Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 68 references

Multivariate Spatial Data Visualization: A Survey

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper surveys recent work on multivariate spatial data visualization and organizes the field into three tasks: feature classification, fusion visualization, and correlation analysis.

desk verdict A competent and useful survey of multivariate spatial data visualization; the three-way taxonomy holds up, but the 'comprehensive' claim is softer than the paper admits. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.11344 v1 pith:YVPKPNWB submitted 2019-08-18 cs.HC cs.CV

Xiangyang He , Yubo Tao , Qirui Wang , Hai Lin This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HCcs.CV
keywords multivariatespatialdatamulti-fieldscientificvisualizationfeatureclassificationfusioncorrelationanalysissurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a survey with a thesis: the recent literature on multivariate spatial data visualization, mainly from 2010 onward, can be organized around three tasks—feature classification, fusion visualization, and correlation analysis. Its goal is to give researchers an up-to-date map of methods in scientific visualization, updating earlier surveys that stopped around 2009–2012. The survey defines multivariate spatial data as fields in which each spatial point carries multiple scalar, vector, or tensor variables, and it shows how each task addresses a distinct difficulty: locating features defined by several variables, presenting several variables in one space without false colors or occlusion, and measuring relationships at different scales. If the taxonomy holds, it gives the field a common vocabulary and exposes the open problems the authors list at the end.

What carries the argument

The central organizing device is the three-part taxonomy of tasks, with two finer structures doing the analytic work. Fusion methods are distinguished by the stage of the visualization pipeline at which variables are combined—before processing (data fusion), after feature extraction (feature fusion), or after separate rendering (image fusion). Correlation methods are distinguished by what relation is measured: voxel gradients or clustering, variable-level statistical or information-theoretic dependence, numerical-value associations, feature correspondences, or hybrid value-variable analysis. These axes let the survey place each cited technique, compare its failure modes, and reveal gaps.

What would settle it

A reader could run a systematic keyword search for multivariate or multi-field visualization papers from 2010 onward and test whether every result can be placed in one of the three task categories; finding a substantial body that fits none of the categories would falsify the taxonomy's completeness claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, on the paper's own terms, is that a comprehensive survey of multivariate spatial data visualization can be organized around three tasks: feature classification, fusion visualization, and correlation analysis. The survey categorizes feature classification into interactive methods (high-dimensional transfer functions, parallel coordinate plots, scatter plot matrices), data-mining methods (clustering, machine-learning classifiers), and topological-structure methods (fiber surfaces, joint contour nets, Reeb spaces). Fusion visualization is split by the visualization pipeline into data fusion, feature fusion, and image fusion. Correlation analysis is split by the relational unit into voxels, variables, numerical values, features, and value-variable hybrids. The paper also states, as part of its contribution, the prospects that follow: topological structures for more than two variables, deep learning for feature classification, local and time-varying correlations, and perceptual evaluation of fusion.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's claim to comprehensiveness rests on the assumption that the major venues and journals it names—IEEE VIS, EuroVis, PacificVis, TVCG, and CGF—contain the important work since 2010, even though no search protocol or inclusion criteria are reported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A new multivariate visualization method can be positioned by asking which of the three tasks it targets and, for fusion, which pipeline stage it acts on; the survey provides the vocabulary for that positioning.
  • Because each fusion stage has characteristic failure modes—ambiguous colors from blending, occlusion from too many features, perceptual load from icons and textures—the survey implies that the choice of stage is a design tradeoff, not a correctness issue.
  • The correlation taxonomy shows that no single method covers all relation types: global variable correlations miss local spatial structure, and numerical-value correlations ignore spatial distributions.
  • The open problems the authors list—topological structures for three or more variables, deep-learning-based classification, local and time-varying correlation, and perceptual evaluation of fusion—follow directly from the gaps in the surveyed methods.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The pipeline-based split of fusion suggests that earlier fusion preserves spatial co-location but risks false colors, while later fusion preserves per-variable appearance but risks occlusion; the paper describes both effects but does not frame them as an explicit tradeoff.
  • The value-variable correlation category implies that subspace and bicluster methods, which cluster variables and spatial points together, are a natural next step for the field; the paper mentions biclustering only as a future direction.
  • One could test the taxonomy's completeness empirically by taking a random sample of papers from the same venues since 2010 and checking whether each can be assigned to exactly one of the three tasks; if many papers straddle categories, the taxonomy would need refinement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a survey of multivariate spatial data visualization, organizing the literature into three main research tasks: feature classification, fusion visualization, and correlation analysis. Feature classification is subdivided into interactive classification, data-mining-based methods, and topological-structure-based methods. Fusion visualization is partitioned by pipeline stage into data fusion, feature fusion, and image fusion. Correlation analysis is divided into correlations among voxels, variables, numerical values, features, and a hybrid value-variable category. The survey covers roughly 60 references from major visualization venues, provides illustrative figures, and closes with suggested future directions involving deep learning, topologically defined features for more than two variables, and perception-aware evaluation.

Significance. If the survey's coverage is accepted as comprehensive, the paper provides a useful organizing framework for a fast-moving subfield and a compact entry point for researchers. The taxonomy is coherent, the cited works are relevant and mostly recent, and the division of fusion methods along the visualization pipeline is a helpful pedagogical device. The paper also correctly identifies open problems, such as topologically extracting features from three or more variables and evaluating perceptually ambiguous fusion results. However, the central claim of comprehensiveness is not fully supported by the manuscript as written, because the literature selection process is undocumented and the only quantitative evidence is explicitly disclaimed as incomplete; the survey is better characterized currently as a valuable but non-reproducible sample of the literature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 1, Fig. 1, Table 1] The claim of a 'comprehensive survey of the state-of-the-art techniques' is load-bearing, but the manuscript provides no reproducible literature selection protocol: no search queries, databases, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or date-boundary rule are stated. The only quantitative support, Fig. 1, is explicitly 'not claimed to be complete,' which weakens the evidence for the comprehensiveness claim. The authors should either report a systematic review methodology or temper the central claim to 'representative survey' or 'overview.'
  2. [Section 1, Table 1, Sections 3.1 and 3.2] The stated temporal scope is inconsistent. Table 1 is introduced as listing 'references published after 2010,' yet the text discusses older works at length, including the 1996 noise-splat method and the 2003 two-level volume rendering example; older foundational works such as Kehrer and Hauser's pre-2012 survey are also used. The paper should clarify whether older work is included as background rather than as part of the 'since 2010' survey, and Table 1's labeling should be corrected or qualified.
  3. [Section 4, Eqs. (1)-(4)] The equations quoted from the literature are mostly consistent with the original sources, but the typesetting of Eq. (2) is problematic: the denominator appears as '||∇f_i · ∇f_j||' rather than the product of the two gradient norms, which changes the mathematical sense. If this is not a transcription artifact, it is an incorrect reproduction of the gradient similarity measure; please verify and correct the formula.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3, Section 3.1] The name 'Carw fis' appears twice and should be 'Crawfis' (reference [10]).
  2. [Section 5] The phrase 'fatal colors' is likely a typo for 'false colors'; please correct it.
  3. [Reference [25]] The title contains 'viusal' and should be 'visual.'
  4. [Section 4.2] The phrase 'Fuchs and Hauser et al. [15]' is redundant because reference [15] has two authors; it should be 'Fuchs and Hauser [15].'
  5. [Reference [2]] The author name 'Akibay, H., May, K.L.' appears to be a misspelling of 'Akiba, H., Ma, K.L.'; please verify against the original publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the survey's taxonomy and literature synthesis are self-contained, and its self-citations do not serve as premises for any derived result.

full rationale

This paper is a literature survey, not a derivation. Its central claim is that it presents a comprehensive survey of multivariate spatial data visualization organized around feature classification, fusion visualization, and correlation analysis. That taxonomy is presented as an organizing scheme for reviewing external literature, and no equation or predicted quantity is derived from fitted inputs. The paper's self-citations, [25] and [59], describe the authors' own prior methods (Biclusters and FeatureNet) as examples within the survey and within future research directions, but neither citation is load-bearing: the survey's structure and the descriptions of other works do not depend on the truth of those self-cited papers. The histogram in Fig. 1 is explicitly 'not claimed to be complete,' which is an evidentiary caveat about the comprehensiveness claim rather than a circular step. The absence of a formal search protocol is a reproducibility limitation, not circularity, because it does not make the survey's content equivalent to its inputs by construction. Overall, no prediction or result reduces to its own definition or to a self-citation chain, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey contains no free parameters and no invented entities. Its technical content is borrowed from the cited literature. The load-bearing assumptions are the organizing taxonomy and the representativeness of the chosen venues and publication window; both are asserted rather than demonstrated. The self-citations ([25], [59]) are ordinary prior-work citations and do not create circularity because no result is derived.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The three-task taxonomy, feature classification, fusion visualization, and correlation analysis, is the right organizing structure for multivariate spatial data visualization.
    The survey's structure and Table 1 are built on this taxonomy, asserted in the introduction without comparison to alternative taxonomies.
  • domain assumption Works published after 2010 in the named venues are representative of recent state-of-the-art multivariate spatial data visualization.
    The paper's scope statement in Section 1 and Table 1 restrict coverage to these venues; Fig. 1 disclaims completeness.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multivariate Spatial Data Visualization: A Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YVPKPNWB

@misc{pith2026190811344,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multivariate Spatial Data Visualization: A Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YVPKPNWB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.11344}
}
read the original abstract

Multivariate spatial data plays an important role in computational science and engineering simulations. The potential features and hidden relationships in multivariate data can assist scientists to gain an in-depth understanding of a scientific process, verify a hypothesis and further discover a new physical or chemical law. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of the state-of-the-art techniques for multivariate spatial data visualization. We first introduce the basic concept and characteristics of multivariate spatial data, and describe three main tasks in multivariate data visualization: feature classification, fusion visualization, and correlation analysis. Finally, we prospect potential research topics for multivariate data visualization according to the current research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Computing in Science & Engineering 9(2), 76–83 (2007)

    Akiba, H., Ma, K.L., Chen, J.H., Hawkes, E.R.: Visualizing multivariate volume data from turbulent combustion simulations. Computing in Science & Engineering 9(2), 76–83 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    In: Proceedings of the 9th Joint Eurographics/IEEE VGTC conference on Visualization, pp

    Akibay, H., May, K.L.: A tri-space visualization interface for analyzing time-varying multivariate volume data. In: Proceedings of the 9th Joint Eurographics/IEEE VGTC conference on Visualization, pp. 115–122. Eurographics Association (2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19(12), 2683–2692 (2013)

    Biswas, A., Dutta, S., Shen, H.W., Woodring, J.: An information-aware framework for exploring multivariate data sets. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19(12), 2683–2692 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Eurographics State of the Art Reports pp

    Borgo, R., Kehrer, J., Chung, D.H., Maguire, E., Laramee, R.S., Hauser, H., Ward, M., Chen, M.: Glyph-based visualization: Foundations, design guidelines, techniques and applications. Eurographics State of the Art Reports pp. 39–63 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    In: Proceedings of the November 12-14, 1963, fall joint computer conference, pp

    Boyell, R.L., Ruston, H.: Hybrid techniques for real-time radar simulation. In: Proceedings of the November 12-14, 1963, fall joint computer conference, pp. 445–458. ACM (1963)

    work page 1963

  6. [6]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20(8), 1100– 1113 (2014)

    Carr, H., Duke, D.: Joint contour nets. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20(8), 1100– 1113 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Computer Graphics Forum 34(3), 241–250 (2015)

    Carr, H., Geng, Z., Tierny, J., Chattopadhyay, A., Knoll, A.: Fiber surfaces: Generalizing isosurfaces to bivariate data. Computer Graphics Forum 34(3), 241–250 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Computational Geometry 24(2), 75–94 (2003)

    Carr, H., Snoeyink, J., Axen, U.: Computing contour trees in all dimensions. Computational Geometry 24(2), 75–94 (2003)

    2003

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 15(6), 1275–1282 (2009)

    Chuang, J., Weiskopf, D., Moller, T.: Hue-preserving color blending. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 15(6), 1275–1282 (2009)

    2009

  2. [10]

    Crawfis, R.: Multivariate volume rendering. Tech. rep., Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (United States) (1996)

    1996

  3. [11]

    The Visual Computer 32(4), 465–478 (2016)

    Ding, Z., Ding, Z., Chen, W., Chen, H., Tao, Y., Li, X., Chen, W.: Visual inspection of multivariate volume data based on multi-class noise sampling. The Visual Computer 32(4), 465–478 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18(12), 2033–2040 (2012)

    Duke, D., Carr, H., Knoll, A., Schunck, N., Nam, H.A., Staszczak, A.: Visualizing nuclear scission through a multifield extension of topological analysis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18(12), 2033–2040 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    In: SIGGRAPH Asia 2017 Symposium on Visualization, p

    Dutta, S., Liu, X., Biswas, A., Shen, H.W., Chen, J.P.: Pointwise information guided visual analysis of time-varying multi-fields. In: SIGGRAPH Asia 2017 Symposium on Visualization, p. 17. ACM (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Foundations of Computational Mathematics, Minneapolis pp

    Edelsbrunner, H., Harer, J.: Jacobi sets of multiple morse functions. Foundations of Computational Mathematics, Minneapolis pp. 37–57 (2002)

    2002

  7. [15]

    Computer Graphics Forum 28(6), 1670–1690 (2009)

    Fuchs, R., Hauser, H.: Visualization of multi-variate scientific data. Computer Graphics Forum 28(6), 1670–1690 (2009)

    2009

  8. [16]

    In: TPCG, pp

    Geng, Z., Duke, D.J., Carr, H., Chattopadhyay, A.: Visual analysis of hurricane data using joint contour net. In: TPCG, pp. 33–40 (2014) Multivariate Spatial Data Visualization: A Survey 15

    2014

  9. [17]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13(6), 1400–1407 (2007)

    Gosink, L., Anderson, J., Bethel, W., Joy, K.: Variable interactions in query-driven visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13(6), 1400–1407 (2007)

    2007

  10. [18]

    In: Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), 2014 IEEE Pacific, pp

    Guo, H., Hong, F., Shu, Q., Zhang, J., Huang, J., Yuan, X.: Scalable lagrangian-based attribute space projection for multivariate unsteady flow data. In: Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), 2014 IEEE Pacific, pp. 33–40. IEEE (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18(9), 1397–1410 (2012)

    Guo, H., Xiao, H., Yuan, X.: Scalable multivariate volume visualization and analysis based on dimension projection and parallel coordinates. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18(9), 1397–1410 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    In: Visualization, 2003

    Hadwiger, M., Berger, C., Hauser, H.: High-quality two-level volume rendering of segmented data sets on consumer graphics hardware. In: Visualization, 2003. VIS 2003. IEEE, pp. 301–308. IEEE (2003)

    2003

  13. [21]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13(6), 1270–1277 (2007)

    Hagh-Shenas, H., Kim, S., Interrante, V., Healey, C.: Weaving versus blending: a quantitative assessment of the infor- mation carrying capacities of two alternative methods for conveying multivariate data with color. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13(...

    2007

  14. [22]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17(12), 1969–1978 (2011)

    Haidacher, M., Bruckner, S., Groller, E.: Volume analysis using multimodal surface similarity. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17(12), 1969–1978 (2011)

    2011

  15. [23]

    Elsevier (2011)

    Han, J., Pei, J., Kamber, M.: Data mining: concepts and techniques. Elsevier (2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    In: Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), 2017 IEEE, pp

    He, W., Liu, X., Shen, H.W., Collis, S.M., Helmus, J.J.: Range likelihood tree: A compact and effective representation for visual exploration of uncertain data sets. In: Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), 2017 IEEE, pp. 151–

    2017

  17. [25]

    In: Visualiza- tion, 2018

    He, X., Tao, Y., Wang, Q., Lin, H.: Biclusters based viusal exploration of multivariate scientific data. In: Visualiza- tion, 2018. VIS Short Paper. IEEE (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20(12), 2545–2554 (2014)

    Hong, F., Lai, C., Guo, H., Shen, E., Yuan, X., Li, S.: Flda: latent dirichlet allocation based unsteady flow analysis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20(12), 2545–2554 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    Computer Graphics Forum 32(3pt3), 341–350 (2013)

    Huettenberger, L., Heine, C., Carr, H., Scheuermann, G., Garth, C.: Towards multifield scalar topology based on pareto optimality. Computer Graphics Forum 32(3pt3), 341–350 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20(12), 2684–2693 (2014)

    Huettenberger, L., Heine, C., Garth, C.: Decomposition and simplification of multivariate data using pareto sets. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20(12), 2684–2693 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    In: Visualization in Medicine and Life Sciences, pp

    Ivanovska, T., Linsen, L.: A user-friendly tool for semi-automated segmentation and surface extraction from color volume data using geometric feature-space operations. In: Visualization in Medicine and Life Sciences, pp. 153–170. Springer (2008)

    2008

  22. [30]

    IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 24(4), 13–17 (2004)

    Johnson, C.: Top scientific visualization research problems. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 24(4), 13–17 (2004)

    2004

  23. [31]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19(3), 495–513 (2013)

    Kehrer, J., Hauser, H.: Visualization and visual analysis of multifaceted scientific data: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19(3), 495–513 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19(12), 2926–2935 (2013)

    Khlebnikov, R., Kainz, B., Steinberger, M., Schmalstieg, D.: Noise-based volume rendering for the visualization of multivariate volumetric data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19(12), 2926–2935 (2013)

    2013

  25. [33]

    In: Proceedings of the conference on Visualization’99: celebrating ten years, pp

    Kirby, R.M., Marmanis, H., Laidlaw, D.H.: Visualizing multivalued data from 2d incompressible flows using concepts from painting. In: Proceedings of the conference on Visualization’99: celebrating ten years, pp. 333–340. IEEE Computer Society Press (1999)

    1999

  26. [34]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 8(3), 270–285 (2002)

    Kniss, J., Kindlmann, G., Hansen, C.: Multidimensional transfer functions for interactive volume rendering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 8(3), 270–285 (2002)

    2002

  27. [35]

    In: Visualization’99

    Kreeger, K.A., Kaufman, A.E.: Mixing translucent polygons with volumes. In: Visualization’99. Proceedings, pp. 191–525. IEEE (1999)

    1999

  28. [36]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12(5) (2006)

    Kruger, J., Schneider, J., Westermann, R.: Clearview: An interactive context preserving hotspot visualization tech- nique. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12(5) (2006)

    2006

  29. [37]

    Kruskal, J.B., Wish, M.: Multidimensional scaling, vol. 11. Sage (1978)

    1978

  30. [38]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18(12), 2122–2129 (2012)

    K¨ uhne, L., Giesen, J., Zhang, Z., Ha, S., Mueller, K.: A data-driven approach to hue-preserving color-blending. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18(12), 2122–2129 (2012)

    2012

  31. [39]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22(1), 955–964 (2016)

    Liu, X., Shen, H.W.: Association analysis for visual exploration of multivariate scientific data sets. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22(1), 955–964 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    Computer Graphics Forum 35(3), 669–691 (2016)

    Ljung, P., Kr¨ uger, J., Groller, E., Hadwiger, M., Hansen, C.D., Ynnerman, A.: State of the art in transfer functions for direct volume rendering. Computer Graphics Forum 35(3), 669–691 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    In: Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), 2017 IEEE, pp

    Lu, K., Shen, H.W.: Multivariate volumetric data analysis and visualization through bottom-up subspace explo- ration. In: Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), 2017 IEEE, pp. 141–150. IEEE (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    Journal of machine learning research 9(Nov), 2579–2605 (2008)

    Maaten, L.v.d., Hinton, G.: Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of machine learning research 9(Nov), 2579–2605 (2008)

    2008

  35. [43]

    IEEE Transactions on Visual- ization and Computer Graphics 17(2), 182–191 (2011)

    Nagaraj, S., Natarajan, V.: Relation-aware isosurface extraction in multifield data. IEEE Transactions on Visual- ization and Computer Graphics 17(2), 182–191 (2011)

    2011

  36. [44]

    Computer Graphics Forum 30(3), 1101–1110 (2011)

    Nagaraj, S., Natarajan, V., Nanjundiah, R.S.: A gradient-based comparison measure for visual analysis of multifield data. Computer Graphics Forum 30(3), 1101–1110 (2011)

    2011

  37. [45]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23(1), 821–830 (2017)

    Rocha, A., Alim, U., Silva, J.D., Sousa, M.C.: Decal-maps: Real-time layering of decals on surfaces for multivariate visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23(1), 821–830 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12(5), 917–924 (2006)

    Sauber, N., Theisel, H., Seidel, H.P.: Multifield-graphs: An approach to visualizing correlations in multifield scalar data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12(5), 917–924 (2006)

    2006

  39. [47]

    Computer Aided Geometric Design 30(6), 521–528 (2013)

    Schneider, D., Heine, C., Carr, H., Scheuermann, G.: Interactive comparison of multifield scalar data based on largest contours. Computer Aided Geometric Design 30(6), 521–528 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14(6), 1475–1482 (2008)

    Schneider, D., Wiebel, A., Carr, H., Hlawitschka, M., Scheuermann, G.: Interactive comparison of scalar fields based on largest contours with applications to flow visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14(6), 1475–1482 (2008)

    2008

  41. [49]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22(1), 877–885 (2016) 16 Xiangyang He et al

    Schroeder, D., Keefe, D.F.: Visualization-by-sketching: An artist’s interface for creating multivariate time-varying data visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22(1), 877–885 (2016) 16 Xiangyang He et al

    2016

  42. [50]

    Com- puter Graphics Forum 34(3), 111–120 (2015)

    Soundararajan, K.P., Schultz, T.: Learning probabilistic transfer functions: A comparative study of classifiers. Com- puter Graphics Forum 34(3), 111–120 (2015)

    2015

  43. [51]

    IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (2018)

    Su, Y., Agrawal, G., Woodring, J., Myers, K., Wendelberger, J., Ahrens, J.: Information guided data sampling and recovery using bitmap indexing. IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    In: Visualization Symposium, 2009

    Sukharev, J., Wang, C., Ma, K.L., Wittenberg, A.T.: Correlation study of time-varying multivariate climate data sets. In: Visualization Symposium, 2009. PacificVis’ 09. IEEE Pacific, pp. 161–168. IEEE (2009)

    2009

  45. [53]

    In: Topological Methods in Data Analysis and Visualization, pp

    Suthambhara, N., Natarajan, V.: Simplification of jacobi sets. In: Topological Methods in Data Analysis and Visualization, pp. 91–102. Springer (2011)

    2011

  46. [54]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23(1), 960–969 (2017)

    Tierny, J., Carr, H.: Jacobi fiber surfaces for bivariate reeb space computation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23(1), 960–969 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    In: Proceedings of the Sixth Joint Eurographics-IEEE TCVG conference on Visualization, pp

    Tzeng, F.Y., Ma, K.L.: A cluster-space visual interface for arbitrary dimensional classification of volume data. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Joint Eurographics-IEEE TCVG conference on Visualization, pp. 17–24. Eurographics Association (2004)

    2004

  48. [56]

    In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE Visualization 2003 (VIS’03), p

    Urness, T., Interrante, V., Marusic, I., Longmire, E., Ganapathisubramani, B.: Effectively visualizing multi-valued flow data using color and texture. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE Visualization 2003 (VIS’03), p. 16. IEEE Computer Society (2003)

    2003

  49. [57]

    Computer Graphics Forum 28(3), 823–830 (2009)

    Van Long, T., Linsen, L.: Multiclustertree: interactive visual exploration of hierarchical clusters in multidimensional multivariate data. Computer Graphics Forum 28(3), 823–830 (2009)

    2009

  50. [58]

    In: Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), 2011 IEEE Pacific, pp

    Wang, C., Yu, H., Grout, R.W., Ma, K.L., Chen, J.H.: Analyzing information transfer in time-varying multivariate data. In: Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), 2011 IEEE Pacific, pp. 99–106. IEEE (2011)

    2011

  51. [59]

    Journal of Visualization 21(3), 443–455 (2018)

    Wang, Q., Tao, Y., Lin, H.: Featurenet: automatic visual summarization of major features in multivariate volume data. Journal of Visualization 21(3), 443–455 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    IEEE Trans- actions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22(1), 807–816 (2016)

    Wang, Z., Seidel, H.P., Weinkauf, T.: Multi-field pattern matching based on sparse feature sampling. IEEE Trans- actions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22(1), 807–816 (2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol

    Wei, T.H., Chen, C.M., Biswas, A.: Efficient local histogram searching via bitmap indexing. In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 34, pp. 81–90. Wiley Online Library (2015)

    2015

  54. [62]

    In: Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), 2017 IEEE, pp

    Wei, T.H., Chen, C.M., Woodring, J., Zhang, H., Shen, H.W.: Efficient distribution-based feature search in multi-field datasets. In: Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), 2017 IEEE, pp. 121–130. IEEE (2017)

    2017

  55. [63]

    Computer Graphics Forum 34(7), 163–172 (2015)

    Wu, F., Chen, G., Huang, J., Tao, Y., Chen, W.: Easyxplorer: A flexible visual exploration approach for multivariate spatial data. Computer Graphics Forum 34(7), 163–172 (2015)

    2015

  56. [64]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23(1), 941–949 (2017)

    Wu, K., Knoll, A., Isaac, B.J., Carr, H., Pascucci, V.: Direct multifield volume ray casting of fiber surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23(1), 941–949 (2017)

    2017

  57. [65]

    In: Volume graphics

    Zhao, X., Kaufman, A.: Multi-dimensional reduction and transfer function design using parallel coordinates. In: Volume graphics. International Symposium on Volume Graphics, p. 69. NIH Public Access (2010)

    2010

  58. [66]

    Computer Graphics Forum 33(3), 151–160 (2014)

    Zhou, L., Hansen, C.: Guideme: Slice-guided semiautomatic multivariate exploration of volumes. Computer Graphics Forum 33(3), 151–160 (2014)

    2014

  59. [67]

    Computers & Graphics 36(6), 596–606 (2012)

    Zhou, L., Schott, M., Hansen, C.: Transfer function combinations. Computers & Graphics 36(6), 596–606 (2012)

    2012

  60. [68]

    IEEE Trans- actions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2017)

    Zhou, L., Weiskopf, D.: Indexed-points parallel coordinates visualization of multivariate correlations. IEEE Trans- actions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.