REVIEW 2 cited by
Training verified learners with learned verifiers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper proposes a new algorithmic framework, predictor-verifier training, to train neural networks that are verifiable, i.e., networks that provably satisfy some desired input-output properties. The key idea is to simultaneously train two networks: a predictor network that performs the task at hand,e.g., predicting labels given inputs, and a verifier network that computes a bound on how well the predictor satisfies the properties being verified. Both networks can be trained simultaneously to optimize a weighted combination of the standard data-fitting loss and a term that bounds the maximum violation of the property. Experiments show that not only is the predictor-verifier architecture able to train networks to achieve state of the art verified robustness to adversarial examples with much shorter training times (outperforming previous algorithms on small datasets like MNIST and SVHN), but it can also be scaled to produce the first known (to the best of our knowledge) verifiably robust networks for CIFAR-10.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
TriGuard: Testing Model Safety with Attribution Entropy, Verification, and Drift
TriGuard reports that attribution drift and entropy provide safety insights orthogonal to adversarial accuracy, and that entropy-regularized training reduces this drift.
-
Learning to Optimize by Differentiable Programming
A tutorial survey of differentiable-programming-based first-order optimization, with dual-based PyTorch case studies and no new results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.