pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27229 · v1 · pith:Z5BNYF5Hnew · submitted 2026-05-26 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

At-Scale Data-Driven Exploration of High-Voltage Cathode-Active Materials for Sodium Batteries

Suchona Akter , Mohammad R. Momeni This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 16:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords sodium-ion batteriescathode-active materialsmachine learningfirst-principles calculationshigh-voltage cathodesmaterials databasesphase stabilityvoltage prediction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Curated data from four databases, ML models on charged structures, and first-principles checks together identify high-voltage cathodes for sodium-ion batteries.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to build a scalable discovery pipeline for cathode-active materials in sodium-ion batteries by pulling stable all-inorganic compounds from the Materials Project, AFLOW, OQMD, and GNoME. It trains generalizable machine-learning models exclusively on charged structures to forecast average voltage and specific capacity, then ranks candidates and subjects the top ones to explicit density-functional-theory calculations of voltage profiles, phase stability, and structural changes upon sodium insertion or removal. A sympathetic reader would care because sodium-ion batteries use abundant, low-cost elements and support fast charging, yet progress has been limited by the lack of robust high-voltage cathodes; the claimed framework is presented as transferable to other battery systems.

Core claim

The integrated data curation, ML ranking and predictions, and first-principles validation strategy establishes a scalable and transferable framework for accelerating the discovery of stable, high-voltage CAMs for SIBs and beyond.

What carries the argument

Descriptor-based machine-learning models trained on charged-only structures from the four databases, used by a committee of the top four models to predict voltage and capacity before DFT validation of voltage profiles and phase stability.

If this is right

  • The pipeline ranks and filters vast chemical spaces without requiring paired charged and discharged structures for every candidate.
  • Top-ranked materials receive detailed checks for structural robustness upon sodiation and desodiation plus electronic properties.
  • The same curation-plus-ML-plus-validation sequence is presented as applicable to other alkali-ion battery chemistries.
  • The resulting shortlist of candidates supplies concrete starting points for further computational or experimental refinement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The emphasis on charged-only training data could lower the barrier for screening materials where the discharged state is difficult to stabilize computationally.
  • The framework may connect to similar large-database searches already used for lithium or potassium cathodes, allowing cross-chemistry comparisons of voltage trends.
  • If the ML models generalize well, the method offers a route to pre-screen candidates before any synthesis attempts, reducing experimental trial-and-error.

Load-bearing premise

Machine-learning models trained exclusively on charged-only structures from the four source databases can produce reliable predictions of average voltage and specific capacity for previously unseen candidate materials.

What would settle it

If the ML-predicted voltages and capacities for the top-ranked candidates deviate substantially from the explicit first-principles calculations of voltage profiles and phase stability, the reliability of the charged-structure training approach would be undermined.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.27229 by Mohammad R. Momeni, Suchona Akter.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Adapted workflow in this work. A dataset comprised of charged structures from the MP battery database is used to train descriptor-based ML models. The trained models are then applied to a carefully curated materials database collected from MP, AFLOW, OQMD, and GNoME to predict voltage and specific capacity using a committee of top-ranked ML models. (ii) NASICON-type phosphates (NaxM2(PO4)3), (iii) py￾ropho… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Data curation workflow. The number of structures remaining after each stage is given. See the main text for more details. default tolerance parameters were used for the fractional length (ltol= 0.2), site position (stol= 0.3), and relative an￾gles (angletol= 5◦ ). 64 (d) Unstable materials were identified and removed. Stability was determined based on either en￾ergy above the hull or formation energy. Stru… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Violin plots of the predicted voltage distributions of curated materials across four databases using the four best￾performing ML models, ET, GB, RF, and XGB. The analogous plot for specific capacity is given in the SI Figure S5. from a committee of all four selected models. The mean pre￾diction was used to rank candidates. This strategy identi￾fies candidates that are consistently predicted to be promis￾in… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Predicted voltages of all curated structures across different polyanionic families using the four best-performing ML models, ET, GB, RF, and XGB. The analogous plot for specific capacity is given in the SI Figure S6. can increase the redox potential through inductive effects, where strongly electronegative anionic groups withdraw elec￾tron density and stabilize higher TM oxidation states. 79,80 This effect… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top 500 global structures with the highest predicted voltages and capacities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Selected DFT validated structures from each database. (a) VFe(P2O7)2 from MP, (b) Zn2O4 from AFLOW, (c) VCr3F20 from GNoME, and (d) AgSO4 from OQMD. See the text for more details. but the capacity remains in good agreement with DFT. Our DFT-calculated band gaps for the charged and discharged states are 1.18 and 1.84 eV, respectively, indicating semicon￾ducting electronic character in both states. Semicondu… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Top five features for the (a) voltage and (b) specific capacity predictions. Feature importances are normalized within each model and averaged across the four models. important features are the periodic table position, Pauling electronegativity calculated from the elemental composition, and atomic size. This indicates that the elements’ ability to attract electrons strongly influences the predicted voltage… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) share similar electrochemistry with Li but offer several advantages, including high abundance in nature and low cost, as well as suitability for fast charging due to a Na-ion mobility higher than that of Li. The development of high-voltage SIBs heavily relies on the discovery of novel, robust cathode-active materials (CAMs). All-inorganic materials represent the most mature and practical choice as CAMs for next-generation SIBs; however, their family spans a vast and chemically diverse space. In this work, we present a large-scale, chemically validated database of stable materials for SIB cathode discovery, curated from four major databases: Materials Project, AFLOW, OQMD, and GNoME. Generalizable and transferable descriptor-based machine learning (ML) models are developed based on a dataset of charged-only structures rather than charged/discharged pairs. Using a committee of the top four trained ML models, average voltage and specific capacity are predicted as target properties. Finally, a subset of top-ranked candidate CAMs is validated through explicit, high-throughput first-principles calculations of voltage profiles, phase stability, structural robustness upon sodiation/desodiation, and electronic properties. Together, this integrated data curation, ML ranking and predictions, and first-principles validation strategy establishes a scalable and transferable framework for accelerating the discovery of stable, high-voltage CAMs for SIBs and beyond.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript curates a database of stable all-inorganic materials from Materials Project, AFLOW, OQMD, and GNoME for sodium-ion battery cathodes. Descriptor-based ML models are trained exclusively on charged-only structures to predict average voltage and specific capacity via a committee of the top four models; top-ranked candidates then undergo high-throughput DFT validation of voltage profiles, phase stability, structural robustness, and electronic properties. The work positions the integrated curation-ML-DFT pipeline as a scalable, transferable framework for high-voltage CAM discovery.

Significance. If the ML models trained solely on charged structures can reliably predict voltages (which require explicit charged-discharged energy differences) for unseen candidates, the approach would constitute a practical, database-leveraging method for accelerating SIB cathode screening beyond what pure DFT enumeration allows.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that descriptor-based ML models trained only on charged structures can predict average voltage rests on the untested assumption that composition/structure descriptors implicitly encode the discharged-state energy contribution. No section demonstrates generalization outside the training distribution, and DFT validation is confined to a small top-ranked subset rather than providing broad ML accuracy metrics or cross-validation against explicit discharged phases.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: no quantitative metrics, error bars, R² values, or validation statistics are reported for the ML models or the committee predictions, making it impossible to assess predictive performance from the summary alone.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive criticism. We address the major comment regarding the validation of our ML models below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that descriptor-based ML models trained only on charged structures can predict average voltage rests on the untested assumption that composition/structure descriptors implicitly encode the discharged-state energy contribution. No section demonstrates generalization outside the training distribution, and DFT validation is confined to a small top-ranked subset rather than providing broad ML accuracy metrics or cross-validation against explicit discharged phases.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's concern about the strength of evidence for our central claim. The ML models are trained on charged structures using descriptors that capture composition and structure, with target values for average voltage obtained from DFT calculations involving both charged and discharged states in the source data. Generalization is demonstrated via cross-validation on held-out portions of the dataset, with performance metrics reported in the manuscript. The DFT validation on top-ranked candidates, selected by the ML model, provides an out-of-sample test of the predictions. However, we agree that the current presentation could benefit from more explicit discussion of these aspects and additional metrics. In the revised version, we will expand the methods and results sections to include detailed cross-validation statistics, clarify the training distribution, and discuss the implications of the limited DFT validation set. We will also add a note on the assumption underlying the approach. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard ML training on database labels followed by external DFT validation

full rationale

The workflow curates charged structures from external databases (MP/AFLOW/OQMD/GNoME), trains descriptor-based ML models to predict voltage and capacity labels already present in those databases, ranks unseen candidates, and performs independent DFT validation on a top subset. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, no self-citation chain bears the central claim, and no ansatz or uniqueness result is imported from the authors' prior work. The derivation remains self-contained against the external benchmarks and first-principles calculations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; ledger left empty.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5793 in / 1085 out tokens · 28678 ms · 2026-06-29T16:42:43.288820+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries

    Tarascon, J.-M.; Armand, M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 2001, 414, 359--367

    2001

  2. [2]

    Building better batteries

    Armand, M.; Tarascon, J.-M. Building better batteries. Nature 2008, 451, 652--657

    2008

  3. [3]

    B.; Kim, Y

    Goodenough, J. B.; Kim, Y. Challenges for rechargeable batteries. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 6688--6694

    2011

  4. [4]

    Layered lithium transition metal oxide cathodes towards high energy lithium-ion batteries

    He, P.; Yu, H.; Zhou, H., et al. Layered lithium transition metal oxide cathodes towards high energy lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 3680--3695

    2012

  5. [5]

    A reflection on lithium-ion battery cathode chemistry

    Manthiram, A. A reflection on lithium-ion battery cathode chemistry. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1550

    2020

  6. [6]

    B.; Park, K.-S

    Goodenough, J. B.; Park, K.-S. The Li-ion rechargeable battery: a perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1167--1176

    2013

  7. [7]

    30 years of lithium-ion batteries

    Li, M.; Lu, J.; Chen, Z.; Amine, K. 30 years of lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800561

    2018

  8. [8]

    Progress in high-voltage cathode materials for rechargeable sodium-ion batteries

    You, Y.; Manthiram, A. Progress in high-voltage cathode materials for rechargeable sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1701785

    2018

  9. [9]

    Comprehensive review of sodium-ion batteries: Principles, materials, performance, challenges, and future perspectives

    Phogat, P.; Dey, S.; Wan, M. Comprehensive review of sodium-ion batteries: Principles, materials, performance, challenges, and future perspectives. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2025, 312, 117870

    2025

  10. [10]

    Usability identification framework and high-throughput screening of two-dimensional materials in lithium ion batteries

    Song, D.; Chen, X.; Lin, Z.; Tang, Z.; Ma, W.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X. Usability identification framework and high-throughput screening of two-dimensional materials in lithium ion batteries. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 16469--16477

    2021

  11. [11]

    Machine-learning-driven high-throughput screening for high-energy density and stable NASICON cathodes

    Jeong, J.; Kim, J.; Sun, J.; Min, K. Machine-learning-driven high-throughput screening for high-energy density and stable NASICON cathodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 24431--24441

    2024

  12. [12]

    Comparison between Na-ion and Li-ion cells: understanding the critical role of the cathodes stability and the anodes pretreatment on the cells behavior

    de la Llave, E.; Borgel, V.; Park, K.-J.; Hwang, J.-Y.; Sun, Y.-K.; Hartmann, P.; Chesneau, F.-F.; Aurbach, D. Comparison between Na-ion and Li-ion cells: understanding the critical role of the cathodes stability and the anodes pretreatment on the cells behavior. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 1867--1875

    2016

  13. [13]

    B.; Linden, D

    Reddy, T. B.; Linden, D. Linden's Handbook of Batteries, 5th ed.; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, 2019

    2019

  14. [14]

    Sodium-ion batteries: present and future

    Hwang, J.-Y.; Myung, S.-T.; Sun, Y.-K. Sodium-ion batteries: present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3529--3614

    2017

  15. [15]

    The Emerging High-Entropy Strategy: A Booster to the Development of Cathode Materials for Power Batteries

    Huang, L.; Zhu, J.; Liu, J.-X.; Wu, H.; Zhang, G.-J. The Emerging High-Entropy Strategy: A Booster to the Development of Cathode Materials for Power Batteries. J. Adv. Ceram. 2024, 13, 1093--1118

    2024

  16. [16]

    Satrughna, J. A. K.; Kanwade, A.; Srivastava, A.; Tiwari, M. K.; Yadav, S. C.; Akula, S. T.; Shirage, P. M. Experimental and computational advancement of cathode materials for futuristic sodium ion batteries. Mater. Today 2023,

    2023

  17. [17]

    A.; Basu, S

    Gupta, P.; Pushpakanth, S.; Haider, M. A.; Basu, S. Understanding the design of cathode materials for Na-ion batteries. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 5605--5614

    2022

  18. [18]

    J.; Heap, R.; Meysami, S

    Rudola, A.; Rennie, A. J.; Heap, R.; Meysami, S. S.; Lowbridge, A.; Mazzali, F.; Sayers, R.; Wright, C. J.; Barker, J. Commercialisation of high energy density sodium-ion batteries: Faradion's journey and outlook. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 8279--8302

    2021

  19. [19]

    The scale-up and commercialization of nonaqueous Na-ion battery technologies

    Bauer, A.; Song, J.; Vail, S.; Pan, W.; Barker, J.; Lu, Y. The scale-up and commercialization of nonaqueous Na-ion battery technologies. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1702869

    2018

  20. [20]

    High rate performance for carbon-coated Na _3 V _2 (PO _4 ) _2 F _3 in Na-ion batteries

    Broux, T.; Fauth, F.; Hall, N.; Chatillon, Y.; Bianchini, M.; Bamine, T.; Leriche, J.-B.; Suard, E.; Carlier, D.; Reynier, Y., et al. High rate performance for carbon-coated Na _3 V _2 (PO _4 ) _2 F _3 in Na-ion batteries. Small Methods 2019, 3, 1800215

    2019

  21. [21]

    Recent progress of promising cathode candidates for sodium-ion batteries: current issues, strategy, challenge, and prospects

    Peng, C.; Xu, X.; Li, F.; Xi, L.; Zeng, J.; Song, X.; Wan, X.; Zhao, J.; Liu, J. Recent progress of promising cathode candidates for sodium-ion batteries: current issues, strategy, challenge, and prospects. Small Struct. 2023, 4, 2300150

    2023

  22. [22]

    Strategies and practical approaches for stable and high energy density sodium-ion battery: a step closer to commercialization

    Yadav, P.; Patrike, A.; Wasnik, K.; Shelke, V.; Shelke, M. Strategies and practical approaches for stable and high energy density sodium-ion battery: a step closer to commercialization. Mater. Today Sustain. 2023, 22, 100385

    2023

  23. [23]

    H.; Gonzalo, E.; Singh, G.; Rojo, T

    Han, M. H.; Gonzalo, E.; Singh, G.; Rojo, T. A comprehensive review of sodium layered oxides: powerful cathodes for Na-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 81--102

    2015

  24. [24]

    Electrochemical intercalation of sodium in Na _x CoO _2 bronzes

    Delmas, C.; Braconnier, J.-J.; Fouassier, C.; Hagenmuller, P. Electrochemical intercalation of sodium in Na _x CoO _2 bronzes. Solid State Ion. 1981, 3, 165--169

    1981

  25. [25]

    Rational Design of Layered Oxide Materials for Batteries

    Wang, Q.; Zhao, C.; Wagemaker, M. Rational Design of Layered Oxide Materials for Batteries. Acc. Chem. Res. 2025, 58, 1742--1753

    2025

  26. [26]

    P2-type Na _x [Fe _ 1/2 Mn _ 1/2 ]O _2 made from earth-abundant elements for rechargeable Na batteries

    Yabuuchi, N.; Kajiyama, M.; Iwatate, J.; Nishikawa, H.; Hitomi, S.; Okuyama, R.; Usui, R.; Yamada, Y.; Komaba, S. P2-type Na _x [Fe _ 1/2 Mn _ 1/2 ]O _2 made from earth-abundant elements for rechargeable Na batteries. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 512--517

    2012

  27. [27]

    Lavela, S.; Santos, A. C. d. N.; Motta, F. V. d.; Bomio, M. R. D.; Lavela, P.; P \'e rez Vicente, C.; Tirado, J. L. Improving the Performance of the Layered Nickel Manganese Oxide Cathode of Sodium-Ion Batteries by Direct Coating with Sodium Niobium Oxide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 56975--56986

    2024

  28. [28]

    W.; Nam, K.-W.; Chung, K

    Ali, G.; Lee, J.-H.; Susanto, D.; Choi, S.-W.; Cho, B. W.; Nam, K.-W.; Chung, K. Y. Polythiophene-wrapped olivine NaFePO _4 as a cathode for Na-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 15422--15429

    2016

  29. [29]

    NaMnFe _2 (PO _4 ) _3 alluaudite phase: synthesis, structure, and electrochemical properties as positive electrode in lithium and sodium batteries

    Trad, K.; Carlier, D.; Croguennec, L.; Wattiaux, A.; Ben Amara, M.; Delmas, C. NaMnFe _2 (PO _4 ) _3 alluaudite phase: synthesis, structure, and electrochemical properties as positive electrode in lithium and sodium batteries. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 5554--5562

    2010

  30. [30]

    Vanadyl-type defects in Tavorite-like NaVPO _4 F: from the average long range structure to local environments

    Boivin, E.; Chotard, J.-N.; Bamine, T.; Carlier, D.; Serras, P.; Palomares, V.; Rojo, T.; Iadecola, A.; Dupont, L.; Bourgeois, L., et al. Vanadyl-type defects in Tavorite-like NaVPO _4 F: from the average long range structure to local environments. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 25044--25055

    2017

  31. [31]

    V.; Dimitrova, O

    Massa, W.; Yakubovich, O. V.; Dimitrova, O. V. Crystal structure of a new sodium vanadyl (IV) fluoride phosphate Na _3 \ V _2 O _2 F[PO _4 ] _2 \ . Solid State Sciences 2002, 4, 495--501

    2002

  32. [32]

    B.; Hong, H.-P.; Kafalas, J

    Goodenough, J. B.; Hong, H.-P.; Kafalas, J. Fast Na+-ion transport in skeleton structures. Mater. Res. Bull. 1976, 11, 203--220

    1976

  33. [33]

    Commercial prospects of existing cathode materials for sodium ion storage

    Li, W.-J.; Han, C.; Wang, W.; Gebert, F.; Chou, S.-L.; Liu, H.-K.; Zhang, X.; Dou, S.-X. Commercial prospects of existing cathode materials for sodium ion storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700274

    2017

  34. [34]

    A nasicon-type phase as intercalation electrode: NaTi _2 (PO _4 ) _3

    Delmas, C.; Cherkaoui, F.; Nadiri, A.; Hagenmuller, P. A nasicon-type phase as intercalation electrode: NaTi _2 (PO _4 ) _3 . Mater. Res. Bull. 1987, 22, 631--639

    1987

  35. [35]

    Routes to high-performance layered oxide cathodes for sodium-ion batteries

    Wang, J.; Zhu, Y.-F.; Su, Y.; Guo, J.-X.; Chen, S.; Liu, H.-K.; Dou, S.-X.; Chou, S.-L.; Xiao, Y. Routes to high-performance layered oxide cathodes for sodium-ion batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2024, 53, 4230--4301

    2024

  36. [36]

    Layered Oxide Cathodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries: Storage Mechanism, Electrochemistry, and Techno-economics

    Zuo, W.; Innocenti, A.; Zarrabeitia, M.; Bresser, D.; Yang, Y.; Passerini, S. Layered Oxide Cathodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries: Storage Mechanism, Electrochemistry, and Techno-economics. Acc. Chem. Res. 2023, 56, 284--296

    2023

  37. [37]

    Polyanion-Type Electrode Materials for Sodium-Ion Batteries

    Ni, Q.; Bai, Y.; Wu, F.; Wu, C. Polyanion-Type Electrode Materials for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Sci. 2017, 4, 1600275

    2017

  38. [38]

    Polyanionic Cathode Materials for Practical Na-Ion Batteries toward High Energy Density and Long Cycle Life

    Xu, C.; Zhao, J.; Yang, C.; Hu, Y.-S. Polyanionic Cathode Materials for Practical Na-Ion Batteries toward High Energy Density and Long Cycle Life. ACS Cent. Sci. 2023, 9, 1721--1736

    2023

  39. [39]

    T.; Davies, D

    Butler, K. T.; Davies, D. W.; Cartwright, H.; Isayev, O.; Walsh, A. Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature 2018, 559, 547--555

    2018

  40. [40]

    E.; Meredig, B.; Thompson, A.; Doak, J

    Kirklin, S.; Saal, J. E.; Meredig, B.; Thompson, A.; Doak, J. W.; Aykol, M.; R \"u hl, S.; Wolverton, C. The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD): assessing the accuracy of DFT formation energies. npj Comput. Mater. 2015, 1, 1--15

    2015

  41. [41]

    D.; Yang, Q.; Cubuk, E

    Sendek, A. D.; Yang, Q.; Cubuk, E. D.; Duerloo, K.-A. N.; Cui, Y.; Reed, E. J. Holistic computational structure screening of more than 12000 candidates for solid lithium-ion conductor materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 306--320

    2017

  42. [42]

    H.; Chen, Q.; Ceder, G.; Persson, K

    Li, H. H.; Chen, Q.; Ceder, G.; Persson, K. A. Voltage Mining for (De) lithiation-Stabilized Cathodes and a Machine Learning Model for Li-Ion Cathode Voltage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 69379--69387

    2024

  43. [43]

    Employing graph neural networks for predicting electrode average voltages and screening high-voltage sodium cathode materials

    He, X.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, G. Employing graph neural networks for predicting electrode average voltages and screening high-voltage sodium cathode materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 24494--24501

    2024

  44. [44]

    Electrochemical Intercalation Reaction of Sodium into the Layered Transition Metal Dichalcogenide ZrS _2 - Influence of the Electrolyte Solvent

    Liers, L.; Mereacre, L.; Li, H.; Mickenbecker, J.; Knapp, M.; Indris, S.; Behrens, M.; Mangelsen, S. Electrochemical Intercalation Reaction of Sodium into the Layered Transition Metal Dichalcogenide ZrS _2 - Influence of the Electrolyte Solvent . Inorg. Chem. 2025, 64, 18045--18061

    2025

  45. [45]

    Wei, S.; Xu, S.; Agrawral, A.; Choudhury, S.; Lu, Y.; Tu, Z.; Ma, L.; Archer, L. A. A stable room-temperature sodium-sulfur battery. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11722

    2016

  46. [46]

    Promising Cathode Materials for Sodium - Ion Batteries from Lab to Application

    Xu, S.; Dong, H.; Yang, D.; Wu, C.; Yao, Y.; Rui, X.; Chou, S.; Yu, Y. Promising Cathode Materials for Sodium - Ion Batteries from Lab to Application . ACS Cent. Sci. 2023, 9, 2012--2035

    2023

  47. [47]

    P.; Hautier, G.; Chen, W.; Richards, W

    Jain, A.; Ong, S. P.; Hautier, G.; Chen, W.; Richards, W. D.; Dacek, S.; Cholia, S.; Gunter, D.; Skinner, D.; Ceder, G., et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 2013, 1

    2013

  48. [48]

    L.; Jahnatek, M.; Chepulskii, R

    Curtarolo, S.; Setyawan, W.; Hart, G. L.; Jahnatek, M.; Chepulskii, R. V.; Taylor, R. H.; Wang, S.; Xue, J.; Yang, K.; Levy, O., et al. AFLOW: An automatic framework for high-throughput materials discovery. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2012, 58, 218--226

    2012

  49. [49]

    NOMAD: The FAIR concept for big data-driven materials science

    Draxl, C.; Scheffler, M. NOMAD: The FAIR concept for big data-driven materials science. MRS Bull. 2018, 43, 676--682

    2018

  50. [50]

    Handbook of Materials Modeling; Springer, 2019; pp 1--25

    Draxl, C.; Scheffler, M. Handbook of Materials Modeling; Springer, 2019; pp 1--25

    2019

  51. [51]

    An atlas of two-dimensional materials

    Mir \'o , P.; Audiffred, M.; Heine, T. An atlas of two-dimensional materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 6537--6554

    2014

  52. [52]

    A.; Thygesen, K

    Rasmussen, F. A.; Thygesen, K. S. Computational 2D materials database: electronic structure of transition-metal dichalcogenides and oxides. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 13169--13183

    2015

  53. [53]

    S.; Shi, Y.; Limbu, D

    Zhang, Z.; Valente, D. S.; Shi, Y.; Limbu, D. K.; Momeni, M. R.; Shakib, F. A. In Silico High-Throughput Design and Prediction of Structural and Electronic Properties of Low-Dimensional Metal--Organic Frameworks. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 9494--9507

    2023

  54. [54]

    R.; Moeck, P.; Downs, R

    Gra z ulis, S.; Da s kevi c , A.; Merkys, A.; Chateigner, D.; Lutterotti, L.; Quiros, M.; Serebryanaya, N. R.; Moeck, P.; Downs, R. T.; Le Bail, A. Crystallography Open Database (COD): an open-access collection of crystal structures and platform for world-wide collaboration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D420--D427

    2012

  55. [55]

    E.; Cepellotti, A.; Pizzi, G.; Marzari, N

    Mounet, N.; Gibertini, M.; Schwaller, P.; Campi, D.; Merkys, A.; Marrazzo, A.; Sohier, T.; Castelli, I. E.; Cepellotti, A.; Pizzi, G.; Marzari, N. Two-dimensional materials from high-throughput computational exfoliation of experimentally known compounds. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 246--252

    2018

  56. [56]

    P.; Cholia, S.; Jain, A.; Brafman, M.; Gunter, D.; Ceder, G.; Persson, K

    Ong, S. P.; Cholia, S.; Jain, A.; Brafman, M.; Gunter, D.; Ceder, G.; Persson, K. A. The Materials Application Programming Interface (API): A simple, flexible and efficient API for materials data based on REpresentational State Transfer (REST) principles. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2015, 97, 209--215

    2015

  57. [57]

    High-throughput computational screening of Li-containing fluorides for battery cathode coatings

    Liu, B.; Wang, D.; Avdeev, M.; Shi, S.; Yang, J.; Zhang, W. High-throughput computational screening of Li-containing fluorides for battery cathode coatings. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 8, 948--957

    2019

  58. [58]

    P.; Richards, W

    Ong, S. P.; Richards, W. D.; Jain, A.; Hautier, G.; Kocher, M.; Cholia, S.; Gunter, D.; Chevrier, V. L.; Persson, K. A.; Ceder, G. Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2013, 68, 314--319

    2013

  59. [59]

    L.; Bergsma, J.; Merkys, A.; Andersen, C

    Evans, M. L.; Bergsma, J.; Merkys, A.; Andersen, C. W.; Andersson, O. B.; Beltr \'a n, D.; Blokhin, E.; Boland, T. M.; Balderas, R. C.; Choudhary, K., et al. Developments and applications of the OPTIMADE API for materials discovery, design, and data exchange. Digit. Discov. 2024, 3, 1509--1533

    2024

  60. [60]

    B.; Fornari, M.; Curtarolo, S

    Rose, F.; Toher, C.; Gossett, E.; Oses, C.; Nardelli, M. B.; Fornari, M.; Curtarolo, S. AFLUX: The LUX materials search API for the AFLOW data repositories. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2017, 137, 362--370

    2017

  61. [61]

    S.; Aykol, M.; Cheon, G.; Cubuk, E

    Merchant, A.; Batzner, S.; Schoenholz, S. S.; Aykol, M.; Cheon, G.; Cubuk, E. D. Scaling deep learning for materials discovery. Nature 2023, 624, 80--85

    2023

  62. [62]

    H.; Kaplan, A

    Pascazio, R.; Chen, Q.; Li, H. H.; Kaplan, A. D.; Persson, K. A. Toward High-Voltage Cathodes for Zinc-Ion Batteries: Discovery Pipeline and Material Design Rules. Chem. Mater. 2025,

    2025

  63. [63]

    D.; Persson, K

    Zhou, J.; Shen, L.; Costa, M. D.; Persson, K. A.; Ong, S. P.; Huck, P.; Lu, Y.; Ma, X.; Chen, Y.; Tang, H.; Feng, Y. P. a. 2DMatPedia, an open computational database of two-dimensional materials from top-down and bottom-up approaches. Sci. Data 2019, 6, 86

    2019

  64. [64]

    W.; Lee, G.; Walsh, A.; Soon, A.; Kim, J.-Y.; Shim, W

    Won, J.; Kim, T.; Lee, M.; Davies, D. W.; Lee, G.; Walsh, A.; Soon, A.; Kim, J.-Y.; Shim, W. Mapping cation-eutaxy ternary with a phenomenological model. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 5634

    2025

  65. [65]

    AI-driven accelerated discovery of intercalation-type cathode materials for magnesium batteries

    Chen, W.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Y. AI-driven accelerated discovery of intercalation-type cathode materials for magnesium batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2025, 108, 40--46

    2025

  66. [66]

    Atom sizes and bond lengths in molecules and crystals

    O'Keefe, M.; Brese, N. Atom sizes and bond lengths in molecules and crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 3226--3229

    1991

  67. [67]

    D.; Humonen, I

    Dembitskiy, A. D.; Humonen, I. S.; Eremin, R. A.; Aksyonov, D. A.; Fedotov, S. S.; Budennyy, S. A. Benchmarking machine learning models for predicting lithium ion migration. npj Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 131

    2025

  68. [68]

    M.; Horton, M.; Aykol, M.; Persson, K

    Pan, H.; Ganose, A. M.; Horton, M.; Aykol, M.; Persson, K. A.; Zimmermann, N. E.; Jain, A. Benchmarking coordination number prediction algorithms on inorganic crystal structures. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 1590--1603

    2021

  69. [69]

    M.; Pandey, M.; Strange, M.; Jacobsen, K

    Larsen, P. M.; Pandey, M.; Strange, M.; Jacobsen, K. W. Definition of a scoring parameter to identify low-dimensional materials components. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2019, 3, 034003

    2019

  70. [70]

    Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python

    Pedregosa, F.; Varoquaux, G.; Gramfort, A.; Michel, V.; Thirion, B.; Grisel, O.; Blondel, M.; Prettenhofer, P.; Weiss, R.; Dubourg, V., et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011, 12, 2825--2830

    2011

  71. [71]

    Feature-driven machine learning screening of sodium-ion battery electrodes to support large-scale energy storage

    Qian, H.; Tang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Yuan, B. Feature-driven machine learning screening of sodium-ion battery electrodes to support large-scale energy storage. Electrochim. Acta 2025, 537, 146734

    2025

  72. [72]

    M.; Sahasrabuddhe, H.; Asta, M.; Beck, K.; Biswas, T.; Bonkowski, A.; Bustamante, J.; Chen, X.; Chiang, Y.; Chrzan, D

    Ganose, A. M.; Sahasrabuddhe, H.; Asta, M.; Beck, K.; Biswas, T.; Bonkowski, A.; Bustamante, J.; Chen, X.; Chiang, Y.; Chrzan, D. C., et al. Atomate2: modular workflows for materials science. Digit. Discov. 2025, 4, 1944--1973

    2025

  73. [73]

    Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals

    Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47, 558--561

    1993

  74. [74]

    Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal-amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium

    Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal-amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 49, 14251--14269

    1994

  75. [75]

    Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set

    Kresse, G.; Furthm \"u ller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 1996, 6, 15 -- 50

    1996

  76. [76]

    Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set

    Kresse, G.; Furthm \"u ller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169

    1996

  77. [77]

    Shen, J.-X.; Horton, M.; Persson, K. A. A charge-density-based general cation insertion algorithm for generating new Li-ion cathode materials. npj Comput. Mater. 2020, 6, 161

    2020

  78. [78]

    Kim, J.; Sari, D.; Chen, Q.; Rutt, A.; Ceder, G.; Persson, K. A. First-principles and experimental investigation of ABO4 zircons as calcium intercalation cathodes. Chem. Mater. 2024, 36, 4444--4455

    2024

  79. [79]

    P.; Kang, B.; Moore, C.; Doe, R.; Ceder, G

    Hautier, G.; Jain, A.; Ong, S. P.; Kang, B.; Moore, C.; Doe, R.; Ceder, G. Phosphates as lithium-ion battery cathodes: an evaluation based on high-throughput ab initio calculations. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 3495--3508

    2011

  80. [80]

    Polyanionic Cathode Materials for Practical Na-Ion Batteries toward High Energy Density and Long Cycle Life

    Xu, C.; Zhao, J.; Yang, C.; Hu, Y.-S. Polyanionic Cathode Materials for Practical Na-Ion Batteries toward High Energy Density and Long Cycle Life . ACS Cent. Sci. 2023, 9, 1721--1736

    2023

Showing first 80 references.