Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Two-Stream Mutual Attention Network for Semi-supervised Biomedical Segmentation with Noisy Labels

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.11719 v3 pith:ZGT7FRSG submitted 2018-07-31 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords attentionlabelsgradientsmodelsnoisydataincorrectnetwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

\begin{abstract} Learning-based methods suffer from a deficiency of clean annotations, especially in biomedical segmentation. Although many semi-supervised methods have been proposed to provide extra training data, automatically generated labels are usually too noisy to retrain models effectively. In this paper, we propose a Two-Stream Mutual Attention Network (TSMAN) that weakens the influence of back-propagated gradients caused by incorrect labels, thereby rendering the network robust to unclean data. The proposed TSMAN consists of two sub-networks that are connected by three types of attention models in different layers. The target of each attention model is to indicate potentially incorrect gradients in a certain layer for both sub-networks by analyzing their inferred features using the same input. In order to achieve this purpose, the attention models are designed based on the propagation analysis of noisy gradients at different layers. This allows the attention models to effectively discover incorrect labels and weaken their influence during the parameter updating process. By exchanging multi-level features within the two-stream architecture, the effects of noisy labels in each sub-network are reduced by decreasing the updating gradients. Furthermore, a hierarchical distillation is developed to provide more reliable pseudo labels for unlabelded data, which further boosts the performance of our retrained TSMAN. The experiments using both the HVSMR 2016 and BRATS 2015 benchmarks demonstrate that our semi-supervised learning framework surpasses the state-of-the-art fully-supervised results.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Revisiting CycleGAN for semi-supervised segmentation

    cs.CV 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Cycle-consistent translation between images and segmentation masks acts as an unsupervised regularizer and improves low-label semi-supervised segmentation on some benchmarks, though the reported gains are dataset-dependent.

  2. Embracing Imperfect Datasets: A Review of Deep Learning Solutions for Medical Image Segmentation

    eess.IV 2019-08 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured review of deep learning segmentation techniques for scarce and weak annotations, with cost-gain recommendations.

Pith tools