Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Robust Routing and Scheduling of Home Healthcare Workers: A Nested Branch-and-Price Approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.06215 v1 pith:ZFCNDFXB submitted 2024-07-04 math.OC econ.GNq-fin.EC

classification math.OCecon.GNq-fin.EC
keywords patientcarecriteriahealthcareapproachbranch-and-pricecaregiverhome
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The global home healthcare market is growing rapidly due to aging populations, advancements in healthcare technology, and patient preference for home-based care. In this paper, we study the multi-day planning problem of simultaneously deciding patient acceptance, assignment, routing, and scheduling under uncertain travel and service times. Our approach ensures cardinality-constrained robustness with respect to timely patient care and the prevention of overtime. We take into account a wide range of criteria including patient time windows, caregiver availability and compatibility, a minimum time interval between two visits of a patient, the total number of required visits, continuity of care, and profit. We use a novel systematic modeling scheme that prioritizes health-related criteria as hard constraints and optimizes cost and preference-related criteria as part of the objective function. We present a mixed-integer linear program formulation, along with a nested branch-and-price technique. Results from a case study in Austin, Texas demonstrate that instances of realistic size can be solved to optimality within reasonable runtimes. The price of robustness primarily results from reduced patient load per caregiver. Interestingly, the criterion of geographical proximity appears to be of secondary priority when selecting new patients and assigning them to caregivers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools