Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Deep Evidential Regression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.02600 v2 pith:ZKAUK6X5 submitted 2019-10-07 cs.LG cs.NEstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.NEstat.ML
keywords traininguncertaintyevidentialduringefficientevidencelearningmeasures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Deterministic neural networks (NNs) are increasingly being deployed in safety critical domains, where calibrated, robust, and efficient measures of uncertainty are crucial. In this paper, we propose a novel method for training non-Bayesian NNs to estimate a continuous target as well as its associated evidence in order to learn both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. We accomplish this by placing evidential priors over the original Gaussian likelihood function and training the NN to infer the hyperparameters of the evidential distribution. We additionally impose priors during training such that the model is regularized when its predicted evidence is not aligned with the correct output. Our method does not rely on sampling during inference or on out-of-distribution (OOD) examples for training, thus enabling efficient and scalable uncertainty learning. We demonstrate learning well-calibrated measures of uncertainty on various benchmarks, scaling to complex computer vision tasks, as well as robustness to adversarial and OOD test samples.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DeepUQ: Assessing the Aleatoric Uncertainties from two Deep Learning Methods

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    On simple toy data, both DE and DER scale their predicted noise with the injected level, but miscalibration appears in half of DE experiments and nearly all DER experiments.

  2. Probabilistic Modeling of Disparity Uncertainty for Robust and Efficient Stereo Matching

    cs.CV 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Stereo matching can report separate data and model uncertainty by combining ordinal-regression disparity distributions with a kernel-regression model-uncertainty estimator.

Pith tools