pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.23231 · v2 · pith:YXVGFMA6new · submitted 2026-01-30 · 📡 eess.IV · cs.LG

Solving Inverse Problems with Flow-based Models via Model Predictive Control

classification 📡 eess.IV cs.LG
keywords controlmodelsflow-basedgenerativeguidanceinversemodelmpc-flow
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Flow-based generative models provide strong unconditional priors for inverse problems, but guiding their dynamics for conditional generation remains challenging. Recent work casts training-free conditional generation in flow models as an optimal control problem; however, solving the resulting trajectory optimisation is computationally and memory intensive, requiring differentiation through the flow dynamics or adjoint solves. We propose MPC-Flow, a model predictive control framework that formulates inverse problem solving with flow-based generative models as a sequence of control sub-problems, enabling practical optimal control-based guidance at inference time. We provide theoretical analysis linking MPC-Flow to the underlying optimal control objective and show how different algorithmic choices yield a spectrum of guidance algorithms, including regimes that avoid backpropagation through the generative model trajectory. We evaluate MPC-Flow on benchmark image restoration tasks, spanning linear and non-linear settings such as in-painting, deblurring, and super-resolution, and demonstrate strong performance and scalability to massive state-of-the-art architectures via training-free guidance of FLUX.2 (32B) in a quantised setting on consumer hardware.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Stability Benchmark of Generative Regularizers for Inverse Problems

    eess.IV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Numerical benchmarks indicate generative regularizers deliver strong reconstructions in some imaging inverse problem settings but can be unstable or problematic under imperfect conditions compared to variational methods.