REVIEW 1 cited by
Reclaiming Privacy and Performance over Centralized DNS
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The Domain Name System (DNS) is both a key determinant of users' quality of experience (QoE) and privy to their tastes, preferences, and even the devices they own. Growing concern about user privacy and QoE has brought a number of alternative DNS services, from public DNS to encrypted and Oblivious DNS. While offering valuable features, these DNS variants are operated by a handful of providers, reinforcing a trend towards centralization that has raised concerns about privacy, competition, resilience and Web QoE. The goal of this work is to let users take advantage of third-party DNS services, without sacrificing privacy or performance. We follow Wheeler's advice, adding another level of indirection with an end-system DNS resolver, Onoma, that improves privacy, avoiding DNS-based user-reidentification by inserting and sharding requests across resolvers, and improves performance by running resolution races among resolvers and reinstating the client-resolver proximity assumption content delivery networks rely on. As our evaluation shows, while there may not be an ideal service for all clients in all places, Onoma dynamically finds the best service for any given location.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Collusion Resistant DNS With Private Information Retrieval
PDNS integrates single-server PIR into DNS so a resolver responds without seeing the requested domain, with a prototype and measurements, but it shifts some query exposure to authoritative name servers and handles onl...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.