Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

Double-bottom centrifugal-barrier molecules dancing with four quarks

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bottom-meson pairs form a predicted family of four-quark molecules, including P-wave states that may explain line-shape anomalies in $e^+e^-$ annihilation.

desk verdict Useful but oversold: the systematic bottom-molecule spectrum is worth a refereed look, but several shallow P-wave states flip between bound and resonant as the cutoff varies across the paper's own shown range. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.03647 v1 pith:YVHTX5F5 submitted 2025-05-06 hep-ph hep-ex

Zhi-Peng Wang , Fu-Lai Wang , Guang-Juan Wang , Xiang Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords double-bottomtetraquarkshidden-bottommoleculesone-boson-exchangepotentialcomplexscalingmethodP-waveresonancesexotichadronsopen-bottomcrosssectionsbottommeson
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper predicts a family of exotic four-quark states made from a bottom meson and a bottom anti-meson (or two bottom mesons), held together by light-meson exchange rather than by the usual quark-antiquark or three-quark pattern. It covers both S-wave and P-wave configurations and argues that the P-wave states are stabilized by the centrifugal barrier, appearing as narrow resonances near the $B\bar{B}^*$ and $B^*\bar{B}^*$ thresholds. The authors claim that two such P-wave states with quantum numbers $0(1^{--})$ sit exactly where Belle and Belle II observe anomalous line shapes in $e^+e^-\to B^{(*)}\bar{B}^*$ cross sections, so those anomalies may be the first experimental hint of this spectrum. If correct, the results give LHCb, Belle II, and future facilities concrete masses, widths, and quantum numbers to search for.

What carries the argument

The central tool is the one-boson-exchange (OBE) potential built from effective Lagrangians of heavy-quark and chiral symmetry, with $\sigma$, pion, and vector-meson exchange and a monopole form factor with cutoff $\Lambda=1$ GeV. The complex scaling method (CSM) rotates the radial coordinate by an angle $\theta$, $r\to re^{i\theta}$, so that resonances appear as isolated eigenvalues with complex energies $E_r-i\Gamma_r/2$ that remain fixed as $\theta$ varies, while bound states stay on the negative real energy axis. The G-parity rule relates the particle-particle systems $BB^*$ and $B^*B^*$ to $B\bar{B}^*$ and $B^*\bar{B}^*$, letting one calculation cover both hidden- and open-bottom molecules. The P-wave centrifugal barrier arising from orbital angular momentum is what stabilizes the predicted resonances.

What would settle it

Run a high-statistics energy scan of $e^+e^-\to B\bar{B}^*$ and $B^*\bar{B}^*$ across 10.6–11.0 GeV and look for the predicted narrow $0(1^{--})$ structures; alternatively, compute the P-wave $B\bar{B}^*$ scattering amplitude on the lattice at physical quark masses and check whether a near-threshold pole exists. No such pole in either measurement would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Within a one-boson-exchange model of the $B^{(*)}\bar{B}^*$ and $B^{(*)}B^*$ interactions, solved with the complex scaling method, the paper finds a spectrum of bound states and resonances up to P-wave. The hidden-bottom systems $B\bar{B}^*$ and $B^*\bar{B}^*$ yield five bound states: $0(1^{++})$, $0(0^{-+})$, $0(2^{++})$, $0(0^{-+})$, and $0(1^{--})$, plus P-wave resonances $0(1^{--})$ and $0(2^{--})$ for $B\bar{B}^*$ and $0(3^{--})$ for $B^*\bar{B}^*$. The two $0(1^{--})$ P-wave molecules are the paper's key phenomenological claim: they lie near the $e^+e^-$ thresholds and may account for the line shape anomalies in $e^+e^-$ annihilation. In the open-bottom sector, the G-parity rule gives a $BB^*$ $0(1^+)$ bound state as the bottom analog of $T_{cc}(3875)^+$, a $B^*B^*$ $0(1^+)$ bound state with binding energy 13.9 MeV, and P-wave resonances $BB^*$ $0(0^-)$, $B^*B^*$ $0(1^-)$, and $0(2^-)$.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the assumption that one-boson exchange with a monopole form factor and a cutoff of 1 GeV gives quantitatively reliable forces between bottom mesons near threshold; if the true cutoff were noticeably smaller, the claimed bound states would instead be virtual states or resonances.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The two $0(1^{--})$ states provide a concrete microscopic explanation for the threshold peaks and dips in the Belle and Belle II $e^+e^-\to B^{(*)}\bar{B}^*$ cross sections, so energy scans across 10.6–11.0 GeV can look for them.
  • The $B^*\bar{B}^*$ $0(1^{--})$ state is a shallow P-wave bound state formed mainly by the $^5P_1$ partial-wave attraction plus off-diagonal coupling, making its line shape especially sensitive to threshold kinematics.
  • The $BB^*$ $0(1^+)$ state is the bottom-sector counterpart of the established $T_{cc}(3875)^+$, so a bound state with roughly 14 MeV binding should appear as a narrow peak in $BB^*$ invariant-mass spectra at LHCb.
  • The $B^*B^*$ $0(1^+)$ bound state with 13.9 MeV binding agrees with the independent chiral effective field theory result of 12.6 MeV, giving two approaches a sharp, testable prediction.
  • All predicted resonances are P-wave with widths of a few MeV or less in the bottom sector; this width suppression follows directly from the larger reduced mass, a pattern that can be checked against charm-sector analogues.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the $0(1^{--})$ interpretation is confirmed, it would establish centrifugal-barrier binding as a general mechanism in heavy-quark hadron spectroscopy, extending the charmonium-like cases proposed earlier.
  • The same machinery applied with the same cutoff would predict a mirror set of double-charm states, and comparing charm- and bottom-sector widths would test the inverse-reduced-mass width suppression the paper notes.
  • A dedicated coupled-channel analysis that includes $B\bar{B}$, $B\bar{B}^*$, and $B^*\bar{B}^*$ together could sharpen the $0(1^{--})$ line-shape predictions, since the measured cross sections show cusps that may mix these channels.
  • The cutoff sensitivity shown in the paper's pole-trajectory plot suggests that a lattice QCD calculation of P-wave $B\bar{B}^*$ scattering near the physical pion mass would be a decisive independent check of the bound-versus-resonance classification.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript uses one-boson-exchange (OBE) potentials with a monopole form factor (cutoff Λ = 1 GeV) and the complex scaling method (CSM) to search for bound states and resonances in the B(*)B̄* and B(*)B* systems up to P-wave. It reports a spectrum of hidden-bottom and double-bottom molecular tetraquark candidates, including S-wave and P-wave bound states in the 0(1++), 0(2++), 0(0−+), 0(1−−), and 0(1+) channels, plus several P-wave resonances, and extends the hidden-bottom results to BB*/B*B* using the G-parity rule. The stated motivation is the recent Belle II open-bottom cross-section data, and the authors suggest that two P-wave 0(1−−) molecules may account for line-shape anomalies in e+e− annihilation.

Significance. If the central predictions were robust, this would be a useful systematic survey that adds P-wave double-bottom molecules to the hadron-molecule landscape. The B*B* 0(1+) binding energy of 13.9 MeV being close to the chiral-EFT result of 12.6 MeV is a genuine consistency check, and the tabulated quantum numbers give concrete search benchmarks for LHCb and Belle II. However, the paper's own Fig. 3 and the reported shallow P-wave states show that the bound-versus-resonant classification is regulator-sensitive, and the calculation provides no numerical precision estimates or input-parameter uncertainties. The stress-test concern therefore lands: the specific list of bound states versus resonances in the abstract is more fragile than the presentation suggests.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, §III, and Fig. 3] The central claim—the specific classification of each state as bound or resonant—is not stable under the regulator variations shown in the paper itself. Fig. 3 shows the B B̄* and B* B̄* 0(1−−) poles moving from the resonance sheet to the bound sheet as Λ varies from 0.8 to 1.1 GeV, with the states near threshold at the adopted Λ = 1 GeV. In addition, §III states that the B B̄* 0(0−+) P-wave state has a binding energy of only a few tenths of an MeV and “evolves into a near-threshold resonance when the interaction strength is slightly decreased.” Since no uncertainty band on Λ or on the OBE couplings g_σ, g, β, λ is provided, a few-percent change in the input can move several of the claimed bound states across threshold. Please add a quantitative sensitivity analysis, for example pole trajectories over Λ and over the individual couplings, and either soften the classification claims or explicitly identify which entries are robust only as near-threshold poles.
  2. [§II (Eqs. (2)–(3)) and Table I] No numerical convergence checks or uncertainty estimates are reported. The CSM computation should specify the momentum-grid size or basis truncation and the scaling angle θ, and should demonstrate that the quoted eigenvalues are stable with respect to these choices. Table I quotes energies and half-widths to 0.1 MeV, which is not meaningful for states with binding energies of a few tenths of an MeV unless the numerical error is estimated. Please add convergence tests and a statement of the numerical precision of every pole.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§II after Eq. (3)] “transformated” should be “transformed.”
  2. [Throughout] “cuto ff” appears with a spurious space in several places and should be unified as “cutoff.”
  3. [Introduction] “the heavy-flavor exotic states has grown rapidly” has a subject-verb disagreement; it should be “states … have grown.”
  4. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption appears corrupted: the fragment “1 05801 06001 06201 06401 06601 0680” seems to be a broken axis or caption remnant and should be repaired or removed.
  5. [§IV] “we identity two bound states” should be “we identify two bound states.”
  6. [Fig. 3 caption] Please state explicitly which Riemann sheets Sheet-I and Sheet-II refer to, and correct the grammar of “The circled number 1–4 represent” to “The circled numbers 1–4 represent.”
  7. [§I and §IV] The statement that the two 0(1−−) molecules “may account for the line shape anomalies in e+e− annihilation” is not quantitatively demonstrated by any line-shape calculation or comparison to the Belle/Belle II cross sections; please either add such a comparison or clearly mark this as a conjecture.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the spectrum follows from fixed OBE/CSM equations with externally calibrated inputs, and the Belle II data are motivation only.

full rationale

The central predictions are obtained by solving the complex-scaled Schrödinger equation with a fixed one-boson-exchange potential; no output quantity is fed back as an input. The coupling constants (g_sigma=0.76, g=0.59, beta=0.90, lambda=0.56 GeV^-1) are taken from external determinations [40-42], and the cutoff Lambda=1 GeV is justified by independent successful descriptions of the deuteron, Pc, and Tcc(3875)+ as hadronic molecules [42,46-48]. Although some of those references include the present authors, the calibration targets are external empirical states, not the double-bottom states predicted here, so the use is not circular. The Belle II and Belle cross sections enter only as motivation ('Motivated by these experimental hints'), not as fit constraints; no parameter is adjusted to the line shapes being discussed. The claimed B*B* 0(1+) bound state is cross-checked against chiral effective field theory's 12.6 MeV binding energy [57], an independent benchmark. The regulator sensitivity visible in Fig. 3 is a robustness or correctness concern, not a circularity: changing Lambda changes the pole positions, but the calculation still derives the poles from the stated Hamiltonian rather than assuming them. Therefore the derivation is not equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The predictive content is entirely determined by the OBE + CSM framework. The only hand-set parameter is the cutoff Lambda = 1 GeV; the predicted states are composites of known mesons, so no new fundamental entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • cutoff Lambda = 1 GeV
    Chosen by hand in Section II, motivated by prior deuteron/Pc/Tcc molecular calculations. The predicted spectrum, especially the bound vs resonance classification, shifts with Lambda as shown in Fig. 3, so the existence of specific bound states is conditional on this value.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Heavy quark spin symmetry and chiral/hidden local symmetry effective Lagrangian (Eq. 1) fully determine the B(*) bar B(*)-light meson vertices.
    All potentials are derived from Eq. (1); omitted terms would change the spectrum.
  • domain assumption The B(*) bar B* interaction is dominated by one-boson exchange (sigma, pi, rho, omega) with a monopole form factor and Breit approximation (Eq. 2).
    No two-pion exchange, quark exchange, or coupled-channel effects are included; the paper relies on this standard but incomplete interaction model.
  • ad hoc to paper The common cutoff Lambda = 1 GeV is appropriate for all channels and all exchanged mesons.
    Chosen in Section II by analogy with deuteron/Pc/Tcc studies; the bound-state classification depends on this value (Fig. 3), making it an ad hoc choice for this paper's predictions.
  • domain assumption G-parity rule exactly relates BB*/B*B* interactions to B bar B*/B* bar B* interactions.
    Used in Section II to extend hidden-bottom results to open-bottom systems; ignores isospin breaking and channel-dependent corrections.
  • standard math The ABC theorem guarantees that CSM eigenvalues with theta > arctan(Gamma/2E)/2 correspond to physical resonances.
    Section II; standard math, not a concern.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Double-bottom centrifugal-barrier molecules dancing with four quarks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YVHTX5F5

@misc{pith2026250503647,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Double-bottom centrifugal-barrier molecules dancing with four quarks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YVHTX5F5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.03647}
}
abstract

Motivated by the recent Belle II measurement of the open-bottom cross section, we perform a systematic study of the double-bottom molecular tetraquark spectrum, including both $S$-wave and $P$-wave configurations. Using the one-boson-exchange potential and the complex scaling method, we investigate the $B^{(*)}\bar{B}^*$ and $B^{(*)}B^*$ systems and predict several bound states and resonances. Our analysis reveals a rich spectrum, including $B\bar{B}^*$ ($0(1^{++})$, $0(0^{-+})$), $B^*\bar{B}^*$ ($0(2^{++})$, $0(0^{-+})$, $0(1^{--})$), $BB^*$ ($0(1^+)$), and $B^*B^*$ ($0(1^+)$) bound states, as well as $B\bar{B}^*$ ($0(1^{--})$, $0(2^{--})$), $B^*\bar{B}^*$ ($0(3^{--})$), $BB^*$ ($0(0^-)$), and $B^*B^*$ ($0(1^-)$, $0(2^-)$) resonances. Our results provide theoretical support for the existence of double-bottom tetraquarks and deliver key benchmarks for future searches at LHCb, Belle II, and other experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.03647 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (Color online.) The various open bottom cross section. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: The pole trajectories with the cuto [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Possible hidden-bottom molecular pentaquarks from $P$-wave $\Lambda_bB^{(*)}/\Sigma_b^{(*)}B^{(*)}$ interactions

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    P-wave Lambda_b B(*)/Sigma_b(*) B(*) one-boson-exchange dynamics predicts a spectrum of positive-parity hidden-bottom molecular pentaquark candidates, including Sigma_b B* and Sigma_b* B* bound states and resonances.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys

    M. Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys. Lett. 8, 214 (1964)

    1964

  2. [2]

    Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking

    G. Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. Version 1, CERN-TH-401

  3. [3]

    S. K. Choi et al. [Belle], Observation of a narrow charmonium- like state in exclusive B± → K±π+π− J/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. [BESIII], Observation of a Charged Char- moniumlike Structure in e+e−→ π+π− J/ψ at√s =4.26 GeV ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Bondar et al

    A. Bondar et al. [Belle], Observation of two charged bottomonium-like resonances in Y(5S) decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 122001 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Liu, An overview of XYZ new particles, Chin

    X. Liu, An overview of XYZ new particles, Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 3815 (2014)

    2014

  7. [7]

    Hosaka, T

    A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y . Sakai, and S. Yasui, Exotic hadrons with heavy flavors: X, Y, Z, and related states, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 062C01 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rep. 639, 1 (2016)

    2016

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    J. M. Richard, Exotic hadrons: review and perspectives, Few Body Syst. 57, 1185-1212 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell and E. S. Swanson, Heavy-Quark QCD Exotica, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 143-194 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki, and D. Zieminska, Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015003 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B. S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Y . R. Liu, H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Pen- taquark and tetraquark states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 237 5 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Brambilla, S

    N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C. P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C. Z. Yuan, The XYZ states: Ex- perimental and theoretical status and perspectives, Phys. Rep. 873, 1 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    L. Meng, B. Wang, G. J. Wang and S. L. Zhu, Chiral perturba- tion theory for heavy hadrons and chiral e ffective field theory for heavy hadronic molecules, Phys. Rept. 1019, 1-149 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y . R. Liu and S. L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys. 86, no.2, 026201 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Z. P. Wang, F. L. Wang, G. J. Wang and X. Liu, Probing exotic JPC resonances from deeply bound charmoniumlike molecules: Insights for identifying exotic hadrons, Phys. Rev. D 110, no.5, L051501 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Ohkoda, Y

    S. Ohkoda, Y . Yamaguchi, S. Yasui, K. Sudoh and A. Hosaka, Exotic mesons with double charm and bottom flavor, Phys. Rev. D 86, 034019 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    Ohkoda, Y

    S. Ohkoda, Y . Yamaguchi, S. Yasui, K. Sudoh and A. Hosaka, Exotic Mesons with Hidden Bottom near Thresholds, Phys. Rev. D 86, 014004 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    J. Z. Wang, Z. Y . Lin, B. Wang, L. Meng and S. L. Zhu, Double pole structures of X1(2900) as the P-wave D¯*K* resonances, Phys. Rev. D 110, no.11, 114003 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], Amplitude analysis of the B+ → D+D−K+ decay, Phys. Rev. D102, 112003 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Aubert et al

    B. Aubert et al. [BaBar], Study of the Exclusive Initial-State Radiation Production of the D anti-D System, Phys. Rev. D 76, 111105 (2007)

    2007

  15. [23]

    Z. Y . Lin, J. Z. Wang, J. B. Cheng, L. Meng and S. L. Zhu, Iden- tification of the G(3900) as the P-wave D ¯D∗/ ¯DD∗ resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, no.24, 241903 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    J. L. Lu, M. Song, P. Wang, J. Y . Guo, G. Li and X. Luo, The bound and resonant states ofD(∗)D(∗) and D(∗) ¯D(∗) with the com- plex scaling method, arXiv:2503.05131 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Sakai and Y

    M. Sakai and Y . Yamaguchi, Analysis of bound and reso- nant states of doubly heavy tetraquarks with spin J ≤ 2, arXiv:2503.11134 [hep-ph]

  18. [26]

    X. X. Chen, Z. M. Ding and J. He, Pole trajectories fromS - and P-wave D ¯D∗ interactions, arXiv:2504.15534 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Z. Yu, M. Song, J. Y . Guo, Y . Zhang and G. Li, Probing double hadron resonances by the complex scaling method, Phys. Rev. C 104, no.3, 035201 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Z. F. Sun, J. He, X. Liu, Z. G. Luo and S. L. Zhu, Zb(10610)± and Zb(10650)± as the B∗ ¯B and B∗ ¯B∗ molecular states, Phys. Rev. D 84, 054002 (2011)

    2011

  21. [29]

    L. Zhao, L. Ma and S. L. Zhu, Spin-orbit force, recoil correc- tions, and possible B ¯B∗ and D ¯D∗ molecular states, Phys. Rev. D 89, no.9, 094026 (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    W. Chen, T. G. Steele, H. X. Chen and S. L. Zhu, Mass spectra of Zc and Zb exotic states as hadron molecules, Phys. Rev. D 92, no.5, 054002 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    He, Study of the B ¯B∗/D ¯D∗ bound states in a Bethe-Salpeter approach, Phys

    J. He, Study of the B ¯B∗/D ¯D∗ bound states in a Bethe-Salpeter approach, Phys. Rev. D 90, no.7, 076008 (2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    F. K. Guo, C. Hidalgo-Duque, J. Nieves and M. P. Valder- rama, Consequences of Heavy Quark Symmetries for Hadronic Molecules, Phys. Rev. D 88, 054007 (2013)

    2013

  25. [33]

    V . Baru, E. Epelbaum, A. A. Filin, C. Hanhart, A. V . Nefediev and Q. Wang, Spin partners WbJ from the line shapes of the Zb(10610) and Zb(10650), Phys. Rev. D 99, no.9, 094013 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Mizuk et al

    R. Mizuk et al. [Belle], Measurement of the energy dependence of the e+e− → BB, BB ∗ and B∗B ∗ exclusive cross sections, JHEP 06, 137 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Adachi et al

    I. Adachi et al. [Belle-II], Measurement of the energy depen- dence of the e+e− → BB, BB ∗ , and B∗B ∗ cross sections at Belle II, JHEP 10, 114 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    X. K. Dong, X. H. Mo, P. Wang and C. Z. Yuan, Hadronic cross section of e+e− annihilation at bottomonium energy re- gion, Chin. Phys. C 44, no.8, 083001 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Burdman and J

    G. Burdman and J. F. Donoghue, Union of chiral and heavy quark symmetries, Phys. Lett. B 280, 287-291 (1992)

    1992

  30. [38]

    M. B. Wise, Chiral perturbation theory for hadrons containing a heavy quark, Phys. Rev. D 45, R2188 (1992)

    1992

  31. [39]

    T. M. Yan, H. Y . Cheng, C. Y . Cheung, G. L. Lin, Y . C. Lin and H. L. Yu, Heavy quark symmetry and chiral dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1148-1164 (1992); Phys. Rev. D 55, 5851E (1997)

    1992

  32. [40]

    Z. F. Sun, Z. G. Luo, J. He, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, A note on the B* anti-B, B* anti-B*, D* anti-D, D* anti-D*, molecular states, Chin. Phys. C 36, 194-204 (2012)

    2012

  33. [41]

    Li and S

    N. Li and S. L. Zhu, Isospin breaking, Coupled-channel e ffects and Diagnosis of X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 86, 074022 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    N. Li, Z. F. Sun, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Coupled-channel analysis of the possible D(∗)D(∗), B (∗) B (∗) and D(∗)B (∗) molecular states, Phys. Rev. D 88, no.11, 114008 (2013)

    2013

  35. [43]

    V . B. Berestetsky, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevsky, Quantum Electrodynamics, Pergamon Press, 1982, ISBN 978-0-7506- 3371-0

    1982

  36. [44]

    N. A. Tornqvist, From the deuteron to deusons, an analysis of deuteron-like meson-meson bound-states, Z. Phys. C 61, 525 (1994)

    1994

  37. [45]

    N. A. Tornqvist, On deusons or deuteron-like meson-meson bound-states, Nuovo Cim. Soc. Ital. Fis. 107A, 2471 (1994)

    1994

  38. [46]

    H. C. Urey, F. G. Brickwedde and G. M. Murphy, A Hydrogen Isotope of Mass 2, Phys. Rev. 39, no.1, 164-165 (1932)

    1932

  39. [47]

    Z. C. Yang, Z. F. Sun, J. He, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, The possible hidden-charm molecular baryons composed of anti-charmed meson and charmed baryon, Chin. Phys. C 36, 6-13 (2012)

    2012

  40. [48]

    R. Chen, X. Liu, X. Q. Li and S. L. Zhu, Identifying exotic hidden-charm pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, no.13, 132002 (2015)

    2015

  41. [49]

    Klempt, F

    E. Klempt, F. Bradamante, A. Martin and J. M. Richard, Antin- ucleon nucleon interaction at low energy: Scattering and proto- nium, Phys. Rept. 368, 119-316 (2002)

    2002

  42. [50]

    T. Myo, Y . Kikuchi, H. Masui and K. Kat¯o, Recent development of complex scaling method for many-body resonances and con- tinua in light nuclei, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 79, 1-56 (2014)

    2014

  43. [51]

    Myo and K

    T. Myo and K. Kato, Complex scaling: Physics of unbound light nuclei and perspective, PTEP 2020, no.12, 12A101 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    Moiseyev, Quantum theory of resonances: calculating ener- gies, widths and cross-sections by complex scaling, Phys

    N. Moiseyev, Quantum theory of resonances: calculating ener- gies, widths and cross-sections by complex scaling, Phys. Rept. 302, no.5-6, 212-293 (1998)

    1998

  45. [53]

    Jacob and G

    M. Jacob and G. C. Wick, On the General Theory of Collisions for Particles with Spin, Annals Phys. 7, 404-428 (1959)

    1959

  46. [54]

    Aguilar and J

    J. Aguilar and J. M. Combes, A class of analytic perturbations for one-body schroedinger hamiltonians, Commun. Math. Phys. 22, 269-279 (1971)

    1971

  47. [55]

    Balslev and J

    E. Balslev and J. M. Combes, Spectral properties of many- body schroedinger operators with dilatation-analytic interac- tions, Commun. Math. Phys. 22, 280-294 (1971)

    1971

  48. [56]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark, Nature Phys. 18, 751-754 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    B. Wang, Z. W. Liu and X. Liu, ¯B(∗) ¯B(∗) interactions in chiral effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D99, no.3, 036007 (2019). 6

    2019

  50. [58]

    J. Z. Wang, Z. Y . Lin, J. B. Chen, L. Meng and S. L. Zhu, Emergence of new heavy quarkoniumlike states: Y(10600) and Y(10650), arXiv:2505.02742

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.