REVIEW 1 cited by
Heavy Ball Momentum for Non-Strongly Convex Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
When considering the minimization of a quadratic or strongly convex function, it is well known that first-order methods involving an inertial term weighted by a constant-in-time parameter are particularly efficient (see Polyak [32], Nesterov [28], and references therein). By setting the inertial parameter according to the condition number of the objective function, these methods guarantee a fast exponential decay of the error. We prove that this type of schemes (which are later called Heavy Ball schemes) is relevant in a relaxed setting, i.e. for composite functions satisfying a quadratic growth condition. In particular, we adapt V-FISTA, introduced by Beck in [10] for strongly convex functions, to this broader class of functions. To the authors' knowledge, the resulting worst-case convergence rates are faster than any other in the literature, including those of FISTA restart schemes. No assumption on the set of minimizers is required and guarantees are also given in the non-optimal case, i.e. when the condition number is not exactly known. This analysis follows the study of the corresponding continuous-time dynamical system (Heavy Ball with friction system), for which new convergence results of the trajectory are shown.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Heavy-ball dynamics with Hessian-driven damping for non-convex optimization under the {\L}ojasiewicz condition
For non-convex objectives satisfying the Łojasiewicz inequality of order 2, the DIN continuous-time dynamics converge in function value at a rate arbitrarily close to e^{-2√µ t}, which is worst-case optimal within thi...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.