pith. sign in

arxiv: 1608.00168 · v1 · pith:ZFACG22Inew · submitted 2016-07-30 · 💻 cs.CV

Sparse vs. Non-sparse: Which One Is Better for Practical Visual Tracking?

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords trackingnon-sparsesparserepresentationtrackervisualmethodspractical
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recently, sparse representation based visual tracking methods have attracted increasing attention in the computer vision community. Although achieve superior performance to traditional tracking methods, however, a basic problem has not been answered yet --- that whether the sparsity constrain is really needed for visual tracking? To answer this question, in this paper, we first propose a robust non-sparse representation based tracker and then conduct extensive experiments to compare it against several state-of-the-art sparse representation based trackers. Our experiment results and analysis indicate that the proposed non-sparse tracker achieved competitive tracking accuracy with sparse trackers while having faster running speed, which support our non-sparse tracker to be used in practical applications.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.