Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 83 references

Energy Efficient AI-Enabled Wireless Sensor Networks for Mission Critical Environments: A Systematic Review across Smart Grid, AI, and Urban Infrastructure Applications

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This systematic review of 50 recent studies argues that AI can improve the energy behaviour of wireless sensor networks in mission-critical environments, and that energy efficiency must be treated as a system-level property intertwined…

desk verdict A useful comparative synthesis of recent AI-enabled WSN energy work that currently fails the audit test for systematic reviews—referee it, but require the missing corpus data. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04499 v1 pith:Z74YDKHG submitted 2026-08-05 cs.SE

Alexandros Gazis , Valeri Mladenov , Kleanthi SantamourI , Stylianos Pappas This is my paper
classification cs.SE
keywords wirelesssensornetworksenergyefficiencyartificialintelligenceedgeAImission-criticalenvironmentssmartgridsurbaninfrastructurecyber-physicalsystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is a systematic review of 50 DOI-indexed studies from 2023–2026 on AI-enabled wireless sensor networks (WSNs) in mission-critical settings, and it tries to establish that AI can improve WSN energy behaviour through routing and clustering, edge AI, reinforcement learning, fuzzy logic, metaheuristic optimisation, and AI-based security. Its second, more consequential claim is that energy efficiency cannot be treated as an isolated performance target, because in smart grids, surveillance, and urban infrastructure, security, latency, and reliability are closely interlinked with energy. A sympathetic reader would care because the review concludes the field should move away from optimising protocols in isolation and toward integrated, lightweight, explainable, secure, and field-tested AI-driven architectures.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a four-category thematic coding scheme—technical approach, energy contribution, application domain, and metrics—applied to a corpus of 50 DOI-indexed studies, combined with an architectural-layer comparison (sensor node, cluster head, edge gateway, network/control plane) mapped approximately onto the OSI model. This lets the authors compare heterogeneous simulation-based studies and extract cross-domain trade-offs, which is the basis for the system-level conclusion.

What would settle it

Run a controlled field experiment in a mission-critical scenario comparing a purely energy-optimising protocol against a jointly optimised energy-plus-security-plus-latency design; if the energy-only protocol achieves lower total energy without degrading mission outcomes, the paper's claim that energy efficiency cannot be treated in isolation would be weakened.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a synthesis rather than a new protocol: across the reviewed 2023–2026 literature, AI improves WSN energy behaviour at several architectural layers—sensor-node filtering, cluster-head selection, edge-gateway anomaly detection, and network-level adaptive routing—and the benefits and costs depend on where the intelligence sits. Routing and clustering are the most mature strands, with hybrid models (PSO, fuzzy logic, self-organising maps) and reinforcement learning growing in prominence; edge AI cuts communication energy but shifts load to computation; security mechanisms add energy cost and therefore cannot be bolted on after the fact. The review concludes that application domain dictates which trade-offs matter—autonomy and resilience for monitoring, cybersecurity and accuracy for smart grids, scale and cost for urban infrastructure—and that current evaluation practices, dominated by heterogeneous simulations, need shared benchmarks and real-world trials before the benefits can be trusted in mission-critical operation.

Load-bearing premise

The synthesis rests on the assumption that the 50 selected studies are representative of the 2023–2026 literature and that the authors' qualitative coding of them is consistent, since the paper does not enumerate the corpus or report the quality-appraisal scores.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Energy-only protocol optimisation will underperform in mission-critical deployments, because energy, security, latency, and reliability must be balanced jointly.
  • Edge AI should be placed selectively: it reduces radio energy but raises computational load, so its net benefit depends on node capability and on how tasks are partitioned across the network.
  • Evaluation practice should adopt shared benchmarks, common metrics, and field trials, since heterogeneous simulation settings do not permit direct comparison of reported energy savings.
  • Future architectures should be designed as distributed cyber-physical systems in which lightweight AI, secure routing, adaptive clustering, and explainable decisions are co-developed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to model task partitioning across node, cluster head, and gateway as a formal optimisation problem with energy, delay, and security constraints, a step the paper gestures toward but does not formalise.
  • If the system-level claim is right, a practical benchmark should measure energy per packet together with attack-detection accuracy and end-to-end latency in the same scenario, so that trade-offs become directly visible.
  • The review's reliance on simulation suggests that replicating one reported AI routing protocol on low-power hardware with real interference would be a strong check on whether the claimed savings survive outside the simulator.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a systematic review of 2023–2026 literature on energy-efficient, AI-enabled wireless sensor networks (WSNs) in mission-critical settings, with a focus on surveillance/monitoring, smart grid, and urban infrastructure applications. The authors report synthesizing 50 DOI-indexed studies through a PRISMA-style selection process, a technical quality-appraisal framework, qualitative thematic coding, and comparative tables. The main claims are that AI can improve WSN energy behavior through routing and clustering, edge AI, reinforcement learning, fuzzy logic, metaheuristic optimization, and AI-based security, and that energy efficiency cannot be treated as an isolated performance target because security, latency, and reliability are interlinked in mission-critical systems. The paper concludes by recommending a shift from isolated protocol optimization toward integrated, lightweight, explainable, secure, and field-tested AI-driven WSN architectures.

Significance. If the synthesis is reliable, the review offers a useful thematic map of a fragmented literature and identifies credible research gaps. Its comparative framing across application domains (monitoring, smart grid, urban infrastructure) is a strength, as is the explicit attention to energy–security–latency trade-offs. The paper also makes a clear, falsifiable recommendation about where future research should concentrate. However, the significance is conditional on the verifiability of the underlying corpus: the review's central claims are aggregations of 50 selected studies, and the reader cannot currently verify which studies were selected, why, or how the quality appraisal was applied. The paper's own acknowledgment that most evidence is simulation-based is an honest limitation, but the missing audit trail is the primary load-bearing concern. If the corpus and coding are made fully transparent, the review would be a credible and useful contribution to the field.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Figure 2, Tables 3–4] The corpus of 50 included studies is never enumerated. The text states that 'A total of 50 studies met the predefined temporal, bibliographic, technological, energy-related, AI-related and application-domain criteria' and refers to a PRISMA-style flow diagram, but the paper reports no counts of records identified, screened, or excluded, and it does not list the 50 DOIs or otherwise identify which references constitute the corpus versus which were used only for context. Since every thematic finding in Tables 5–9 is a synthesis of these 50 studies, the central claim ('AI can improve WSN energy behaviour') rests on an unshown selection. The manuscript must provide the list of included studies (e.g., as a supplementary table or appendix), report the PRISMA flow numbers at each stage, and clearly mark corpus references in the reference list.
  2. [Section 4, quality-appraisal framework] The paper defines a technical quality-appraisal framework with normalized scores and thresholds (75% = high quality, 50–74% = moderate, below 50% = low quality and excluded, and a bibliographic/research-integrity score of 0 leads to exclusion), but no quality scores are reported for any study. Readers cannot verify that excluded studies were in fact low quality, that included studies met the stated threshold, or that the quality appraisal was applied consistently. This is load-bearing because the selection of studies is a key determinant of the review's conclusions. The authors should provide a supplementary table per included study with criterion-level scores and the final inclusion decision.
  3. [Tables 5–9, Section 5] The synthesis tables cite 'representative sources' rather than all 50 corpus studies, and the paper does not report coding frequencies. For example, the third finding and Table 5 describe routing and clustering as 'the most frequently recurring concerns,' a frequency claim, yet the paper states that categories were 'not treated as mutually exclusive' and does not provide counts. Without a complete cross-tabulation of themes by included study, it is impossible to assess whether the thematic coding is comprehensive or selective, and whether the qualitative summaries are supported by the full corpus. Please report the coding frequency per theme/domain/technique and provide a mapping from each included study to its coded categories.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3] The phrase 'three criterions' should be 'three criteria'; also, the sentence beginning 'The surveillance or monitoring component of the scope is interpreted in detail and in many parts but with a lot of caution' is awkwardly worded and could be clarified.
  2. [Section 4] There are several typographical issues, including 'Simialriy' (should be 'Similarly'), 'the paper and it does not claim to be a meta-analysis' (garbled), and inconsistent enumeration of the search sources ('ScienceDirect, Elsevier and Springer' should be rephrased). These do not affect the technical content but should be corrected.
  3. [Sections 5 and 6] There are misspellings such as 'Furtheremore' (Section 5) and 'moniotirng' (Section 6). Please perform a careful proofreading pass for typos and grammatical slips.
  4. [Introduction] The sentence 'This is important as, based on the above, it is evident that HCI use has a much broader relevance for mobile applications as it provides a unique set of challenges which must also be considered in the design phase' uses the undefined acronym 'HCI' and appears disjointed from the surrounding text; either define the term or remove the sentence.
  5. [Figure 2] The PRISMA-style flow diagram is referenced but the manuscript does not provide legible counts at each stage. Even if the figure contains numbers, they are not described in the text; please add a table or textual summary of the counts at identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion stages.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's findings are thematic aggregations of cited primary studies, with only one non-load-bearing self-citation and a transparency gap in the audit trail.

full rationale

This is a narrative systematic review, not a derivation with fitted parameters or equations, so the classic circularity patterns do not apply. The central claim that 'AI can improve WSN energy behaviour through routing and clustering, edge AI, reinforcement learning, fuzzy logic, metaheuristic optimisation, and AI-based security' is presented as a qualitative synthesis of 50 DOI-indexed studies satisfying explicit inclusion criteria (2023–2026, WSN relevance, energy dimension, AI dimension, application domain). The findings in Tables 5–9 are aggregations of the cited primary studies; the conclusion that energy efficiency cannot be treated as an isolated performance target follows from the reviewed evidence and from the paper's own stated framing, not from a definitional identity. The only self-citation is reference [15], by two of the present authors, cited in a contextual list of AI techniques ('[12,15–17]'); it is not load-bearing and does not supply any premise on which the conclusions uniquely depend. The skeptical concern that the 50 included studies, PRISMA flow counts, and quality-appraisal scores are never enumerated is a real auditability and representativeness limitation, and the paper itself acknowledges simulation-heavy evidence and lack of field validation, but missing reporting is not circularity: it weakens verification without making the argument equivalent to its inputs. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, a renamed known result, or a self-citation chain, so no circularity step is flagged beyond the minor self-citation reflected in the score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review rests on the unverifiable selection of a 50-study corpus, the assumption that the primary studies' reported results are credible, and the appropriateness of adapting PRISMA/JBI to heterogeneous simulation-based engineering studies. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced, as the paper is a synthesis.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The 50-study corpus is representative of the 2023-2026 AI-enabled WSN literature and the inclusion criteria were applied consistently.
    The paper does not provide the list of included studies or quality scores, so the representativeness of the corpus is unverifiable. Section 4, Tables 3-4.
  • domain assumption AI techniques described in the included studies genuinely improve energy efficiency in mission-critical settings as reported.
    The review relies on the primary studies' self-reported performance without independent verification. Section 5.
  • domain assumption PRISMA and JBI frameworks are appropriate for synthesizing heterogeneous engineering and simulation studies.
    The authors adapt PRISMA and JBI despite noting no single checklist fits, which weakens the methodological grounding. Section 4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Energy Efficient AI-Enabled Wireless Sensor Networks for Mission Critical Environments: A Systematic Review across Smart Grid, AI, and Urban Infrastructure Applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z74YDKHG

@misc{pith2026260804499,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Energy Efficient AI-Enabled Wireless Sensor Networks for Mission Critical Environments: A Systematic Review across Smart Grid, AI, and Urban Infrastructure Applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z74YDKHG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04499}
}
read the original abstract

Advanced wireless sensor networks powered by artificial intelligence are increasingly required for applications demanding continuous monitoring, autonomous operation, reliable communication, and fast decision support. This systematic review examines recent work from 2023 to 2026 on energy-efficient, AI-enabled wireless sensor networks (WSNs) in mission-critical environments, with particular focus on power electronics, and urban infrastructure systems. The authors synthesise a corpus of 50 DOI indexed studies satisfying inclusion criteria that received qualitative thematic coding and comparative analysis. Other references were only cited to provide historical, methodological, or technical context and were not included in the systematic review corpus. As such, our results show that AI can improve WSN energy behaviour through routing and clustering, edge AI, reinforcement learning, fuzzy logic, metaheuristic optimisation, and AI-based security. At the same time, energy efficiency cannot be treated as an isolated performance target. In mission-critical systems, security, latency, and reliability are closely interlinked requirements. The review concludes that future work should move away from optimising protocols in isolation, and instead focus on building lightweight, explainable, secure, and field-tested AI-driven WSN architectures suited to real operational environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04499 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. UML activity-style ETL logic for our review information and extraction. Moreover, Data interpretation, claim assessment and the selection mechanism were organized in relation to the connection between search terms and rationale. In this sense, data interpretation refers to how a source was judged useful for the review: not merely because it mentioned WSNs, or AI, but only where it links a technical solution to both … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. PRISMA-style flow diagram for study identification, screening, eligibility assessment, and inclusion. The thematic classification was finalized after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria as presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Typical WSN-IoT architecture with sensing, multi-hop communication, gateway/edge transport, and application layers 7. Conclusions This review evaluated recent literature on energy-efficient AI-enabled WSNs suitable for mission-critical environments, focusing on monitoring, smart grid, and urban infra￾structure applications. The bottom line is that AI-enabled WSNs are not simply enhanced versions of classical sensor … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [15]

    Sensitivity and Robustness Analysis of Hybrid Forecasting Models for Mission -Critical Energy Systems under Noisy Operational Conditions

    Pappas, S.; Gazis, A.; Mastorakis, N. Sensitivity and Robustness Analysis of Hybrid Forecasting Models for Mission -Critical Energy Systems under Noisy Operational Conditions. WSEAS Transactions on Systems and Control, 2026, 20, 595 -606. https://doi.org/10.37394/23203.2025.20.58

    work page arXiv 2026

  2. [1]

    Wireless sensor networks and communication protocols

    Jeelani, M.; Muqeem, M.; Ahmad, S.; Zafar, A.; Azrour, M.; Singh, K.P. Wireless sensor networks and communication protocols. In Integrating Intelligent Control Systems with Sensor Technologies ; IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025; pp. 189 –238. http://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0330-7.ch007

    work page doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0330-7.ch007 2025

  3. [2]

    IoT and Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs)

    Qaisar, M.U.F.; Yuan, W.; Bellavista, P.; Tabassum, H. IoT and Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). In Empowering IoT: Reliability, Network Management, Sensing, and Probabilistic Charging in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comprehensive Guide to IoT -Based WSN Network Optimization; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2025; pp. 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-96-6079-7_2 2025

  4. [3]

    An adaptive authentication approach for optimum security and energy efficiency in WMSN

    Kulkarni, A.N.; Yadav, A.; Kulkarni, N.S. An adaptive authentication approach for optimum security and energy efficiency in WMSN. Eng. Res. Express 2026, 8, 045306. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ae4290

    work page doi:10.1088/2631-8695/ae4290 2026

  5. [4]

    Enhancing smart grid reliability through cross- domain optimization of IoT sensor placement and communication links

    Sarin, S.; Singh, S.K.; Kumar, S.; Goyal, S.; Gupta, B.B.; Arya, V.; Alhomoud, A. Enhancing smart grid reliability through cross- domain optimization of IoT sensor placement and communication links. Telecommun. Syst. 2025, 88, 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-024-01235-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s11235-024-01235-1 2025

  6. [5]

    Wireless Sensor Networks for Urban Development: A Study of Applications, Chal- lenges, and Performance Metrics

    Sheeja Rani, S.; Aburukba, R.; El Fakih, K. Wireless Sensor Networks for Urban Development: A Study of Applications, Chal- lenges, and Performance Metrics. Smart Cities 2025, 8, 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8030089

    work page doi:10.3390/smartcities8030089 2025

  7. [6]

    Energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: A top -down survey

    Rault, T.; Bouabdallah, A.; Challal, Y. Energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: A top -down survey. Comput. Netw. 2014, 67, 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2014.03.027

    work page doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2014.03.027 2014

  8. [7]

    WSNs applications

    Fahmy, H.M.A. WSNs applications. In Concepts, Applications, Experimentation and Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks ; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 67–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20709-9_3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20709-9_3 2023

Show all 83 references
  1. [8]

    Algorithmic self-repair: frontiers in fault-tolerant computation

    Markarian, C.; Panthakkan, A. Algorithmic self-repair: frontiers in fault-tolerant computation. Frontiers in Computer Science 2026, 8, 1717711. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2026.1717711

    2026

  2. [9]

    Design of a wireless sensor node for overhead high voltage transmission power lines

    Ferracini, M.; Pagano, M.; Petrarca, C.; Polo, E.; Saggini, S.; Segatti, G.; Ursino, M. Design of a wireless sensor node for overhead high voltage transmission power lines. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2022, 38, 1472 –1482. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2022.3216915 FOR PEER REVIE...

    2022

  3. [10]

    Review of IoT -Based Wireless Underground Sensor Networks for Smart Cities

    Kaur, T.; Kaur, S.; Bala, I. Review of IoT -Based Wireless Underground Sensor Networks for Smart Cities. In Hybrid Optical Wireless Networks and Sensor Technologies ; Apple Academic Press, 2025; pp. 245 –270. Available online: https://www.taylorfran- cis.com/chapters/edit/10.1...

    2025 doi

  4. [11]

    Towards prolonged lifetime for deployed WSNs in outdoor environment mon- itoring

    Al-Turjman, F.M.; Hassanein, H.S.; Ibnkahla, M. Towards prolonged lifetime for deployed WSNs in outdoor environment mon- itoring. Ad Hoc Netw. 2015, 24, 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2014.08.017

    2015 doi

  5. [12]

    AI -Driven Energy-Efficient Routing in IoT-Based Wireless Sensor Networks: A Com- prehensive Review

    Thakur, S.; Sarkar, N.I.; Yongchareon, S. AI -Driven Energy-Efficient Routing in IoT-Based Wireless Sensor Networks: A Com- prehensive Review. Sensors 2025, 25, 7408. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25247408

    2025 doi

  6. [13]

    AI-Driven Cluster-Based Routing Protocols in WSNs: A Survey of Fuzzy Heuristics, Metaheuristics, and Machine Learning Models

    Shokouhifar, M.; Fanian, F.; Kuchaki Rafsanjani, M.; Hosseinzadeh, M.; Mirjalili, S. AI-Driven Cluster-Based Routing Protocols in WSNs: A Survey of Fuzzy Heuristics, Metaheuristics, and Machine Learning Models. Comput. Sci. Rev. 2024, 54, 100684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosr...

    2024

  7. [14]

    Energy-Efficient Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Meta -heuristic and Artificial Intelligence -based Ap- proach: A Comprehensive Review

    Priyadarshi, R. Energy-Efficient Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Meta -heuristic and Artificial Intelligence -based Ap- proach: A Comprehensive Review. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2024, 31, 2109–2137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-10039-6

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    Designing Intelligent Sensor Networks: A Comprehensive Survey of Sensing, Edge AI, and 5G+/6G Connectivity

    Herglotz, C.; Jablonski, I.; Karnapke, R.; Shahin, K.; Reichenbach, M. Designing Intelligent Sensor Networks: A Comprehensive Survey of Sensing, Edge AI, and 5G+/6G Connectivity. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 172306 –172325. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3615205

    2025

  9. [17]

    A Comprehensive Survey of Machine Learning Applied to Resource Allocation in Wireless Communications

    Pivoto, D.G.S.; de Figueiredo, F.A.P.; de Lamare, R.C.; Luna, J.M.; Vieira, F.L.J. A Comprehensive Survey of Machine Learning Applied to Resource Allocation in Wireless Communications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2025.3552370

    2025

  10. [18]

    AI-driven energy management techniques for enhancing network longevity in wireless sensor networks

    Hadi, A.S.A.A.; Wahab, A.A.B.A.; Hamzah, F.M.; Veena, B.S. AI-driven energy management techniques for enhancing network longevity in wireless sensor networks. J. Robot. Control 2025, 6, 246 –261. Available online: https://journal.umy.ac.id/in- dex.php/jrc/article/view/24885 (a...

    2025

  11. [19]

    Artificial Intelligence Based Energy Optimiza tion Framework for Wireless Sensor Networks

    Danghi, P.S.; Maniraj, K.; Jain, P.; Adilakshmi, K.; Garapati, R.S.; Jain, S.K. Artificial Intelligence Based Energy Optimiza tion Framework for Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE 5th International Conference on ICT in Business Industry & Government (ICT...

    2025

  12. [20]

    WSN strategies based on sensors, deployment, sensing models, coverage and energy efficiency: Review, approaches and open issues

    Amutha, J.; Sharma, S.; Nagar, J. WSN strategies based on sensors, deployment, sensing models, coverage and energy efficiency: Review, approaches and open issues. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2020, 111, 1089–1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06903-z

    2020 doi

  13. [21]

    An evolutionary computing -based energy-efficient solution for IoT -enabled software- defined sensor network architecture

    Mishra, P.; Kumar, N.; Godfrey, W.W. An evolutionary computing -based energy-efficient solution for IoT -enabled software- defined sensor network architecture. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 2022, 35, e5111. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.5111

    2022 doi

  14. [22]

    Efficient communication in wire- less sensor networks using optimized energy efficient engroove leach clustering protocol

    Meenakshi, N.; Ahmad, S.; Prabu, A.V.; Rao, J.N.; Othman, N.A.; Abdeljaber, H.A.; Nazeer, J. Efficient communication in wire- less sensor networks using optimized energy efficient engroove leach clustering protocol. Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 2024, 29, 985–

    2024

  15. [23]

    Energy -efficient and resilient secure routing in energy harvesting wireless sensor networks with transceiver noises: EcoSecNet design and analysis

    Muhammad Umer, M.; Hong, J.; Muhammad, O.; Awwad, F.A.; Ismail, E.A. Energy -efficient and resilient secure routing in energy harvesting wireless sensor networks with transceiver noises: EcoSecNet design and analysis. J. Sens. 2024, 2024, 3570302. https://www.researchgate.net/...

    2024

  16. [24]

    Resilient wireless sensor networks in indus trial contexts via energy -efficient optimization and trust -based secure routing

    Singh, A.; Raj, A.; Rani, P.; Khatibi, A.; Aldeeb, H.; Shukla, P.K.; Hassan, M.M. Resilient wireless sensor networks in indus trial contexts via energy -efficient optimization and trust -based secure routing. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 2025, 18, 132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s120...

    2025 doi

  17. [25]

    A survey on cyber -physical security of active distribution net- works in smart grids

    Khalaf, M.; Ayad, A.; Tushar, M.H.K.; Kassouf, M.; Kundur, D. A survey on cyber -physical security of active distribution net- works in smart grids. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 29414–29444. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3364362

    2024

  18. [26]

    GRNN -based detection of eavesdropping attacks in SWIPT -enabled smart grid wireless sensor networks

    Jiang, W.; Wang, J.; Hsiung, K.L.; Chen, H.Y. GRNN -based detection of eavesdropping attacks in SWIPT -enabled smart grid wireless sensor networks. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024, 11, 37381–37393. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2024.3443277

    2024

  19. [27]

    Energy efficient lightweight scheme to identify selective forwarding attack on wireless sensor networks

    Jawarneh, M.; Jayakrishna, M.; Davuluri, S.K.; Ramanan, S.V.; Singh, P.P.; Joseph, J.A. Energy efficient lightweight scheme to identify selective forwarding attack on wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Networki...

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    Coordinated data falsification attack detection in the domain of distributed generation using deep learning

    Bhusal, N.; Gautam, M.; Shukla, R.M.; Benidris , M.; Sengupta, S. Coordinated data falsification attack detection in the domain of distributed generation using deep learning. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2022, 134, 107345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107345

    2022

  21. [29]

    Edge AI for smart cities: Foundations, challenges, and opportunities

    Velaga, K.S.; Guo, Y.; Yu, W. Edge AI for smart cities: Foundations, challenges, and opportunities. Smart Cities 2025, 8, 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8060211

    2025 doi

  22. [30]

    AI -IoT low -cost pollution -monitoring sensor network to assist citizens with respiratory problems

    Felici-Castell, S.; García -Pineda, M.; Segura -García, J.; Alcaraz -Calero, J.M.; Wang, Q. AI -IoT low -cost pollution -monitoring sensor network to assist citizens with respiratory problems. Sensors 2023, 23, 9585. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23239585

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    Energy-efficient wireless sensor network for urban groundwater level monitoring using machine learning and sink mobility

    Manchanda, R.; Lakshmi, A.V.; Kaur, G.; Sudhamsu, G.; Samal, S.K.; Jebaselvi, G.A.; Ashok, N. Energy-efficient wireless sensor network for urban groundwater level monitoring using machine learning and sink mobility. Sci. Rep. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39435-1

    2026 doi

  24. [32]

    Energy -efficient routing pro- tocols for wireless sensor networks: Architectures, strategies, and performance

    Behera, T.M.; Samal, U.C.; Mohapatra, S.K.; Khan, M.S.; Appasani, B.; Bizon, N.; Thounthong, P. Energy -efficient routing pro- tocols for wireless sensor networks: Architectures, strategies, and performance. Electronics 2022, 11, 2282. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11152282

    2022 doi

  25. [33]

    Energy-efficiency strategies for wireless sensor networks in IoT

    Kolhar, A. Energy-efficiency strategies for wireless sensor networks in IoT. In Energy-Efficient Deep Learning Approaches in IoT, Fog, and Green Blockchain Revolution; IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025; pp. 167–192. http://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0300- 0.ch006

    2025 doi

  26. [34]

    Wireless sensor networks: From fundamentals and applications to innovations and future trends

    Trigka, M.; Dritsas, E. Wireless sensor networks: From fundamentals and applications to innovations and future trends. IEEE Access 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3572328

    2025

  27. [35]

    Recent trends in localization, routing, and security for wireless sensor networks

    Vishwas, H.N.; Ramesh, T.K. Recent trends in localization, routing, and security for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3555280

    2025

  28. [36]

    On the lifetime of wireless sensor networks

    Chen, Y.; Zhao, Q. On the lifetime of wireless sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Lett. 2005, 9, 976 –978. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2005.11010

    2005 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Cluster based data aggregation scheme for latency and packet loss reduction in WSN

    Devi, V.S.; Ravi, T.; Priya, S.B. Cluster based data aggregation scheme for latency and packet loss reduction in WSN. Comput. Commun. 2020, 149, 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2019.10.003

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    Stochastic gradient descent intrusions detection for wireless sensor network attack detection system using machine learning

    Saleh, H.M.; Marouane, H.; Fakhfakh, A. Stochastic gradient descent intrusions detection for wireless sensor network attack detection system using machine learning. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 3825–3836. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3349248

    2024

  31. [39]

    A Survey on Coverage and Security in Wireless Sensor Networks

    Moslehi, M.M.; Ammari, H.M. A Survey on Coverage and Security in Wireless Sensor Networks. Preprints 2025. http://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202505.0438.v1

    2025

  32. [40]

    Energy -aware neuro-fuzzy routing model for WSN based -IoT

    Jeevanantham, S.; Rebekka, B. Energy -aware neuro-fuzzy routing model for WSN based -IoT. Telecommun. Syst. 2022, 81, 441–

    2022

  33. [41]

    Enhancing security and energy efficiency in wireless sensor network routing with IOT challenges: a thorough review

    Mushtaq, M.U.; Hong, J.; Owais, M.; Danso, S.A. Enhancing security and energy efficiency in wireless sensor network routing with IOT challenges: a thorough review. LC Int. J. STEM 2023, 4, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10184917

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    Optimization techniques for energy efficiency in machining processes—a review

    Abdelaoui, F.Z.E.; Jabri, A.; Barkany, A.E. Optimization techniques for energy efficiency in machining processes—a review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2023, 125, 2967–3001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10927-y

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    The potential and challenges of Bim in enhancing energy efficiency in existing build- ings: A comprehensive review

    Alvur, E.; Anaç, M.; Cuce, P.M.; Cuce, E. The potential and challenges of Bim in enhancing energy efficiency in existing build- ings: A comprehensive review. Sustain. Clean Build. 2026, 42–65. https://doi.org/10.37256/scb.1120264988

    2026 doi

  36. [44]

    A review of hybrid clustering and routing protocols for the hotspot problem in wireless sensor networks

    Lonkar, B.; Charde, P.; Kuthe, A.; Dehankar, A.; Dandekar, P.; Puri, N.; Banabakode, D. A review of hybrid clustering and routing protocols for the hotspot problem in wireless sensor networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 2026, 19, 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-025-02135-0

    2026 doi

  37. [45]

    Energy -efficient and secure routing strategy for opportunistic data transmission in WSNs

    Narayana, P.; Keerthi, K.; Khalaf, O.I.; Chithaluru, P.; Patil, M.A.; Tumula, S.; Sharif, M.S. Energy -efficient and secure routing strategy for opportunistic data transmission in WSNs. J. Cyber Secur. Technol. 2026, 10, 1 –36. https://doi.org/10.1080/23742917.2024.2431355

    2026

  38. [46]

    Energy-Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks: A Novel Hybrid Adaptive Ar- chimedes Marine Predator -Based Routing Strategy

    Mathupriya, S.; Chinnasamy, A.; Thangarajan, S.K. Energy-Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks: A Novel Hybrid Adaptive Ar- chimedes Marine Predator -Based Routing Strategy. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 2026, 19, 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-025- 02104-7

    2026 doi

  39. [47]

    Hybrid Energy-Aware Framework for WSNs: Clustering, Routing, and Optimization Using PSO, Fuzzy Logic, and SOM

    Vishwas, H.N.; Ramesh, T.K. Hybrid Energy-Aware Framework for WSNs: Clustering, Routing, and Optimization Using PSO, Fuzzy Logic, and SOM. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCOMS.2026.3666185

    2026

  40. [48]

    A Hybrid 8D -Chaotic Search and Bio-Inspired Rejuvenation Framework for Energy-Efficient Routing in Wireless Body Sensor Networks

    Jebur, T.K.; Penalver, L.; Lloret, J.; Hoomod, H.K. A Hybrid 8D -Chaotic Search and Bio-Inspired Rejuvenation Framework for Energy-Efficient Routing in Wireless Body Sensor Networks. IEEE Sens. J. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2026.3680837

    2026

  41. [49]

    An Energy -Efficient Routing Protocol with Reinforcement Learning in Software-Defined Wireless Sensor Networks

    Godfrey, D.; Suh, B.K.; Lim, B.H.; Lee, K.C.; Kim, K.I. An Energy -Efficient Routing Protocol with Reinforcement Learning in Software-Defined Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors 2023, 23, 8435. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23208435 FOR PEER REVIEW 24 of 25

    2023 doi

  42. [50]

    Energy-Efficient Routing Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach

    Soltani, P.; Eskandarpour, M.; Ahmadizad, A.; Soleimani, H. Energy-Efficient Routing Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach. arXiv 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.14679

    2025 doi arXiv

  43. [51]

    Role of AI in wireless sensor network

    Ramachandran, N.; Devendiran, R.; Murugan, T. Role of AI in wireless sensor network. In Adaptive AI in Sensor Informatics; Elsevier, 2026; pp. 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-36412-9.00012-1

    2026 doi

  44. [52]

    Ensemble bagging-based classifier for eavesdropper detection in 6G wireless networks

    Mohan, S.; S, N.; K, G. Ensemble bagging-based classifier for eavesdropper detection in 6G wireless networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 2025, 18, 238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-025-02049-x

    2025 doi

  45. [53]

    Security with Wireless Sensor Networks in Smart Grids: A Review

    Yilmaz, S.; Dener, M. Security with Wireless Sensor Networks in Smart Grids: A Review. Symmetry 2024, 16, 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16101295

    2024 doi

  46. [54]

    AI-Enabled Integration of Smart Grids and Green Hydrogen: A System-Level Review of Flexibility, Control, and Cyber -Physical Energy Systems

    Bibih, M.; Choukri, K.; El Khaili, M.; Chakir, H.E. AI-Enabled Integration of Smart Grids and Green Hydrogen: A System-Level Review of Flexibility, Control, and Cyber -Physical Energy Systems. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 2504. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052504

    2026 doi

  47. [55]

    Internet of Things -Based Energy Consumption -Aware Framework Design for Smart Grid Environ- ment

    Colak, M.A.; Bayilmis, C. Internet of Things -Based Energy Consumption -Aware Framework Design for Smart Grid Environ- ment. Sensors 2026, 26, 2989. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26102989

    2026 doi

  48. [56]

    AutoGMM -RWKV: A Detecting Scheme Based on Attention Mechanisms Against Selective For- warding Attacks in Wireless Sensor Networks

    Xie, S.; Li, Y.; Ma, Y.; Wu, Y. AutoGMM -RWKV: A Detecting Scheme Based on Attention Mechanisms Against Selective For- warding Attacks in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Internet Things J. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2024.3484999

    2025

  49. [57]

    Energy -Efficient and Trust-Based Autono- mous Underwater Vehicle Scheme for 6G -Enabled Internet of Underwater Things

    Hussain, A.; Li, S.; Hussain, T.; Attar, R.W.; Alhomoud, A.; Alsagri , R.; Zaman, K. Energy -Efficient and Trust-Based Autono- mous Underwater Vehicle Scheme for 6G -Enabled Internet of Underwater Things. Sensors 2025, 25, 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25010286

    2025 doi

  50. [58]

    A Cluster -Based Energy-Efficient Secure Optimal Path -Routing Protocol for Wireless Body -Area Sensor Networks

    Dass, R.; Narayanan, M.; Ananthakrishnan, G.; Kathirvel Murugan, T.; Nallakaruppan, M.K.; Somayaji, S.R.K.; Arputharaj, K.; Khan, S.B.; Almusharraf, A. A Cluster -Based Energy-Efficient Secure Optimal Path -Routing Protocol for Wireless Body -Area Sensor Networks. Sensors 2023...

    2023 doi

  51. [59]

    Performance Evaluation of LoRa-Based Wireless Sensor Network for Smart Waste Bank Data Transmission

    Kusumawardani, M.; Ghazali, R.Y.; Mustafa, L.D.; Mahfudi, I. Performance Evaluation of LoRa-Based Wireless Sensor Network for Smart Waste Bank Data Transmission. JUITA J. Inform. 2026, 177–184. https://doi.org/10.30595/juita.v14i1.28746

    2026 doi

  52. [60]

    Energy Consumption Benchmarking of Post -Quantum Cryptography on Resource-Constrained IoT Nodes

    Holgado-Moreno, A.; Portilla, J.; López -Fernández, D.; Redondo, L. Energy Consumption Benchmarking of Post -Quantum Cryptography on Resource-Constrained IoT Nodes. IEEE Internet Things J. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2026.3663839

    2026

  53. [61]

    LEACH Protocol Evolution in WSN: A Review of Energy Consumption Optimization and Security Reinforcement

    Chu, A.; Zhang, T.; Wang, C. LEACH Protocol Evolution in WSN: A Review of Energy Consumption Optimization and Security Reinforcement. Sensors 2026, 26, 2272. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26072272

    2026 doi

  54. [62]

    Distributed Intelligence in the Artificial Intelligence of Things: A Comprehensive Review of Architectures, Applications, and Challenges

    Ortiz, L.A.P.; Cuenca-Sánchez, A.; Loarte, B. Distributed Intelligence in the Artificial Intelligence of Things: A Comprehensive Review of Architectures, Applications, and Challenges. Future Internet 2026, 18, 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi18060296

    2026 doi

  55. [63]

    Adaptive Energy Proficient Optimization Routing Technique using Fuzzy-based Swarm Intelligence in WSNs

    Singh, O.; Rishiwal, V.; Yadav, M.; Kumar, L. Adaptive Energy Proficient Optimization Routing Technique using Fuzzy-based Swarm Intelligence in WSNs. Franklin Open 2026, 100651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fraope.2026.100651

    2026

  56. [64]

    Energy-Efficient Clustering with Graph Neural Networks in Wire- less Sensor Networks

    Saadati, M.; Mazinani, S.M.; Khazaei, A.A.; Chabok, S.J.S.M. Energy-Efficient Clustering with Graph Neural Networks in Wire- less Sensor Networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 2024, 158, 103432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2024.103432

    2024

  57. [65]

    Energy Efficient Resource Allocation for Power Transmissio n Line Monitoring Sensor Networks

    Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wei, Y.; Xu, H.; Zhao, L.; Zhao, J.; Tian, B. Energy Efficient Resource Allocation for Power Transmissio n Line Monitoring Sensor Networks. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-025-02536-y

    2026 doi

  58. [66]

    AI-Driven Adaptive Urban Lighting for Reducing Light Pollution and Energy Consumption in a Multi-Level Perspective

    Bodizs, D.; Zseni, A.; Schmeller, D. AI-Driven Adaptive Urban Lighting for Reducing Light Pollution and Energy Consumption in a Multi-Level Perspective. Energies 2026, 19, 1128. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19051128

    2026 doi

  59. [67]

    AGRIC: Artificial Intelligence -Based Green Routing for Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems in Extreme Environment

    Verma, S.; Kaur, S.; Garg, S.; Sharma, A.K.; Alrashoud, M. AGRIC: Artificial Intelligence -Based Green Routing for Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems in Extreme Environment. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3316269

    2024

  60. [68]

    Energy Optimization Routing for Hierarchical Cluster Based WSN Using Artificial Bee Colony

    Santhosh, G.; Prasad, K.V. Energy Optimization Routing for Hierarchical Cluster Based WSN Using Artificial Bee Colony. Meas. Sens. 2023, 29, 100848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2023.100848

    2023

  61. [69]

    JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis ; JBI, 2024

    Aromataris, E.; Lockwood, C.; Porritt, K.; Pilla, B.; Jordan, Z., Eds. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis ; JBI, 2024. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-24-01

    2024 doi

  62. [70]

    Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A. ; Brennan, S.E.; Chou, R.; Glanville, J.; Grimshaw, J.M.; Hróbjartsson, A.; Lalu, M.M.; Li, T.; Loder, E.W.; Mayo -Wilson, E.; McDonald, S.; McGuinness...

    2020 doi

  63. [71]

    Enhanced Distributed Energy-Efficient Clustering (DEEC) Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Modular Implementation and Performance Analysis

    Juwaied, A.; Jackowska-Strumillo, L.; Majchrowicz, M. Enhanced Distributed Energy-Efficient Clustering (DEEC) Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Modular Implementation and Performance Analysis. Sensors 2025, 25, 4015. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25134015 FOR PEER REVIEW 25 of 25

    2025 doi

  64. [72]

    Intelligent Clustering and Adaptive Energy Management in Wireless Sensor Networks

    Kundu, M.; Kanjilal, R.; Uysal, I. Intelligent Clustering and Adaptive Energy Management in Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors 2025, 25, 2588. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25082588

    2025 doi

  65. [73]

    Energy -Efficient, Cluster-Based Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Using Fuzzy Logic and Quantum Annealing Algorithm

    Wang, H.; Liu, K.; Wang, C.; Hu, H. Energy -Efficient, Cluster-Based Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Using Fuzzy Logic and Quantum Annealing Algorithm. Sensors 2024, 24, 4105. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24134105

    2024 doi

  66. [74]

    A Hybrid Ap- proach for Energy Consumption and Improvement in Sensor Network Lifespan in Wireless Sensor Networks

    Ullah, A.; Khan, F.S.; Mohy -ud-din, Z.; Hassany, N.; Gul, J.Z.; Khan, M.; Kim, W.Y.; Park, Y.C.; Rehman, M.M. A Hybrid Ap- proach for Energy Consumption and Improvement in Sensor Network Lifespan in Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors 2024, 24,

    2024

  67. [75]

    An Efficient DRL - Dual-Conceptualized Firefly-Weighted Grey Wolf Optimization Approach for Clustering and Routing in IoT Cloud Environ- mental Wireless Sensor Network

    Sreelakshmi, K.; Jadhav, S.H.; Rekha, K.S.; Balaramakrishna, K.V.; Nagaraju, S.; Dahiya, A.; Kishore, K.H. An Efficient DRL - Dual-Conceptualized Firefly-Weighted Grey Wolf Optimization Approach for Clustering and Routing in IoT Cloud Environ- mental Wireless Sensor Network. I...

    2026 doi

  68. [76]

    Cross-layer optimization employing energy efficient routing protocols in WSN

    Alatabani, L.E.; Saeed, R.A.; Ali, E.S. Cross-layer optimization employing energy efficient routing protocols in WSN. In Energy Efficient Internet of Things-Based Wireless Sensor Network; 2026; pp. 273–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394314751.ch10

    2026 doi

  69. [77]

    WOAD3QN -RP: An Intelligent Routing Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks - A Swarm Intelligence and Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Approach

    Yang, X.; Yan, J.; Wang, D.; Xu, Y.; Hua, G. WOAD3QN -RP: An Intelligent Routing Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks - A Swarm Intelligence and Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024, 246, 123089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.123089

    2024

  70. [78]

    A Survey of Energy -Efficient Clustering Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Metaheuristic Approaches

    Del-Valle-Soto, C.; Rodriguez, A.; Ascencio-Pina, C.R. A Survey of Energy -Efficient Clustering Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Metaheuristic Approaches. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10402-w

    2023 doi

  71. [79]

    Conversational Intelligence Framework for Secure and Energy -Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks

    Bal, S.; Mandal, L. Conversational Intelligence Framework for Secure and Energy -Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks. Discov. Netw. 2026, 2, 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44354-026-00024-3

    2026 doi

  72. [80]

    Device -Level Energy Efficiency for Machine-Type Communications and Sensing

    Ntabeni, U.; Basutli, B.; Alves, H.; Chuma, J. Device -Level Energy Efficiency for Machine-Type Communications and Sensing. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCOMS.2024.3443920 Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in a...

    2024

  73. [459]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-022-00955-6

    doi

  74. [1001]

    https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2023.9010056

    2023

  75. [1353]

    https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051353

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.