Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 46 references

Impacts into rotating targets: angular momentum draining and efficient formation of synthetic families

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Asteroid collisions systematically drain rotational angular momentum from the population, because although individual impacts can spin a target up or down, deceleration wins on average.

desk verdict Solid, useful SPH study showing rotation boosts cratering ejecta up to 5x, but the population-level 'systematic spin-down' claim outruns the equatorial-only impact geometry. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03248 v1 pith:ZMAJ3JB7 submitted 2019-08-08 astro-ph.EP

P. Ševeček , M. Brož , M. Jutzi This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords asteroidrotationfamiliesSPHsimulationsangularmomentumdrainhypervelocityimpactsspinbarriermainbeltcollisions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that asteroid rotation cannot be ignored in collision modelling: a rotating parent body ejects up to five times more mass in oblique cratering impacts than an identical non-rotating one, changing the synthetic family size distributions. It then computes how much spin the target gains or loses, using hundreds of SPH/N-body impact simulations on 10 km and 100 km monolithic targets. The central population-level result is that although individual impacts can either accelerate or decelerate a target, deceleration wins when impacts are averaged over impact angles, so collisions act as a systematic spin-down mechanism. That matters because it offers a physical explanation for the observed abundance of slow rotators in the Main Belt, and because neglecting rotation would bias predicted asteroid family properties.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the dimensionless angular-momentum transfer effectivity $\gamma = (L_{\mathrm{lr}} - L_{\mathrm{pb}})/L_{\mathrm{imp}}$, comparing the largest remnant's spin angular momentum $L_{\mathrm{lr}}$ with the target's pre-impact spin $L_{\mathrm{pb}}$ and the impactor's orbital angular momentum $L_{\mathrm{imp}}$ (negative for retrograde impacts). Together with the angle-averaged spin change $\Delta\omega = \int \Delta\omega \sin 2\varphi\, d\varphi$, it turns a matrix of single impacts into a population-level statement about systematic spin-down. Supporting this is the paper's unified SPH/N-body code, whose correction tensor in the velocity-gradient estimate keeps bulk rotation stable and conserves angular momentum through both the fragmentation and the reaccumulation phases. A heuristic ratio $\omega_{\mathrm{pb}}/\omega_{\mathrm{imp}} \sim D_{\mathrm{pb}}/(v_{\mathrm{imp}} P_{\mathrm{pb}} \sin\varphi_{\mathrm{imp}})$ identifies when rotation matters, predicting larger effects for larger targets.

What would settle it

Repeat the impact-energy matrix with out-of-plane trajectories (projectiles hitting at high target latitudes) or with tilted spin axes and recompute the angle-averaged $\Delta\omega$; if the average turns positive for typical Main Belt periods, the systematic spin-down claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For monolithic asteroids, the paper claims, initial rotation materially changes the outcome of sub-catastrophic collisions. Cratering impacts into targets rotating near the critical breakup period eject up to five times more mass than impacts into stationary targets, with oblique prograde impacts most affected; at high impact energies the rotation makes little difference. The spin change is not one-directional: the paper defines a transfer effectivity $\gamma = (L_{\mathrm{lr}} - L_{\mathrm{pb}})/L_{\mathrm{imp}}$ and finds that prograde cratering mostly accelerates the target while retrograde cratering decelerates it, whereas for the most energetic impacts the pattern reverses. Averaging over impact angles with a $\sin 2\varphi$ weighting, the mean spin change $\Delta\omega$ is negative for both cratering and mid-energy impacts except for very slow rotators, so the net secular effect of the collisional environment is to drain angular momentum from the asteroid population.

Load-bearing premise

All impact simulations place the projectile in the target's equatorial plane; the claim that collisions systematically spin the population down assumes this geometry is representative of impacts at other latitudes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Neglecting rotation biases synthetic asteroid family size-frequency distributions, most strongly for large parent bodies and oblique impacts.
  • Rotation can turn a formally cratering impact into a catastrophic disruption, so families produced from fast rotators contain more and smaller fragments than stationary-target models predict.
  • Because the angle-averaged spin change is negative, the collisional environment acts as a net angular momentum drain on the asteroid population, supporting the view that impacts help create the observed excess of slow rotators.
  • Near the critical spin rate a target cannot be spun up further, so the spin-down effect and the mass-ejection amplification are strongest just below the spin barrier.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the equatorial-plane restriction holds up, the spin-down result should couple with spin-up processes such as thermal torques to cap asteroid spins near the barrier, a feedback the paper does not model.
  • The fivefold ejection amplification near critical rotation implies cratering lifetimes and family production rates are underestimated for fast-rotating bodies, which could bias collisional evolution models.
  • The same transfer-effectivity analysis could be rerun for rubble-pile targets with macro-porosity to see whether the population-level spin-down strengthens or weakens, since the paper only treats monolithic targets.
  • A direct observational test would compare the size-frequency distributions and spin rates of families from known fast-rotating parent bodies with these synthetic families.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a new unified SPH/N-body code, OpenSPH, and uses it to simulate impacts into rotating, monolithic asteroid targets of diameters 10 km and 100 km, over impact energies Q/Q*_D from 0.03 to 3, impact angles from 15° to 75° (prograde and retrograde), and rotation periods from near-critical to 50 P_crit. The authors compare synthetic family size-frequency distributions for rotating and non-rotating targets, quantify the enhancement of ejected mass (up to a factor of about five in oblique cratering events near the critical spin rate), and analyze the angular momentum transfer through the efficiency parameter γ and the angle-averaged spin-rate change Δω. The central claim, stated in the abstract, is that although individual cratering impacts can either accelerate or decelerate a target, deceleration prevails on average, so impacts cause a systematic spin-down of the asteroid population.

Significance. If the central spin-down claim holds, the paper provides a concrete collisional mechanism that could help explain the observed excess of slow rotators in the Main Belt, and it quantifies a previously neglected effect in synthetic family generation. The strengths of the work are its unusually broad simulation matrix (over 400 runs), the open-source release of the code, the explicit presentation of the governing equations, and the inclusion of consistency checks such as the comparison between inertial and co-rotating frames. The paper is therefore a potentially useful reference for both impact modeling and asteroid collisional evolution. However, the population-level spin-down conclusion is currently supported only by equatorial-plane impacts, and the verification of the code is described but not quantitatively documented, so the significance of the main claim is not yet fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1 and Eq. (24)] The population-level claim in the abstract ('collisions thus cause a systematic spin-down of asteroid population') is supported only by an average over the in-plane angle φ for impacts restricted to the equatorial plane. All simulations set the rotation vector along z and place both the impactor position and velocity in the x-y plane, so no impact latitude is ever sampled. Equation (24) integrates sin 2φ over φ from 0 to π/2 only; it is a conditional average at the equator. The justification in Section 3.1 is a magnitude argument: equatorial impacts feel the largest centrifugal force and their angular momentum is aligned with the target spin, which supports the expectation that the effect is largest at the equator, not that its sign survives the latitude average. Since the paper itself notes in Section 4 that a non-rotating target is always spun up by an impact, high-latitude impacts should approach that limit, and the latitude-averaged Δω could be weaker, zero, or even positive, particularly for slow rotators and weak cratering events. To support the abstract's claim, the authors need either off-equator simulations or an explicit argument establishing that the sign of Δω is latitude-independent.
  2. [Section 2 and Appendix B] The manuscript states that the new code 'has been verified against previous ones (Benz and Asphaug 1994)', but the text reports no quantitative verification results; Appendix B only gives a visual comparison between the inertial-frame and co-rotating-frame implementations. The central quantities Δω, γ, and μej are outcomes of simulations where the angular momentum balance is delicate: the sign of Δω changes with impact angle and period in Fig. 6, so numerical angular momentum diffusion or modest conservation errors could affect the conclusions. Please report quantitative tests, including conservation of total linear and angular momentum and of energy for representative runs, a resolution study (the 400-run set uses about 100,000 particles while the family-formation sets use about 500,000), and a quantitative benchmark comparison with an established code or a published impact problem.
  3. [Section 4, Eqs. (23)-(24), and Section 2.5] The averaging in Eq. (24) and Fig. 8 includes runs with Q/Q*_D = 1, for which the paper states that the whole target is disintegrated and the largest remnant is reaccumulated; for these runs Δω is not the spin change of a surviving target but of a reaccumulated body. The reaccumulation model merges particles subject to the critical-spin condition in Eq. (20), which explicitly prevents the formation of supercritical rotators and, as noted in Section 2.5, modifies the moment of inertia of fragments. This merging rule can bias the inferred Δω toward negative values independently of the physics of angular momentum draining. The spin-down claim should either be restricted to cratering events where a surviving target is identifiable (roughly Q/Q*_D ≲ 0.3), or the analysis should quantify how the merger criterion affects the spin of the largest remnant.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (23)] The definition of γ uses Lpb twice: the second occurrence should be the angular momentum of the largest remnant, presumably Llr.
  2. [Section 3.4] The text says 'over 400 simulations' were performed for the ejected-mass study, but the parameter grid described (nine periods, six angles, four projectile diameters) gives 216 combinations; please clarify whether the additional runs include repeats, intermediate parameters, or other geometries.
  3. [Section 3] The paper states that Q*_D necessarily depends on the target's rotation but then treats Q*_D as independent of rotation and uses the Benz-Asphaug (1999) value. This is a reasonable choice for labeling runs, but it should be stated more explicitly that the quoted Q/Q*_D values do not represent the actual disruption threshold for a rotating target.
  4. [Eq. (7)] The energy equation has a likely index typo: the term (w_j^β - w_j^β) should probably be (w_j^α - w_j^α) or a similar pair with consistent indices.
  5. [Appendix C] The line 'As of August 12, 2019' should be replaced by a version or access date appropriate for the published version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central results are simulation outputs with external calibration, and the caveats are scope limitations rather than circular reductions.

full rationale

All load-bearing quantities — the spin-rate change Δω, the effectivity γ, and the ejected-mass ratio μej — are measured simulation outputs from the SPH/N-body runs, not parameters fitted to the conclusions. The impactor sizes are normalized using the Benz and Asphaug (1999) scaling law, which is an external calibration; the paper explicitly treats Q*_D as rotation-independent, so no outcome is fitted to the rotation state. Equation (24) is a weighted average of the simulated Δω(φ) values; because it is evaluated after the simulations, the sign of the average is not forced by the formula and could have come out positive. The acknowledged equatorial-plane restriction in Section 3.1 and the merger-shape limitation in Section 2.5 narrow the population-level applicability of the spin-down claim, but they are representativeness or correctness concerns, not self-referential reductions. Self-citations to Ševeček et al. (2017) and Jutzi et al. appear only for code context, prior parameter choices, and narrative background; they are not invoked to establish the spin-down result. Consequently, no step in the derivation reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not fit any free parameter to the results it reports. Its conclusions rest on standard SPH material models and several simplifying assumptions (monolithic bodies, equatorial impacts, fixed impact velocity, rotation-independent Q*_D). The numerical parameters (eta, C_CFL, C_d, restitution coefficients, damping) are standard choices, not tuned to the target outputs.

free parameters (6)
  • SPH smoothing length factor eta = 1.3
    Chosen to give about 65 neighbor particles; a numerical resolution parameter affecting surface behavior, not fitted to target results.
  • Courant number C_CFL = 0.25
    Chosen for stability of explicit time integration, as higher values can lead to instabilities.
  • Derivative time-step constant C_d = 0.2
    Limits the time step based on value-to-derivative ratios of all time-dependent quantities; a numerical stability choice.
  • Damping coefficient delta = gradually decreased
    Arbitrary damping used only in the pre-impact stabilization phase to settle the rotating target; it does not enter the impact physics.
  • Coefficients of restitution (eta_n, eta_t) = 0.5, 1.0
    Used for inelastic bounces during N-body reaccumulation; chosen by hand, not measured.
  • Merger spin limit factor = not stated (presumably 1)
    User-defined multiplier applied to v_esc and omega_crit in the merging rule; the exact values used in the runs are not given in the text.
assumptions (8)
  • ad hoc to paper Q*_D is taken independent of the target's rotation (Benz and Asphaug 1999 scaling law).
    The paper states Q*_D necessarily depends on rotation but fixes it to a single value for all runs as a dimensionless energy measure (Section 3). This changes the interpretation of Q/Q*_D for rotating targets.
  • domain assumption Targets and impactors are monolithic, homogeneous bodies.
    Stated in Section 3; real asteroids may be rubble piles or porous, and the authors defer such cases to future work.
  • domain assumption Only equatorial impacts are simulated (rotation vector aligned with impactor angular momentum).
    Section 3.1 reduces the parameter space; the authors expect the largest effect there and cite Takeda and Ohtsuki (2009) for rubble piles, but the monolithic case is not demonstrated for other latitudes.
  • domain assumption The fragmentation model follows Benz and Asphaug 1994; fully damaged material has no tensile or shear strength and cannot heal.
    Section 2.1; this affects fragment shapes and, to a lesser degree, size distributions.
  • domain assumption Von Mises plasticity with no pressure-dependent yield and no friction.
    Section 2.1; the authors cite more complex rheologies and note that friction is not discussed.
  • domain assumption Tillotson equation of state with material parameters from Table 1.
    Standard EOS for rock; parameters from prior literature (Tillotson 1962; Benz and Asphaug 1999).
  • domain assumption Impact velocity fixed at v_imp = 5 km/s.
    Section 3 states this is close to the mean Main-belt collision velocity (Dahlgren 1998), but real collisions have a distribution of speeds.
  • domain assumption The critical spin period P_crit is about 2.009 h for rho = 2700 kg/m^3; targets at P = 2 h are held together by material strength.
    Section 3.2 assumes a strengthless fluid breakup limit; the P = 2 h target therefore rotates slightly supercritically and is stabilized by cohesion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Impacts into rotating targets: angular momentum draining and efficient formation of synthetic families." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZMAJ3JB7

@misc{pith2026190803248,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Impacts into rotating targets: angular momentum draining and efficient formation of synthetic families},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZMAJ3JB7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03248}
}
read the original abstract

About 10% of the observed asteroids have rotational periods lower than P = 3 h and they seem to be relatively close to the spin barrier. Yet, the rotation has often been neglected in simulations of asteroid collisions. To determine the effect of rotation, we perform a large number of SPH/N-body impact simulations with rotating targets. We developed a new unified SPH/N-body code with self-gravity, suitable for simulations of both fragmentation phase and gravitational reaccumulation. The code has been verified against previous ones (Benz and Asphaug 1994), but we also tested new features, e.g. rotational stability, tensile stability, etc. Using the new code, we ran simulations with D_pb = 10 km and 100 km monolithic targets and compared synthetic asteroid families created by these impacts with families corresponding to non-rotating targets. The rotation affects mostly cratering events at oblique impact angles. The total mass ejected by these collision can be up to five times larger for rotating targets. We further compute the transfer of the angular momentum and determine conditions under which impacts accelerate or decelerate the target. While individual cratering collisions can cause both acceleration and deceleration, the deceleration prevails on average, collisions thus cause a systematic spin-down of asteroid population.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03248 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Impacts into Dpb = 100 km targets without rotation (first row), rotational period Ppb = 3 h (second row) and Ppb = 2 h (third row). The period of two hours is approximately the critical period of the target. The color brightness corresponds to specific internal energy of the particles. dimp = 1.226 km φ = -75° Q/QD * = 3.0 N (> D) D / km 1 10 100 103 104 0.1 1 dimp = 0.850 km φ = -75° Q/QD * = 1.0 N (> D) 1 10 100 1… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Cumulative size-frequency distributions N(> D) of the synthetic families for Dpb = 10 km targets. Stationary targets are plotted in black, red and yellow plots correspond to targets with rotational period P = 3 h and P = 2 h, respectively. Columns 3 to 5 of the plot show prograde impacts (positive impact angles), columns 1 and 2 are retrograde impacts (negative impact angles). angular momentum of projectiles is larg… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Cumulative size-frequency distribution for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The total mass of fragments Mej(P)/Mej(∞) ejected by collisions, normalized by the mass of fragments from a corresponding collision into a stationary target. Four figures correspond to different relative impact energies, from cratering (left) to mid-energy (right) even…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: We plot the change of frequency rather than period, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Damage of the target at time t = 10 s after the impact for various impact angles; from left to right, φimp = 75◦ , 45◦ , 15◦ , −45◦ , −75◦ . Simulations were carried out with the impactor of size dimp = 314 m and speed vimp = 5 km/s, target was not rotating. Red outlin…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Change of the spin rate ∆ω of the target (or the largest remnant in case Q/Q? D ' 1) as a function of the initial period Ppb of the target (here in units of the critical period Pcrit) and the impact angle φimp. Four images correspond to different sizes of the impactor,…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Dimensionless effectivity γ of the angular momentum transfer. Other quantities are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Quantities averaged over impact angles using Eq. (24) as a function of period [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Numerical Simulations of Collisional Disruption of Rotating Gravitational Aggregates: Dependence on Material Properties

    author Ballouz , R.L. , author Richardson , D.C. , author Michel , P. , author Schwartz , S.R. , author Yu , Y. , year 2015 . title Numerical simulations of collisional disruption of rotating gravitational aggregates: Dependence on material properties . journal volume 107 , pages 29--35 . :10.1016/j.pss.2014.06.003, http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.6650 arXiv:1409.6650

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    , author Walsh , K.J

    author Ballouz , R.L. , author Walsh , K.J. , author Richardson , D.C. , author Michel , P. , year 2018 . title Numerical Simulations of Asteroid Reaccumulation: Improving the SPH to N-Body Handoff Using Alpha Shapes , in: booktitle Lunar and Planetary Science Conference , p. pages 2816

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    , year 1995

    author Balsara , D.S. , year 1995 . title von Neumann stability analysis of smoothed particle hydrodynamics---suggestions for optimal algorithms . journal Journal of Computational Physics volume 121 , pages 357--372 . :10.1016/S0021-9991(95)90221-X

    doi:10.1016/s0021-9991(95)90221-x 1995

  4. [4]

    , author Hut , P

    author Barnes , J. , author Hut , P. , year 1986 . title A hierarchical O(N log N) force-calculation algorithm . journal volume 324 , pages 446--449 . :10.1038/324446a0

    doi:10.1038/324446a0 1986

  5. [5]

    , author Durda , D.D

    author Benavidez , P.G. , author Durda , D.D. , author Enke , B. , author Campo Bagatin , A. , author Richardson , D.C. , author Asphaug , E. , author Bottke , W.F. , year 2018 . title Impact simulation in the gravity regime: Exploring the effects of parent body size and internal structure . journal volume 304 , pages 143--161 . :10.1016/j.icarus.2017.05.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.05.030 2018

  6. [6]

    , author Durda , D.D

    author Benavidez , P.G. , author Durda , D.D. , author Enke , B.L. , author Bottke , W.F. , author Nesvorn \'y , D. , author Richardson , D.C. , author Asphaug , E. , author Merline , W.J. , year 2012 . title A comparison between rubble-pile and monolithic targets in impact simulations: Application to asteroid satellites and family size distributions . jo...

    doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2012.01.015 2012

  7. [7]

    , author Asphaug , E

    author Benz , W. , author Asphaug , E. , year 1994 . title Impact simulations with fracture. I - Method and tests . journal volume 107 , pages 98 . :10.1006/icar.1994.1009

    arXiv 1994

  8. [8]

    , author Asphaug , E

    author Benz , W. , author Asphaug , E. , year 1999 . title Catastrophic Disruptions Revisited . journal volume 142 , pages 5--20 . :10.1006/icar.1999.6204, http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:astro-ph/9907117 arXiv:arXiv:astro-ph/9907117

    arXiv 1999

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    , year 2005

    author Canup , R.M. , year 2005 . title A Giant Impact Origin of Pluto-Charon . journal Science volume 307 , pages 546--550 . :10.1126/science.1106818

    2005 doi

  2. [10]

    , year 2008

    author Canup , R.M. , year 2008 . title Lunar-forming collisions with pre-impact rotation . journal volume 196 , pages 518--538 . :10.1016/j.icarus.2008.03.011

    2008 doi

  3. [11]

    , year 2010

    author Cossins , P.J. , year 2010 . title The Gravitational Instability and its Role in the Evolution of Protostellar and Protoplanetary Discs . Ph.D. thesis. University of Leicester

    2010

  4. [12]

    , author Stewart , S.T

    author \'C uk , M. , author Stewart , S.T. , year 2012 . title Making the Moon from a Fast-Spinning Earth: A Giant Impact Followed by Resonant Despinning . journal Science volume 338 , pages 1047 . :10.1126/science.1225542

    2012 doi

  5. [13]

    , year 1998

    author Dahlgren , M. , year 1998 . title A study of Hilda asteroids. III. Collision velocities and collision frequencies of Hilda asteroids . journal volume 336 , pages 1056--1064

    1998

  6. [14]

    , author Burns , J.A

    author Dobrovolskis , A.R. , author Burns , J.A. , year 1984 . title Angular momentum drain - A mechanism for despinning asteroids . journal volume 57 , pages 464--476 . :10.1016/0019-1035(84)90130-1

    1984 doi

  7. [15]

    , author Bottke , W.F

    author Durda , D.D. , author Bottke , W.F. , author Nesvorn \'y , D. , author Enke , B.L. , author Merline , W.J. , author Asphaug , E. , author Richardson , D.C. , year 2007 . title Size-frequency distributions of fragments from SPH/N-body simulations of asteroid impacts: Com...

    2007 doi

  8. [16]

    , author Jorda , L

    author F \'e tick , R.J. , author Jorda , L. , author Vernazza , P. , author Marsset , M. , author Drouard , A. , author Fusco , T. , author Carry , B. , author Marchis , F. , author Hanu s , J. , author Viikinkoski , M. , author Birlan , M. , author Bartczak , P. , author Ber...

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    , author Scheeres , D.J

    author Hirabayashi , M. , author Scheeres , D.J. , year 2014 . title Analysis of Asteroid (216) Kleopatra Using Dynamical and Structural Constraints . journal volume 780 , pages 160 . :10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/160, http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.4976 arXiv:1312.4976

    2014 arXiv

  10. [18]

    , author Asphaug , E

    author Jutzi , M. , author Asphaug , E. , author Gillet , P. , author Barrat , J.A. , author Benz , W. , year 2013 . title The structure of the asteroid 4 Vesta as revealed by models of planet-scale collisions . journal volume 494 , pages 207--210 . :10.1038/nature11892

    2013 doi

  11. [19]

    , author Benz , W

    author Jutzi , M. , author Benz , W. , year 2017 . title Formation of bi-lobed shapes by sub-catastrophic collisions. A late origin of comet 67P's structure . journal volume 597 , pages A62 . :10.1051/0004-6361/201628964, http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.02615 arXiv:1611.02615

    2017 arXiv

  12. [20]

    , author Holsapple , K

    author Jutzi , M. , author Holsapple , K. , author W \"u nneman , K. , author Michel , P. , year 2015 . title Modeling asteroid collisions and impact processes , in: editor Michel , P. , editor DeMeo , F.E. , editor Bottke , W.F. (Eds.), booktitle Asteroids IV . publisher The ...

    2015

  13. [21]

    , author Michel , P

    author Jutzi , M. , author Michel , P. , author Richardson , D.C. , year 2019 . title Fragment properties from large-scale asteroid collisions: I: Results from SPH/N-body simulations using porous parent bodies and improved material models . journal volume 317 , pages 215--228 ...

    2019 arXiv

  14. [22]

    , author Genda , H

    author Kurosawa , K. , author Genda , H. , year 2018 . title Effects of Friction and Plastic Deformation in Shock-Comminuted Damaged Rocks on Impact Heating . journal volume 45 , pages 620--626 . :10.1002/2017GL076285, http://arxiv.org/abs/1801.01100 arXiv:1801.01100

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    , author Antuono, M

    author Marrone, S. , author Antuono, M. , author Colagrossi, A. , author Colicchio, G. , author Touzé, D.L. , author Graziani, G. , year 2011 . title -sph model for simulating violent impact flows . journal Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering volume 200 , pag...

    2011 doi

  16. [24]

    , author Richardson , D.C

    author Michel , P. , author Richardson , D.C. , year 2013 . title Collision and gravitational reaccumulation: Possible formation mechanism of the asteroid Itokawa . journal volume 554 , pages L1 . :10.1051/0004-6361/201321657

    2013 doi

  17. [25]

    , author Richardson , D.C

    author Michel , P. , author Richardson , D.C. , author Durda , D.D. , author Jutzi , M. , author Asphaug , E. , year 2015 . title Collisional Formation and Modeling of Asteroid Families , in: editor Michel , P. , editor DeMeo , F.E. , editor Bottke , W.F. (Eds.), booktitle Ast...

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    , author Gingold, R

    author Monaghan, J. , author Gingold, R. , year 1983 . title Shock simulation by the particle method sph . journal Journal of Computational Physics volume 52 , pages 374 -- 389 . :http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(83)90036-0

    1983 doi

  19. [27]

    , year 1985

    author Monaghan , J.J. , year 1985 . title Particle methods for hydrodynamics . journal Computer Physics Reports volume 3 , pages 71--124 . :10.1016/0167-7977(85)90010-3

    1985 doi

  20. [28]

    , year 2000

    author Monaghan , J.J. , year 2000 . title SPH without a Tensile Instability . journal Journal of Computational Physics volume 159 , pages 290--311 . :10.1006/jcph.2000.6439

    2000

  21. [29]

    , author Burchell , M.J

    author Morris , A.J.W. , author Burchell , M.J. , year 2017 . title Laboratory tests of catastrophic disruption of rotating bodies . journal volume 296 , pages 91--98 . :10.1016/j.icarus.2017.05.016

    2017 doi

  22. [30]

    , author Fujiwara , A

    author Nakamura , A. , author Fujiwara , A. , year 1991 . title Velocity distribution of fragments formed in a simulated collisional disruption . journal volume 92 , pages 132--146 . :10.1016/0019-1035(91)90040-Z

    1991 doi

  23. [31]

    , author Bro z , M

    author Nesvorn\'y , D. , author Bro z , M. , author Carruba , V. , year 2015 . title Identification and Dynamical Properties of Asteroid Families , in: editor Michel , P. , editor DeMeo , F.E. , editor Bottke , W.F. (Eds.), booktitle Asteroids IV . publisher The University of ...

    2015

  24. [32]

    , year 2014

    author Owen , J.M. , year 2014 . title A compatibly differenced total energy conserving form of SPH . journal International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids volume 75 , pages 749--774 . :10.1002/fld.3912

    2014 doi

  25. [33]

    , author Stadel , J

    author Reinhardt , C. , author Stadel , J. , year 2017 . title Numerical aspects of giant impact simulations . journal volume 467 , pages 4252--4263 . :10.1093/mnras/stx322, http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.08296 arXiv:1701.08296

    2017 arXiv

  26. [34]

    , author Owen , J.M

    author Remington , T. , author Owen , J.M. , author Nakamura , A. , author Miller , P.L. , author Bruck Syal , M. , year 2018 . title Benchmarking Asteroid-Deflection Simulations: Basalt Spheres , in: booktitle AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts \#50 , p. pa...

    2018

  27. [35]

    , author Quinn , T

    author Richardson , D.C. , author Quinn , T. , author Stadel , J. , author Lake , G. , year 2000 . title Direct Large-Scale N-Body Simulations of Planetesimal Dynamics . journal volume 143 , pages 45--59 . :10.1006/icar.1999.6243

    2000

  28. [36]

    , author Riecker , S

    author Sch \"a fer , C. , author Riecker , S. , author Maindl , T.I. , author Speith , R. , author Scherrer , S. , author Kley , W. , year 2016 . title A smooth particle hydrodynamics code to model collisions between solid, self-gravitating objects . journal volume 590 , pages...

    2016 arXiv

  29. [37]

    , author Bro z , M

    author Sevecek S eve c ek , P. , author Bro z , M. , author Nesvorn \'y , D. , author Enke , B. , author Durda , D. , author Walsh , K. , author Richardson , D.C. , year 2017 . title SPH/N-Body simulations of small (D = 10km) asteroidal breakups and improved parametric relatio...

    2017 doi

  30. [38]

    , year 2001

    author Stadel , J.G. , year 2001 . title Cosmological N-body simulations and their analysis . Ph.D. thesis. University of Washington

    2001

  31. [39]

    , author Tanaka , H

    author Suetsugu , R. , author Tanaka , H. , author Kobayashi , H. , author Genda , H. , year 2018 . title Collisional disruption of planetesimals in the gravity regime with iSALE code: Comparison with SPH code for purely hydrodynamic bodies . journal volume 314 , pages 121--13...

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    , author Kobayashi , H

    author Sugiura , K. , author Kobayashi , H. , author Inutsuka , S. , year 2018 . title Toward understanding the origin of asteroid geometries. Variety in shapes produced by equal-mass impacts . journal volume 620 , pages A167 . :10.1051/0004-6361/201833227, http://arxiv.org/ab...

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    , author Ohtsuki , K

    author Takeda , T. , author Ohtsuki , K. , year 2007 . title Mass dispersal and angular momentum transfer during collisions between rubble-pile asteroids . journal volume 189 , pages 256--273 . :10.1016/j.icarus.2006.12.017

    2007 doi

  34. [42]

    , author Ohtsuki , K

    author Takeda , T. , author Ohtsuki , K. , year 2009 . title Mass dispersal and angular momentum transfer during collisions between rubble-pile asteroids. II. Effects of initial rotation and spin-down through disruptive collisions . journal volume 202 , pages 514--524 . :10.10...

    2009 doi

  35. [43]

    , year 1962

    author Tillotson, J.H. , year 1962 . title Metallic equations of state for hypervelocity impact . journal General Atomic Report volume GA-3216

    1962

  36. [44]

    , author Bro z , M

    author Vernazza , P. , author Bro z , M. , author Drouard , A. , author Hanu s , J. , author Viikinkoski , M. , author Marsset , M. , author Jorda , L. , author Fetick , R. , author Carry , B. , author Marchis , F. , author Birlan , M. , author Fusco , T. , author Santana-Ros ...

    2018

  37. [45]

    , year 2019

    author Vinogradova , T.A. , year 2019 . title Empirical method of proper element calculation and identification of asteroid families . journal volume 484 , pages 3755--3764 . :10.1093/mnras/stz228

    2019 doi

  38. [46]

    , author Burchell , M.J

    author Wickham-Eade , J.E. , author Burchell , M.J. , author Price , M.C. , author Harriss , K.H. , year 2018 . title Hypervelocity impact fragmentation of basalt and shale projectiles . journal volume 311 , pages 52--68 . :10.1016/j.icarus.2018.03.017

    2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.