Mawqif-XT: An Arabic Benchmark Dataset for Cross-Target Stance Detection

Ahmed Ashraf; Asma Yamani; Hamzah Luqman; Maram Kurdi; Nuha Albadi; Rasha Albalawi; Saad Ezzini

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 18 references

Mawqif-XT: An Arabic Benchmark Dataset for Cross-Target Stance Detection

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read 996 Arabic tweets form a held-out benchmark for cross-target stance detection.

desk verdict Mawqif-XT is a useful, honestly documented Arabic stance dataset extension, but the missing cross-corpus overlap check against the original Mawqif training set is a load-bearing gap that needs to be addressed before the benchmark is adopted. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09539 v2 pith:ZHK4AO7Y submitted 2026-08-10 cs.CL

Rasha Albalawi , Nuha Albadi , Hamzah Luqman , Maram Kurdi , Saad Ezzini , Asma Yamani , Ahmed Ashraf This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.CL

keywords ArabicdatasetStancedetectionCross-targetgeneralizationTarget-specificMulti-tasklearningSentimentanalysisSarcasmtweets

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces Mawqif-XT, a held-out Arabic benchmark of 996 manually annotated tweets for stance, sentiment, and sarcasm across three targets: Women Driving, E-Cars, and Trimester System. The dataset is designed to be a test set only, with the original Mawqif dataset reserved for training and development, so that cross-target generalization can be measured cleanly. Two evaluation protocols are defined: one that tests transfer to a target semantically related to the training data, and one that tests generalization to unseen domains. The paper also reports baselines from seven transformer models and three zero-shot LLMs, with Qwen 2.5 (72B) obtaining the highest overall scores under both protocols. A sympathetic reader would care because Arabic stance resources with a controlled train/test separation are scarce, and this benchmark gives the field a common yardstick for comparing related-target transfer and unseen-target generalization.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Mawqif-XT Extension itself: a test-only dataset of 996 tweets built on the original Mawqif annotation scheme, which labels each tweet for stance (Favor, Against, None), sentiment (Positive, Negative, Neutral), and sarcasm (Sarcastic, Non-sarcastic). The evaluation design rests on two protocols: Protocol 1 trains on all original Mawqif targets and tests on Women Driving, a related target; Protocol 2 trains on COVID-19 Vaccine and Digital Transformation, validates on Women Empowerment, and tests on E-Cars and Trimester System, two unseen domains. The separation of training, development, and test targets is what makes measured performance interpretable as cross-target generalization rather than in-domain memorization.

What would settle it

Recompute the baseline $F_{\text{avg}2}$ scores after removing all tweets whose stance label lacked full three-way annotator agreement; if model rankings change substantially, the benchmark's moderate agreement is driving the results rather than cross-target ability. Also run a duplicate and near-duplicate check between the original Mawqif training tweets and the new test tweets; finding near-duplicates would mean the held-out scores are inflated by leakage.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Mawqif-XT provides a valid held-out evaluation set for cross-target stance detection in Arabic. Each of its 996 tweets carries stance, sentiment, and sarcasm labels following the original Mawqif scheme; three annotators label every tweet and a fourth resolves disagreements. The benchmark's design separates the original Mawqif targets (COVID-19 Vaccine, Digital Transformation, Women Empowerment) as training and development data from three new test targets, with Women Driving chosen to be semantically related to Women Empowerment and E-Cars and Trimester System chosen as unseen domains. Baseline experiments show that no model wins on every target: Qwen 2.5 (72B) achieves the best overall scores ($F_{\text{avg}2} = 73.66$ on Women Driving under Protocol 1 and $74.75$ overall under Protocol 2), while MARBERT is the strongest encoder on the unseen-target protocol. The paper's claim is that, together with the original Mawqif dataset, this extension constitutes a standardized benchmark for studying cross-target generalization in Arabic stance detection.

Load-bearing premise

The benchmark's validity depends on the manually assigned labels being accurate enough that score differences reflect real cross-target generalization, even though annotators reached full three-way agreement on only 62.95% of stance labels.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Future Arabic stance systems can report comparable $F_{\text{avg}2}$ scores on a fixed held-out test set instead of constructing their own splits.
The two protocols allow researchers to separate the difficulty of transferring to a semantically related target from the difficulty of generalizing to an unseen domain.
Zero-shot LLMs, particularly Qwen 2.5, are competitive on Arabic stance, while encoder models such as MARBERT remain strong on specific unseen targets.
Because every tweet also has sentiment and sarcasm labels, the benchmark supports multi-task studies of how these labels interact with stance.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Since most stance disagreements involve the None label and the reported $F_{\text{avg}2}$ metric ignores None, the metric may partly immunize the baselines against the noisiest annotation decisions; reporting $F_{\text{avg}2}$ on only full-agreement tweets would test this directly.
A natural safeguard for users is to run a duplicate or near-duplicate check between the original Mawqif training tweets and Mawqif-XT before treating the scores as generalization results; the paper does not report such an overlap analysis.
The observed disagreement pattern suggests that a third, weaker label like 'leaning favor' might reduce noise, but that would require changing the original annotation scheme.
One could extend the same protocol to test whether models trained jointly on stance, sentiment, and sarcasm beat single-task models on cross-target transfer.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Pyramidal take: Mawqif-XT is a legitimate, clearly described Arabic dataset extension for cross-target stance detection, with a sensible design and honest reporting. The main gap is the absence of an overlap analysis against the original Mawqif training set, which matters because one of the new test targets is deliberately related to a training target.

What is new: the paper adds 996 manually annotated tweets on three targets, following the existing Mawqif annotation scheme, and explicitly sets up two protocols: a related-target transfer (Women Driving vs. Women Empowerment) and an unseen-target generalization (E-Cars, Trimester System). That design is genuinely useful. The IAA scores are moderate (Fleiss stance kappa 0.564) but the authors dig into the disagreements and show that most involve neutral-vs-polar decisions, which is a familiar and credible pattern. They also report baselines from a range of Arabic and multilingual models, plus zero-shot LLMs. The limitations section is straightforward and doesn't overclaim. The data, while small, is adequate for a benchmark, and the citation pattern is fine — they reference the prior Arabic stance datasets and the original Mawqif without red flags.

Where it's soft:

- The bigger issue: there's no check for duplicates or near-duplicates between the new test tweets and the original Mawqif training tweets. Section 2.2 talks about removing duplicates within each collection, but not across corpora. Since Women Driving was collected from the same platform over a period that overlaps with the original Mawqif data and is semantically close to Women Empowerment, the risk is concrete. If some test tweets have near-copies in training, the reported Favg2 numbers could partially reflect memorization rather than generalization. This is fixable: run a deduplication check (exact and near-duplicate) against the original corpus and report the results, or at least explain why it's not needed.

- The paper says the dataset is released but gives no URL or access instructions. That's a practical problem for a resource paper. It also prevents an independent check of the leakage issue.

- Minor: the manual review step for Women Driving is described as a random sample of 500 tweets, whereas the other two targets went through full manual review. That discrepancy is confusing and should be clarified.

- The baseline numbers would be more convincing with seed-level variance, but that's a minor point for a dataset paper.

Net assessment: The core resource claim is plausible and the paper is honest with its limitations. The leakage gap is load-bearing enough that it should be addressed before the benchmark is widely adopted, but it's not a fatal flaw; a proper overlap analysis would likely settle it. This paper deserves a serious referee and a request for revision rather than a desk reject. It will be useful to Arabic NLP researchers and the stance detection community. I'd probably not bring it to a general reading group, but if you work on Arabic or cross-target stance, it's worth a look.

Recommendation: send to peer review with the expectation that the authors add the dataset link, run and report a cross-corpus overlap analysis, and clarify the manual review procedure.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. Mawqif-XT is a dataset paper introducing a held-out Arabic stance-detection test set of 996 manually annotated tweets across three targets: Women Driving (semantically related to Women Empowerment in the original Mawqif corpus), E-Cars, and Trimester System (both previously unseen targets). The paper preserves the original Mawqif annotation scheme and labels each tweet for stance, sentiment, and sarcasm. It defines two evaluation protocols—related-target generalization (Protocol 1) and unseen-target generalization (Protocol 2)—and reports baselines for seven encoder-based models and three zero-shot LLMs, with Qwen 2.5 (72B) achieving the best overall scores (Favg2 = 73.66 on Women Driving under Protocol 1 and 74.75 overall under Protocol 2). The central claim is that the dataset, together with the original Mawqif train/dev splits, provides a benchmark for evaluating cross-target generalization in Arabic stance detection.

Significance. If the dataset is released with the stated variables and protocols, it would be a useful, carefully scoped Arabic resource for cross-target stance detection, complementing existing datasets by explicitly separating the related-target and unseen-target transfer scenarios. Strengths of the paper include the preservation of a published annotation scheme, explicit reporting of Fleiss kappas and disagreement patterns, clear baseline configurations, and two protocols that operationalize different transfer settings. The main risks are that no cross-corpus overlap analysis is reported, no dataset link or full data dictionary is supplied, and the exact zero-shot prompt and decoding setup is not given; these must be addressed before the benchmark claim is fully supported.

major comments (4)

[3.1.3 / 2.2] Section 2.2 reports within-target duplicate elimination, and Section 3.1.3 defines the held-out protocols, but no analysis compares the 996 Mawqif-XT test tweets against the original Mawqif training and development tweets used in Table 7. Since Women Driving is deliberately related to Women Empowerment and is collected from the same platform over a 2016–2026 window, exact or lightly edited near-duplicates are plausible. If any such overlaps exist, the Protocol 1 and Protocol 2 scores in Table 10 may partly reflect memorization of training surface forms rather than cross-target generalization. Please report a cross-corpus overlap analysis (e.g., exact tweet-ID matching, normalized-text exact match, and a near-duplicate similarity search), remove any overlapping instances, and quantify the effect.
[Abstract / Sections 2, 4] Although the paper calls Mawqif-XT a 'released' benchmark and provides usage notes in Section 4, it contains no URL, repository name, DOI, license, or access instructions anywhere in the manuscript. For a dataset paper, the artifact itself is the central claim, so an availability statement is not optional. Add a Data Availability section with a persistent download link, license, and versioning information.
[Table 5] Table 5 lists the released variables as id, tweet_id, target, stance, sentiment, and sarcasm, but does not list the tweet text. If the release contains only tweet IDs, most researchers cannot reconstruct the tweets because of X API restrictions and content deletion, which would make the benchmark unusable in practice. Please clarify in Table 5 (or a data dictionary) whether the tweet text is included, and if it is not, add it to the planned release.
[3.1.1–3.1.2] Section 3.1.1 states that the three zero-shot LLMs receive 'the target and tweet as input and [are] instructed to predict one of the three stance labels,' but the exact prompt template (including the Arabic wording), temperature, maximum output length, and number of inference runs are not reported. Zero-shot LLM results are sensitive to these choices, so Table 10 cannot be reproduced from the information given. Provide the full prompts and decoding configuration, or release the inference script.

minor comments (5)

[2.3] The sentence 'The retained tweets were manually following the annotation guidelines' is missing a word; it should read 'manually annotated following the annotation guidelines.'
[Abstract and passim] The dataset is called 'Mawqif-v2 Extension' in the abstract but 'Mawqif-XT Extension' throughout the rest of the paper; please standardize the name.
[2.3] There is a punctuation and capitalization error in 'regardless of the author’s stance towards the target. while sarcasm was annotated'; the period before 'while' should be a comma or semicolon.
[3.2] The word 'usefull' in the final sentence of Section 3.2 is a typo and should be 'useful.'
[2.1] The Women Driving collection states a search period of January 1, 2016 to February 16, 2026, but later describes the initial collection as spanning January 2, 2016 to November 27, 2025; please reconcile the two date ranges.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the benchmark construction and baseline evaluations are self-contained and do not reduce to their inputs.

full rationale

The paper makes no formal derivation or fitted-parameter claim that could be circular. Its central contribution is a new held-out evaluation set: 996 newly collected and manually annotated Arabic tweets for three targets (Women Driving, E-Cars, Trimester System), with stance, sentiment, and sarcasm labels following the original Mawqif annotation scheme. The original Mawqif dataset is used only as the training and development source for the baseline experiments, and the new tweets are evaluated as a separate test set under two protocols. There is no equation in the paper in which a predicted quantity is defined in terms of the fitted quantity, and no parameter is fit to the test data. The reuse of the original Mawqif annotation guidelines is a consistency choice for label compatibility, not a case of defining the evaluation outcome in terms of the input. The moderate inter-annotator agreement (Fleiss stance kappa 0.564) is an annotation-quality limitation that the paper itself reports, and it does not constitute circularity. The absence of a reported cross-corpus overlap or near-duplicate analysis between the new tweets and the original Mawqif training tweets is a real validity and leakage risk for the benchmark claim, as the skeptic headline notes, but it is a correctness or data-integrity concern rather than a circular-reasoning defect: even if leakage existed, the flaw would be contamination of the test set, not a derivation that reduces to its own inputs. Likewise, the zero-shot LLM baselines and fine-tuned transformer baselines are measured on unseen annotations; no result is asserted to follow from the annotation scheme itself. The paper is therefore best described as a resource and benchmarking contribution with no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central contribution is a resource, not a formal derivation. The paper loads a small number of domain assumptions: the search strategies capture relevant opinions, the moderate-IAA adjudicated labels are reliable, and there is no leakage from the original training corpus. No free numerical parameters are fitted to the test set, and no new theoretical entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The keyword, hashtag, and exclusion-term search strategies in Table 1 retrieve tweets that express public stance about each target.
Section 2.1 states that the queries were designed manually and selected based on active usage; no recall analysis or comparison against alternative queries is provided, so relevance is assumed rather than demonstrated.
domain assumption Three-annotator labeling with a fourth-annotator tie-break yields valid ground truth labels for stance, sentiment, and sarcasm.
Section 2.3 reports moderate Fleiss kappa (0.564 for stance) and states that a fourth annotator assigned final labels; the paper assumes that adjudication corrects annotator disagreement rather than propagating systematic bias.
domain assumption No tweet in Mawqif-XT overlaps or near-duplicates tweets in the original Mawqif training set, so performance reflects target generalization rather than memorization.
Sections 2.1 and 2.2 describe deduplication within the new collection but do not describe any cross-corpus overlap check with the original Mawqif data; Section 3.1.3 relies on this separation to claim held-out evaluation.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mawqif-XT: An Arabic Benchmark Dataset for Cross-Target Stance Detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZHK4AO7Y

@misc{pith2026260809539,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mawqif-XT: An Arabic Benchmark Dataset for Cross-Target Stance Detection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZHK4AO7Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09539}
}

read the original abstract

Publicly available Arabic datasets for target-specific stance detection remain limited, particularly for evaluating cross-target generalization. This paper presents the Mawqif-XT, consisting of 996 manually annotated Arabic tweets collected from three public targets: Women Driving, E-Cars, and Trimester System. Each tweet is annotated with stance, sentiment, and sarcasm labels following the original Mawqif annotation scheme. The released extension is intended as a held-out evaluation set for assessing model generalization to both semantically related and previously unseen targets, while the original Mawqif dataset is used for training and development. In addition, we establish baseline results using several Arabic and multilingual transformer models, as well as zero-shot large language models (LLMs), to facilitate reproducible evaluation. Together with the original Mawqif dataset, the Mawqif-v2 Extension provides a benchmark for evaluating cross-target generalization in Arabic stance detection.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.09539 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** TF-IDF-based word clouds comparing the three original Mawqif training targets and the three released evaluation targets. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

[1]

Mohammad, S

S. Mohammad, S. Kiritchenko, P. Sobhani, X. Zhu, C. Cherry, Semeval-2016 task 6: Detecting stance in tweets, in: Proceedings of the 10th international workshop on semantic evaluation (SemEval-2016), 2016, pp. 31–41

2016
[2]

N. S. Alturayeif, H. A. Luqman, M. A. K. Ahmed, Mawqif: A multi-label arabic dataset for target-specific stance detection, in: Proceedings of the Seventh Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop (W ANLP), 2022, pp. 174–184

2022
[3]

R. Baly, M. Mohtarami, J. Glass, L. Màrquez, A. Moschitti, P. Nakov, Integrating stance detection and fact checking in a unified corpus, in: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, V olume 2 (Short Papers), 2018, pp. 21–27

2018
[4]

Khouja, Stance prediction and claim verification: An arabic perspective, in: Proceedings of the Third Work- shop on Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER), 2020, pp

J. Khouja, Stance prediction and claim verification: An arabic perspective, in: Proceedings of the Third Work- shop on Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER), 2020, pp. 8–17

2020
[5]

Alhindi, A

T. Alhindi, A. Alabdulkarim, A. Alshehri, M. Abdul-Mageed, P. Nakov, Arastance: A multi-country and multi- domain dataset of arabic stance detection for fact checking, in: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on NLP for Internet Freedom: Censorship, Disinformation, and Propaganda, 2021, pp. 57–65

2021
[6]

Charfi, M

A. Charfi, M. Bessghaier, A. Atalla, R. Akasheh, S. Al-Emadi, W. Zaghouani, Marasta: A multi-dialectal ara- bic cross-domain stance corpus, in: Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024), 2024, pp. 11060–11069

2024
[7]

M. M. Jaziriyan, A. Akbari, H. Karbasi, Exaasc: a general target-based stance detection corpus in arabic lan- guage, in: 2021 11th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Knowledge (ICCKE), IEEE, 2021, pp. 424–429

2021
[8]

Alkhathlan, F

A. Alkhathlan, F. Alahmadi, F. Kateb, H. Al-Khalifa, Constructing and evaluating arabicstancex: A social media dataset for arabic stance detection, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 8 (2025) 1615800. 9

2025

Show all 18 references

[9]

J. R. Landis, G. G. Koch, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, biometrics (1977) 159– 174

1977
[10]

Antoun, F

W. Antoun, F. Baly, H. Hajj, Arabert: Transformer-based model for arabic language understanding, arXiv (2020)

2020
[11]

Inoue, B

G. Inoue, B. Alhafni, N. Baimukan, H. Bouamor, N. Habash, The interplay of variant, size, and task type in arabic pre-trained language models, in: Proceedings of the sixth Arabic natural language processing workshop, 2021, pp. 92–104

2021
[12]

Abdul-Mageed, A

M. Abdul-Mageed, A. Elmadany, E. M. B. Nagoudi, Arbert & marbert: Deep bidirectional transformers for arabic, arXiv (2020). URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2101.01785

2020 arXiv
[13]

Devlin, M

J. Devlin, M. Chang, K. Lee, K. Toutanova, BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding, CoRR abs/1810.04805 (2018).arXiv:1810.04805. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805

2018 arXiv
[14]

V . Sanh, L. Debut, J. Chaumond, T. Wolf, Distilbert, a distilled version of bert: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter, arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01108 (2019)

2019 arXiv
[15]

Conneau, K

A. Conneau, K. Khandelwal, N. Goyal, V . Chaudhary, G. Wenzek, F. Guzmán, E. Grave, M. Ott, L. Zettlemoyer, V . Stoyanov, Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning at scale, in: Proceedings of the 58th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, 2...

2020
[16]

Touvron, T

H. Touvron, T. Lavril, G. Izacard, X. Martinet, M.-A. Lachaux, T. Lacroix, B. Rozière, N. Goyal, E. Hambro, F. Azhar, et al., Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 (2023)

2023 arXiv
[17]

Team, Qwen2.5: A party of foundation models (September 2024)

Q. Team, Qwen2.5: A party of foundation models (September 2024). URLhttps://qwenlm.github.io/blog/qwen2.5/

2024
[18]

Sengupta, S

N. Sengupta, S. K. Sahu, B. Jia, S. Katipomu, H. Li, F. Koto, W. Marshall, G. Gosal, C. Liu, Z. Chen, et al., Jais and jais-chat: Arabic-centric foundation and instruction-tuned open generative large language models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16149 (2023). 10

2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Mohammad, S

S. Mohammad, S. Kiritchenko, P. Sobhani, X. Zhu, C. Cherry, Semeval-2016 task 6: Detecting stance in tweets, in: Proceedings of the 10th international workshop on semantic evaluation (SemEval-2016), 2016, pp. 31–41

2016

[2] [2]

N. S. Alturayeif, H. A. Luqman, M. A. K. Ahmed, Mawqif: A multi-label arabic dataset for target-specific stance detection, in: Proceedings of the Seventh Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop (W ANLP), 2022, pp. 174–184

2022

[3] [3]

R. Baly, M. Mohtarami, J. Glass, L. Màrquez, A. Moschitti, P. Nakov, Integrating stance detection and fact checking in a unified corpus, in: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, V olume 2 (Short Papers), 2018, pp. 21–27

2018

[4] [4]

Khouja, Stance prediction and claim verification: An arabic perspective, in: Proceedings of the Third Work- shop on Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER), 2020, pp

J. Khouja, Stance prediction and claim verification: An arabic perspective, in: Proceedings of the Third Work- shop on Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER), 2020, pp. 8–17

2020

[5] [5]

Alhindi, A

T. Alhindi, A. Alabdulkarim, A. Alshehri, M. Abdul-Mageed, P. Nakov, Arastance: A multi-country and multi- domain dataset of arabic stance detection for fact checking, in: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on NLP for Internet Freedom: Censorship, Disinformation, and Propaganda, 2021, pp. 57–65

2021

[6] [6]

Charfi, M

A. Charfi, M. Bessghaier, A. Atalla, R. Akasheh, S. Al-Emadi, W. Zaghouani, Marasta: A multi-dialectal ara- bic cross-domain stance corpus, in: Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024), 2024, pp. 11060–11069

2024

[7] [7]

M. M. Jaziriyan, A. Akbari, H. Karbasi, Exaasc: a general target-based stance detection corpus in arabic lan- guage, in: 2021 11th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Knowledge (ICCKE), IEEE, 2021, pp. 424–429

2021

[8] [8]

Alkhathlan, F

A. Alkhathlan, F. Alahmadi, F. Kateb, H. Al-Khalifa, Constructing and evaluating arabicstancex: A social media dataset for arabic stance detection, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 8 (2025) 1615800. 9

2025