Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 14 cited by

Flexible-Antenna Systems: A Pinching-Antenna Perspective

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Pinching antennas can hit the MISO interference-channel upper bound by positioning antennas to satisfy two distance constraints, this paper argues.

desk verdict A solid first analysis of pinching antennas that deserves a serious referee, but the MISO interference-bound achievability claim is overstated in the abstract and conclusions and needs qualification. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.02376 v1 pith:ZM6X7VTQ submitted 2024-12-03 cs.IT eess.SPmath.IT

Zhiguo Ding , Robert Schober , H. Vincent Poor This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ITeess.SPmath.IT
keywords pinchingantennaflexiblesystemsMISOinterferencechannelnon-orthogonalmultipleaccessreconfigurablewirelesspathlossmitigationmovableantennasergodicsumrate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a new flexible-antenna technology, pinching antennas, can reconfigure wireless channels well beyond what fixed antennas or small-displacement movable antennas can do. For the simplest case, a single pinching antenna on one waveguide, closed-form ergodic sum rates show gains that grow with the deployment area, because the antenna moves close to each user and so mitigates large-scale path loss. For several pinching antennas fed by the same waveguide signal, the paper shows NOMA is a natural fit and outperforms orthogonal access. The central result is for multiple waveguides: by moving pinching antennas to satisfy two distance constraints, the MISO interference-channel upper bound, where each user's SINR reaches $\rho |h_m|^2$, becomes achievable—something impossible with beamforming alone on fixed channels.

What carries the argument

The pinching antenna is a small dielectric particle applied to a dielectric waveguide; its position on the waveguide is freely adjustable over distances far larger than a wavelength, which changes both the large-scale path loss and the phase of the signal radiated toward a user. Multiple pinching antennas on one waveguide must be fed the same signal, with location-dependent phase shifts, so serving several users at once motivates superposition coding and NOMA. For the multi-waveguide MISO setting, the load-bearing objects are the two geometric constraints (Eqs. (37) and (38)) on sums and products of antenna-user distances; when they hold, the channel matrix is effectively orthogonalized by the placement itself, letting a simple beamformer reach the interference-channel upper bound.

What would settle it

Run the search in Algorithm 1 over a fine grid of waveguide positions for many random user pairs in a shared square, as in Fig. 11. Count the fraction of realizations where both (37) and (38) hold with antenna displacements no more than a few wavelengths from the positions closest to the users. If that fraction is not close to 1, the claim that pinching antennas make the MISO upper bound achievable for typical deployments fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that pinching antennas make the generally unattainable MISO interference-channel upper bound achievable. In the two-user, two-waveguide case, if the antenna positions satisfy $\lvert\psi_1-\tilde{\psi}_1^{\mathrm{Pin}}\rvert-\lvert\psi_2-\tilde{\psi}_1^{\mathrm{Pin}}\rvert-\lvert\psi_1-\tilde{\psi}_2^{\mathrm{Pin}}\rvert+\lvert\psi_2-\tilde{\psi}_2^{\mathrm{Pin}}\rvert = k\lambda/2$ for odd $k$ and $\lvert\psi_1-\tilde{\psi}_1^{\mathrm{Pin}}\rvert\lvert\psi_2-\tilde{\psi}_2^{\mathrm{Pin}}\rvert = \lvert\psi_2-\tilde{\psi}_1^{\mathrm{Pin}}\rvert\lvert\psi_1-\tilde{\psi}_2^{\mathrm{Pin}}\rvert$, then a beamformer simultaneously matches phases (maximum-ratio combining) and cancels cross-interference (zero-forcing), so $\mathrm{SINR}_m = \rho |h_m|^2$. The paper proves these conditions are always feasible in a symmetric special case (users on the x-axis, antennas at $y=\pm D/3$), develops a search-based algorithm for general placements, and shows by simulation that the bound is reached for typical deployments though not for every random one.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the two geometric constraints (37) and (38) can be satisfied simultaneously, within a few wavelengths of ideal positions, for typical user and waveguide deployments; the paper proves this only for a symmetric special case and otherwise relies on simulation, explicitly leaving a rigorous feasibility analysis to future work.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For two-user, two-waveguide deployments that meet the distance constraints, the MISO interference-channel upper bound is reached without sophisticated beamforming; ZF or MRC suffices, as Fig. 10(b) shows.
  • Placing pinching antennas close to their associated users and then using low-complexity beamforming yields near-bound performance, which means exhaustive location search can be avoided in practice.
  • NOMA-assisted pinching-antenna systems outperform OMA-assisted ones on a single waveguide, and the sum-rate gain grows when users' channel conditions become more different (Eq. (26)).
  • Because the constraints depend only on antenna positions, the achievability result carries over to other flexible-antenna systems that can reconfigure channel phases, as the paper notes.
  • The ability to mitigate large-scale path loss and create strong LoS links is quantified: the sum-rate gain over fixed antennas is a monotonically increasing function of the deployment-area size $D/d$ at high SNR (Lemma 2).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the two distance constraints are generally feasible for random deployments, then pinching antennas effectively convert an interference channel into a set of orthogonal links without spectrum division, which could change how cell-edge interference is managed in dense indoor or factory scenarios.
  • Editorial inference: the constraints have a geometric flavor of equal path-length products and half-wavelength path-difference sums; this might generalize to more than two users by treating antenna placement as a search over constant-difference hyperboloids, though the paper does not attempt that.
  • Editorial inference: a direct extension to test is whether the same positioning strategy achieves the upper bound for MIMO (multiple pinching antennas per waveguide), since the phase-matching/orthogonality logic is per-stream rather than per-antenna.
  • Editorial inference: because the paper omits waveguide propagation loss, the reported rates are upper bounds; including the roughly 0.1 dB/m dielectric loss would lower the achievable rates and may shift the optimal antenna spacings.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies downlink communication with pinching antennas, a flexible-antenna concept in which dielectric particles applied to a waveguide act as antennas whose positions can be reconfigured. It first derives closed-form ergodic sum-rate expressions for a single pinching antenna on one waveguide, compares with a conventional fixed antenna, and proves that the pinching antenna yields a higher rate at high SNR. It then considers multiple pinching antennas on a single waveguide, which must be fed with the same signal, and analyzes OMA and NOMA designs, including high-SNR approximations and a NOMA-versus-OMA comparison. Finally, it treats two users served by two pinching antennas on two waveguides as a MISO interference channel, identifies two conditions (phase matching and orthogonality) under which the upper bound SINR_m ≤ ρ|h_m|^2 is achieved, proves feasibility for a symmetric special case, and presents a search algorithm and simulations. The abstract and conclusions state that the interference-channel upper bound is achievable with pinching antennas.

Significance. The paper provides useful analytical tools for a promising flexible-antenna architecture: explicit ergodic-rate formulas, a proof that antenna repositioning mitigates large-scale path loss, and a systematic NOMA analysis. The identification of constraints (37) and (38) is a useful step toward characterizing when the MISO interference upper bound can be approached. However, the unqualified claim in the abstract and conclusions that the upper bound is 'shown to be achievable' goes beyond what is proven. The only analytical feasibility guarantee is the symmetric special case in Section IV-B.2, and the paper's own Table I exhibits a deployment (Case II) where the proposed scheme does not reach the bound. With appropriate qualifications and either a broader feasibility result or a clear limitation statement, the paper would be a solid contribution to the emerging pinching-antenna literature.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section IV-B.1 and Conclusions] The central claim that the MISO interference upper bound is achievable with pinching antennas is not supported for general user/waveguide deployments. The feasibility proof is restricted to the symmetric case with users on the x-axis and waveguides at y=±D/3 (Section IV-B.2), while Section IV-B.1 explicitly states 'We have yet to obtain a rigorous analysis for the impact of the user/waveguide deployment on the feasibility of the two constraints.' Moreover, Table I (Case II) shows the proposed scheme achieving SINR_min = 8.7484 against the bound of 9.7785, i.e., the bound is not reached. Since this is the headline advertised result, the manuscript should either prove feasibility for a broader class of deployments, or carefully reword the abstract and conclusions to present achievability as conditional on deployment and proven only for the special case, with the general case as a conjecture supported by simulations.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (4)] The factor 1/M is missing in Eq. (4); Eq. (3), Eq. (5), and Lemma 1 all include it, so Eq. (4) should be corrected to avoid an inconsistency.
  2. [Section II] The remark after Eq. (2) and the remark after Lemma 2 are both numbered 1; the second one should be numbered 2, and the subsequent remarks renumbered accordingly.
  3. [Eq. (29)] In Eq. (29), the denominator of SINR_2 omits the factor ρ; it should be ρ|h_2^H p_1|^2 + 1, consistent with Eq. (30).
  4. [Abstract] The abstract expands MISO as 'multiple-input single-input'; the standard expansion is 'multiple-input single-output'.
  5. [Eqs. (14) and (17)] Equations (14) and (17) use 'log' without an explicit base; for consistency with the rest of the paper, the base-2 logarithm should be indicated.
  6. [Eq. (32)] The matrix in Eq. (32) contains an entry with the undefined index m in the exponent |ψ_2^Pin − ψ_m^Pin|; the indexing should be checked and corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all central results are direct model evaluations or explicitly conditional constructions.

full rationale

The paper's analytical results are computed directly from the stated geometric and channel models: free-space LoS path loss, uniform user distributions, equal power sharing among activated pinching antennas, and the waveguide phase-shift model. No parameter is fitted to data and then renamed as a prediction; the ergodic-rate expressions in Lemmas 1 and 3 and the NOMA/OMA comparison in Eq. (26) are closed-form evaluations of the model. The MISO upper-bound achievability claim is constructive rather than circular: for fixed antenna positions, the upper bound SINR_m ≤ ρ|h_m|² is achieved iff the beamforming coefficients satisfy phase matching and zero interference, and the paper reduces those conditions to explicit geometric constraints (37)-(38) and proves feasibility in a symmetric special case (Section IV-B.2), while explicitly acknowledging that a general feasibility analysis is open and that Table I contains a random realization where the bound is not reached. That is a limitation/correctness caveat, not circularity. Self-citations to the authors' prior NOMA and relay results are background or standard external formulas and are not used to assume the conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on idealized channel assumptions (free-space LoS, no waveguide loss, perfect positioning) and on geometric approximations whose validity is only partially established. No fitted parameters are used to force agreement with simulations; the analytical formulas follow directly from the model. The power-splitting coefficients for NOMA are chosen by a heuristic, but the main NOMA versus OMA comparison is insensitive to that choice.

free parameters (1)
  • NOMA power allocation coefficients α_m = α_m = b[m] / (b^T 1_M) with b = [2M+1, ..., 3, 1]
    Set by a hand-chosen heuristic vector b, not fitted to data. The high-SNR sum-rate difference (26) is independent of α_2, so the central NOMA versus OMA comparison does not depend on this choice, but the individual user rates do.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Free-space LoS channel model with path-loss exponent 2 for all links, η = c²/(16π²f_c²).
    Invoked in Eq. (1) and throughout; the paper notes NLoS would increase pinching gains but is beyond scope (Section II-A).
  • domain assumption Pinching antennas can be moved perfectly to any required location on the waveguide.
    Stated in footnote 2; imprecise positioning is left as future work, so the rate results are upper bounds under positioning error.
  • domain assumption Waveguide propagation loss is negligible.
    Stated in footnote 3; the paper notes that adding the 0.1 dB/m waveguide loss would make the results upper bounds.
  • domain assumption For OMA with N pinching antennas, |ψ_m − ψ_tilde_n| / |ψ_m − ψ_pin_m| ≈ 1 when antennas cluster near the user's closest point on the waveguide.
    Used to simplify Eq. (15) to Eq. (16), the N-antenna rate upper bound; the distance-ratio approximation is not rigorously justified but is verified by simulation in Fig. 6.
  • domain assumption For NOMA, well-separated users give |h_m|² ≈ η / |ψ_m − ψ_pin_m|², i.e., the closest-antenna distance dominates the channel gain.
    Used in Section III-B to derive the simplified NOMA rates in Eqs. (18)-(19) and Lemma 3; valid only for large D1, as acknowledged.
  • domain assumption The upper bound in (33) does not change significantly when antennas are moved a few wavelengths to satisfy the phase and orthogonality constraints.
    Stated in Section IV-B; this justifies calling micro-meter movements sufficient to achieve the bound, and it is not rigorously proven.
  • standard math Cauchy-Schwarz gives SINR_m ≤ ρ|h_m|², defining the interference-free upper bound.
    Used to define the upper bound in Eq. (33) for the MISO interference channel.
  • domain assumption Users are uniformly distributed in squares or rectangles.
    Used to compute ergodic expectations; the paper notes in Remark 2 that the shape of the user area affects the performance gain of pinching antennas.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Flexible-Antenna Systems: A Pinching-Antenna Perspective." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZM6X7VTQ

@misc{pith2026241202376,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Flexible-Antenna Systems: A Pinching-Antenna Perspective},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZM6X7VTQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.02376}
}
read the original abstract

Flexible-antenna systems have recently received significant research interest due to their capability to reconfigure wireless channels intelligently. This paper focuses on a new type of flexible-antenna technology, termed pinching antennas, which can be realized by applying small dielectric particles on a waveguide. Analytical results are first developed for the simple case with a single pinching antenna and a single waveguide, where the unique feature of the pinching-antenna system to create strong line-of-sight links and mitigate large-scale path loss is demonstrated. An advantageous feature of pinching-antenna systems is that multiple pinching antennas can be activated on a single waveguide at no extra cost; however, they must be fed with the same signal. This feature motivates the application of non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA), and analytical results are provided to demonstrate the superior performance of NOMA-assisted pinching-antenna systems. Finally, the case with multiple pinching antennas and multiple waveguides is studied, which resembles a classical multiple-input single-input (MISO) interference channel. By exploiting the capability of pinching antennas to reconfigure the wireless channel, it is revealed that a performance upper bound on the interference channel becomes achievable, where the achievability conditions are also identified. Computer simulation results are presented to verify the developed analytical results and demonstrate the superior performance of pinching-antenna systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.02376 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of a pinching-antenna system [16]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of a NOMA-assisted pinching-antenna s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of a network with multiple waveguides a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ergodic sum rates achieved by the considered schemes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Performance gain of NOMA over OMA, with N pinching antenna and a single waveguide. M = N = 2, and D2 = 10 m. The analytical results are based on (26). The other parameters are the same as for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The users’ individual data rates achieved by pinchin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Performance achieved by the low-complexity pinchi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 14 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multiuser Communications Aided by Cross-Linked Movable Antenna Array: Architecture and Optimization

    cs.IT 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A cross-linked movable antenna array with M+N motors achieves multiuser transmit power within about 2 dB of the theoretical lower bound and within 1 dB of element-wise movable antenna systems.

  2. Performance Analysis of Pinching-Antenna Systems

    cs.NI 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Closed-form outage probability and average rate for pinching-antenna systems with waveguide losses, plus the optimal antenna position along the waveguide.

  3. Beam Training for Pinching-Antenna Systems (PASS)

    eess.SP 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A three-stage hierarchical beam training method for pinching-antenna systems cuts training overhead from over a million scans to about 50 while keeping data rates near the phase-aligned upper bound.

  4. Minimum Data Rate Maximization for Uplink Pinching-Antenna Systems

    cs.IT 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For uplink pinching-antenna systems, the authors propose a successive-convex-approximation placement algorithm plus a Lambert-W closed form for resource allocation, maximizing the minimum user rate.

  5. Secure Pinching Antenna-aided ISAC

    cs.IT 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A pinching-antenna ISAC scheme that aligns antennas with users and targets, then optimizes beamforming and artificial noise, is claimed to outperform equidistant and fixed-array baselines by 3-30 dB in illumination power.

  6. Joint Beamforming for NOMA Assisted Pinching Antenna Systems (PASS)

    cs.IT 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A NOMA-assisted pinching antenna system with jointly optimized antenna positions, transmit beamforming, and power allocation is simulated to reduce downlink transmit power by over 95% versus a fixed massive MIMO-NOMA ...

  7. Cram\'er-Rao Bounds for Integrated Sensing and Communications in Pinching-Antenna Systems

    eess.SP 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A bistatic Integrated Sensing and Communications system with pinching antennas is claimed to achieve centimeter-level ranging and sub-degree angle estimation, based on a Cramér-Rao analysis that contains a load-bearin...

  8. Graph Neural Network Enabled Pinching Antennas

    eess.SP 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A bipartite graph attention network (BGAT) solves the joint antenna placement and power allocation problem for pinching antennas to maximize downlink energy efficiency.

  9. Downlink Beamforming with Pinching-Antenna Assisted MIMO Systems

    cs.IT 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A fractional-programming and block-coordinate-descent algorithm that jointly optimizes digital precoding and pinching-antenna locations achieves substantially higher multiuser downlink sum-rate than fixed-location ant...

  10. Agentic Graph Neural Networks for Wireless Communications and Networking Towards Edge General Intelligence: A Survey

    eess.SP 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A synthesis of GNN techniques for wireless networks, with speculative frameworks for agentic orchestration and LLM-based Q&A, not experimentally validated.

  11. Analytical Optimization for Antenna Placement in Pinching-Antenna Systems

    cs.IT 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    For fairness-based OMA, the optimal pinching-antenna location is the mean of users' x-coordinates and does not depend on their distance from the waveguide; for NOMA it moves exponentially toward the user nearest the w...

  12. Sum-Rate Maximization for NOMA-Assisted Pinching-Antenna Systems

    cs.IT 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    For a two-user NOMA downlink with pinching antennas, a bisection-based antenna-placement and power-allocation algorithm is shown in simulations to nearly match exhaustive search and to beat fixed-antenna NOMA.

  13. GPASS: Deep Learning for Beamforming in Pinching-Antenna Systems (PASS)

    eess.SP 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A staged graph neural network jointly learns pinching-antenna positions and transmit beamforming, and the authors report it outperforms a heuristic baseline in simulated pinching-antenna systems.

  14. Antenna Activation for NOMA Assisted Pinching-Antenna Systems

    eess.SP 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A low-complexity matching algorithm selects which preconfigured pinching antennas to activate along a dielectric waveguide to maximize NOMA downlink sum rate, reaching about 99% of exhaustive-search performance in sim...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 14 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Cover and J

    T. Cover and J. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory , 6th ed. Wiley and Sons, New Y ork, 1991

    work page 1991

  2. [2]

    Towards 6G wireless communication networks: Vision, enabling technologies, and new paradigm shifts,

    X. Y ou, C. Wang, J. Huang et al., “Towards 6G wireless communication networks: Vision, enabling technologies, and new paradigm shifts,” Sci. China Inf. Sci. , vol. 64, no. 110301, pp. 1–74, Feb. 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    On limits of wireless communica tion in a fading environment when using multiple antennas,

    G. Foschini and M. Gans, “On limits of wireless communica tion in a fading environment when using multiple antennas,” Wireless Personal Commun., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 311–335, Mar. 1998

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    Scaling up MIMO: Opportunitie s and challenges with very large arrays,

    F. Rusek, D. Persson, B. K. Lau, E. G. Larsson, T. L. Marzet ta, O. Edfors, and F. Tufvesson, “Scaling up MIMO: Opportunitie s and challenges with very large arrays,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag. , vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 40–60, Jan. 2013

    2013

  5. [5]

    V aezi, Z

    M. V aezi, Z. Ding, and H. V . Poor, Multiple Access Techniques for 5G Wireless Networks and Beyond . Springer International Publishing, 2019

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    The road to nex t- generation multiple access: A 50-year tutorial review,

    Y . Liu, C. Ouyang, Z. Ding, and R. Schober, “The road to nex t- generation multiple access: A 50-year tutorial review,” Proc. IEEE , pp. 1–49, to appear in 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Noise modulation,

    E. Basar, “Noise modulation,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 844–848, Mar. 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Smart radio environments empowered by AI reconfigurable meta-sur faces: An idea whose time has come,

    M. D. Renzo, M. Debbah, D.-T. Phan-Huy, A. Zappone, M.-S. Alouini, C. Y uen, V . Sciancalepore, G. C. Alexandropoulos, J. Hoydis, H. Gacanin, J. de Rosny, A. Bounceu, G. Lerosey, and M. Fink, “ Smart radio environments empowered by AI reconfigurable meta-sur faces: An idea whose time has come,” EURASIP J. on Wirel. Com. Netw. , vol. 129, pp. 1–20, May 2019

    2019

Show all 27 references
  1. [9]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for energy ef ficiency in wireless communication,

    C. Huang, A. Zappone, G. C. Alexandropoulos, M. Debbah, a nd C. Y uen, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for energy ef ficiency in wireless communication,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. , vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 4157–4170, Aug. 2019

    2019

  2. [10]

    Intelligent reflecting surface enha nced wireless network via joint active and passive beamforming,

    Q. Wu and R. Zhang, “Intelligent reflecting surface enha nced wireless network via joint active and passive beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 5394–5409, Nov. 2019

    2019

  3. [11]

    Intellig ent reflecting surface-aided wireless communications: A tutor ial,

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, B. Zheng, C. Y ou, and R. Zhang, “Intellig ent reflecting surface-aided wireless communications: A tutor ial,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 3313–3351, May 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    F luid antenna systems,

    K.-K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “F luid antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950–1962, Mar. 2021

    1950

  5. [13]

    Fluid antenna multiple acce ss,

    K.-K. Wong and K.-F. Tong, “Fluid antenna multiple acce ss,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 4801–4815, Jul. 2022

    2022

  6. [14]

    Modeling and performance an alysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Modeling and performance an alysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6234–6250, Jun. 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    MIMO capacity characteriza tion for movable antenna systems,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “MIMO capacity characteriza tion for movable antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 3392–3407, Apr. 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    Pinching antenna - using a dielectric waveguide as an anten na,

    A. Fukuda, H. Y amamoto, H. Okazaki, Y . Suzuki, and K. Kaw ai, “Pinching antenna - using a dielectric waveguide as an anten na,” NTT DOCOMO Technical J. , vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 5–12, Jan. 2022

    2022

  9. [17]

    Pinching antenna,

    “Pinching antenna,” NTT DOCOMO, Inc., Tokyo, Japan, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.docomo.ne.jp/english/info/media center/event/mwc21/pdf/06 MWC2021 docomo

    2022

  10. [18]

    Hologra phic MIMO for LEO satellite communications aided by reconfigurable ho lographic surfaces,

    R. Deng, B. Di, H. Zhang, H. V . Poor, and L. Song, “Hologra phic MIMO for LEO satellite communications aided by reconfigurable ho lographic surfaces,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 3071–3085, Sept. 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, 4th ed. Wiley, New Y ork, US, 1998

    1998

  12. [20]

    A primer on spatial modeling and analysis in wireless network s,

    J. G. Andrews, R. K. Ganti, M. Haenggi, N. Jindal, and S. W eber, “A primer on spatial modeling and analysis in wireless network s,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 156–163, Nov. 2010

    2010

  13. [21]

    Performance anal ysis of outdoor mmwave ad hoc networks,

    A. Thornburg, T. Bai, and R. W. Heath, “Performance anal ysis of outdoor mmwave ad hoc networks,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 64, no. 15, pp. 4065–4079, Aug. 2016

    2016

  14. [22]

    Beam focusing for near-field multiuser MIMO communi cations,

    H. Zhang, N. Shlezinger, F. Guidi, D. Dardari, M. F. Iman i, and Y . C. Eldar, “Beam focusing for near-field multiuser MIMO communi cations,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 7476–7490, Sept. 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    A compariso n of MIMO techniques in downlink millimeter wave cellular networks w ith hybrid beamforming,

    M. N. Kulkarni, A. Ghosh, and J. G. Andrews, “A compariso n of MIMO techniques in downlink millimeter wave cellular networks w ith hybrid beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1952–1967, May 2016

    1952

  16. [24]

    On the performan ce of non-orthogonal multiple access in 5G systems with randomly deployed users,

    Z. Ding, Z. Y ang, P . Fan, and H. V . Poor, “On the performan ce of non-orthogonal multiple access in 5G systems with randomly deployed users,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett. , vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1501–1505, Dec. 2014

    2014

  17. [25]

    Complete c haracteriza- tion of the Pareto boundary for the MISO interference channe l,

    E. A. Jorswieck, E. G. Larsson, and D. Danev, “Complete c haracteriza- tion of the Pareto boundary for the MISO interference channe l,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 5292–5296, Oct. 2008

    2008

  18. [26]

    Efficient computation of Pareto optimal beamforming vectors for the MISO interferen ce channel with successive interference cancellation,

    J. Lindblom, E. Karipidis, and E. G. Larsson, “Efficient computation of Pareto optimal beamforming vectors for the MISO interferen ce channel with successive interference cancellation,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 61, no. 19, pp. 4782–4795, Oct. 2013

    2013

  19. [27]

    Wireles s information and power transfer in cooperative networks with spatially rand om relays,

    Z. Ding, I. Krikidis, B. Sharif, and H. V . Poor, “Wireles s information and power transfer in cooperative networks with spatially rand om relays,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 4440–4453, Aug. 2014

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.