Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 69 references

Spin Phonon Relaxation Dynamics from a Conical Intersection of Trapped Rydberg Ions

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that spin–phonon oscillations encoding a conical intersection in two trapped Rydberg ions remain clearly visible within the microsecond Rydberg lifetime, so the conical effect can be observed despite dissipation.

desk verdict Useful feasibility case study for observing conical-intersection dynamics in trapped Rydberg ions, but the phonon relaxation results are internally inconsistent with the stated master equation. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19070 v1 pith:ZDXOOIBR submitted 2024-11-28 quant-ph

Manish Chaudhary , Rejish Nath , Weibin Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords conicalintersectiontrappedRydbergionsspin-phonondynamicsmasterequationdissipativelifetimevibronicquantumsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the finite lifetime of Rydberg states prevents a trapped-ion simulator from showing the dynamics of a conical intersection, a point where two electronic energy surfaces meet and the usual separation between electronic and nuclear motion breaks down. Using a master equation for two trapped strontium ions, it finds that spontaneous decay of the nS Rydberg state damps both the collective spin and the phonon populations, yet the oscillatory spin–phonon response survives for several microseconds, which is within the Rydberg lifetime. The authors conclude that the conical-intersection dynamics can be observed before the Rydberg state decays, and that collective spin observables are the clearest place to look. This matters because trapped Rydberg ions have been proposed as a slow, controllable quantum simulator for conical-intersection physics, and the decay of the Rydberg states was an open threat to that programme.

What carries the argument

The central object is the quantized vibronic Hamiltonian $H = \omega_x(a_x^\dagger a_x+\tfrac12) + \omega_y(a_y^\dagger a_y+\tfrac12) + G_x(a_x^\dagger+a_x)S_z + G_y(a_y^\dagger+a_y)S_x$, where $S_z$ and $S_x$ are collective spin operators of the two-ion Rydberg pair and $a_x$, $a_y$ are the two phonon modes; the perpendicular couplings $G_x$ and $G_y$ create the conical intersection in the collective spin sector. The dissipative part is a Lindblad master equation with a single decay channel $|0\rangle\to|g\rangle$ at rate $\gamma_S$. The coherent dynamics is constrained by the parity symmetry $P = S_z e^{i\pi N_y}$, which leaves the Hamiltonian invariant and makes $\langle S_z\rangle+\langle N_y\rangle$ conserved; the decay breaks this symmetry, which is why the $y$-phonon number relaxes in the dissipative case. The argument proceeds by exact numerical integration of the master equation in a truncated Fock basis, with a mean-field steady-state analysis used to confirm that the long-time state has vanishing spin and phonon expectation values.

What would settle it

A concrete falsifier would be a two-Sr+-ion experiment prepared in $|0,1\rangle=|50S,50P\rangle$ with the $x$-phonon mode in a coherent state: the model predicts that $\langle xS_z\rangle$ and $\langle N_x\rangle$ oscillate and damp on the ~7 $\mu$s 50S lifetime. If the measured spin–phonon correlations disappear within about one microsecond, or if the $|0\rangle$ population decays appreciably faster than $e^{-\gamma_S t}$, then the single-channel decay model omits a dominant decoherence mechanism and the visibility claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the conical-intersection signal in a trapped Rydberg ion pair is not erased by spontaneous decay of the Rydberg state forming it. Starting from the state $|0,1\rangle$ with the $x$-phonon mode in a coherent state, the exact master-equation evolution shows $\langle x\rangle$ and the spin–phonon correlations $\langle xS_z\rangle$ and $\langle yS_x\rangle$ oscillating with microsecond periodicity while decaying on the ~7.2 $\mu$s lifetime of the 50S state; the individual-ion populations oscillate only weakly. The decay $|0\rangle\to|g\rangle$ at rate $\gamma_S=0.13\ \mu\text{s}^{-1}$ destroys the collective spin sector in which the conical intersection is defined, and because the spin and phonon modes are coupled, the phonon populations relax even though there is no direct phonon loss. The paper therefore frames the conical-intersection dynamics as a transient, observable phenomenon, with collective spin measurements as the recommended probe.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the relevant dissipation on the microsecond timescale is a single Markovian decay channel from the nS Rydberg state $|0\rangle$ to a passive ground state $|g\rangle$ at rate $\gamma_S=0.13\ \mu\text{s}^{-1}$, with intermediate decay steps, micromotion, and motional heating neglected; if those produce comparable decoherence, the predicted visibility window for the conical-intersection oscillations could close.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Within the Rydberg lifetime, the phonon position and the spin–phonon correlations still show clear oscillations, so an experimental run can resolve conical-intersection dynamics before decay erases the collective spin sector.
  • Collective spin observables such as $\langle S_z\rangle$ and $\langle xS_z\rangle$ are the better measurement channel: their oscillation amplitudes are much larger than those of single-ion Rydberg populations, which oscillate only weakly.
  • The phonon populations relax to their steady values even though the dissipator contains no phonon loss, because the spin–phonon coupling converts the electronic decay into damping of the vibrational modes.
  • The decay of the nP state $|1\rangle$ can be neglected for the conical-intersection dynamics, since its lifetime is one to two orders of magnitude longer than that of the nS state $|0\rangle$; including it would not change the relevant timescale.
  • The conical-intersection signal is transient by nature: once the $|0\rangle$ population has decayed, the collective spin sector no longer exists, so experiments should target the first several microseconds of evolution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could test how much of the geometric-phase suppression of tunneling survives the decay by extracting a tunneling probability from the dissipative wavepacket and comparing it with the coherent case; the paper reports the localization but does not quantify this visibility in the presence of decay.
  • Varying the principal quantum number $n$ would change both the spin–phonon couplings and the Rydberg lifetime together, so a natural extension is to search for an $n$ that maximizes the number of resolvable oscillation periods before the decay erases the signal.
  • The contrast with the superconducting-circuit experiment, where dephasing enhanced wavepacket branching at a conical intersection, suggests that different decoherence mechanisms act very differently on conical-intersection dynamics; a comparative study of amplitude damping versus dephasing in this trapped-ion setting could clarify when the conical signature survives.
  • Because the authors model only one decay channel, the inclusion of cascade decay through intermediate states could introduce additional dephasing of the spin–phonon correlations; a master equation with a multi-level decay ladder is a testable extension that would show whether the visibility window shrinks.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies how the finite lifetime of a Rydberg state affects vibronic dynamics near a conical intersection in a system of two trapped Rydberg ions. The authors take the CI Hamiltonian from their earlier PRL, quantize the phonon modes, and add a Lindblad dissipator describing spontaneous decay from the Rydberg state |0> to a low-lying state |g>. Using mean-field equations and QuTiP master-equation simulations, they report damping of spin and phonon observables and claim that oscillatory spin-phonon dynamics remain visible within the Rydberg lifetime. The stated parameters are taken from prior work and atomic lifetime data without fitting to the target result.

Significance. The qualitative conclusion—that CI-induced spin-phonon oscillations survive for several microseconds before Rydberg decay destroys the collective spin sector—is interesting and experimentally relevant for the emerging trapped-Rydberg-ion platform. The paper has the merit of starting from a concrete Hamiltonian with parameters from previous experiments and independent atomic data, and the master-equation setup is clearly stated. If the numerical results are correct, the collective spin observables provide a plausible observable target. However, the reported phonon relaxation to zero in the absence of any phonon-loss term is internally inconsistent with the stated model, and the absence of convergence checks makes the quantitative claims unreliable. These issues directly affect the central 'relaxation dynamics' part of the paper.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eqs. (6)-(7)] The reported steady state ⟨Ny⟩=0 in Fig. 4b is inconsistent with the stated master equation. The dissipator in Eq. (7) acts only on the electronic states via σ^{g0} and leaves the phonon Fock state unchanged. Once the population has decayed to |g⟩, the Hamiltonian (3) in that sector reduces to the free oscillator ω_y a_y† a_y, since Sx=Sz=0 on |g⟩. Consequently the y-phonon number distribution in the |g⟩ sector is conserved, and the no-jump path starting from Eq. (4) populates y-phonon states with ⟨Ny⟩>0 (see Fig. 2b). The steady-state value of ⟨Ny⟩ is therefore a positive decay-time average, not zero. This means the phonon relaxation and steady-state statements in Sec. 3.2 and Appendix B (A=B=0) do not follow from Eqs. (6)-(7). The authors should either include an explicit phonon-loss mechanism or revise the phonon dynamics claims.
  2. [Section 3.2, Fig. 4] No Fock-basis truncation dimension or convergence test is reported for the QuTiP simulations. The stated phonon decay could be an artifact of an insufficient Fock cutoff, which removes population that would otherwise remain in high-|n⟩ states. Given the unexpected decay of ⟨Nx⟩ and ⟨Ny⟩ in Fig. 4b, the authors should specify the truncation used and demonstrate convergence with respect to the cutoff before the quantitative phonon relaxation results are accepted.
  3. [Section 2.2] The statement 'Hence, (⟨Sz⟩+⟨Ny⟩) is a conserved quantity' does not follow from the parity symmetry P=Sz e^{iπNy}. A direct calculation gives [H, Sz+Ny] = -2i Gy(a_y†+a_y)Sy + Gy Sx(a_y†-a_y), which is generically non-zero. The parity P is indeed conserved, but the sum ⟨Sz⟩+⟨Ny⟩ is not. This invalidates the explanation of the small ⟨Ny⟩ in Fig. 2b and should be corrected.
  4. [Appendix B] The mean-field fixed point A=B=0 is not the long-time limit of the mean-field equations. When the spin expectation values have decayed to zero, the equations reduce to ˙A=-iωx A and ˙B=-iωy B, whose solutions are undamped oscillations; A=B=0 is reached only if the initial phonon amplitudes vanish. Therefore the claimed steady state with vanishing expectation values is inconsistent with the initial coherent state used in the paper, and the agreement with the exact numerics is not established.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1] There is a typo: 'Rybderg' should be 'Rydberg'.
  2. [Section 3.1] The decay rate γS = 0.13 μs⁻¹ corresponds to a lifetime of about 7.7 μs, while the text states 7.2 μs for the 50S state; please reconcile the numbers.
  3. [Figure 6] The dotted black line representing e^{-γS t} is not identified in the legend; specify which curve it corresponds to.
  4. [Appendix B] The mean-field equations should explicitly state the factorization assumption ⟨AB⟩≈⟨A⟩⟨B⟩ used to close the equations, since this is essential for reproducing the derivation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the dissipative CI dynamics follow from a stated master equation with independently sourced lifetimes and trap parameters; the self-cited CI model is a legitimate foundation.

full rationale

The claimed result that oscillatory spin-phonon dynamics around the trapped-ion CI remain visible within the Rydberg lifetime is obtained by solving the Lindblad master equation (6)-(7) for Hamiltonian (3), with Hamiltonian parameters taken from Ref. [30] and the decay rate taken from independent model-potential atomic lifetimes (gamma_S=0.13 microsecond^-1 for 50S, lifetime 7.2 microseconds). No parameter is fitted to the predicted observables; the long-time limits Sz->0 and population transfer to |g> follow directly from the dissipator (7), and the early-time oscillations are a numerical consequence of the stated couplings. The sole self-referential element is that the CI Hamiltonian itself is imported from the authors' earlier PRL [30] via the statement 'Following the scheme in our previous work [30]'; this is a normal citation to a peer-reviewed, parameter-bearing proposal, not a circular reduction, and no uniqueness theorem or hidden ansatz is smuggled in. The conclusion's caveat that micromotion and motional heating are neglected is a limitation statement, not a circular step. Separately, a correctness rather than circularity concern: Section 3.2's claim that <Ny> reaches zero in the steady state despite 'there is no phonon loss term' is hard to reconcile with dissipator (7), which acts only on internal states and leaves y-phonon Fock states unchanged; this suggests unmodeled phonon damping or a numerical artifact, but it does not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the inherited CI Hamiltonian and a simplified one-channel dissipative model; all numerical parameters are physical inputs from prior experiments or atomic-structure calculations rather than outputs fitted to the target result. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • spin-phonon couplings Gx, Gy = 2π × (0.22, 0.86) MHz; strong-coupling case 2π × (1, 1) MHz
    Chosen from the earlier trap proposal [30]; the visibility and amplitude of CI oscillations depend on these values.
  • trap frequencies ωx, ωy = 2π × 1 MHz and 2π × 1.6 MHz
    Experimental trap parameters from Ref. [30]; set the phonon energy scales in the model.
  • decay rate γS = 0.13 μs^-1
    From the 7.2 μs lifetime of the 50S Rydberg state of Sr+, an atomic-structure input; the damping timescale of the results is set by it.
  • initial coherent amplitude αx = √2
    Initial phonon wavepacket displacement used to prepare a state near the CI minimum; the size of the x-phonon oscillations depends on it.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Hamiltonian (3) correctly describes the engineered conical intersection in two trapped Rydberg ions.
    The CI platform and linear spin-phonon couplings are taken from the authors' previous PRL [30] without re-derivation; all subsequent dynamics assumes this Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption The two Rydberg states |0> and |1> plus the ground state |g> form a sufficient level structure for the CI dynamics, with |g> acting only as a decay sink.
    Section 3.1 explicitly neglects the intermediate cascade states and the decay of |1>; the collective spin sector is assumed to capture the relevant physics.
  • domain assumption A Markovian Lindblad master equation with a single decay channel and rate γS describes the dissipation.
    Equations (6)-(7) in Section 3.1; no derivation of Markovianity or of the environment spectral density, and real Rydberg decay cascades could add non-Markovian or multi-channel effects.
  • ad hoc to paper The phonon Fock basis truncation used in the QuTiP simulation is large enough for convergence.
    No truncation dimension or convergence check is reported, although the initial coherent state with αx=√2 requires many phonon states.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin Phonon Relaxation Dynamics from a Conical Intersection of Trapped Rydberg Ions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZDXOOIBR

@misc{pith2026241119070,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin Phonon Relaxation Dynamics from a Conical Intersection of Trapped Rydberg Ions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZDXOOIBR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19070}
}
read the original abstract

Non-adiabatic processes near conical intersections are rooted in the stronger coupling between electronic and nuclear degrees of freedom. Using a system of two trapped Rydberg ions, their high polarizability and strong dipolar interactions allow to form a conical intersection, where dynamics takes place on a microsecond time scale. Rydberg lifetimes are typically from a few to tens of microseconds, which could affect the conical dynamics. We study the effect of the finite lifetime of the Rydberg state on the vibronic dynamics around the conical intersection via analyzing the master equation. Through mean field and numerical calculations, damping dynamics are found in both the phonon populations and electronic states depending on the initial states. It is found that oscillatory vibronic dynamics can be seen clearly within the Rydberg lifetime, permitting to observe the conical effect in the trapped Rydberg ion system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19070 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Two Rydberg ions in Rydberg states |0⟩ = |nS1/2⟩ and |1⟩ = |n ′P1/2⟩ vibrate around their equilibrium distance |X| in a linear Paul trap. In Rydberg states, the long-range dipole–dipole interaction couples to the breathing mode of the crystal vibration. (b) The conical intersection is formed due to the coupling of Rydberg states |0⟩ and |1⟩ with the breathing mode. (c) Energy levels. Both Rydberg states decay to… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Coherent quantum dynamics. Time evolution of (a) average values ⟨x⟩ and ⟨Sz⟩, and (b) average phonon number ⟨Nx⟩ and ⟨Ny⟩. These quantities are obtained by solving the Hamiltonian (3). In both figures, we consider different coupling (Gx, Gy) = 2π × (0.22, 0.86) MHz (solid line), and (Gx, Gy) = 2π × (1, 1) MHz (dashed line), respectively. Other parameters are αx = √ 2, αy = 0, ωx = 2π × 1 MHz, ωy = 2π × 1.6 MHz and γ… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Correlation between spin and phonon modes. We show (a) ⟨xSz⟩ and (b) ⟨ySx⟩. Here, (Gx, Gy) = 2π × (0.22, 0.86) MHz (solid line), and (Gx, Gy) = 2π × (1, 1) MHz (dashed line), respectively. Other parameters are αx = √ 2, αy = 0, ωx = 2π × 1 MHz, ωy = 2π × 1.6 MHz and γS = 0. 3. Dissipative Vibronic Dynamics With the illustration of the coherent CI dynamics, we now turn to the investigation of the dissipative vibronic… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Average values of ⟨x⟩ and ⟨Sz⟩. (b) Average phonon number ⟨Nx⟩ and ⟨Ny⟩. Couplings are (Gx, Gy) = 2π × (0.22, 0.86) MHz (solid line), and (Gx, Gy) = 2π × (1, 1) MHz (dashed line), re￾spectively, with the dissipation parameter γS = 0.13µs −1 for the Rydberg state 50…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Correlation between spin and phonon modes in the dissipation regime. (a) ⟨xSz⟩ (b) ⟨ySx⟩. Here (Gx, Gy) = 2π × (0.22, 0.86) MHz (solid line), and (Gx, Gy) = 2π × (1, 1) MHz (dashed line), respectively. Other parameters are αx = √ 2, αy = 0, ωx = 2π × 1 MHz, ωy = 2π × 1…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Evolution of individual Rydberg ions with the coupling (a) (Gx, Gy) = (0.22, 0.86), (b) (Gx, Gy) = (1, 1) for the decay rate γS = 0.13µs −1 . The population of the level ⟨σ l gg⟩ increases due to the spontaneous decay from the level ⟨σ l 00⟩. The population of the Rydb…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Conical Intersections: Electronic Structure, Dynamics and Spectroscopy ; World Scientific: Singapore, 2004

    Domcke, W.; Yarkony, D.; Köppel, H. Conical Intersections: Electronic Structure, Dynamics and Spectroscopy ; World Scientific: Singapore, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1142/5406

    doi:10.1142/5406 2004

  2. [2]

    Non-adiabatic dynamics close to conical intersections and the surface hopping perspective

    Malhado, J.P .; Bearpark, M.J.; Hynes, J.T. Non-adiabatic dynamics close to conical intersections and the surface hopping perspective. Front. Chem. 2014, 2, 97. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2014.00097

    work page arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    Diabolical Conical Intersections

    Yarkony, D.R. Diabolical Conical Intersections. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1996, 68, 985–1013. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.68.985

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.68.985 1996

  4. [4]

    Theoretical Study of Geometric Phase Effects in the Hydrogen-Exchange Reaction

    Juanes-Marcos, J.C.; Althorpe, S.C.; Wrede, E. Theoretical Study of Geometric Phase Effects in the Hydrogen-Exchange Reaction. Science 2005, 309, 1227–1230. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1114890

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1114890 2005

  5. [5]

    Conical Intersections: A Perspective on the Computation of Spectroscopic Jahn–Teller Parameters and the Degenerate ‘Intersection Space’

    Paterson, M.J.; Bearpark, M.J.; Robb, M.A.; Blancafort, L.; Worth, G.A. Conical Intersections: A Perspective on the Computation of Spectroscopic Jahn–Teller Parameters and the Degenerate ‘Intersection Space’. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 2100–2115. https://doi.org/10.1039/B416538A

    work page doi:10.1039/b416538a 2005

  6. [6]

    Vibrational Conical Intersections as a Mechanism of Ultrafast Vibrational Relaxation.Phys

    Hamm, P .; Stock, G. Vibrational Conical Intersections as a Mechanism of Ultrafast Vibrational Relaxation.Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 173201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.173201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.173201 2012

  7. [7]

    Dynamics at Conical Intersections: The Influence of O–H Stretching Vibrations on the Photodissociation of Phenol

    Hause, M.L.; Heidi Yoon, Y.; Case, A.S.; Crim, F.F. Dynamics at Conical Intersections: The Influence of O–H Stretching Vibrations on the Photodissociation of Phenol. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 104307. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2831512

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2831512 2008

  8. [8]

    Ultrafast decay of electronically excited singlet cytosine via a π, π* to no, π* state switch

    Ismail, N.; Blancafort, L.; Olivucci, M.; Kohler, B.; Robb, M.A. Ultrafast decay of electronically excited singlet cytosine via a π, π* to no, π* state switch. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6818–6819. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0258273

    work page doi:10.1021/ja0258273 2002

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    Role of conical intersections in molecular spectroscopy and photoinduced chemical dynamics

    Domcke, W.; Yarkony, D.R. Role of conical intersections in molecular spectroscopy and photoinduced chemical dynamics. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2012, 63, 325–352. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103522

    2012 doi

  2. [11]

    Quantum simulation of conical intersections using trapped ions

    Whitlow, J.; Jia, Z.; Wang, Y.; Fang, C.; Kim, J.; Brown, K.R. Quantum simulation of conical intersections using trapped ions. Nat. Chem. 2023, 15, 1509–1514. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01303-0

    2023 doi

  3. [12]

    Direct observation of geometric-phase interference in dynamics around a conical intersection

    Valahu, C.H.; Olaya-Agudelo, V .C.; MacDonell, R.J.; Navickas, T.; Rao, A.D.; Millican, M.J.; Pérez-Sánchez, J.B.; Yuen-Zhou, J.; Biercuk, M.J.; Hempel, C.; et al. Direct observation of geometric-phase interference in dynamics around a conical intersection. Nat. Chem. 2023, 15...

    2023 doi

  4. [13]

    Conical Intersections in Laboratory Coordinates with Ultracold Molecules

    Wallis, A.O.G.; Gardiner, S.A.; Hutson, J.M. Conical Intersections in Laboratory Coordinates with Ultracold Molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 083201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.083201

    2009 doi

  5. [14]

    Conical Intersections in an Ultracold Gas

    Wüster, S.; Eisfeld, A.; Rost, J.M. Conical Intersections in an Ultracold Gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 153002. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.153002

    2011 doi

  6. [15]

    Mapping of wave packet dynamics at conical intersections by time-and frequency- resolved fluorescence spectroscopy: A computational study

    Chen, L.; Gelin, M.F.; Zhao, Y.; Domcke, W. Mapping of wave packet dynamics at conical intersections by time-and frequency- resolved fluorescence spectroscopy: A computational study. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 5873–5880. https://doi.org/10.1021/ acs.jpclett.9b02208

    2019

  7. [16]

    Non-adiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: Theory and applications for modeling photophysics in extended molecular materials

    Nelson, T.R.; White, A.J.; Bjorgaard, J.A.; Sifain, A.E.; Zhang, Y.; Nebgen, B.; Fernandez-Alberti, S.; Mozyrsky, D.; Roitberg, A.E.; Tretiak, S. Non-adiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: Theory and applications for modeling photophysics in extended molecular materials. ...

    2020 doi

  8. [17]

    Relaxation mechanisms of UV-photoexcited DNA and RNA nucleobases

    Barbatti, M.; Aquino, A.J.; Szymczak, J.J.; Nachtigallová, D.; Hobza, P .; Lischka, H. Relaxation mechanisms of UV-photoexcited DNA and RNA nucleobases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 21453–21458. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014982107

    2010 doi

  9. [18]

    Conical intersection dynamics of the primary photoisomerization event in vision

    Polli, D.; Altoè, P .; Weingart, O.; Spillane, K.M.; Manzoni, C.; Brida, D.; Tomasello, G.; Orlandi, G.; Kukura, P .; Mathies, R.A.; et al. Conical intersection dynamics of the primary photoisomerization event in vision. Nature 2010, 467, 440–443. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09346

    2010 doi

  10. [19]

    Coupled electron transfers in artificial photosynthesis

    Hammarström, L.; Styring, S. Coupled electron transfers in artificial photosynthesis. Phil. T rans. R. Soc. B Bio. Sci. 2008, 363, 1283–1291. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2225

    2008

  11. [20]

    Ultrafast X-ray Auger probing of photoexcited molecular dynamics

    McFarland, B.; Farrell, J.; Miyabe, S.; Tarantelli, F.; Aguilar, A.; Berrah, N.; Bostedt, C.; Bozek, J.; Bucksbaum, P .; Castagna, J.; et al. Ultrafast X-ray Auger probing of photoexcited molecular dynamics. Nat. Comm. 2014, 5, 4235. https://doi.org/10.1038/ ncomms5235

    2014

  12. [21]

    Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics

    Young, L.; Ueda, K.; Gühr, M.; Bucksbaum, P .H.; Simon, M.; Mukamel, S.; Rohringer, N.; Prince, K.C.; Masciovecchio, C.; Meyer, M.; et al. Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics. J. Phys. B 2018, 51, 032003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6 455/aa9735. Photonics...

    2018 doi

  13. [22]

    Probing ultrafast dynamics during and after passing through conical intersections

    Adachi, S.; Schatteburg, T.; Humeniuk, A.; Mitri´ c, R.; Suzuki, T. Probing ultrafast dynamics during and after passing through conical intersections. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 13902–13905. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CP04426K

    2019 doi

  14. [23]

    Stimulated Raman signals at conical intersections: Ab initio surface hopping simulation protocol with direct propagation of the nuclear wave function

    Kowalewski, M.; Mukamel, S. Stimulated Raman signals at conical intersections: Ab initio surface hopping simulation protocol with direct propagation of the nuclear wave function. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 143, 044117. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4927475

    2015 doi

  15. [24]

    Two-dimensional Fourier transform electronic spectroscopy at a conical intersection

    Kitney-Hayes, K.A.; Ferro, A.A.; Tiwari, V .; Jonas, D.M. Two-dimensional Fourier transform electronic spectroscopy at a conical intersection. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140, 124312. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4867996

    2014 doi

  16. [25]

    Analog Quantum Simulation of Chemical Dynamics

    MacDonell, R.J.; Dickerson, C.E.; Birch, C.J.T.; Kumar, A.; Edmunds, C.L.; Biercuk, M.J.; Hempel, C.; Kassal, I. Analog Quantum Simulation of Chemical Dynamics. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 9794–9805. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1sc02142g

    2021 doi

  17. [26]

    Observation of Wave-Packet Branching through an Engineered Conical Intersection

    Wang, C.S.; Frattini, N.E.; Chapman, B.J.; Puri, S.; Girvin, S.M.; Devoret, M.H.; Schoelkopf, R.J. Observation of Wave-Packet Branching through an Engineered Conical Intersection. Phys. Rev. X 2023, 13, 011008. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011 008

    2023 doi

  18. [27]

    Direct geometric probe of singularities in band structure

    Brown, C.D.; Chang, S.W.; Schwarz, M.N.; Leung, T.H.; Kozii, V .; Avdoshkin, A.; Moore, J.E.; Stamper-Kurn, D. Direct geometric probe of singularities in band structure. Science 2022, 377, 1319–1322. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm6442

    2022 doi

  19. [28]

    Simulation of the Jahn–Teller–Dicke Magnetic Structural Phase Transition with Trapped Ions

    Ivanov, P .A.; Porras, D.; Ivanov, S.S.; Schmidt-Kaler, F. Simulation of the Jahn–Teller–Dicke Magnetic Structural Phase Transition with Trapped Ions. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 2013, 46, 104003. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/46/10/104003

    2013 doi

  20. [29]

    Quantum Simulation of the Cooperative Jahn-Teller Transition in 1D Ion Crystals.Phys

    Porras, D.; Ivanov, P .A.; Schmidt-Kaler, F. Quantum Simulation of the Cooperative Jahn-Teller Transition in 1D Ion Crystals.Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 235701. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.235701

    2012 doi

  21. [30]

    Exploring the Many-Body Dynamics Near a Conical Intersection with Trapped Rydberg Ions

    Gambetta, F.M.; Zhang, C.; Hennrich, M.; Lesanovsky, I.; Li, W. Exploring the Many-Body Dynamics Near a Conical Intersection with Trapped Rydberg Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 126, 233404. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.233404

    2021 doi

  22. [31]

    Quantum simulations with trapped ions

    Blatt, R.; Roos, C.F. Quantum simulations with trapped ions. Nat. Phys. 2012, 8, 277. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2252

    2012 doi

  23. [32]

    Simulating the spin-boson model with a controllable reservoir in an ion trap

    Wang, G.X.; Wu, Y.K.; Yao, R.; Lian, W.Q.; Cheng, Z.J.; Xu, Y.L.; Zhang, C.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, Y.Z.; Qi, B.X.; et al. Simulating the spin-boson model with a controllable reservoir in an ion trap. Phys. Rev. A 2024, 109, 062402. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA. 109.062402

    2024 doi

  24. [33]

    Electronically Excited Cold Ion Crystals

    Li, W.; Lesanovsky, I. Electronically Excited Cold Ion Crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 023003. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.108.023003

    2012

  25. [34]

    Highly Polarizable Rydberg Ion in a Paul Trap.Phys

    Higgins, G.; Pokorny, F.; Zhang, C.; Hennrich, M. Highly Polarizable Rydberg Ion in a Paul Trap.Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 153602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.153602

    2019 doi

  26. [35]

    Rydberg Spectrum of a Single TrappedCa+ Ion: A Floquet Analysis

    Pawlak, M.; Sadeghpour, H.R. Rydberg Spectrum of a Single TrappedCa+ Ion: A Floquet Analysis. Phys. Rev. A 2020, 101, 052510. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.052510

    2020 doi

  27. [36]

    Rydberg Ions in Coherent Motional States: A New Method for Determining the Polarizability of Rydberg Ions

    Niederländer, M.; Vogel, J.; Schulze-Makuch, A.; Gély, B.; Mokhberi, A.; Schmidt-Kaler, F. Rydberg Ions in Coherent Motional States: A New Method for Determining the Polarizability of Rydberg Ions. New J. Phys. 2023, 25, 033020. https://doi.org/10.108 8/1367-2630/acbf06

    2023

  28. [37]

    Submicrosecond entangling gate between trapped ions via Rydberg interaction

    Zhang, C.; Pokorny, F.; Li, W.; Higgins, G.; Pöschl, A.; Lesanovsky, I.; Hennrich, M. Submicrosecond entangling gate between trapped ions via Rydberg interaction. Nature 2020, 580, 345–349. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2152-9

    2020 doi

  29. [38]

    Trapped Rydberg Ions: From Spin Chains to Fast Quantum Gates.New J

    Müller, M.; Liang, L.; Lesanovsky, I.; Zoller, P . Trapped Rydberg Ions: From Spin Chains to Fast Quantum Gates.New J. Phys. 2008, 10, 093009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/10/9/093009

    2008 doi

  30. [39]

    Spectral Signatures of Vibronic Coupling in Trapped Cold Ionic Rydberg Systems.Phys

    Wilkinson, J.W.P .; Li, W.; Lesanovsky, I. Spectral Signatures of Vibronic Coupling in Trapped Cold Ionic Rydberg Systems.Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024, 132, 223401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.223401

    2024 doi

  31. [40]

    Single Strontium Rydberg Ion Confined in a Paul Trap

    Higgins, G.; Li, W.; Pokorny, F.; Zhang, C.; Kress, F.; Maier, C.; Haag, J.; Bodart, Q.; Lesanovsky, I.; Hennrich, M. Single Strontium Rydberg Ion Confined in a Paul Trap. Phys. Rev. X 2017, 7, 021038. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.021038

    2017 doi

  32. [41]

    Exploring Nonequilibrium Phases of the Generalized Dicke Model with a Trapped Rydberg-ion Quantum Simulator

    Gambetta, F.M.; Lesanovsky, I.; Li, W. Exploring Nonequilibrium Phases of the Generalized Dicke Model with a Trapped Rydberg-ion Quantum Simulator. Phys. Rev. A 2019, 100, 022513. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.022513

    2019 doi

  33. [42]

    Rydberg-Ion Flywheel for Quantum Work Storage.Phys

    Martins, W.S.; Carollo, F.; Li, W.; Brandner, K.; Lesanovsky, I. Rydberg-Ion Flywheel for Quantum Work Storage.Phys. Rev. A 2023, 108, L050201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.L050201

    2023 doi

  34. [43]

    Hexagonal Plaquette Spin–Spin Interactions and Quantum Magnetism in a Two-Dimensional Ion Crystal

    Nath, R.; Dalmonte, M.; Glaetzle, A.W.; Zoller, P .; Schmidt-Kaler, F.; Gerritsma, R. Hexagonal Plaquette Spin–Spin Interactions and Quantum Magnetism in a Two-Dimensional Ion Crystal. New J. Phys. 2015, 17, 065018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ 17/6/065018

    2015 doi

  35. [44]

    Non-Hermitian Dynamics and $\mathcal{PT}$-Symmetry Breaking in Interacting Mesoscopic Rydberg Platforms

    Lourenço, J.A.S.; Higgins, G.; Zhang, C.; Hennrich, M.; Macrì, T. Non-Hermitian Dynamics and $\mathcal{PT}$-Symmetry Breaking in Interacting Mesoscopic Rydberg Platforms. Phys. Rev. A 2022, 106, 023309. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106. 023309

    2022 doi

  36. [45]

    Tripartite Quantum Rabi Model with Trapped Rydberg Ions.Phys

    Hamlyn, T.J.; Zhang, C.; Lesanovsky, I.; Li, W. Tripartite Quantum Rabi Model with Trapped Rydberg Ions.Phys. Rev. Res. 2024, 6, 023223. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023223

    2024 doi

  37. [46]

    Quantum Dynamics of Single Trapped Ions

    Leibfried, D.; Blatt, R.; Monroe, C.; Wineland, D. Quantum Dynamics of Single Trapped Ions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2003, 75, 281. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.281

    2003 doi

  38. [47]

    Quantum Computing with Trapped Ions

    Häffner, H.; Roos, C.; Blatt, R. Quantum Computing with Trapped Ions. Phys. Rep. 2008, 469, 155–203. https://doi.org/16/j. physrep.2008.09.003

    2008

  39. [48]

    Coherent Control of a Single Trapped Rydberg Ion

    Higgins, G.; Pokorny, F.; Zhang, C.; Bodart, Q.; Hennrich, M. Coherent Control of a Single Trapped Rydberg Ion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 220501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.220501. Photonics 2024, 1, 0 12 of 12

    2017 doi

  40. [49]

    Long-Range Multibody Interactions and Three-Body Antiblockade in a Trapped Rydberg Ion Chain

    Gambetta, F.M.; Zhang, C.; Hennrich, M.; Lesanovsky, I.; Li, W. Long-Range Multibody Interactions and Three-Body Antiblockade in a Trapped Rydberg Ion Chain. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 125, 133602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.133602

    2020 doi

  41. [50]

    Trapped Rydberg ions: A new platform for quantum information processing

    Mokhberi, A.; Hennrich, M.; Schmidt-Kaler, F. Trapped Rydberg ions: A new platform for quantum information processing. In Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics ; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 69, pp. 233–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aamop.2...

    2020 doi

  42. [51]

    Geometric Phase Effects in Nonadiabatic Dynamics near Conical Intersections

    Ryabinkin, I.G.; Joubert-Doriol, L.; Izmaylov, A.F. Geometric Phase Effects in Nonadiabatic Dynamics near Conical Intersections. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 1785–1793. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00220

    2017 doi

  43. [52]

    Dissipative Dynamics at Conical Intersections: Simulations with the Hierarchy Equations of Motion Method

    Chen, L.; Gelin, M.F.; Chernyak, V .Y.; Domcke, W.; Zhao, Y. Dissipative Dynamics at Conical Intersections: Simulations with the Hierarchy Equations of Motion Method. Faraday Discuss. 2016, 194, 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6FD00088F

    2016 doi

  44. [53]

    Dissipative Dynamics of a System Passing through a Conical Intersection: Ultrafast Pump-Probe Observables

    Gelman, D.; Katz, G.; Kosloff, R.; Ratner, M.A. Dissipative Dynamics of a System Passing through a Conical Intersection: Ultrafast Pump-Probe Observables. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 134112. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2032968

    2005 doi

  45. [54]

    Excited-State Charge Transfer at a Conical Intersection: Effects of an Environment

    Burghardt, I.; Hynes, J.T. Excited-State Charge Transfer at a Conical Intersection: Effects of an Environment. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 11411–11423. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp057569c

    2006 doi

  46. [55]

    Short-Time Dynamics Through Conical Intersections in Macrosystems

    Cederbaum, L.S.; Gindensperger, E.; Burghardt, I. Short-Time Dynamics Through Conical Intersections in Macrosystems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 113003. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.113003

    2005 doi

  47. [56]

    Quantum Information with Rydberg Atoms

    Saffman, M.; Walker, T.G.; Mølmer, K. Quantum Information with Rydberg Atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010, 82, 2313. https: //doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2313

    2010 doi

  48. [57]

    Rydberg Superatoms: An Artificial Quantum System for Quantum Information Processing and Quantum Optics

    Shao, X.Q.; Su, S.L.; Li, L.; Nath, R.; Wu, J.H.; Li, W. Rydberg Superatoms: An Artificial Quantum System for Quantum Information Processing and Quantum Optics. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2024, 11, 031320. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0211071

    2024 doi

  49. [58]

    Quantum Dynamics of Cold Trapped Ions with Application to Quantum Computation

    James, D. Quantum Dynamics of Cold Trapped Ions with Application to Quantum Computation. Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 1998, 66, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003400050373

    1998 doi

  50. [59]

    Multichannel Rydberg Spectroscopy of Complex Atoms

    Aymar, M.; Greene, C.; Luc-Koenig, E. Multichannel Rydberg Spectroscopy of Complex Atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1996, 68, 1015–1123. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.68.1015

    1996 doi

  51. [60]

    Schrödinger Cat

    Monroe, C.; Meekhof, D.M.; King, B.E.; Wineland, D.J. A “Schrödinger Cat” Superposition State of an Atom. Science 1996, 272, 1131–1136. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5265.1131

    1996

  52. [61]

    Quantum Optics, 1st ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997

    Scully, M.O.; Zubairy, M.S. Quantum Optics, 1st ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997. https://doi.org/https: //doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813993

    1997 doi

  53. [62]

    Integrability of the Rabi Model

    Braak, D. Integrability of the Rabi Model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 100401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.100401

    2011 doi

  54. [63]

    The Quantum Rabi Model: Solution and Dynamics

    Xie, Q.; Zhong, H.; Batchelor, M.T.; Lee, C. The Quantum Rabi Model: Solution and Dynamics. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 2017, 50, 113001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa5a65

    2017 doi

  55. [64]

    Rydberg Atoms; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005

    Gallagher, T.F. Rydberg Atoms; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511524530

    2005 doi

  56. [65]

    https://doi.org/10 .1093/acprof:oso/9780199213900.001.0001

    Breuer, H.P .; Petruccione, F.The Theory of Open Quantum Systems ; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2007. https://doi.org/10 .1093/acprof:oso/9780199213900.001.0001

    2007

  57. [66]

    Qutip Documentation and Coding

    QuTiP . Qutip Documentation and Coding. 2024. Available online: https://qutip.org (accessed on)

    2024

  58. [67]

    Lifetimes of Rydberg States in Ions of the Group II Elements.Opt

    Glukhov, I.L.; Nikitina, E.A.; Ovsiannikov, V .D. Lifetimes of Rydberg States in Ions of the Group II Elements.Opt. Spectrosc. 2013, 115, 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X13070060

    2013 doi

  59. [68]

    Impact of Micromotion on the Excitation of Rydberg States of Ions in a Paul Trap

    Martins, W.S.; Wilkinson, J.W.P .; Hennrich, M.; Lesanovsky, I. Impact of Micromotion on the Excitation of Rydberg States of Ions in a Paul Trap. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2410.24047. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.24047

    2024 doi arXiv

  60. [69]

    Heating of trapped ions from the quantum ground state

    Turchette, Q.A.; Kielpinski.; King, B.E.; Leibfried, D.; Meekhof, D.M.; Myatt, C.J.; Rowe, M.A.; Sackett, C.A.; Wood, C.S.; Itano, W.M.; et al. Heating of trapped ions from the quantum ground state. Phys. Rev. A 2000, 61, 063418. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.61.063418

  61. [70]

    Nonequilibrium Phase Diagram of a Driven and Dissipative Many-Body System.Phys

    Tomadin, A.; Diehl, S.; Zoller, P . Nonequilibrium Phase Diagram of a Driven and Dissipative Many-Body System.Phys. Rev. A 2011, 83, 013611. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.013611. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications...

    2011 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.