R

    G. Manzano and R. Zambrini, Quantum thermodynam- ics under continuous monitoring: A general framework, A VS Quantum Sci.�, 025302 (2022)

    2022

  94. [102]

    P. P. Hofer, M. Perarnau-Llobet, L. D. M. Miranda, G. Haack, R. Silva, J. B. Brask, and N. Brunner, Marko- vian master equations for quantum thermal machines: local versus global approach, New J. Phys.��, 123037 (2017)

    2017

  95. [103]

    J. M. Horowitz, Quantum-trajectory approach to the stochastic thermodynamics of a forced harmonic oscil- lator, Phys. Rev. E��, 031110 (2012)

    2012

  96. [104]

    Elouard, D

    C. Elouard, D. A. Herrera-Mart ´ ı, M. Clusel, and A. Auff` eves, The role of quantum measurement in stochastic thermodynamics, npj Quantum Inf.�, 9 (2017)

    2017

  97. [105]

    Kerremans, P

    T. Kerremans, P. Samuelsson, and P. Potts, Probabilis- tically violating the first law of thermodynamics in a quantum heat engine, SciPost Phys.��, 168 (2022)

    2022

  98. [106]

    See accompanying supplementary material for further details on the protocol equations and on the heuristic model, which includes Refs [117, 118]

  99. [107]

    Benenti, G

    G. Benenti, G. Casati, K. Saito, and R. S. Whitney, Fundamental aspects of steady-state conversion of heat to work at the nanoscale, Phys. Rep.���, 1 (2017)

    2017

  100. [108]

    Ribezzi-Crivellari and F

    M. Ribezzi-Crivellari and F. Ritort, Work extraction, information-content and the Landauer bound in the continuous Maxwell Demon, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.����(8), 084013

  101. [109]

    P. P. Potts and P. Samuelsson, Detailed Fluctua- tion Relation for Arbitrary Measurement and Feedback Schemes, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 210603 (2018)

    2018

  102. [110]

    J. P. Garrahan and F. Ritort, Generalized continuous Maxwell demons, Phys. Rev. E���, 034101 (2023)

    2023

  103. [111]

    K. Liu, M. Nakagawa, and M. Ueda, Maxwell’s de- mon for quantum transport, Phys. Rev. A���, 022436 (2026)

    2026

  104. [112]

    Zubchenko, D

    A. Zubchenko, D. Middlebrooks, T. Rasmussen, L. Lausen, F. Kuemmeth, A. Chatterjee, and J. P. Zwolak, Autonomous bootstrapping of quantum dot de- vices, Phys. Rev. Appl.��, 014072 (2025)

    2025

  105. [113]

    Paurevic, A

    A. Paurevic, A. Sakr, T. Joshi, D. van der Bovenkamp, Q. T. Nicolau, F. A. Zwanenburg, and J. Baugh, Auto- mated tuning and characterization of a single-electron transistor charge sensor, arXiv:2502.02521 (2025)

    2025

  106. [114]

    M. V. Berry, Transitionless quantum driving, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.��, 365303 (2009)

    2009

  107. [115]

    Brange, R

    F. Brange, R. Baruah, and C. Flindt, Adiabatic Cooper pair splitter, Phys. Rev. B���, L081402 (2024)

    2024

  108. [116]

    Campbell and S

    S. Campbell and S. Deffner, Trade-Off Between Speed and Cost in Shortcuts to Adiabaticity, Phys. Rev. Lett. ���, 100601 (2017)

    2017

  109. [117]

    Sprekeler, G

    H. Sprekeler, G. Kießlich, A. Wacker, and E. Sch¨ oll, Coulomb effects in tunneling through a quantum dot stack, Phys. Rev. B��, 125328 (2004)

    2004

  110. [118]

    S´ anchez, G

    R. S´ anchez, G. Platero, and T. Brandes, Resonance Flu- orescence in Transport through Quantum Dots: Noise Properties, Phys. Rev. Lett.��, 146805 (2007). � ������������� �������� �� ���� ������������� �������� �� ���� ������� �� ��� ��������� ��������� �� ��� �������� ������ ...

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.