Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Column Type Annotation using ChatGPT

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.00745 v2 pith:Z7KELO2D submitted 2023-06-01 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords annotationcolumntypechatgpttablecolumnsdatatask
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Column type annotation is the task of annotating the columns of a relational table with the semantic type of the values contained in each column. Column type annotation is an important pre-processing step for data search and data integration in the context of data lakes. State-of-the-art column type annotation methods either rely on matching table columns to properties of a knowledge graph or fine-tune pre-trained language models such as BERT for column type annotation. In this work, we take a different approach and explore using ChatGPT for column type annotation. We evaluate different prompt designs in zero- and few-shot settings and experiment with providing task definitions and detailed instructions to the model. We further implement a two-step table annotation pipeline which first determines the class of the entities described in the table and depending on this class asks ChatGPT to annotate columns using only the relevant subset of the overall vocabulary. Using instructions as well as the two-step pipeline, ChatGPT reaches F1 scores of over 85% in zero- and one-shot setups. To reach a similar F1 score a RoBERTa model needs to be fine-tuned with 356 examples. This comparison shows that ChatGPT is able deliver competitive results for the column type annotation task given no or only a minimal amount of task-specific demonstrations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Interpretable Column Annotation with LLM-Symbolized Decision Process Materialization

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SymCA reaches state-of-the-art column type and property annotation by inducing a label-skeleton with LLMs and evolving per-node random-forest operators.

  2. CaTE Data Curation for Trustworthy AI

    cs.LG 2025-08 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    A synthesis of data curation practices for trustworthy AI, framed around an actionable definition of trustworthiness and a decision tree.

  3. An Empirical study on LLM-based Log Retrieval for Software Engineering Metadata Management

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A natural-language log retrieval pipeline using LLM-generated video and signal descriptions shows that prompt and model choice matter, but its proposed reliability metrics are not validated against any ground truth.

Pith tools