The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2103.01926 · v2 · pith:ZAGHU73U · submitted 2021-03-02 · stat.ML · cs.LG· econ.EM· stat.AP

Slow-Growing Trees

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:ZAGHU73Urecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification stat.ML cs.LGecon.EMstat.AP
keywords learningtreetreesboogingcartgreedyperformancerandom
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Random Forest's performance can be matched by a single slow-growing tree (SGT), which uses a learning rate to tame CART's greedy algorithm. SGT exploits the view that CART is an extreme case of an iterative weighted least square procedure. Moreover, a unifying view of Boosted Trees (BT) and Random Forests (RF) is presented. Greedy ML algorithms' outcomes can be improved using either "slow learning" or diversification. SGT applies the former to estimate a single deep tree, and Booging (bagging stochastic BT with a high learning rate) uses the latter with additive shallow trees. The performance of this tree ensemble quaternity (Booging, BT, SGT, RF) is assessed on simulated and real regression tasks.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.