Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor

Quantum algorithms for path and cycle containment problems

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-12 · grok-4.3

Pith's one-line read A dichotomy for path-containment problems shows some are solvable with linear queries while others are equivalent to cycle problems and admit a quantum-walk algorithm with query complexity Õ(n^{3/2 - α_k}) where α_k decays exponentially in k, plus a conditional lower bound.

desk verdict The paper gives a concrete improvement to the quantum query bound for an equivalence class of path and cycle problems via a new quantum walk, plus a clean dichotomy, but the constant-factor claim on the randomized reductions is the part that needs the closest look. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.09017 v2 pith:ZCXPIOJX submitted 2026-05-09 quant-ph cs.CC

classification quant-phcs.CC
keywords problemsquerypathcomplexitycyclecycle-containmentequivalencegraph
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum query complexity counts how many times a quantum algorithm must inspect entries of the input graph's adjacency matrix to answer a question. The authors study several versions of the problem of finding a path or cycle of length exactly k or at most k, in directed or undirected graphs, with or without promises on the input. Using randomized reductions they prove that many of these variants have essentially the same complexity. For path problems they obtain a clean split: some versions need only a linear number of queries while the remaining ones collapse into a single equivalence class that also contains several cycle problems. For this hard class they construct a quantum-walk algorithm whose query cost is Õ(n^{3/2 - α_k}) with α_k roughly (1.33)^{-k}. This beats the previous O(n^{3/2}) bound by a factor that grows with k. They also prove that no linear-query quantum algorithm exists for the hard class unless the graph-collision problem itself admits an O(√n)-query algorithm.
Extended reading notes

Core claim

We prove a novel quantum-walk-based algorithm that achieves query complexity Õ(n^{3/2-α_k}), where α_k ∈ Θ(c^{-k}) and c = √(3+√17)/2 ≈ 1.33, beating the previous best upper bound O(n^{3/2}).

Load-bearing premise

The randomized reductions between problem variants preserve quantum query complexity up to constant factors; if this fails for any of the listed variants, the claimed equivalence classes and the transfer of the new upper bound would collapse.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript classifies quantum query complexities for path- and cycle-containment problems of constant length k in the adjacency-matrix model. Randomized reductions are used to group variants into equivalence classes, yielding a dichotomy for path problems (some linear-query solvable, others equivalent to each other and to certain cycle problems). For the non-trivial class, a new quantum-walk algorithm is given with query complexity Õ(n^{3/2-α_k}) where α_k ∈ Θ(c^{-k}) and c = √(3+√17)/2 ≈ 1.33, improving on the prior O(n^{3/2}) bound; a conditional lower bound is also derived from the graph-collision problem.

Significance. If the reductions and algorithm hold, the work meaningfully advances quantum query complexity for subgraph problems by supplying both an explicit improved upper bound via quantum walks and a structural dichotomy via reductions. The exponential-in-k improvement in the exponent for fixed k and the conditional lower bound are concrete contributions that help map the complexity landscape.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3] Section 3 (Randomized Reductions and Equivalence Classes): The assertion that randomized reductions preserve quantum query complexity up to constant factors is load-bearing for the equivalence classes and for transferring the Õ(n^{3/2-α_k}) upper bound to all members of the class. The manuscript must supply explicit bounds on error-probability amplification, the number of oracle calls in the reduction, and the overhead of simulating the adjacency-matrix oracle on the reduced instances; without these, the claimed constant-factor equivalence cannot be verified.
  2. [Section 4] Section 4 (Quantum Walk Algorithm): The derivation of the exponent α_k ∈ Θ(c^{-k}) with the specific constant c = √(3+√17)/2 is central to the claimed improvement over O(n^{3/2}). The recurrence or closed-form analysis that produces this exponent (and confirms it is strictly positive for each fixed k) should be stated with all intermediate steps so that the query-complexity bound can be checked independently.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract lists promise versions without enumerating them; a one-sentence clarification of the promise assumptions would improve readability.
  2. [Notation] Notation for the Õ symbol and the precise definition of α_k should be repeated at the first use in the main text for consistency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful comments on our manuscript. We address the two major comments below and will incorporate the necessary clarifications and details in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Section 3] Section 3 (Randomized Reductions and Equivalence Classes): The assertion that randomized reductions preserve quantum query complexity up to constant factors is load-bearing for the equivalence classes and for transferring the Õ(n^{3/2-α_k}) upper bound to all members of the class. The manuscript must supply explicit bounds on error-probability amplification, the number of oracle calls in the reduction, and the overhead of simulating the adjacency-matrix oracle on the reduced instances; without these, the claimed constant-factor equivalence cannot be verified.

    Authors: We agree that explicit bounds are required to rigorously establish constant-factor preservation of quantum query complexity. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (or short appendix) that (i) specifies the error-amplification procedure, showing that O(1) independent repetitions suffice to boost success probability to 2/3 while incurring only constant overhead, (ii) bounds the number of reduction oracle calls by a k-dependent constant, and (iii) proves that each adjacency-matrix query on the reduced instance is simulated by at most a constant number of original-oracle calls. These additions will confirm the claimed equivalence classes. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section 4] Section 4 (Quantum Walk Algorithm): The derivation of the exponent α_k ∈ Θ(c^{-k}) with the specific constant c = √(3+√17)/2 is central to the claimed improvement over O(n^{3/2}). The recurrence or closed-form analysis that produces this exponent (and confirms it is strictly positive for each fixed k) should be stated with all intermediate steps so that the query-complexity bound can be checked independently.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The exponent α_k is obtained from the spectral analysis of a quantum walk on the Johnson graph whose marked set encodes paths of length k. In the revision we will expand the relevant subsection to include the full derivation: we first recall the general quantum-walk query bound, then derive the recurrence relating the improvement factor at step k to the eigenvalue gap and marked-set density at step k-1, solve the resulting linear recurrence to obtain the closed form α_k = Θ(c^{-k}) with the stated constant c, and verify that α_k > 0 for every finite k. All algebraic steps will be shown explicitly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; upper bound from explicit new algorithm, reductions are external assumptions

full rationale

The paper derives its main upper bound Õ(n^{3/2-α_k}) from an explicit quantum-walk algorithm constructed in the adjacency-matrix model, with α_k obtained from the analysis of the walk's hitting time or eigenvalue gap rather than any fitted parameter or self-referential definition. Equivalence classes among problem variants are established by randomized reductions whose preservation of quantum query complexity (up to constants) is stated as a separate claim, not derived from the complexity bound itself. The conditional lower bound references the independent graph-collision problem. No step in the provided derivation chain reduces the claimed result to a quantity defined by the result, nor relies on load-bearing self-citations or smuggled ansatzes. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on the standard quantum query model and the assumption that randomized reductions preserve query complexity up to constants. No free parameters are fitted to data and no new entities are postulated.

assumptions (2)
  • standard math Quantum query complexity is measured in the adjacency-matrix model
    All variants are defined and analyzed inside this standard model.
  • domain assumption Randomized reductions between problem variants preserve quantum query complexity up to constant factors
    Used to establish the equivalence classes and transfer the new upper bound.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum algorithms for path and cycle containment problems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZCXPIOJX

@misc{pith2026260509017,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum algorithms for path and cycle containment problems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZCXPIOJX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.09017}
}
abstract

The quantum query complexity of subgraph-containment problems, which ask whether a given subgraph $H$ is present in an input graph $G$, has been the subject of considerable study. However, even for relatively simple subgraphs, such as paths and cycles, a complete understanding of their query complexities remains elusive. In this work, we consider several variants of path- and cycle-containment problems in the adjacency matrix model, where we search for paths or cycles of constant length $k$. We compare the settings where the graphs are directed or undirected, where the goal is to detect or find the existence of a path/cycle, and where the path/cycle we are looking for has length exactly $k$, or at most $k$. We also consider several promise versions of these problems, where we suppose that the input graph has a certain structure. We characterize the relative difficulty of these variants of the path/cycle-containment problems, by relating them to one another using randomized reductions, and grouping them into equivalence classes. When we restrict our attention to path-containment problems, we get a dichotomy result. Some of the path-containment problems can be solved using a linear number of queries, and all the others are equivalent to one another (and additionally to several cycle-containment problems) under randomized reductions, up to constant overhead. For the latter equivalence class, we prove a novel quantum-walk-based algorithm that achieves query complexity $\widetilde{O}(n^{3/2-\alpha_k})$, where $\alpha_k \in \Theta(c^{-k})$ and $c = \sqrt{3+\sqrt{17}}/2 \approx 1.33$, beating the previous best upper bound $O(n^{3/2})$ on its query complexity. We also provide a conditional lower bound based on the graph-collision problem, which implies that this equivalence class does not admit linear-query quantum algorithms unless graph collision admits an $O(\sqrt{n})$ query algorithm.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.09017 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Randomized reductions between problems for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A layered graph (left) and a layered cycle graph (right). These can be obtained from general [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Randomized reductions between path-containment problems. All the green problems can be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Pictorial representation of the randomized reductions we prove in this section, for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The layered-path problem. Every set Vj for j ∈ [k − 1] represents a set of Θ(n) vertices, and the first and last layer might have a different size, say |V0| = |Vk| = r. We are looking for a directed path that traverses all the layers from V0 to Vk. Lemma 4.2. Let k, n,…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The best-known upper bounds on the query complexity of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools

Reviewed May 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.