Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Exploring the Viability of Synthetic Audio Data for Audio-Based Dialogue State Tracking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.01842 v1 pith:ZDJDUWL2 submitted 2023-12-04 cs.SD cs.AIeess.AS

classification cs.SDcs.AIeess.AS
keywords dataaudiohumansyntheticaudio-baseddialoguedatasetsmodalities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Dialogue state tracking plays a crucial role in extracting information in task-oriented dialogue systems. However, preceding research are limited to textual modalities, primarily due to the shortage of authentic human audio datasets. We address this by investigating synthetic audio data for audio-based DST. To this end, we develop cascading and end-to-end models, train them with our synthetic audio dataset, and test them on actual human speech data. To facilitate evaluation tailored to audio modalities, we introduce a novel PhonemeF1 to capture pronunciation similarity. Experimental results showed that models trained solely on synthetic datasets can generalize their performance to human voice data. By eliminating the dependency on human speech data collection, these insights pave the way for significant practical advancements in audio-based DST. Data and code are available at https://github.com/JihyunLee1/E2E-DST.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. High-precision medical speech recognition through synthetic data and semantic correction: UNITED-MEDASR

    eess.AS 2024-11 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A synthetic-data pipeline for medical ASR reports sub-1% WER on standard benchmarks, but the reported numbers are internally inconsistent and not reproducible from the paper.

Pith tools