REVIEW 2 cited by
The causal ladder and the strength of K-causality. II
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Hawking's stable causality implies Sorkin and Woolgar's K-causality. The work investigates the possible equivalence between the two causality requirements, an issue which was first considered by H. Seifert and then raised again by R. Low after the introduction of K-causality. First, a new proof is given that a spacetime is stably causal iff the Seifert causal relation is a partial order. It is then shown that given a K-causal spacetime and chosen an event, the light cones can be widened in a neighborhood of the event without spoiling K-causality. The idea is that this widening of the light cones can be continued leading to a global one. Unfortunately, due to some difficulties in the inductive process the author was not able to complete the program for a proof as originally conceived by H. Seifert. Nevertheless, it is proved that if K-causality coincides with stable causality then in any K-causal spacetime the K future coincides with the Seifert future. Explicit examples are provided which show that the K^+ future may differ from the Seifert relation in causal spacetimes.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Rigorous Feature Importance Scores based on Shapley Value and Banzhaf Index
Two game-theoretic feature importance scores that include non-WAXp contributions and quantify how effective each feature is at ruling out adversarial examples.
-
Destructuring Physics: A functional derivation of spacetime
Spacetime can be represented minimally as an arbitrary set equipped with a family of real functions that, the author argues, retains the essential causal, topological, and metric content.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.