Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.09383 v3 pith:YXQ5QOCT submitted 2021-01-23 math.PR

The Lightning Model

classification math.PR
keywords epsilonmodelpercolationdirectedmathbbstronglyvertexinfinite
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce a non-standard model for percolation on the integer lattice $\mathbb Z^2$. Randomly assign to each vertex $a \in \mathbb Z^2$ a potential, denoted $\phi_a$, chosen independently and uniformly from the interval $[0, 1]$. For fixed $\epsilon \in [0,1]$, draw a directed edge from vertex $a$ to a nearest-neighbor vertex $b$ if $\phi_b < \phi_a + \epsilon$, yielding a directed subgraph of the infinite directed graph $\overrightarrow{G}$ whose vertex set is $\mathbb Z^2$, with nearest-neighbor edge set. We define notions of weak and strong percolation for our model, and observe that when $\epsilon = 0$ the model fails to percolate weakly, while for $\epsilon = 1$ it percolates strongly. We show that there is a positive $\epsilon_0$ so that for $0 \le \epsilon \le \epsilon_0$, the model fails to percolate weakly, and that when $\epsilon > p_\text{site}$, the critical probability for standard site percolation in $\mathbb Z^2$, the model percolates strongly. We study the number of infinite strongly connected clusters occurring in a typical configuration. We show that for these models of percolation on directed graphs, there are some subtle issues that do not arise for undirected percolation. Although our model does not have the finite energy property, we are able to show that, as in the standard model, the number of infinite strongly connected clusters is almost surely 0, 1 or $\infty$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.