Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Intent Detection and Entity Extraction from BioMedical Literature

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.03598 v2 pith:YWUYK2VV submitted 2024-04-04 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords biomedicalapproachesdetectionentityintentliteraturellmsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Biomedical queries have become increasingly prevalent in web searches, reflecting the growing interest in accessing biomedical literature. Despite recent research on large-language models (LLMs) motivated by endeavours to attain generalized intelligence, their efficacy in replacing task and domain-specific natural language understanding approaches remains questionable. In this paper, we address this question by conducting a comprehensive empirical evaluation of intent detection and named entity recognition (NER) tasks from biomedical text. We show that Supervised Fine Tuned approaches are still relevant and more effective than general-purpose LLMs. Biomedical transformer models such as PubMedBERT can surpass ChatGPT on NER task with only 5 supervised examples.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CodeSCM: Causal Analysis for Multi-Modal Code Generation

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A causal framework with latent mediators quantifies how prompt modalities affect code LLMs, finding that input-output examples and function-header names are influential beyond natural language instructions.

Pith tools