Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Evaluation Uncertainty in Data-Driven Self-Driving Testing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.09306 v2 pith:Z45GVY24 submitted 2019-04-19 stat.ME cs.ROstat.ML

Evaluation Uncertainty in Data-Driven Self-Driving Testing

classification stat.ME cs.ROstat.ML
keywords evaluationapproachinputsafetyself-drivinguncertaintycarlodata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Safety evaluation of self-driving technologies has been extensively studied. One recent approach uses Monte Carlo based evaluation to estimate the occurrence probabilities of safety-critical events as safety measures. These Monte Carlo samples are generated from stochastic input models constructed based on real-world data. In this paper, we propose an approach to assess the impact on the probability estimates from the evaluation procedures due to the estimation error caused by data variability. Our proposed method merges the classical bootstrap method for estimating input uncertainty with a likelihood ratio based scheme to reuse experiment outputs. This approach is economical and efficient in terms of implementation costs in assessing input uncertainty for the evaluation of self-driving technology. We use an example in autonomous vehicle (AV) safety evaluation to demonstrate the proposed approach as a diagnostic tool for the quality of the fitted input model.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.