Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Hedging with Market Impact

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.13326 v2 pith:Z2TVVXXP submitted 2024-02-20 q-fin.CP cs.AI

classification q-fin.CPcs.AI
keywords hedgingimpactmarketdynamiclearningliquiditymodelcaused
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Dynamic hedging is the practice of periodically transacting financial instruments to offset the risk caused by an investment or a liability. Dynamic hedging optimization can be framed as a sequential decision problem; thus, Reinforcement Learning (RL) models were recently proposed to tackle this task. However, existing RL works for hedging do not consider market impact caused by the finite liquidity of traded instruments. Integrating such feature can be crucial to achieve optimal performance when hedging options on stocks with limited liquidity. In this paper, we propose a novel general market impact dynamic hedging model based on Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) that considers several realistic features such as convex market impacts, and impact persistence through time. The optimal policy obtained from the DRL model is analysed using several option hedging simulations and compared to commonly used procedures such as delta hedging. Results show our DRL model behaves better in contexts of low liquidity by, among others: 1) learning the extent to which portfolio rebalancing actions should be dampened or delayed to avoid high costs, 2) factoring in the impact of features not considered by conventional approaches, such as previous hedging errors through the portfolio value, and the underlying asset's drift (i.e. the magnitude of its expected return).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Robust Hedging Valuation Adjustment for Deep Hedging Policies under Market Frictions

    q-fin.RM 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A common-stress reserve framework for deep hedgers shows classical trading bands usually beat learned policies, with sparse learned execution winning only under a strict low-liquidity budget.

Pith tools