Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

GraphextQA: A Benchmark for Evaluating Graph-Enhanced Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.08487 v1 pith:Z2YMA75Z submitted 2023-10-12 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelsgraphdatasetgraph-languagegenerationgraphsknowledgelanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While multi-modal models have successfully integrated information from image, video, and audio modalities, integrating graph modality into large language models (LLMs) remains unexplored. This discrepancy largely stems from the inherent divergence between structured graph data and unstructured text data. Incorporating graph knowledge provides a reliable source of information, enabling potential solutions to address issues in text generation, e.g., hallucination, and lack of domain knowledge. To evaluate the integration of graph knowledge into language models, a dedicated dataset is needed. However, there is currently no benchmark dataset specifically designed for multimodal graph-language models. To address this gap, we propose GraphextQA, a question answering dataset with paired subgraphs, retrieved from Wikidata, to facilitate the evaluation and future development of graph-language models. Additionally, we introduce a baseline model called CrossGNN, which conditions answer generation on the paired graphs by cross-attending question-aware graph features at decoding. The proposed dataset is designed to evaluate graph-language models' ability to understand graphs and make use of it for answer generation. We perform experiments with language-only models and the proposed graph-language model to validate the usefulness of the paired graphs and to demonstrate the difficulty of the task.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Graph Language: How Knowledge Graphs Speak to Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GRALAN uses question-focused subgraphs, a graph encoder, and a learned mediator to let a frozen LLM answer KG questions by classifying entities, reporting state-of-the-art or near-SOTA accuracy on several QA benchmarks.

Pith tools