Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The Hallucinations Leaderboard -- An Open Effort to Measure Hallucinations in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.05904 v2 pith:ZM6GKSC2 submitted 2024-04-08 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords hallucinationsmodelslanguageleaderboarddifferentlargemeasureopen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed the Natural Language Processing (NLP) landscape with their remarkable ability to understand and generate human-like text. However, these models are prone to ``hallucinations'' -- outputs that do not align with factual reality or the input context. This paper introduces the Hallucinations Leaderboard, an open initiative to quantitatively measure and compare the tendency of each model to produce hallucinations. The leaderboard uses a comprehensive set of benchmarks focusing on different aspects of hallucinations, such as factuality and faithfulness, across various tasks, including question-answering, summarisation, and reading comprehension. Our analysis provides insights into the performance of different models, guiding researchers and practitioners in choosing the most reliable models for their applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 6 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Expect the Unexpected: FailSafe Long Context QA for Finance

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FailSafeQA, a 220-example financial long-context benchmark, shows no tested LLM can both stay robust to input perturbations and refuse to hallucinate when context is missing or irrelevant.

  2. Self-Training Large Language Models for Tool-Use Without Demonstrations

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Correctness-filtered, self-generated tool-use traces fine-tuned via SFT or DPO improve accuracy on long-tail QA (PopQA +3.7) while giving mixed results elsewhere.

  3. The Science of Evaluating Foundation Models

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey-and-checklist proposal that organizes LLM evaluation into an ABCD framework (Algorithm, Big Data, Computation, Domain Expertise) for context-aware, documented assessment.

Pith tools