REVIEW 1 cited by
Label-Free Model Evaluation with Semi-Structured Dataset Representations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Label-free model evaluation, or AutoEval, estimates model accuracy on unlabeled test sets, and is critical for understanding model behaviors in various unseen environments. In the absence of image labels, based on dataset representations, we estimate model performance for AutoEval with regression. On the one hand, image feature is a straightforward choice for such representations, but it hampers regression learning due to being unstructured (\ie no specific meanings for component at certain location) and of large-scale. On the other hand, previous methods adopt simple structured representations (like average confidence or average feature), but insufficient to capture the data characteristics given their limited dimensions. In this work, we take the best of both worlds and propose a new semi-structured dataset representation that is manageable for regression learning while containing rich information for AutoEval. Based on image features, we integrate distribution shapes, clusters, and representative samples for a semi-structured dataset representation. Besides the structured overall description with distribution shapes, the unstructured description with clusters and representative samples include additional fine-grained information facilitating the AutoEval task. On three existing datasets and 25 newly introduced ones, we experimentally show that the proposed representation achieves competitive results. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/sxzrt/Semi-Structured-Dataset-Representations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Suitability Filter: A Statistical Framework for Classifier Evaluation in Real-World Deployment Settings
A statistical non-inferiority test on estimated per-sample correctness probabilities flags when a classifier's accuracy on unlabeled user data drops by more than a chosen margin relative to its test set.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.