pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.17354 · v1 · pith:ZMIFYRSOnew · submitted 2025-03-21 · 💻 cs.AI

HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks

David Rein , Joel Becker , Amy Deng , Seraphina Nix , Chris Canal , Daniel O'Connel , Pip Arnott , Ryan Bloom
show 14 more authors
Thomas Broadley Katharyn Garcia Brian Goodrich Max Hasin Sami Jawhar Megan Kinniment Thomas Kwa Aron Lajko Nate Rush Lucas Jun Koba Sato Sydney Von Arx Ben West Lawrence Chan Elizabeth Barnes
This is my paper
classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords taskstakehourshumansagentshcastsoftwaretime
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

To understand and predict the societal impacts of highly autonomous AI systems, we need benchmarks with grounding, i.e., metrics that directly connect AI performance to real-world effects we care about. We present HCAST (Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks), a benchmark of 189 machine learning engineering, cybersecurity, software engineering, and general reasoning tasks. We collect 563 human baselines (totaling over 1500 hours) from people skilled in these domains, working under identical conditions as AI agents, which lets us estimate that HCAST tasks take humans between one minute and 8+ hours. Measuring the time tasks take for humans provides an intuitive metric for evaluating AI capabilities, helping answer the question "can an agent be trusted to complete a task that would take a human X hours?" We evaluate the success rates of AI agents built on frontier foundation models, and we find that current agents succeed 70-80% of the time on tasks that take humans less than one hour, and less than 20% of the time on tasks that take humans more than 4 hours.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FrontierFinance: A Long-Horizon Computer-Use Benchmark of Real-World Financial Tasks

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    FrontierFinance benchmark shows human financial experts outperform state-of-the-art LLMs by achieving higher scores and more client-ready outputs on realistic long-horizon tasks.

  2. Toward Generalist Autonomous Research via Hypothesis-Tree Refinement

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Arbor combines a coordinator, executors, and a hypothesis tree to enable cumulative autonomous research, outperforming Codex and Claude Code by over 2.5x on six real tasks and reaching 86.36% Any Medal on MLE-Bench Lite.

  3. Think Fast: Estimating No-CoT Task-Completion Time Horizons of Frontier AI Models

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    No-CoT 50% task-completion time horizons for frontier models have doubled yearly for six years, reaching over 3 minutes for GPT-5.5, with median projections of 7 minutes by 2028 and 25 minutes by 2030.

  4. Two AI Metrics Diverged: Will it Make All the Difference?

    cs.AI 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bounded performance metrics always favor convergence of AI capabilities to meek models while unbounded metrics allow frontier models to maintain leads indefinitely, with policy implications for capability concentration.

  5. Think Fast: Estimating No-CoT Task-Completion Time Horizons of Frontier AI Models

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Frontier AI models' no-CoT 50% task-completion time horizons have doubled yearly over six years, reaching over 3 minutes for GPT-5.5 with projections to 25 minutes by 2030.