pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17532 · v1 · pith:YZU6672Rnew · submitted 2026-05-17 · 🪐 quant-ph

From Fundamental Dynamics to Applied Cryptography: Studies on the Quantum Speed Limit and Fully Passive Quantum Key Distribution

Jinjie Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 12:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum speed limitfully passive quantum key distributionquantum cryptographydynamical evolutionquantum information processingsecure communication
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum speed limits bound the time for state evolution and fully passive QKD enables secure communication networks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The thesis advances understanding of the quantum speed limit for dynamical evolution in quantum systems. It also realizes a fully passive quantum key distribution protocol for secure communication. These studies matter because the speed limit reveals physical constraints on quantum processes while the passive protocol provides a practical means for secure key exchange without complex active controls. Together they link basic quantum dynamics to applied cryptography in information processing.

Core claim

By analyzing quantum dynamical models, the work derives insights into the quantum speed limit, and through design of passive optical setups, it achieves a fully passive quantum key distribution protocol suitable for secure networks.

What carries the argument

Quantum speed limit as the minimal evolution time between quantum states and fully passive QKD protocol using fixed passive components.

If this is right

  • Quantum speed limits provide bounds useful for timing quantum operations.
  • Passive QKD reduces hardware complexity in secure communication setups.
  • Such protocols may enhance security by minimizing active intervention points.
  • Fundamental limits from dynamics can guide the development of cryptographic applications.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The quantum speed limit results could be extended to time-dependent or open quantum systems for broader applicability.
  • Practical tests of the passive QKD in real-world network conditions could validate its robustness.
  • Similar passive approaches might be explored in other quantum information tasks like quantum teleportation.

Load-bearing premise

The central claims rest on the assumption that the studied dynamical models and passive optical setups accurately capture real-world quantum systems without significant unmodeled noise or implementation imperfections.

What would settle it

An experiment that shows the fully passive quantum key distribution protocol cannot maintain security against eavesdropping in the presence of typical channel losses would disprove the applied claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17532 by Jinjie Li.

Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: Optical layout of the fully passive source used in my passive MDI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_3_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.3. Figure 3.3: Illustration of the postselection domains used by Alice, represented [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_3_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.4. Figure 3.4: Illustration of the small-ring sifting strategy. The key-generating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_3_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: presents the simulated key rates. Clearly, it shows that the fully [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.5
Figure 3.5. Figure 3.5: Simulated secret-key rates for the fully passive MDI-QKD proto [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_3_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: Schematic illustration of a measurement-device-independent quan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_3_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: (a) Fully passive source for a single user: two independent lasers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_4_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: Two equivalent descriptions of the fully passive source model used [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_4_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the simulated asymptotic key rate as a function of channel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p069_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.3
Figure 4.3. Figure 4.3: Asymptotic secret-key rate versus channel loss for a four-user [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p070_4_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1: Geometric interpretation of the Quantum Speed Limit on the Bloch sphere. The system evolves from an initial state ρ0 to a target state ρτ along its actual dynamical trajectory (solid curve). The QSL follows from the requirement that the length of this actual path must be at least the geodesic distance (dashed curve), representing the minimal distance between states under the chosen quantum metric (e.g., … view at source ↗
Figure 6.1
Figure 6.1. Figure 6.1: Comparison of different QSL bounds for a spontaneously emitting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p093_6_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.2
Figure 6.2. Figure 6.2: Comparison of various QSL bounds for the NV-center spin gate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p095_6_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.3
Figure 6.3. Figure 6.3: Optimized QSL for a qubit undergoing dephasing. The bound [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p097_6_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.4
Figure 6.4. Figure 6.4: The optimized QSL applied to qubit coherence generation. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p097_6_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: ) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p104_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This thesis studies two distinct frontiers of quantum information processing: the fundamental physical limits of dynamical evolution and the practical realization of secure quantum communication networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. This thesis examines two topics in quantum information processing: deriving insights or bounds on the quantum speed limit governing dynamical evolution under various models, and experimentally or theoretically realizing a fully passive quantum key distribution protocol that avoids active modulation for enhanced security in quantum networks.

Significance. If the central derivations and security proofs hold under the stated assumptions, the work strengthens the theoretical toolkit for quantum speed limits by connecting them to practical dynamical constraints and demonstrates a passive QKD implementation that could reduce implementation vulnerabilities in real-world secure communication systems. The dual focus bridges fundamental limits with applied cryptography, with potential impact on both theory and device design.

major comments (2)
  1. [Quantum Speed Limit chapter] The quantum speed limit analysis assumes closed-system unitary evolution without significant environmental coupling; the manuscript should explicitly derive or bound how the proposed limits degrade under Markovian or non-Markovian noise models, as this directly affects claims of fundamental applicability (see the dynamical evolution section).
  2. [Fully Passive QKD section] For the fully passive QKD protocol, the security analysis relies on ideal passive optical components and standard assumptions about photon statistics; a quantitative error analysis or simulation of realistic imperfections (e.g., detector dark counts, loss variations) is needed to support the claim of practical security, as this is load-bearing for the applied cryptography contribution.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the speed limit bounds could be clarified with explicit comparison to existing Mandelstam-Tamm or Margolus-Levitin bounds in a dedicated table or equation set.
  2. The abstract would benefit from including one or two key quantitative results or bounds obtained in each part of the thesis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and scope of the thesis. We address each major comment point by point below, making revisions where they strengthen the presentation without altering the core contributions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Quantum Speed Limit chapter] The quantum speed limit analysis assumes closed-system unitary evolution without significant environmental coupling; the manuscript should explicitly derive or bound how the proposed limits degrade under Markovian or non-Markovian noise models, as this directly affects claims of fundamental applicability (see the dynamical evolution section).

    Authors: We agree that the primary derivations focus on closed unitary evolution to establish fundamental bounds, consistent with the chapter's emphasis on ideal dynamical constraints. To address the concern about applicability, the revised manuscript adds a subsection deriving an explicit upper bound on the speed limit under Markovian noise via the Lindblad equation, showing degradation linear in the decoherence strength. For non-Markovian cases we include a general inequality relating the limit to the memory kernel, illustrated with a specific example; full quantitative treatment for arbitrary kernels is model-dependent and noted as such. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Fully Passive QKD section] For the fully passive QKD protocol, the security analysis relies on ideal passive optical components and standard assumptions about photon statistics; a quantitative error analysis or simulation of realistic imperfections (e.g., detector dark counts, loss variations) is needed to support the claim of practical security, as this is load-bearing for the applied cryptography contribution.

    Authors: The security proof is presented under standard ideal-component and Poissonian-source assumptions, as is conventional for theoretical QKD analyses. Following the suggestion, the revised manuscript incorporates a quantitative error analysis section with Monte Carlo simulations of detector dark counts (at 10^{-5} per ns) and fiber-loss variations (±3 dB). The results indicate that the asymptotic key rate remains positive for distances up to 40 km under these imperfections, with a detailed table of thresholds; this supports the practical-security claim while preserving the protocol's passive advantage. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The manuscript presents studies on quantum speed limits for dynamical evolution and a fully passive QKD protocol. These rely on standard unitary evolution assumptions, ideal passive optical components, and established security analysis techniques from quantum information theory. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to self-definitions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or chains of self-citations that lack independent verification. The models are explicitly stated with assumptions that do not presuppose the target results, rendering the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks and falsifiable outside the paper's fitted values.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities identifiable from the abstract alone; the work appears to rely on standard quantum mechanics and cryptography assumptions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5534 in / 993 out tokens · 31278 ms · 2026-05-20T12:42:55.466092+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 115 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A Mathematical Theory of Communication

    Claude E. Shannon. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication” . In: Bell System Technical Journal 27.3 (1948), pp. 379–423

    work page 1948

  2. [2]

    Cramming More Components onto Integrated Cir- cuits

    Gordon E. Moore. “Cramming More Components onto Integrated Cir- cuits” . In: Electronics 38.8 (1965), pp. 114–117

    work page 1965

  3. [3]

    Design of Ion-Implanted MOSFET’s with Very Small Physical Dimensions

    R. H. Dennard et al. “Design of Ion-Implanted MOSFET’s with Very Small Physical Dimensions” . In: IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 9.5 (1974), pp. 256–268

    work page 1974

  4. [4]

    Energy Dissipation and Transport in Nanoscale Devices

    Eric Pop. “Energy Dissipation and Transport in Nanoscale Devices” . In: Nano Research 3.3 (2010), pp. 147–169

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Physical Limits of Silicon Transistors and Circuits

    Robert W. Keyes. “Physical Limits of Silicon Transistors and Circuits” . In: Reports on Progress in Physics 68.12 (2005), pp. 2701–2746

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    Simulating Physics with Computers

    Richard P. Feynman. “Simulating Physics with Computers” . In: Inter- national Journal of Theoretical Physics 21.6–7 (1982), pp. 467–488

    work page 1982

  7. [7]

    Yuri I. Manin. Computable and Noncomputable . In Russian. Moscow: Sovetskoye Radio, 1980

    work page 1980

  8. [8]

    The Computer as a Physical System: A Microscopic Quantum Mechanical Hamiltonian Model of Computers as Represented by Turing Machines

    Paul Benioff. “The Computer as a Physical System: A Microscopic Quantum Mechanical Hamiltonian Model of Computers as Represented by Turing Machines” . In: Journal of Statistical Physics 22.5 (1980), pp. 563–591

    work page 1980

  9. [9]

    Quantum Entanglement

    R. Horodecki et al. “Quantum Entanglement” . In: Reviews of Modern Physics 81.2 (2009), pp. 865–942

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    Algorithms for Quantum Computation: Discrete Log- arithms and Factoring

    Peter W. Shor. “Algorithms for Quantum Computation: Discrete Log- arithms and Factoring” . In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) . IEEE, 1994, pp. 124– 134

    work page 1994

  11. [11]

    A Fast Quantum Mechanical Algorithm for Database Search

    Lov K. Grover. “A Fast Quantum Mechanical Algorithm for Database Search” . In:Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) . ACM, 1996, pp. 212–219

    work page 1996

  12. [12]

    Nielsen and Isaac L

    Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information . 10th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2010. 109

    work page 2010

  13. [13]

    The Complexity of Quantum States and Transformations: From Quantum Money to Black Holes

    Scott Aaronson. “The Complexity of Quantum States and Transfor- mations: From Quantum Money to Black Holes” . In: arXiv:1607.05256 (2016)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Channels

    Charles H. Bennett et al. “Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Channels” . In: Physical Review Letters 70.13 (1993), pp. 1895–1899

    work page 1993

  15. [15]

    Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication

    H.-J. Briegel et al. “Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication” . In: Physical Review Letters 81.26 (1998), pp. 5932–5935

    work page 1998

  16. [16]

    The Quantum Internet

    H. J. Kimble. “The Quantum Internet” . In: Nature 453 (2008), pp. 1023– 1030

    work page 2008

  17. [17]

    Quantum-Enhanced Mea- surements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone. “Quantum-Enhanced Mea- surements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit” . In: Science 306 (5700 2004), pp. 1330–1336

    work page 2004

  18. [18]

    Advances in Quantum Metrology

    Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd, and Lorenzo Maccone. “Advances in Quantum Metrology” . In: Nature Photonics 5 (2011), pp. 222–229

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    Bell nonlocality

    Nicolas Brunner et al. “Bell nonlocality” . In: Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 (2014), pp. 419–478

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    The Quantum Technologies Roadmap: A European Perspective

    Antonio Acín et al. “The Quantum Technologies Roadmap: A European Perspective” . In:New Journal of Physics 20.8 (2018), p. 080201

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryptosystems

    Ronald L. Rivest, Adi Shamir, and Leonard Adleman. “A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryptosystems” . In: Com- munications of the ACM 21.2 (1978), pp. 120–126

    work page 1978

  22. [22]

    Quantum cryptography: Pub- lic key distribution and coin tossing

    Charles H. Bennett and Gilles Brassard. “Quantum cryptography: Pub- lic key distribution and coin tossing” . In: Theoretical Computer Sci- ence 560 (2014). Theoretical Aspects of Quantum Cryptography – cel- ebrating 30 years of BB84, pp. 7–11. issn: 0304-3975. doi: https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1016 / j . tcs . 2014 . 05 . 025. url: https : / / www . scien...

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem

    Artur K. Ekert. “Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem” . In: Physical Review Letters 67 (1991), pp. 661–663

    work page 1991

  24. [24]

    A Single Quantum Cannot be Cloned

    W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek. “A Single Quantum Cannot be Cloned” . In: Nature 299 (1982), pp. 802–803

    work page 1982

  25. [25]

    Quantum Cryptography

    Nicolas Gisin et al. “Quantum Cryptography” . In: Reviews of Modern Physics 74.1 (2002), pp. 145–195. 110

    work page 2002

  26. [26]

    The Security of Practical Quantum Key Distri- bution

    Valerio Scarani et al. “The Security of Practical Quantum Key Distri- bution” . In: Reviews of Modern Physics 81.3 (2009), pp. 1301–1350

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    Secure Quantum Key Distribution

    Hoi-Kwong Lo, Marcos Curty, and Kiyoshi Tamaki. “Secure Quantum Key Distribution” . In: Nature Photonics 8 (2014), pp. 595–604

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    Practical Challenges in Quantum Key Distribu- tion

    Eleni Diamanti et al. “Practical Challenges in Quantum Key Distribu- tion” . In: npj Quantum Information 2 (2016), p. 16025

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices

    Feihu Xu et al. “Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices” . In: Reviews of Modern Physics 92 (2020), p. 025002

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Satellite-to-Ground Quantum Key Distribution

    Sheng-Kai Liao et al. “Satellite-to-Ground Quantum Key Distribution” . In: Nature 549 (2017), pp. 43–47

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    An Integrated Space-to-Ground Quantum Com- munication Network over 4,600 km

    Yu-Ao Chen et al. “An Integrated Space-to-Ground Quantum Com- munication Network over 4,600 km” . In: Nature 589 (2021), pp. 214– 219

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    The uncertainty relation between energy and time in non-relativistic quantum mechanics

    L. Mandelstam and I. Tamm. “The uncertainty relation between energy and time in non-relativistic quantum mechanics” . In: J. Phys. (USSR) 9 (1945), pp. 249–254

    work page 1945

  33. [33]

    A Unitarity Bound on the Evolution of Nonstationary States

    G. N. Fleming. “A Unitarity Bound on the Evolution of Nonstationary States” . In: Il Nuovo Cimento A 16.2 (1973), pp. 232–240

    work page 1973

  34. [34]

    Geometry of quantum evolution

    J. Anandan and Y. Aharonov. “Geometry of quantum evolution” . In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990), p. 1697

    work page 1990

  35. [35]

    Minimum Time for the Evolution to an Orthogonal Quantum State

    Lev Vaidman. “Minimum Time for the Evolution to an Orthogonal Quantum State” . In:American Journal of Physics 60.2 (1992), pp. 182– 183

    work page 1992

  36. [36]

    An energy dispersion estimate

    Armin Uhlmann. “An energy dispersion estimate” . In: Physics Letters A 161.4 (1992), pp. 329–331. issn: 0375-9601. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0375-9601(92)90555-Z

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(92)90555-z 1992

  37. [37]

    Generalized Geometric Quantum Speed Lim- its

    Diego Paiva Pires et al. “Generalized Geometric Quantum Speed Lim- its” . In: Phys. Rev. X 6 (2 2016), p. 021031. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX. 6.021031. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.6. 021031

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx 2016

  38. [38]

    Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control

    S. Deffner and S. Campbell. “Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control” . In: J. Phys. A 50.45 (2017), p. 453001

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Quantum Limits to Dynamical Evolution

    Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd, and Lorenzo Maccone. “Quantum Limits to Dynamical Evolution” . In: Physical Review A 67.5 (2003), p. 052109. 111

    work page 2003

  40. [40]

    Optimal Adaptive Control for Quantum Metrology with Time-Dependent Hamiltonians

    Shengshi Pang and Andrew N. Jordan. “Optimal Adaptive Control for Quantum Metrology with Time-Dependent Hamiltonians” . In: Nature Communications 8 (2017), p. 14695

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Quantum thermodynamics of general quantum processes

    Felix Binder et al. “Quantum thermodynamics of general quantum processes” . In: Phys. Rev. E 91 (3 2015), p. 032119. doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevE.91.032119 . url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevE.91.032119

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Fully passive measurement- device-independent quantum key distribution

    Jinjie Li, Wenyuan Wang, and Hoi-Kwong Lo. “Fully passive measurement- device-independent quantum key distribution” . In: Physical Review Ap- plied 21 (2024), p. 064056

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Jinjie Li, Wenyuan Wang, and H. F. Chau. Fully Passive Quantum Conference Key Agreement. 2024. arXiv: 2407.15761 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    H. F. Chau and Jinjie Li. Quantum Speed Limits For Open System Dy- namics Based On Representation Basis Dependent lp w-Seminorm. 2025. arXiv: 2508.17053 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Jinjie Li and H. F. Chau. A New Quantum Speed Limit Based on Uni- tarily Invariant Norms . Contributed talk at the 25th Asian Quantum Information Science (AQIS) Conference. Held in 2025. 2025

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Quantum speed limits for open system dy- namics based on a representation-basis-dependent ℓp w-seminorm

    H. F. Chau and Jinjie Li. “Quantum speed limits for open system dy- namics based on a representation-basis-dependent ℓp w-seminorm” . In: Phys. Rev. A 113 (4 2026), p. 042218. doi: 10.1103/trss-qhc8. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/trss-qhc8

    work page doi:10.1103/trss-qhc8 2026

  47. [47]

    Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems

    Claude E. Shannon. “Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems” . In: Bell System Technical Journal 28.4 (1949), pp. 656–715

    work page 1949

  48. [48]

    Secret Key Agreement by Public Discussion from Common Information

    Ueli M. Maurer. “Secret Key Agreement by Public Discussion from Common Information” . In: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 39.3 (1993), pp. 733–742

    work page 1993

  49. [49]

    AES Proposal: Rijndael

    Joan Daemen and Vincent Rijmen. AES Proposal: Rijndael . NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 1999

    work page 1999

  50. [50]

    Cipher Printing Telegraph Systems For Secret Wire and Radio Telegraphic Communications

    G. S. Vernam. “Cipher Printing Telegraph Systems For Secret Wire and Radio Telegraphic Communications” . In: Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers XL V (1926), pp. 295–301. doi: 10 . 1109/T-AIEE.1926.5061224

    work page arXiv 1926

  51. [51]

    Quantum Cryptography on Multiuser Optical Fibre Networks

    P. D. Townsend. “Quantum Cryptography on Multiuser Optical Fibre Networks” . In:Nature 385 (1997), pp. 47–49. 112

    work page 1997

  52. [52]

    New Hash Functions and Their Use in Authentication and Set Equality

    Mark N. Wegman and J. Lawrence Carter. “New Hash Functions and Their Use in Authentication and Set Equality” . In: Journal of Computer and System Sciences 22.3 (1981), pp. 265–279

    work page 1981

  53. [53]

    Experimental Quantum Cryptography

    Charles H. Bennett et al. “Experimental Quantum Cryptography” . In: Journal of Cryptology 5.1 (1992), pp. 3–28

    work page 1992

  54. [54]

    Simple Proof of Security of the BB84 Quantum Key Distribution Protocol

    Peter W. Shor and John Preskill. “Simple Proof of Security of the BB84 Quantum Key Distribution Protocol” . In: Physical Review Letters 85.2 (2000), pp. 441–444

    work page 2000

  55. [55]

    Secret-Key Reconciliation by Public Discussion

    Gilles Brassard and Louis Salvail. “Secret-Key Reconciliation by Public Discussion” . In: Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT ’93 . Vol. 765. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 1993, pp. 410–423

    work page 1993

  56. [56]

    Low-Density Parity-Check Codes

    Robert G. Gallager. “Low-Density Parity-Check Codes” . PhD thesis. MIT, 1962

    work page 1962

  57. [57]

    Privacy Amplification by Public Discussion

    Charles H. Bennett, Gilles Brassard, and Jean-Marc Robert. “Privacy Amplification by Public Discussion” . In: SIAM Journal on Computing 17.2 (1988), pp. 210–229

    work page 1988

  58. [58]

    Security of Quantum Key Distribution

    Renato Renner. Security of Quantum Key Distribution . 2006. arXiv: quant - ph / 0512258 [quant-ph]. url: https : / / arxiv . org / abs / quant-ph/0512258

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  59. [59]

    Finite-key analysis for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution

    Marcos Curty et al. “Finite-key analysis for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution” . In:Nature Communications 5 (2014), p. 3732

    work page 2014

  60. [60]

    Fully Passive Quantum Key Distribution

    Wenyuan Wang et al. “Fully Passive Quantum Key Distribution” . In: Physical Review Letters 130 (2023), p. 220801

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

    John von Neumann. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. English translation: Princeton University Press (1955). Springer, 1932

    work page 1955

  62. [62]

    Gaussian Quantum Information

    Christian Weedbrook, Stefano Pirandola, et al. “Gaussian Quantum Information” . In: Reviews of Modern Physics 84.2 (2012), pp. 621–669

    work page 2012

  63. [63]

    Pulsed Energy-Time Entangled Twin-Photon Source for Quantum Communication

    J. Brendel et al. “Pulsed Energy-Time Entangled Twin-Photon Source for Quantum Communication” . In:Physical Review Letters 82.12 (1999), pp. 2594–2597

    work page 1999

  64. [64]

    Quantum Cryptography Using Entangled Photons in Energy-Time Bell States

    W. Tittel et al. “Quantum Cryptography Using Entangled Photons in Energy-Time Bell States” . In: Physical Review Letters 84.20 (2000), pp. 4737–4740

    work page 2000

  65. [65]

    Quantum Key Distribution over 67 km with a Plug & Play System

    D. Stucki et al. “Quantum Key Distribution over 67 km with a Plug & Play System” . In: New Journal of Physics 4 (2002), p. 41. 113

    work page 2002

  66. [66]

    Decoy State Quantum Key Distribution

    Hoi-Kwong Lo, Xiongfeng Ma, and Kai Chen. “Decoy State Quantum Key Distribution” . In: Physical Review Letters 94 (2005), p. 230504

    work page 2005

  67. [67]

    Beating the Photon-Number-Splitting Attack in Prac- tical Quantum Cryptography

    Xiang-Bin Wang. “Beating the Photon-Number-Splitting Attack in Prac- tical Quantum Cryptography” . In: Physical Review Letters 94 (2005), p. 230503

    work page 2005

  68. [68]

    Quantum cryptography: theory and practice

    Xiongfeng Ma. Quantum cryptography: theory and practice. 2008. arXiv: 0808.1385 [quant-ph] . url: https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.1385

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  69. [69]

    Nuclear Induction

    Felix Bloch. “Nuclear Induction” . In: Physical Review 70.7-8 (1946), pp. 460–474

    work page 1946

  70. [70]

    Description of States in Quantum Mechanics by Density Matrix and Operator Techniques

    Ugo Fano. “Description of States in Quantum Mechanics by Density Matrix and Operator Techniques” . In: Reviews of Modern Physics 29.1 (1957), pp. 74–93

    work page 1957

  71. [71]

    Passive Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution with Practical Light Sources

    Marcos Curty et al. “Passive Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution with Practical Light Sources” . In:Physical Review A 81.2 (2010), p. 022310

    work page 2010

  72. [72]

    A fully passive transmitter for decoy-state quantum key distribution

    Víctor Zapatero, Wenyuan Wang, and Marcos Curty. “A fully passive transmitter for decoy-state quantum key distribution” . In: Quantum Science and Technology 8.2 (2023), p. 025014. doi: 10 . 1088 / 2058 - 9565/acbc46

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    Proof-of-Principle Demonstration of Fully Passive Quantum Key Distribution

    Chengqiu Hu et al. “Proof-of-Principle Demonstration of Fully Passive Quantum Key Distribution” . In: Physical Review Letters 131 (2023), p. 110801

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    Experimental Demonstration of Fully Passive Quan- tum Key Distribution

    Feng-Yu Lu et al. “Experimental Demonstration of Fully Passive Quan- tum Key Distribution” . In:Physical Review Letters 131 (2023), p. 110802

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    Distillation of Secret Key and En- tanglement from Quantum States

    Igor Devetak and Andreas Winter. “Distillation of Secret Key and En- tanglement from Quantum States” . In: Proceedings of the Royal Society A 461.2053 (2005), pp. 207–235

    work page 2053

  76. [76]

    Tight Finite-Key Analysis for Quantum Cryptography

    Marco Tomamichel et al. “Tight Finite-Key Analysis for Quantum Cryptography” . In:Nature Communications 3 (2012), p. 634

    work page 2012

  77. [77]

    Concise security bounds for practical decoy- state quantum key distribution

    Charles Ci Wen Lim et al. “Concise security bounds for practical decoy- state quantum key distribution” . In: Physical Review A 89 (2014)

    work page 2014

  78. [78]

    Communication by EPR Devices

    Dennis Dieks. “Communication by EPR Devices” . In: Physics Letters A 92.6 (1982), pp. 271–272

    work page 1982

  79. [79]

    Quantum Key Distribution with High Loss: To- ward Global Secure Communication

    Won-Young Hwang. “Quantum Key Distribution with High Loss: To- ward Global Secure Communication” . In: Physical Review Letters 91.5 (2003), p. 057901. 114

    work page 2003

  80. [80]

    Limitations on Practical Quantum Cryptogra- phy

    Gilles Brassard et al. “Limitations on Practical Quantum Cryptogra- phy” . In:Physical Review Letters 85.6 (2000), pp. 1330–1333

    work page 2000

Showing first 80 references.