Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Table2Image: Interpretable Tabular Data Classification with Realistic Image Transformations

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that converting each tabular row into a realistic MNIST-style image lets a small CNN match or beat gradient-boosted trees, with a dual SHAP mechanism for interpretability.

desk verdict The pipeline is coherent and the code is real, but the label-conditioned image mapping lets the CNN read class-mean images rather than tabular features, so the headline accuracy and interpretability claims are not supported as reported. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06265 v2 pith:ZEAMKYQ5 submitted 2024-12-09 cs.LG

Seungeun Lee , Il-Youp Kwak , Kihwan Lee , Subin Bae , Sangjun Lee , Seulbin Lee , Seungsang Oh This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LG
keywords tabulardataclassificationtabular-to-imagetransformationautoencoderCNNclassifiervarianceinflationfactorinitializationDualSHAPOpenML-CC18benchmarkTabZilla
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that gradient-boosted decision trees are not the only practical way to classify tabular data: a table row can be turned into a realistic MNIST/Fashion-MNIST-style image, and a small CNN can read that image and match or beat XGBoost. The transformation is not a fixed pixel layout but an autoencoder that takes the row plus random noise and reconstructs a randomly chosen same-class image, so the row's features and the image class both shape the output. A variance-inflation-factor initialization is added to dampen correlated features, and a dual SHAP framework derives feature importance from both the table and the image. If the claims hold, tabular deep learning becomes lighter and more interpretable, and tabular data can enter multimodal pipelines that assume image inputs.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the label-conditioned random image mapping together with the autoencoder $AE(x,r)$: each row $x$ is paired with a random image $M(x)$ whose class equals the row's label, and the reconstruction loss $\|AE(x,r)-M(x)\|^2$ forces the generated image to depend on both $x$ and $r$; the CNN then classifies $AE(x,r)$. The VIF initialization sets first-layer weights to $w_{ij}=1/\mathrm{VIF}_i$, so features with high collinearity enter with smaller initial influence, and the VIF embedding is concatenated with the ordinary embedding before entering the autoencoder. DualSHAP ties the two modalities together by minimizing MSE, KL divergence, and MMD between rescaled tabular SHAP values and image SHAP values, so the final importance scores are derived from both views.

What would settle it

Pair each training row with a fixed image per class (or with images from the wrong class) and retrain; if accuracy stays roughly the same, or if the autoencoder output is nearly unchanged when the tabular input is zeroed out, then the label-selection signal, not the table's features, is carrying the result.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a tabular row can be classified by first converting it into a realistic 28x28 image through an autoencoder conditioned jointly on the row and on random noise, where the target image is a randomly drawn FashionMNIST or MNIST image whose class matches the row's label. The reconstruction loss trains the autoencoder to blend row information with the chosen image; a two-layer CNN then classifies the generated image. The authors report that with this design, Table2Image and its VIF-initialized variant score higher average accuracy and AUC than XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and a set of recent deep tabular models on 67 OpenML-CC18 datasets and 34 TabZilla datasets. The VIF variant weights the first layer by the inverse variance inflation factor of each feature and concatenates that embedding, which they argue stabilizes learning under multicollinearity. The same image pathway also supports DualSHAP, an interpretability method that aligns SHAP values computed on the original table with Deep SHAP values computed on the generated image.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the autoencoder's reconstructions actually encode the row's feature values, rather than just reproducing the class information that was already used to pick each random image; if the image class does most of the work, the reported accuracy and the DualSHAP explanations would not be about the tabular data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On the reported benchmarks, a CNN reading generated images matches or beats XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and recent deep tabular models, so tabular data does not obviously require tree-based models or large transformers.
  • The VIF-initialized variant ranks first in average accuracy on both OpenML-CC18 and TabZilla, indicating that explicitly down-weighting collinear features helps learning stability.
  • Multi-image random mapping outperforms the single-image mapping used by HACNet in the paper's three-class experiments, so the diversity of the image pool is part of the method's behavior.
  • DualSHAP gives per-row feature importance from both the table and the generated image, with reported stability under column shuffling, so interpretability is available without switching back to trees.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mapping itself injects the label into the autoencoder's target image, so the accuracy and explanation results could partly reflect class-prior reconstruction; a reader could test this by using fixed or wrong-class images and measuring how much accuracy changes.
  • The VIF initialization is stated in terms of a generic first-layer weight scaling, so it could be applied to ordinary MLP or transformer tabular models even without the image transformation.
  • Because the generated images are class-typical averages, they could serve as a visual diagnostic for label leakage or class overlap, a use the paper does not develop.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Table2Image, a framework that maps tabular instances to randomly selected images of the same class, uses an autoencoder to reconstruct those images from tabular features plus noise, and then trains a two-layer CNN on the reconstructions for classification. A VIF-based weight initialization variant (Table2Image-VIF) is introduced to address multicollinearity, and DualSHAP is proposed as an interpretability framework that aligns SHAP values from the tabular and image branches. Experiments on OpenML-CC18 and TabZilla report competitive accuracy and AUC relative to GBDTs and deep tabular baselines, and the authors claim interpretability advantages.

Significance. If the label-injection confound were absent, the framework would offer a lightweight deep-learning alternative to GBDTs with a dual-view interpretability mechanism, and the public code release is a strength. However, the current experimental design cannot separate the contribution of tabular features from the class signal injected by the image-mapping schema, and the interpretability evaluation is circular. With appropriate controls, the method could interest the tabular deep learning community, but the present evidence does not support the headline claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.1, Appendix H] The reconstruction target M(x) is, by construction, a randomly selected image of the same class y as x, and is otherwise independent of x and r. Under L_recon = ||AE(x,r) - M(x)||^2, the optimal reconstruction is the class-conditional mean image E[I|y], and the authors' own Appendix H states that the autoencoder 'tends to generate averaged images that represent the typical images within each class.' Thus the downstream CNN is effectively classifying per-class templates, and the only tabular information that can influence the classifier is the inferred label y, not the feature vector x. Consequently, the accuracy and AUC numbers in Table 1 (e.g., Table2Image-VIF Avg ACC 0.8787 vs XGBoost 0.8675) do not establish that the method learns a useful tabular representation. The authors should add a control experiment in which image targets are assigned independently of the label (or features are permuted within each class) and show that the classifier's performance collapses to chance if the tabular features carry no signal.
  2. [Section 4.1, Table 1] The reported gains over GBDTs are small (e.g., Avg ACC 0.8787 vs 0.8675, Avg AUC 0.9219 vs 0.8758 for XGBoost), yet no standard deviations, confidence intervals, or significance tests are reported, despite Appendix G stating that each experiment is repeated three times. Without measures of variance, the 'best performance' and 'wins' claims are not statistically grounded. This is especially important given the label-injection confound described above.
  3. [Section 3.3, Appendix A, Appendix C] DualSHAP is defined by minimizing L_DualSHAP = L_MSE + L_KLD + L_MMD between P and Q, and the paper then presents the low values of these losses (Table 5) as evidence of interpretability. This is circular: the objective is being minimized, so its attainment is not external validation. The paper also derives the P=Q equality from Bayes' theorem while explicitly treating X, I, and F 'as outputs of the model or mechanism, rather than as probability distributions,' which leaves the normative basis of the equality unclear. The authors need an external validation of the explanations (e.g., faithfulness metrics, comparison with true feature relevance on synthetic data, or ablation of features with low importance).
  4. [Section 3.2, Appendix D, Table 6] The claimed benefit of the VIF initialization is not demonstrated. Table 6 shows that Table2Image-VIF improves Avg ACC from 0.8766 to 0.8787 relative to Table2Image, a marginal difference, and no analysis is provided on datasets with known multicollinearity or on how the initialization changes learned weights. The paper should evaluate the method on a suite of collinear datasets and compare against standard initialization to support the claim of improved robustness.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix G] The statement that Table2Image 'does not undergo any hyperparameter tuning' is imprecise: the MLP expansion dimension (N+4), the noise size, and the choice of FashionMNIST/MNIST mapping are architectural hyperparameters, even if not tuned per dataset. The claim should be qualified.
  2. [Section 3.3] The dimension handling in the DualSHAP equations (e.g., S × φ_img / X_recon) is not clear from the main text; Appendix B explains pixel unshuffle, but the exact shapes of S, T, and the products are never specified. A concrete tensor-shape diagram would improve reproducibility.
  3. [Appendix C, Table 4] The standard deviations of feature importance scores for class 9 are substantially larger than for other classes (e.g., P: 2.1893 vs typically ~0.3), but this is not discussed. The authors should explain this outlier.
  4. [Abstract / Section 1] The term 'realistic and diverse image representations' is overstated given that Appendix H shows the autoencoder outputs class-typical averaged images rather than instance-specific realistic images; consider rewording to 'class-typical prototypes'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

DualSHAP's reported validation is its own training objective; the core benchmark comparison is external and not circular.

  1. self definitional [Appendix A, Step 3; Section 4.2; Appendix C (Table 5)]
    "Inspired by Theorem A.1, we may set our optimization target as P = Q. We then minimize their distributional discrepancy by utilizing mean squared error (MSE), Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD), and maximum mean discrepancy (MMD). Finally, the value of DualSHAP is the equality P = Q itself. ... Despite the unsupervised nature of the task, where exact targets are not provided, the low MSE, KLD, and MMD losses indicate robust optimization outcomes."

    The DualSHAP value is defined as the trained equality P=Q, and L_DualSHAP is exactly the objective minimized to enforce that equality. Section 4.2 then treats the post-training MSE, KLD, and MMD values as evidence of interpretability quality, and Appendix C repeats that these same losses 'demonstrate effective optimization and robustness.' Because these quantities are the minimized training objective rather than an independent measure against ground-truth feature importance, the interpretability result reduces by construction to the fitting procedure and cannot validate the framework.

full rationale

The classification evaluation (Table 1) is anchored to external benchmarks (OpenML-CC18, TabZilla) and to standard baselines, so the accuracy/AUC claims are not circular. The clear circular step is confined to the interpretability contribution: DualSHAP stipulates its output to be the equality of two learned distributions, trains with a loss that minimizes their discrepancy, and then reports the minimized discrepancy as evidence of success. This is a self-definitional reduction. The same-class random image mapping is a serious validity threat to the claim that the image representations carry instance-level tabular information, but it is an empirical/architectural weakness rather than a derivation that equates prediction with input by construction, so it is not counted as a separate circular step. No load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems appear in the derivation chain. The paper's own stated limitations (regression not addressed, Gaussian S/T assumption) are acknowledged without affecting this circularity verdict.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The method's free parameters are mostly architectural constants and data-derived initializations; there is no fitted physical constant. The main conceptual debt is the DualSHAP construction, where S and T are invented latent variables with assumed normal distributions and the output P equals Q is defined as the training target. The mapping assumption carries the classification claim.

free parameters (5)
  • MLP expansion dimensions and hidden width = N+4 and 128
    Fixed by hand across all datasets and not derived from data or theory. These choices control the capacity of the autoencoder and are part of the 'no hyperparameter tuning' claim.
  • Arbitrary label-to-image mapping order = Table 12 order: classes 0 to 9 to FashionMNIST, classes 10 to 19 to MNIST
    Which tabular class maps to which image class is chosen by the authors; changing this order changes the generated images and potentially the results.
  • VIF-based initial weights = w_ij = 1/VIF_i for the first layer FC9
    Computed from the data's collinearity structure and used as initialization; a data-derived quantity whose effect on convergence is not justified by theory.
  • DualSHAP Gaussian parameters = Learned by MLP1 and MLP2 during unsupervised optimization
    mu_s, sigma_s, mu_t, and sigma_t define S and T and are fitted with the same objective that is later reported as validation; no independent target anchors them.
  • AdamW optimizer hyperparameters = Not reported, defaults assumed
    The paper states AdamW but does not report learning rate or weight decay, so these are implicit free choices that affect training.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper Bayes' theorem can be used as a template even though X, I, and F are not treated as probability events
    Appendix A explicitly says terms are treated as model outputs rather than probability distributions; this is the only justification for setting P equal to Q.
  • ad hoc to paper S and T follow normal distributions
    Appendix A, Step 2 states the assumption, and the Limitations section admits alternative distributional assumptions may improve performance.
  • domain assumption A random same-class FashionMNIST or MNIST image is a valid carrier of tabular class information
    Section 3.1 defines M(x) this way and the reconstruction loss L_recon relies on it; without this, the generated images are an arbitrary class-conditioned prior.
  • domain assumption Tabular data is like a compressed latent space while images are uncompressed, so CNNs can exploit tabular relationships
    Stated in the Introduction as motivation; it is not proven but only motivates the architecture, so it carries less weight than the mapping assumption.
invented entities (1)
  • Normally distributed latent variables S and T in DualSHAP
    purpose: S represents tabular data generated from feature importance and images; T represents images generated from feature importance and tabular data; they are combined into P and Q.
    No data outside the framework supports their semantic meaning. They are constructed by MLPs, assumed normal, and fitted by the same loss that is used as validation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Table2Image: Interpretable Tabular Data Classification with Realistic Image Transformations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZEAMKYQ5

@misc{pith2026241206265,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Table2Image: Interpretable Tabular Data Classification with Realistic Image Transformations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZEAMKYQ5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06265}
}
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in deep learning for tabular data have shown promise, but challenges remain in achieving interpretable and lightweight models. This paper introduces Table2Image, a novel framework that transforms tabular data into realistic and diverse image representations, enabling deep learning methods to achieve competitive classification performance. To address multicollinearity in tabular data, we propose a variance inflation factor (VIF) initialization, which enhances model stability and robustness by incorporating statistical feature relationships. Additionally, we present an interpretability framework that integrates insights from both the original tabular data and its transformed image representations, by leveraging Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and methods to minimize distributional discrepancies. Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate the efficacy of our approach, achieving superior accuracy, area under the curve, and interpretability compared to recent leading deep learning models. Our lightweight method provides a scalable and reliable solution for tabular data classification.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.06265 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Table2Image framework. Mapping schema. First, we decide a realistic image set I according to the number of classes, say n, for the tabular dataset X. For datasets with n ≤ 10 classes, we use the FashionMNIST dataset as I, which contains ten predefined classes. Only the classes matching the range of class labels are used. For n > 10, we extend the image pool by combin￾ing FashionMNIST and MNIST datasets, allowing for… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. VIF initialization. where VIFi quantifies the degree of multicollinearity be￾tween the i-th feature and all other predictors. This ini￾tialization assigns smaller weights to features with high collinearity, reducing their initial influence during training. These weights are subsequently updated as part of the train￾ing process. The final representation P(x) in Table2Image-VIF is con￾structed by concatenating the out… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An overview of the DualSHAP framework. the model, leading us to propose DualSHAP, an interpretabil￾ity framework that integrates two distinct information. The information regarding which feature the model focuses on within the tabular data, and which regions it concentrates on within the image data. Eventually, this mechanism provides the importance for each variable in tabular data with a richer understanding of th… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The result of our interpretability framework using the balance-scale dataset. The feature importance scores for one sam￾ple of the balance-scale dataset are plotted, comparing the scores obtained from P, Q in Appendix A, and SHAP. exploit the uncompressed format of ima…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Pixel unshuffle operation. As described in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Class #: 2 (tic-tac-toe dataset). 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Class #: 6 (first-order-theorem-proving dataset). 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Class #: 19 (soybean dataset from OpenML), Part 1. 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Class #: 19 (soybean dataset from OpenML), Part 2. 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Class #: 19 (soybean dataset from OpenML), Part 3. 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tabular Image: a method to convert tabular data to images for convolutional neural networks

    cs.CE 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Converting tabular credit data into images with target-based feature allocation lets a 2D CNN match or beat XGBoost on large credit scoring benchmarks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    and Pfister, T

    Arik, S. . and Pfister, T. Tabnet: Attentive interpretable tabular learning. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 35 0 (8): 0 6679--6687, May 2021. doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16826. URL https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/16826

    doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16826 2021

  2. [2]

    G., van Rijn, J

    Bischl, B., Casalicchio, G., Feurer, M., Gijsbers, P., Hutter, F., Lang, M., Mantovani, R. G., van Rijn, J. N., and Vanschoren, J. Open ML benchmarking suites. In Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2), 2021. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=OCrD8ycKjG

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Trompt: Towards a better deep neural network for tabular data

    Chen, K.-Y., Chiang, P.-H., Chou, H.-R., Chen, T.-W., and Chang, T.-H. Trompt: Towards a better deep neural network for tabular data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18446, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    and Guestrin, C

    Chen, T. and Guestrin, C. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp.\ 785--794, 2016

    2016

  5. [5]

    Notes from the ai frontier: Insights from hundreds of use cases

    Chui, M., Manyika, J., Miremadi, M., Henke, N., Chung, R., Nel, P., and Malhotra, S. Notes from the ai frontier: Insights from hundreds of use cases. McKinsey Global Institute, 2: 0 267, 2018

    2018

  6. [6]

    Support-vector networks

    Cortes, C. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 1995

    1995

  7. [7]

    Cox, D. R. The regression analysis of binary sequences. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 20 0 (2): 0 215--232, 1958

    1958

  8. [8]

    The mnist database of handwritten digit images for machine learning research [best of the web]

    Deng, L. The mnist database of handwritten digit images for machine learning research [best of the web]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 29 0 (6): 0 141--142, 2012. doi:10.1109/MSP.2012.2211477

    arXiv 2012

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    T., Cherepanova, V., Hegde, C., Hutter, F., Goldblum, M., Cohen, N., and White, C

    Feuer, B., Schirrmeister, R. T., Cherepanova, V., Hegde, C., Hutter, F., Goldblum, M., Cohen, N., and White, C. Tunetables: Context optimization for scalable prior-data fitted networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.11137, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Revisiting deep learning models for tabular data

    Gorishniy, Y., Rubachev, I., Khrulkov, V., and Babenko, A. Revisiting deep learning models for tabular data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34: 0 18932--18943, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    On embeddings for numerical features in tabular deep learning

    Gorishniy, Y., Rubachev, I., and Babenko, A. On embeddings for numerical features in tabular deep learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35: 0 24991--25004, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    Tabm: Advancing tabular deep learning with parameter-efficient ensembling

    Gorishniy, Y., Kotelnikov, A., and Babenko, A. Tabm: Advancing tabular deep learning with parameter-efficient ensembling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24210, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    M., Rasch, M

    Gretton, A., Borgwardt, K. M., Rasch, M. J., Sch \"o lkopf, B., and Smola, A. A kernel two-sample test. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13 0 (1): 0 723--773, 2012

    2012

  6. [14]

    and Porter, D

    Gujarati, D. and Porter, D. Multicollinearity: What happens if the regressors are correlated. Basic econometrics, 363, 2003

    2003

  7. [15]

    Tab PFN : A transformer that solves small tabular classification problems in a second

    Hollmann, N., M \"u ller, S., Eggensperger, K., and Hutter, F. Tab PFN : A transformer that solves small tabular classification problems in a second. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=cp5PvcI6w8_

    2023

  8. [16]

    An introduction to statistical learning, 2013

    James, G. An introduction to statistical learning, 2013

    2013

  9. [17]

    Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree

    Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., and Liu, T.-Y. Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  10. [18]

    Classification and regression by randomforest

    Liaw, A. Classification and regression by randomforest. R news, 2002

    2002

  11. [19]

    and Hutter, F

    Loshchilov, I. and Hutter, F. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    Lundberg, S. M. and Lee, S.-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    Hacnet: End-to-end learning of interpretable table-to-image converter and convolutional neural network

    Matsuda, T., Uchida, K., Saito, S., and Shirakawa, S. Hacnet: End-to-end learning of interpretable table-to-image converter and convolutional neural network. Knowledge-Based Systems, 284: 0 111293, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    When do neural nets outperform boosted trees on tabular data? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024

    McElfresh, D., Khandagale, S., Valverde, J., Prasad C, V., Ramakrishnan, G., Goldblum, M., and White, C. When do neural nets outperform boosted trees on tabular data? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    V., and Gulin, A

    Prokhorenkova, L., Gusev, G., Vorobev, A., Dorogush, A. V., and Gulin, A. Catboost: unbiased boosting with categorical features. Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018

    2018

  16. [24]

    A., and Tsunoda, T

    Sharma, A., Vans, E., Shigemizu, D., Boroevich, K. A., and Tsunoda, T. Deepinsight: A methodology to transform a non-image data to an image for convolution neural network architecture. Scientific reports, 9 0 (1): 0 11399, 2019

    2019

  17. [25]

    P., Bishop, R., Rueckert, D., and Wang, Z

    Shi, W., Caballero, J., Husz \'a r, F., Totz, J., Aitken, A. P., Bishop, R., Rueckert, D., and Wang, Z. Real-time single image and video super-resolution using an efficient sub-pixel convolutional neural network. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pat...

    2016

  18. [26]

    and Armon, A

    Shwartz-Ziv, R. and Armon, A. Tabular data: Deep learning is not all you need. Information Fusion, 81: 0 84--90, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    B., and Goldstein, T

    Somepalli, G., Schwarzschild, A., Goldblum, M., Bruss, C. B., and Goldstein, T. SAINT : Improved neural networks for tabular data via row attention and contrastive pre-training. In NeurIPS 2022 First Table Representation Workshop, 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=FiyUTAy4sB8

    2022

  20. [28]

    Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting

    Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Salakhutdinov, R. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The journal of machine learning research, 15 0 (1): 0 1929--1958, 2014

    1929

  21. [29]

    Hybrid pixel-unshuffled network for lightweight image super-resolution

    Sun, B., Zhang, Y., Jiang, S., and Fu, Y. Hybrid pixel-unshuffled network for lightweight image super-resolution. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 37 0 (2): 0 2375--2383, Jun. 2023. doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i2.25333. URL https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/...

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    A., Xiao, C., and Koh, E

    Tang, A., Chan, G., Rossi, R. A., Xiao, C., and Koh, E. Tabular data to image generation: Benchmark data, approaches, and evaluation. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData), pp.\ 1539--1543. IEEE, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Fashion-mnist: a novel image dataset for benchmarking machine learning algorithms

    Xiao, H., Rasul, K., and Vollgraf, R. Fashion-mnist: a novel image dataset for benchmarking machine learning algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.07747, 2017

    2017 arXiv

  24. [32]

    A., Doroshow, J

    Zhu, Y., Brettin, T., Xia, F., Partin, A., Shukla, M., Yoo, H., Evrard, Y. A., Doroshow, J. H., and Stevens, R. L. Converting tabular data into images for deep learning with convolutional neural networks. Scientific reports, 11 0 (1): 0 11325, 2021

    2021

  25. [33]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.