Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

One scalar margin decides whether size-structured equilibria persist, whether the adjoint is solvable, and where optimal harvest thresholds sit.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 23:55 UTC pith:Z2BH6A4R

load-bearing objection Solid pure-theory paper: fixed-flux boundary produces a genuine Dirac-corrected adjoint identity that cleanly unifies closure folds, adjoint resonance, and bang-bang thresholds. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.03790 v1 pith:Z2BH6A4R submitted 2026-07-04 math.AP

Optimal Harvesting of Size-Structured Populations with Environmental Feedback and Fixed Recruitment Flux

Louis Shuo Wang , Jiguang Yu This is my paper
classification math.AP MSC 92D2535L0435Q9249K2049J20
keywords stationary equilibriumadjoint equationfold bifurcationbang-bang controlsize-structured populationsenvironmental feedbackoptimal harvesting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies populations whose individuals grow and die at rates that depend on a single environmental signal built from the whole size distribution, while managers harvest by size and recruitment is fixed as a flux at the lower size boundary. Stationary states reduce to a scalar closure equation; when that equation's derivative equals one the equilibrium folds and uniqueness is lost. Away from those folds, on uniformly nonresonant branches, an optimal stationary harvesting policy exists inside a compact class of bounded-variation controls. The same scalar that governs the fold also equals the loop gain of a boundary-corrected adjoint equation, so the switching function that decides bang-bang harvest thresholds is controlled by a single explicit margin. The result is a unified description of environmental feedback, critical transitions, and optimal size-selective harvest.

Core claim

For the closed-loop size-structured transport system with fixed recruitment flux, the derivative of the scalar closure map equals the loop gain of the boundary-corrected rank-one adjoint. Consequently closure resonance, zero-discount adjoint resonance, and singularity of the Sherman–Morrison reduction are identical, and the switching function that determines optimal harvest thresholds inherits explicit persistence and window-birth criteria from that common margin.

What carries the argument

The forward–adjoint identity B0 = ⟨σ, ψ₀⟩ = Φ′u(E∗), which equates equilibrium sensitivity to the adjoint loop gain after the fixed-flux boundary correction is included in the co-load σ.

Load-bearing premise

The whole admissible control class must stay on a uniformly nonresonant equilibrium branch whose isolating margin never approaches zero; otherwise the continuous sheet used for existence of an optimum ceases to be a single-valued graph.

What would settle it

Compute the discrete closure derivative Φ′h and the discrete adjoint loop gain Bh(0) on a nonresonant stationary pair; if their difference fails to converge to zero while the boundary-corrected co-load is used, the identity is false. Alternatively, omit the Dirac boundary term and check whether a residual of size a(l0)ψ₀(l0) appears.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies a nonlinear size-structured transport equation with distributed harvesting, fixed recruitment flux, and scalar environmental feedback E=⟨χ,x⟩. It proves global well-posedness on L¹ as a forward-complete positive control system, reduces stationary equilibria to the scalar closure E=Φ_u(E), and shows that loss of uniqueness occurs through a generic fold when Φ'_u(E*)=1. On uniformly nonresonant stationary sheets (Assumption 2.4), it establishes existence of an optimal stationary harvesting policy in a compact BV class by the direct method. The first-order system is a boundary-corrected rank-one adjoint; the central identity (Theorem 3.11) equates the adjoint loop gain B_0=⟨σ,ψ_0⟩ with the closure derivative Φ'_u(E*), so that closure resonance, zero-discount adjoint resonance, and Sherman–Morrison singularity coincide. From the switching decomposition S=S_red-Γ_0 ψ_0 the paper derives criteria for single-threshold persistence and tangency birth of harvest windows.

Significance. If the arguments hold, the paper supplies a clean analytical bridge between environmental feedback, equilibrium continuation, and bang–bang harvesting structure for size-structured models with flux-type recruitment. The fixed-flux boundary condition produces a nontrivial Dirac correction in the co-load σ; the identity B_0=Φ'_u(E*) is the load-bearing novelty and is proved by differentiating the stationary flux, justifying W^{1,1} regularity of g*y+a, and integrating by parts against the resolvent ψ_0. The resulting unified scalar margin controls equilibrium sensitivity, adjoint solvability, and threshold geometry. Proofs are written in full (including a detailed frozen-path BV stability appendix), which is a genuine strength for a pure-theory contribution in structured-population control. The main limitation is that optimal-policy existence is restricted to uniformly nonresonant sheets, so the fold regime highlighted in the abstract remains largely open for optimization.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.4, Theorem 3.9] Theorem 3.9 asserts a Banach-space Lagrange multiplier rule under surjectivity of the linearized state–flux–closure map onto X*_adj × ℝ × ℝ, but the proof only sketches invertibility of the transport block (g*≥g_m) and the scalar block (1-Φ'_u(E*)≠0). A short, explicit verification that the joint linearized operator is onto (including the flux constraint and the E-variation through a and m) would make the multiplier existence fully rigorous rather than formal.
  2. [§3.5, Theorems 3.9 and 3.13] The pointwise bang–bang law (Theorem 3.13) and the subsequent threshold geometry require the inactive-BV condition TV(u*)<M_u. If an optimizer saturates TV(u*)=M_u, the variational inequality acquires a total-variation multiplier and the pure bang–bang characterization can fail. The paper should either prove that optima can be chosen with inactive TV, or state the saturated-TV case as an open caveat rather than claiming the pointwise maximum condition unconditionally for local maximizers.
  3. [Assumption 2.4; §5 Discussion] Assumption 2.4 (uniform closure margin γ_cl>0 on the whole U_stat) is essential for continuous dependence of the sheet (Theorem 3.7) and direct-method existence (Theorem 3.8). The abstract and introduction emphasize fold characterization of critical transitions, yet near Φ'_u=1 the sheet ceases to be a graph and Γ_0 becomes singular. Section 5 only sketches a set-valued theory. A clearer separation—what is proved on nonresonant sheets versus what remains open at folds—would align the claims with the theorems and avoid overstating the reach of the optimality results.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Global] Throughout the manuscript many words are concatenated without spaces (e.g., “Westudyanonlinear”, “bang–bangcontrol”, “forward–adjointidentity”). This appears to be a typesetting/export artifact and should be cleaned for readability.
  2. [Figures 1–5] Figures 1–5 are schematic and useful, but axis labels and panel captions in the source are hard to parse; ensure final production figures have legible labels and that the caption block at the end matches the in-text callouts.
  3. [§2–§3] Notation for the environmental map switches among E, ℋ(x), and ⟨χ,x⟩; a single consistent symbol after the introduction would help. Likewise, Φ_u vs Φ(E,η) in the fold theorem should be cross-referenced.
  4. [§3.4, Corollary 3.12] Corollary 3.12 (discount continuation) is useful but slightly buried; a one-sentence pointer in the introduction that r>0 is only a resolvent parameter, not a true discounted objective, would prevent misreading.
  5. [References] Several concurrent self-citations (Wang–Yu 2025–2026) supply background; where they are used only for standard well-posedness or BV facts, a classical reference (e.g., Ambrosio–Fusco–Pallara is already present) would suffice and improve accessibility.
  6. [§3.5] Proposition 3.16–3.17 give practical residual certificates; a brief remark on how a numerical scheme should discretize the Dirac boundary term in σ would make the diagnostic section more actionable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: central identity and existence results are derived self-containedly from characteristics, differentiation, integration by parts, and the direct method.

full rationale

The paper is a pure existence/first-order optimality analysis of a size-structured transport system with fixed-flux recruitment. Stationary profiles are obtained explicitly by characteristics (2.6); the closure map Φ_u and its derivative are computed by direct differentiation and Fubini (Theorem 3.4); fold resonance follows from the standard implicit-function/Taylor argument (Theorem 3.6); continuous dependence of the nonresonant sheet and direct-method existence use only the uniform margin Assumption 2.4 and BV compactness (Theorems 3.7–3.8); the rank-one adjoint is obtained from a constrained Lagrangian with the fixed-flux boundary term (Theorem 3.9); and the load-bearing identity B_0 = ⟨σ, ψ_0⟩ = Φ'_u(E*) is proved by differentiating the stationary flux, verifying (g* y + a)(l_0) = 0, integrating by parts against X_adj, and specializing to ψ_0 = R_0 χ (Theorem 3.11). No parameters are fitted, no prediction is forced by construction, and self-citations supply only concurrent background models; none is invoked as an unproved premise that forces the target identity or the existence claim. The derivation chain is therefore independent of its own conclusions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 2 invented entities

The paper is pure analysis: free parameters are design bounds on the control class, not data fits. Axioms are standard PDE/control hypotheses plus one strong uniform nonresonance condition that keeps the stationary sheet a continuous graph. Invented entities are mathematical constructions (closure map, boundary-corrected co-load, stationary sheet), not physical postulates; they have no independent empirical handle outside the model.

free parameters (3)
  • u_max (harvest intensity bound)
    Upper bound on admissible harvesting rate; chosen by the modeler, enters bang-bang law and admissible set 𝒰_stat.
  • M_u (total-variation bound on stationary controls)
    Compactness parameter that makes 𝒰_stat sequentially compact in L1; existence of an optimum depends on this a-priori bound.
  • γ_cl (uniform closure margin)
    Positive lower bound on |1 − ∂_E Φ_u| on isolating intervals; required by Assumption 2.4 for continuous dependence and direct-method existence.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Growth speed g(E,l) ≥ g_m > 0 with W^{2,∞} regularity and Lipschitz dependence on E (Assumption 2.1).
    Guarantees finite propagation, invertible characteristics, and differentiable frozen profiles; standard for size-structured transport but essential for every estimate.
  • domain assumption Environmental weight χ ∈ L^∞_+ , χ ≢ 0, and χ ∈ W^{1,∞} for adjoint identities (Assumption 2.2).
    Makes the feedback scalar and the co-load well-defined; invoked throughout §§2–3.
  • ad hoc to paper Uniform nonresonance of the selected stationary sheet (Assumption 2.4): |1 − ∂_E Φ_u| ≥ γ_cl > 0 on isolating neighborhoods for all u ∈ 𝒰_stat.
    Strong global gap away from folds; without it Theorems 3.7–3.8 and the continuous sheet used for optimization fail. The paper itself flags the fold case as open.
  • standard math Banach-space Lagrange multiplier rule under surjectivity of the linearized state–flux–closure map (used in Theorem 3.9).
    Standard infinite-dimensional CQ; stated rather than fully verified for every admissible control.
  • standard math BV composition estimate (Lemma A.3) from Ambrosio–Fusco–Pallara measure representation of one-dimensional BV derivatives.
    Underpins the frozen-path L1 stability estimate that closes the well-posedness contraction.
invented entities (2)
  • Boundary-corrected co-load σ (with Dirac term −a(l0)δ_l0) no independent evidence
    purpose: Encodes the fixed-flux sensitivity of the environmental feedback inside the rank-one adjoint equation.
    Mathematical construction forced by the flux boundary condition; the paper shows that omitting the Dirac term produces a detectable residual a(l0)ψ0(l0). No independent physical evidence is claimed.
  • Stationary sheet u ↦ E∗_u over the BV-admissible class no independent evidence
    purpose: Selects a continuous branch of equilibria on which the yield functional is optimized by the direct method.
    Definitional device under Assumption 2.4; ceases to be a graph at folds, which the discussion leaves open.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 30330 in / 3984 out tokens · 41636 ms · 2026-07-11T23:55:37.862262+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study a nonlinear size-structured transport model with distributed harvesting and prescribed recruitment flux, where environmental feedback is determined by a scalar population functional. After establishing global well-posedness on $L^1$, we reduce stationary equilibria to a scalar closure equation. This reduction reveals that loss of equilibrium uniqueness occurs through a generic fold, mathematically characterizing critical population transitions. On uniformly nonresonant equilibrium branches, we prove the existence of optimal stationary harvesting policies via the direct method of the calculus of variations. We then derive a boundary-corrected adjoint equation and establish an identity equating equilibrium sensitivity with the adjoint loop gain. This relation yields explicit criteria for the persistence and creation of optimal harvesting thresholds. Collectively, these results provide a unified analytical framework connecting environmental feedback, equilibrium structure, and optimal harvesting.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03790 by Jiguang Yu, Louis Shuo Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: E ¤ Environmental Level E E ¤ Clo s u r e ©u(E) y = E ©u(E) 1 ¡ © 0u (E ¤ ) 0 (a) Non-Resonant Closure E ¤ Environmental Level E E ¤ Clo s u r e ©u(E) Singularity: © 0u (E ¤ ) = 1 Loss of local graph structure (b) Fold Resonance ´ ¤ Parameter ´ E ¤ Statio n a ry State E E + (´) E ¡ (´) Fold: ´H 0 EEH 0 (c) Local Normal Form [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: l0 lm Size l 2 ­ 0 Switching Signal lred l ¤ ½Ã Slope bound: mout Single-Threshold Preservation Geometry Perturbation Envelope (§½Ã) Unperturbed Sred(l) Perturbed S(l) = Sred(l) ¡ ¡0Ã0(l) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reflected Optimal Stopping with a Max-Type Payoff: Measure-Valued Stopping Gains and Killed Resolvent Representation

    math.AP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    For reflected diffusion optimal stopping with G=x1∨αx2, the gain Γ is a signed measure with singular diagonal part −(n⊤an)/(2√(1+α²))σΔ, and V=G−R_C^r Γ (killed at first entry to the stopping set).

  2. Multiplier Sensitivity in Isoperimetric Optimal Control

    math.AP 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Under stated convexity and attainability conditions, the isoperimetric Pontryagin multiplier is the negative supergradient of the constrained value function, and this sensitivity can survive when the modified control-...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Springer, 2014

    Johan A Metz and Odo Diekmann.The dynamics of physiologically structured populations. Springer, 2014

    2014

  2. [2]

    Non-linear age-dependent population dynamics.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 54(3):281–300, 1974

    Morton E Gurtin and Richard C MacCamy. Non-linear age-dependent population dynamics.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 54(3):281–300, 1974. 12

    1974

  3. [3]

    CRC Press, 1985

    Glenn F Webb.Theory of nonlinear age-dependent population dynamics. CRC Press, 1985

    1985

  4. [4]

    Mathematical theory of age-structured population dynamics.Giardini Editori e Stampatori in Pisa, 1995

    M IANNELLI. Mathematical theory of age-structured population dynamics.Giardini Editori e Stampatori in Pisa, 1995

    1995

  5. [5]

    Analysis framework for stochastic predator–prey model with demographic noise.Results in Applied Mathematics, 27:100621, 2025

    Louis Shuo Wang and Jiguang Yu. Analysis framework for stochastic predator–prey model with demographic noise.Results in Applied Mathematics, 27:100621, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Springer, 2007

    Benoît Perthame.Transport equations in biology. Springer, 2007

    2007

  7. [7]

    Springer, 2018

    Pierre Magal, Shigui Ruan, et al.Theory and applications of abstract semilinear Cauchy problems, volume 201. Springer, 2018

    2018

  8. [8]

    SIAM, 1998

    Jim Michael Cushing.An introduction to structured population dynamics. SIAM, 1998

    1998

  9. [9]

    Multiscale population dynamics in reproductive biology: singular perturbation reduction in deterministic and stochastic models.ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys, 67:72–99, 2020

    Celine Bonnet, Keltoum Chahour, Frédérique Clément, Marie Postel, and Romain Yvinec. Multiscale population dynamics in reproductive biology: singular perturbation reduction in deterministic and stochastic models.ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys, 67:72–99, 2020

    2020

  10. [10]

    From microscopic damage to macroscopic games: a dimensionality reduction of stem cell homeostasis.Transport Phenomena, 1(2):20260037, 2026

    Jiguang Yu, Louis Shuo Wang, Shihan Ban, and Ye Liang. From microscopic damage to macroscopic games: a dimensionality reduction of stem cell homeostasis.Transport Phenomena, 1(2):20260037, 2026

    2026

  11. [11]

    A structured population model of cell differentiation.SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 71(6):1918–1940, 2011

    Marie Doumic, Anna Marciniak-Czochra, Benoît Perthame, and Jorge P Zubelli. A structured population model of cell differentiation.SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 71(6):1918–1940, 2011

    1918

  12. [12]

    Globalwell-posednessandstabilityofnonlocaldamage-structuredlineagemodel with feedback and dedifferentiation.Mathematics, 13(22):3583, 2025

    YeLiang,LouisShuoWang,JiguangYu,andZonghaoLiu. Globalwell-posednessandstabilityofnonlocaldamage-structuredlineagemodel with feedback and dedifferentiation.Mathematics, 13(22):3583, 2025

    2025

  13. [13]

    Production, development, and maturation of red blood cells: a mathematical model

    Annette Grabosch and Henk JAM Heijmans. Production, development, and maturation of red blood cells: a mathematical model. In Mathematical population dynamics, pages 189–210. CRC Press, 2020

    2020

  14. [14]

    A damage-structured pde model of stem cell hierarchies: The dual role of dedifferentiation in tissue homeostasis and aging.Plos one, 21(2):e0335163, 2026

    Louis Shuo Wang, Jiguang Yu, and Zonghao Liu. A damage-structured pde model of stem cell hierarchies: The dual role of dedifferentiation in tissue homeostasis and aging.Plos one, 21(2):e0335163, 2026

    2026

  15. [15]

    LouisShuoWang,JiguangYu,ShijiaLi,andZonghaoLiu.Analysisandmean-fieldlimitofahybridpde-abmmodelingangiogenesis-regulated resistance evolution.Mathematics, 13(17):2898, 2025

    2025

  16. [16]

    HorstRThieme. Well-posednessofphysiologicallystructuredpopulationmodelsfordaphniamagna:Howbiologicalconceptscanbenefitby abstract mathematical analysis.Journal of Mathematical Biology, 26(3):299–317, 1988

    1988

  17. [17]

    Global dynamics in sea lice model with stage structure.Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 44:283–304, 2018

    Yun Tian, Isam Al-Darabsah, and Yuan Yuan. Global dynamics in sea lice model with stage structure.Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 44:283–304, 2018

    2018

  18. [18]

    Bidirectionalendothelialfeedbackdrivesturing-vascular patterning and drug-resistance niches: a hybrid pde-agent-based study.Bioengineering, 12(10):1097, 2025

    ZonghaoLiu,LouisShuoWang,JiguangYu,JilinZhang,EricaMartel,andShijiaLi. Bidirectionalendothelialfeedbackdrivesturing-vascular patterning and drug-resistance niches: a hybrid pde-agent-based study.Bioengineering, 12(10):1097, 2025

    2025

  19. [19]

    Controllabilityforascalarconservationlawwithnonlocalvelocity.JournalofDifferentialEquations, 252(1):181–201, 2012

    Jean-MichelCoronandZhiqiangWang. Controllabilityforascalarconservationlawwithnonlocalvelocity.JournalofDifferentialEquations, 252(1):181–201, 2012

    2012

  20. [20]

    Controllability for a highly re-entrant manufacturing system with local and nonlocal velocity.European Journal of Control, 67:100716, 2022

    Qiongyuan Li and Peipei Shang. Controllability for a highly re-entrant manufacturing system with local and nonlocal velocity.European Journal of Control, 67:100716, 2022

    2022

  21. [21]

    Analysis and control of a scalar conservation law modeling a highly re-entrant manufacturing system

    Peipei Shang and Zhiqiang Wang. Analysis and control of a scalar conservation law modeling a highly re-entrant manufacturing system. Journal of Differential Equations, 250(2):949–982, 2011

    2011

  22. [22]

    Algebraic–spectralthresholdsanddiscrete–continuousstabilitytransferinleslie–gowersystems.Electronic Research Archive, 34(1):251–290, 2026

    LouisShuoWangandJiguangYu. Algebraic–spectralthresholdsanddiscrete–continuousstabilitytransferinleslie–gowersystems.Electronic Research Archive, 34(1):251–290, 2026

    2026

  23. [23]

    Amodelofphysiologicallystructuredpopulationdynamicswithanonlinearindividualgrowthrate.Journal of Mathematical Biology, 33(4):335–364, 1995

    ÀngelCalsinaandJoanSaldaña. Amodelofphysiologicallystructuredpopulationdynamicswithanonlinearindividualgrowthrate.Journal of Mathematical Biology, 33(4):335–364, 1995

    1995

  24. [24]

    A general model of size-dependent population dynamics with nonlinear growth rate.Journal of mathematical analysis and applications, 297(1):234–256, 2004

    Nobuyuki Kato. A general model of size-dependent population dynamics with nonlinear growth rate.Journal of mathematical analysis and applications, 297(1):234–256, 2004

    2004

  25. [25]

    Rigorous analysis of a nonlocal transport–renewal system for physiologically structured populations.Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, 2026

    Jiguang Yu, Louis Shuo Wang, and Ye Liang. Rigorous analysis of a nonlocal transport–renewal system for physiologically structured populations.Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, 2026

    2026

  26. [26]

    Optimal harvesting for nonlinear size-structured populations with nonlocal environmental feedback.Mathematics, 14(11):2025, 2026

    Cai Jie, Xiaoyang Chen, Gu Longfei, Chen Jiayao, Chu Nuo, Louis Shuo Wang, Liang Ye, and Yu Jiguang. Optimal harvesting for nonlinear size-structured populations with nonlocal environmental feedback.Mathematics, 14(11):2025, 2026

    2025

  27. [27]

    Optimalcontrolofcoffeeberryborers:synergy between bio-insecticide and traps.Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 196(3):882–899, 2023

    YvesFotsoFotso,SuzanneTouzeau,FrédéricGrognard,BergeTsanou,andSamuelBowong. Optimalcontrolofcoffeeberryborers:synergy between bio-insecticide and traps.Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 196(3):882–899, 2023

    2023

  28. [28]

    AzmyAckleh,BaolingMa,andRobertMiller.Ageneralnonlinearmodelfortheinteractionofasize-structuredpopulationanditsenvironment: well-posedness and approximation.Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 74(4):671–704, 2016

    2016

  29. [29]

    A population harvesting model with time and size competition dependence function.Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 195(2):647–665, 2022

    Bedreddine Ainseba, Loïc Louison, and Abdennebi Omrane. A population harvesting model with time and size competition dependence function.Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 195(2):647–665, 2022

    2022

  30. [30]

    JiguangYu,LouisShuoWang,ZonghaoLiu,andJingfengLiu. Patternsuppressionandrecoveryunderone-wayversustwo-waychemotactic coupling in hybrid partial differential equation–ordinary differential equation models.Transport Phenomena, (0), 2026

    2026

  31. [31]

    An adaptative model for a multistage structured population under fluctuating environment.Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems-Series B, 25(6), 2020

    B Ainseba and SM Bouguima. An adaptative model for a multistage structured population under fluctuating environment.Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems-Series B, 25(6), 2020

    2020

  32. [32]

    Well-posedness and bifurcation analysis of a size-structured population model: Application to female gametes dynamics

    Frédérique Clément, Louis Fostier, and Romain Yvinec. Well-posedness and bifurcation analysis of a size-structured population model: Application to female gametes dynamics. 2024

    2024

  33. [33]

    Measure-valuedsolutionsforahierarchicallysize-structuredpopulation.JournalofDifferentialEquations, 217(2):431–455, 2005

    AzmySAcklehandKazufumiIto. Measure-valuedsolutionsforahierarchicallysize-structuredpopulation.JournalofDifferentialEquations, 217(2):431–455, 2005

    2005

  34. [34]

    Integralandintegro-differentialequationswithmeasure-valuedsolutionsdescribingtheevolutionofstructuredpopulations

    EugeniaFranco. Integralandintegro-differentialequationswithmeasure-valuedsolutionsdescribingtheevolutionofstructuredpopulations. 2022

    2022

  35. [35]

    Modelling physiologically structured populations: renewal equations and partial differential equations.Journal of Evolution Equations, 23(3):46, 2023

    Eugenia Franco, Odo Diekmann, and Mats Gyllenberg. Modelling physiologically structured populations: renewal equations and partial differential equations.Journal of Evolution Equations, 23(3):46, 2023

    2023

  36. [36]

    Thebreakdownoflinearquasi-cycles:Demographicnoiseandabsorbingboundaries in finite predator–prey systems.Electronic Research Archive, 34(6):4248–4289, 2026

    LouisShuoWang,JiguangYu,YeLiang,andJilinZhang. Thebreakdownoflinearquasi-cycles:Demographicnoiseandabsorbingboundaries in finite predator–prey systems.Electronic Research Archive, 34(6):4248–4289, 2026. 13

    2026

  37. [37]

    Stabilityandregularityresultsforasize-structuredpopulationmodel.JournalofMathematicalAnalysis and Applications, 328(1):119–136, 2007

    JozsefZFarkasandThomasHagen. Stabilityandregularityresultsforasize-structuredpopulationmodel.JournalofMathematicalAnalysis and Applications, 328(1):119–136, 2007

    2007

  38. [38]

    Steady-state analysis of structured population models.Theoretical population biology, 63(4):309–338, 2003

    Odo Diekmann, Mats Gyllenberg, and JAJ Metz. Steady-state analysis of structured population models.Theoretical population biology, 63(4):309–338, 2003

    2003

  39. [39]

    Transport equations with inflow boundary conditions.Partial Differential Equations and Applications, 3(3):35, 2022

    L Ridgway Scott and Sara Pollock. Transport equations with inflow boundary conditions.Partial Differential Equations and Applications, 3(3):35, 2022

    2022

  40. [40]

    Beyond diagonal noise: A better predator-prey modeling framework with cross-covariance.PLoS One, 21(5):e0350127, 2026

    Jiguang Yu and Louis Shuo Wang. Beyond diagonal noise: A better predator-prey modeling framework with cross-covariance.PLoS One, 21(5):e0350127, 2026

    2026

  41. [41]

    Oxford university press, 2000

    Luigi Ambrosio, Nicola Fusco, and Diego Pallara.Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems. Oxford university press, 2000

    2000

  42. [42]

    Pontryagin’s principle for control problems in age-dependent population dynamics.Journal of Mathematical Biology, 23(1):75–101, 1985

    Martin Brokate. Pontryagin’s principle for control problems in age-dependent population dynamics.Journal of Mathematical Biology, 23(1):75–101, 1985

    1985

  43. [43]

    LouisShuoWang,JiguangYu,YeLiang,andJilinZhang.Ellipticcriticalityversusvolterramemoryinindirectchemotaxiscascades.Transport Phenomena, 1(2):20260061, 2026

    2026

  44. [44]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    Xungjing Li and Jiongmin Yong.Optimal control theory for infinite dimensional systems. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  45. [45]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    Sebastian Anita.Analysis and control of age-dependent population dynamics, volume 11. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    2013

  46. [46]

    Multi-strategy hybrid improved intelligent algorithm for solving uav-mtsp.Information Technology and Control, 54(2):413–438, 2025

    Zixin Wang, Danqing Wang, and Jiguang Yu. Multi-strategy hybrid improved intelligent algorithm for solving uav-mtsp.Information Technology and Control, 54(2):413–438, 2025

    2025

  47. [47]

    GustavFeichtinger,GernotTragler,andVladimirMVeliov.Optimalityconditionsforage-structuredcontrolsystems.JournalofMathematical Analysis and Applications, 288(1):47–68, 2003

    2003

  48. [48]

    Optimal harvesting for periodic age-dependent population dynamics

    Eun-Jae Park, Mimmo Iannelli, Mi-Young Kim, and Sebastian Anita. Optimal harvesting for periodic age-dependent population dynamics. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 58(5):1648–1666, 1998

    1998

  49. [49]

    Optimal control of population dynamics.Journal of optimization theory and applications, 102(1):1–14, 1999

    Viorel Barbu and Mimmo Iannelli. Optimal control of population dynamics.Journal of optimization theory and applications, 102(1):1–14, 1999

    1999

  50. [50]

    Maximumprincipleforoptimalharvestinginlinearsize-structuredpopulation.MathematicalPopulationStudies,15(2):123– 136, 2008

    NobuyukiKato. Maximumprincipleforoptimalharvestinginlinearsize-structuredpopulation.MathematicalPopulationStudies,15(2):123– 136, 2008

    2008

  51. [51]

    Optimal development problem for a nonlinear population model with size structure in a periodic environment.AIMS MATHEMATICS, 10(5):12726–12744, 2025

    Rong Liu, Xin Yi, and Yanmei Wang. Optimal development problem for a nonlinear population model with size structure in a periodic environment.AIMS MATHEMATICS, 10(5):12726–12744, 2025

    2025

  52. [52]

    Rollingpredictionmodelofclosingpricebasedoneemddatanoisereductionandhgs-delm

    YuanshengGao,LeiLi,andJiguangYu. Rollingpredictionmodelofclosingpricebasedoneemddatanoisereductionandhgs-delm. In2022 International Conference on Data Analytics, Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ICDACAI), pages 255–260. IEEE, 2022

    2022

  53. [53]

    Maximum principle for a size-structured model of forest and carbon sequestration management.Applied Mathematics Letters, 21(10):1090–1094, 2008

    Natali Hritonenko, Yuri Yatsenko, Renan-Ulrich Goetz, and Angels Xabadia. Maximum principle for a size-structured model of forest and carbon sequestration management.Applied Mathematics Letters, 21(10):1090–1094, 2008

    2008

  54. [54]

    A bang–bang regime in optimal harvesting of size-structured populations.Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 71(12):e2331–e2336, 2009

    Natali Hritonenko, Yuri Yatsenko, Renan-Ulrich Goetz, and Angels Xabadia. A bang–bang regime in optimal harvesting of size-structured populations.Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 71(12):e2331–e2336, 2009

    2009

  55. [55]

    na, 2012

    Sergey M Aseev and Vladimir M Veliov.Maximum principle for infinite-horizon optimal control problems with dominating discount. na, 2012

    2012

  56. [56]

    On the infinite-horizon optimal control of age-structured systems.Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 167(1):243–271, 2015

    Bernhard Skritek and Vladimir M Veliov. On the infinite-horizon optimal control of age-structured systems.Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 167(1):243–271, 2015. A. Frozen-flow stability estimate The transport equation carries a prescribed nonzero inflow flux at𝑙0; the attendant trace and interface handling is in the spirit of the analysis ...

    2015