Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Motion Before Action: Diffusing Object Motion as Manipulation Condition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.09658 v3 pith:YZMNIUPJ submitted 2024-11-14 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords motionactionobjectmanipulationgenerationobservationsrobotbefore
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Inferring object motion representations from observations enhances the performance of robotic manipulation tasks. This paper introduces a new paradigm for robot imitation learning that generates action sequences by reasoning about object motion from visual observations. We propose MBA (Motion Before Action), a novel module that employs two cascaded diffusion processes for object motion generation and robot action generation under object motion guidance. MBA first predicts the future pose sequence of the object based on observations, then uses this sequence as a condition to guide robot action generation. Designed as a plug-and-play component, MBA can be flexibly integrated into existing robotic manipulation policies with diffusion action heads. Extensive experiments in both simulated and real-world environments demonstrate that our approach substantially improves the performance of existing policies across a wide range of manipulation tasks. Project page: https://selen-suyue.github.io/MBApage/

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Detecting Reading-Induced Confusion Using EEG and Eye Tracking

    cs.HC 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Multimodal EEG plus eye tracking classifies reading-induced confusion at 77.3% average weighted accuracy, beating unimodal models by 4-22%, in an 11-participant study.

Pith tools