REVIEW 8 cited by
An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge for LLM Evaluation: Fine-tuned Judge Model is not a General Substitute for GPT-4
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recently, there has been a growing trend of utilizing Large Language Model (LLM) to evaluate the quality of other LLMs. Many studies have fine-tuned judge models based on open-source LLMs for evaluation. While the fine-tuned judge models are claimed to achieve comparable evaluation capability with GPT-4, in this work, we conduct an empirical study of LLM-as-a-Judge. Our findings indicate that although the fine-tuned judge models achieve high performance on in-domain test sets, even surpassing GPT-4, they underperform GPT-4 across several dimensions, including generalizability, fairness and adaptability. We also reveal that the fine-tuned judge model inherently operates as a task-specific classifier, consequently imposing the limitations.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
Chain-of-Models: Cross-Model Auditing for Bias-Robust LLM Judges
Per-bias selection of a cross-family LLM auditor lifts biased-judgment accuracy from 0.805/0.824 baselines to 0.884.
-
On the Effectiveness of LLM-as-a-judge for Code Generation and Summarization
Even the best tested LLM judge, GPT-4-turbo, frequently misjudges code correctness (e.g., 50% of wrong Java functions judged correct) but agrees moderately with humans when judging code summary quality.
-
VLM@school -- Evaluation of AI image understanding on German middle school knowledge
A new German middle school visual question-answering benchmark shows open-weight VLMs score below 45% overall, with especially weak results in music, math, and adversarial questions.
-
LLM-as-a-Judge Scores Are Unreliable Optimization Signals in Closed-Loop Table Recognition
Reference-free LLM judge scores failed to select better table-extraction outputs over eight regeneration iterations on FinTabNet and OmniDocBench; keeping the first output was safest.
-
Towards Reliable Generative AI-Driven Scaffolding: Reducing Hallucinations and Enhancing Quality in Self-Regulated Learning Support
A multi-agent reliability check and an LLM-as-a-judge quality check both reduce hallucinations in AI-generated study scaffolds, with the multi-agent check matching human expert judgments almost perfectly.
-
A Conceptual Framework for AI Capability Evaluations
A descriptive conceptual framework with seven elements (target, task, subject, inputs, instance, measurement, result analysis) for systematizing analysis of AI capability evaluations.
-
(Towards) Scalable Reliable Automated Evaluation with Large Language Models
Multi-LLM pairwise Elo ranking with adjustable consensus thresholds produces rankings of competency profiles that average Spearman ρ≈0.83 with expert judgments.
-
Music Recommendation with Large Language Models: Challenges, Opportunities, and Evaluation
A review and position paper proposing a six-dimension success framework and risk diagnostics for evaluating LLM-based music recommendation systems.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.