Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Audio Is the Achilles' Heel: Red Teaming Audio Large Multimodal Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.23861 v1 pith:ZIZE3USX submitted 2024-10-31 cs.CL cs.MMcs.SDeess.AS

classification cs.CLcs.MMcs.SDeess.AS
keywords audiolmmsmodelsharmfulmultimodalsafetytextlarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have demonstrated the ability to interact with humans under real-world conditions by combining Large Language Models (LLMs) and modality encoders to align multimodal information (visual and auditory) with text. However, such models raise new safety challenges of whether models that are safety-aligned on text also exhibit consistent safeguards for multimodal inputs. Despite recent safety-alignment research on vision LMMs, the safety of audio LMMs remains under-explored. In this work, we comprehensively red team the safety of five advanced audio LMMs under three settings: (i) harmful questions in both audio and text formats, (ii) harmful questions in text format accompanied by distracting non-speech audio, and (iii) speech-specific jailbreaks. Our results under these settings demonstrate that open-source audio LMMs suffer an average attack success rate of 69.14% on harmful audio questions, and exhibit safety vulnerabilities when distracted with non-speech audio noise. Our speech-specific jailbreaks on Gemini-1.5-Pro achieve an attack success rate of 70.67% on the harmful query benchmark. We provide insights on what could cause these reported safety-misalignments. Warning: this paper contains offensive examples.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Watch, Listen, Understand, Mislead: Tri-modal Adversarial Attacks on Short Videos for Content Appropriateness Evaluation

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Coordinated misleading text descriptions of video, audio, and meaning flip the appropriateness labels assigned by most multimodal LLMs in about 90% of test videos.

  2. Investigating Vulnerabilities and Defenses Against Audio-Visual Attacks: A Comprehensive Survey Emphasizing Multimodal Models

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes audio and video AI security research into adversarial, backdoor, and jailbreak attacks, with extra attention to multimodal large language models.

Pith tools