pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.07947 · v1 · pith:ZMINDZ6Nnew · submitted 2019-07-18 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.app-ph

Ultra-broadband nanophotonic phase shifter based on subwavelength metamaterial waveguides

David Gonz\'alez-Andrade , Jos\'e Manuel Luque-Gonz\'alez , J. Gonzalo Wang\"uemert-P\'erez , Alejandro Ortega-Mo\~nux , Pavel Cheben , \'I\~nigo Molina-Fern\'andez , Aitor V. Velasco This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 19:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.app-ph
keywords nanophotonic phase shiftersubwavelength metamaterialultra-broadbandsilicon photonicsdispersion engineeringFloquet-Bloch analysistelecommunication bandsSOI fabrication
0
0 comments X

The pith

Subwavelength metamaterial waveguides deliver a 90-degree phase shifter with less than 1.7 degrees error across 400 nm bandwidth.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a passive 90-degree optical phase shifter that relies on anisotropy and dispersion engineering inside subwavelength metamaterial waveguides. Calculations using the Floquet-Bloch method show the phase error stays below ±1.7° from 1.35 μm to 1.75 μm, covering five full telecommunication bands. The same design keeps its flat response even when fabrication errors reach ±20 nm, and measurements on standard 220-nm silicon-on-insulator wafers confirm a fourfold drop in phase variation over the tested 145 nm window. This approach targets applications in telecom, sensors, and quantum circuits where broadband passive phase control has been missing.

Core claim

By exploiting anisotropy and dispersion engineering in subwavelength metamaterial waveguides, a 90° phase shifter achieves a phase shift error below ±1.7° over the 400 nm range from 1.35 μm to 1.75 μm according to Floquet-Bloch calculations, maintains performance under fabrication variations up to ±20 nm, and demonstrates a fourfold reduction in phase variation compared with conventional structures when fabricated on 220-nm SOI wafers.

What carries the argument

Subwavelength metamaterial waveguides that use anisotropy and dispersion engineering to produce the required phase shift.

If this is right

  • Photonic integrated circuits can operate across the entire E, S, C, L, and U telecommunication bands with a single passive phase shifter.
  • The device tolerates fabrication errors up to ±20 nm while keeping phase error below ±1.7°.
  • A fourfold reduction in spectral phase variation is obtained relative to conventional waveguide phase shifters.
  • The same subwavelength engineering principle supports other broadband passive functions in silicon photonics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Integration with active modulators or sensors could extend the ultra-broadband property to full transceiver chips.
  • Relaxed fabrication tolerances may lower cost for high-volume production of broadband photonic circuits.
  • The same metamaterial approach could be tested on other material platforms or for different phase values such as 45° or 180°.

Load-bearing premise

The Floquet-Bloch model and measurements on standard 220-nm SOI wafers correctly describe device behavior over the full claimed bandwidth even when fabrication variations reach ±20 nm.

What would settle it

A direct measurement showing phase shift error larger than ±1.7° anywhere between 1.35 μm and 1.75 μm on a fabricated device would falsify the central performance claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.07947 by Aitor V. Velasco, Alejandro Ortega-Mo\~nux, David Gonz\'alez-Andrade, \'I\~nigo Molina-Fern\'andez, J. Gonzalo Wang\"uemert-P\'erez, Jos\'e Manuel Luque-Gonz\'alez, Pavel Cheben.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: shows the schematics of the proposed SWG phase shifter (panel a), as well as two common alternatives known in the state-of￾the-art. In all cases, two waveguides of the same length are used to establish a differential phase shift by means of geometric differences in the PS section. Tapered PS shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a), by adjusting the length of the PS section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Simulated maximum phase shift error in the wavelength range 1.35 μm - 1.75 μm and fabrication errors up to ∆𝛿 = ±20 nm. Inset: longitudinal and transversal variations for each SWG segment were considered. observed that our subwavelength engineered PS leverages additional degrees of freedom offered by SWG engineering to mitigate the wavelength dependence, achieving an almost flat response with an unpreceden… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Optical phase shifters are extensively used in integrated optics not only for telecom and datacom applications, but also for sensors and quantum computing. While various active solutions have been demonstrated, progress in passive phase shifters is still lacking. Here, we present a new type of ultra-broadband 90{\deg} phase shifter, which exploits the anisotropy and dispersion engineering in subwavelength metamaterial waveguides. Our Floquet-Bloch calculations predict a phase shift error below $\pm$1.7{\deg} over an unprecedented operation range from 1.35 $\mu$m to 1.75 $\mu$m, i.e. 400 nm bandwidth covering the E, S, C, L and U telecommunication bands. The flat spectral response of our phase shifter is maintained even in the presence of fabrication errors up to $\pm$20 nm, showing greater robustness than conventional structures. Our device was experimentally demonstrated using standard 220-nm-thick SOI wafers, showing a fourfold reduction in the phase variation compared to conventional phase shifters within the 145 nm wavelength range of our measurement setup. The proposed subwavelength engineered phase shifter paves the way for novel photonic integrated circuits with an ultra-broadband performance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a passive 90° phase shifter based on subwavelength metamaterial waveguides on standard 220-nm SOI. Floquet-Bloch calculations are used to predict a phase-shift error below ±1.7° across 1.35–1.75 μm (400 nm bandwidth covering E/S/C/L/U bands) with robustness to ±20 nm fabrication variations. Experimental measurements on fabricated devices demonstrate a fourfold reduction in phase variation relative to conventional shifters, but only within the 145 nm range accessible to the measurement setup.

Significance. If the Floquet-Bloch predictions hold across the full claimed bandwidth, the result would be significant for integrated photonics: it offers a passive, fabrication-tolerant route to ultra-broadband phase control that spans multiple telecom bands, addressing a longstanding limitation of conventional waveguide-based shifters. The use of standard SOI and the combination of dispersion-engineered metamaterial modeling with experiment are positive features.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, §4] Abstract and §4: The headline claim of ±1.7° error over the full 400 nm (1.35–1.75 μm) bandwidth and the ±20 nm fabrication robustness rest exclusively on Floquet-Bloch simulations of the metamaterial unit cell. Experimental data are reported only for a 145 nm window; no additional measurements, SEM-characterized devices, or cross-validation outside this window are provided to confirm that the simulated effective-index anisotropy and dispersion remain accurate when wavelength, material dispersion, and actual sidewall angles deviate from the nominal model. This is load-bearing for the central ultra-broadband claim.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that the flat spectral response is “maintained even in the presence of fabrication errors up to ±20 nm” is simulation-only. Because the experimental section does not include devices with controlled thickness or width variations, the robustness claim lacks direct experimental support and should be qualified or supplemented.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states “fourfold reduction in the phase variation” but does not specify the exact metric (peak-to-peak, RMS, or wavelength-dependent standard deviation) or the reference conventional device geometry; this should be clarified for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 2 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. We acknowledge the distinction between our simulation predictions and the limited experimental bandwidth, and we will revise the manuscript to qualify the claims accordingly. Point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, §4] Abstract and §4: The headline claim of ±1.7° error over the full 400 nm (1.35–1.75 μm) bandwidth and the ±20 nm fabrication robustness rest exclusively on Floquet-Bloch simulations of the metamaterial unit cell. Experimental data are reported only for a 145 nm window; no additional measurements, SEM-characterized devices, or cross-validation outside this window are provided to confirm that the simulated effective-index anisotropy and dispersion remain accurate when wavelength, material dispersion, and actual sidewall angles deviate from the nominal model. This is load-bearing for the central ultra-broadband claim.

    Authors: We agree that the ±1.7° phase error over the full 400 nm bandwidth is a Floquet-Bloch simulation result, with experiments limited to the 145 nm range of our setup. The model shows good agreement with measured data in the accessible band. We will revise the abstract and §4 to explicitly state that the ultra-broadband performance and full-band error are simulation predictions validated within the measured window, and add discussion on model applicability based on the subwavelength physics. This is a partial revision since new experimental data outside 145 nm cannot be added. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that the flat spectral response is “maintained even in the presence of fabrication errors up to ±20 nm” is simulation-only. Because the experimental section does not include devices with controlled thickness or width variations, the robustness claim lacks direct experimental support and should be qualified or supplemented.

    Authors: We agree the ±20 nm fabrication robustness is simulation-only. We will revise the abstract to qualify the statement as a simulation prediction. A dedicated experimental study with intentionally varied devices lies outside the scope of this work. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Experimental confirmation of phase-shift performance over the full 400 nm bandwidth
  • Direct experimental data on devices with controlled ±20 nm fabrication variations

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on independent EM modeling and measurement

full rationale

The paper's central performance claims (phase error <±1.7° over 1.35–1.75 μm and robustness to ±20 nm errors) are obtained from Floquet-Bloch calculations on the subwavelength unit cell, with experimental confirmation limited to the 145 nm measurement window. No quoted step reduces by construction to its own inputs: there is no self-definitional loop, no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation chain. The derivation chain is self-contained against external electromagnetic benchmarks and does not match any enumerated circularity pattern.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard electromagnetic modeling assumptions and the validity of the fabrication process for the described structures.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Floquet-Bloch theorem applies to model the periodic subwavelength metamaterial waveguide structure
    Invoked for the calculations predicting the phase shift error.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5797 in / 1175 out tokens · 32923 ms · 2026-05-24T19:50:27.271528+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Silicon-based optoelectronics,

    R. A. Soref, “Silicon-based optoelectronics,” Proc. IEEE 81, 1687- 1706 (1993)

    work page 1993

  2. [2]

    Silicon optical modulators,

    G. T. Reed, G. Mashanovich, F. Y. Gardes, and D. J. Thomson, “Silicon optical modulators,” Nat. Photonics 4, 518-526 (2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Low-power, 2 2 silicon electro -optic switch with 110 -nm bandwidth for broadband reconfigurable optical networks,

    J. Van Campenhout, W. M. J. Green, S. Assefa, and Y. A. Vlasov, “Low-power, 2 2 silicon electro -optic switch with 110 -nm bandwidth for broadband reconfigurable optical networks,” Opt. Express 17, 24020-24029 (2009)

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    High-speed two- mode switch for mode -division multiplexing optical networks,

    Y. Xiong, R. B. Priti, and O. Liboiron-Ladouceur, “High-speed two- mode switch for mode -division multiplexing optical networks,” Optica 4, 1098-1102 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Fully reconfigurable silicon photonic lattice filters with four cascaded unit cells,

    S. S. Djordjevic, L. W. Luo, S. Ibrahim, N. K. Fontaine, C. B. Poitras, B. Guan, L. Zhou, K. Okamoto, Z. Ding, M. Lipson, and S. J. B. Yoo, “Fully reconfigurable silicon photonic lattice filters with four cascaded unit cells,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 23, 42-44 (2011)

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Reconfigurable silicon filter with continuous bandwidth tunability,

    P. Orlandi, C. Ferrari, M. J. Strain, A. Canciamilla, F. Morichetti, M. Sorel, P. Bassi, and A. Melloni, “Reconfigurable silicon filter with continuous bandwidth tunability,” Opt. Lett. 37, 3669-3671 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Simple all-optical FFT scheme enabling Tbit/s real-time signal processing,

    D. Hillerkuss, M. Winter, M. Teschke, A. Marculescu, J. Li, G. Sigurdsson, K. Worms, S. Ben Ezra, N. Narkiss, W. Freude, and J. Leuthold, “Simple all-optical FFT scheme enabling Tbit/s real-time signal processing,” Opt. Express 18, 9324-9340 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Monolithic polarization and phase diversity coherent receiver in silicon,

    C. R. Doerr, P. J. Winzer, Y. K. Chen, S. Chandrasekhar, M. S. Rasras, L. Chen, T. -Y. Liow, K. -W. Ang, and G. Q. Lo, “Monolithic polarization and phase diversity coherent receiver in silicon,” J. Lightwave Technol. 28, 520-525 (2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Large- scale quantum photonic circuits in silicon,

    N. C. Harris, D. Bunandar, M. Pant, G. R. Steinbrecher, J. Mower, M. Prabhu, T. Baehr-Jones, M. Hochberg, and D. Englund, “Large- scale quantum photonic circuits in silicon,” Nanophotonics 5, 456- 468 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics,

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, “A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics,” Nature 409, 46-52 (2001)

    work page 2001

  11. [11]

    Efficient, compact and low loss thermo-optic phase shifter in silicon,

    N. C. Harris, Y. Ma, J. Mower, T. Baehr-Jones, D. Englund, M. Hochberg, and C. Galland, “Efficient, compact and low loss thermo-optic phase shifter in silicon,” Opt. Express 22, 10487- 10493 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Temperature-independent silicon subwavelength grating waveguides,

    J. H. Schmid, M. Ibrahim, P. Cheben, J. Lapointe, S. Janz, P. J. Bock, A. Densmore, B. Lamontagne, R. Ma, W. N. Ye, and D.-X. Xu, “Temperature-independent silicon subwavelength grating waveguides,” Opt. Letters 36, 2110-2112 (2011)

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    Electrooptical effects in silicon,

    R. A. Soref and B. R. Bennett, “Electrooptical effects in silicon,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23, 123-129 (1987)

    work page 1987

  14. [14]

    Highly efficient optical phase modulator in SOI waveguides,

    C. K. Tang and G. T. Reed, “Highly efficient optical phase modulator in SOI waveguides,” Electron. Lett. 31, 451-452 (1995)

    work page 1995

  15. [15]

    Phase-shifter using submicron silicon waveguide couplers with ultra -small electro-mechanical actuator,

    T. Ikeda, K. Takahashi, Y. Kanamori, and K. Hane, “Phase-shifter using submicron silicon waveguide couplers with ultra -small electro-mechanical actuator,” Opt. Express 18, 7031-7037 (2010)

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    Broadband nanoelectromechanical phase shifting of light on a chip,

    M. Poot and H. X. Tang, “Broadband nanoelectromechanical phase shifting of light on a chip,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 061101 (2014)

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    Multimode interference couplers for the conversion and combining of zero- and first-order modes,

    J. Leuthold, J. Eckner, E. Gamper, P. A. Besse, and H. Melchior, “Multimode interference couplers for the conversion and combining of zero- and first-order modes,” J. Lightwave Technol. 16, 1228- 1239 (1998)

    work page 1998

  18. [18]

    Novel optical 90° hybrid consisting of a paired interference based 24 MMI coupler, a phase shifter and a 22 MMI coupler,

    S. H. Jeong and K. Morito, “Novel optical 90° hybrid consisting of a paired interference based 24 MMI coupler, a phase shifter and a 22 MMI coupler,” J. Lightwave Technol. 28, 1323-1331 (2010)

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    Unconstrained splitting ratios in compact double- MMI couplers,

    M. Cherchi, S. Ylinen, M. Harjanne, M. Kapulainen, T. Vehmas, and T. Aalto, “Unconstrained splitting ratios in compact double- MMI couplers,” Opt. Express 22, 9245-9253 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Silica-based 22 multimode interference coupler with arbitrary power splitting ratio,

    T. Saida, A. Himeno, M. Okuno, A. Sugita, and K. Okamoto, “Silica-based 22 multimode interference coupler with arbitrary power splitting ratio,” Electron. Lett. 35, 2031-2033 (1999)

    work page 2031

  21. [21]

    Ultra -broadband mode converter and multiplexer based on sub-wavelength structures,

    D. González-Andrade, J. G. Wangüemert-Pérez, A. V. Velasco, A. Ortega-Moñux, A. Herrero -Bermello, I. Molina -Fernández, R. Halir, and P. Cheben, “Ultra -broadband mode converter and multiplexer based on sub-wavelength structures,” IEEE Photon. J. 10, 2201010 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Compact silicon-based integrated optic time delays,

    S. Yegnanarayanan, P. D. Trinh, F. Coppinger, and B. Jalali, “Compact silicon-based integrated optic time delays,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 9, 634-635 (1997)

    work page 1997

  23. [23]

    Temperature dependence mitigation in stationary Fourier - transform on-chip spectrometers,

    A. Herrero-Bermello, A. V. Velasco, H. Podmore, P. Cheben, J. H. Schmid, S. Janz, M. L. Calvo, D.-X. Xu, A. Scott, and P. Corredera, “Temperature dependence mitigation in stationary Fourier - transform on-chip spectrometers,” Opt. Lett. 42, 2239-2242 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Multimode interference couplers as compact and robust static optical phase shifters,

    P. E. Morrissey and F. H. Peters, “Multimode interference couplers as compact and robust static optical phase shifters,” Opt. Commun. 345, 1-5 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Two- mode de/multiplexer based on multimode interference couplers with a tilted joint as phase shifter,

    L. Han, S. Liang, H. Zhu, L. Qiao, J. Xu, and W. Wang, “Two- mode de/multiplexer based on multimode interference couplers with a tilted joint as phase shifter,” Opt. Lett. 40, 518-521 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    Refractive index engineering with subwavelength gratings for efficient microphotonic couplers and planar waveguide multiplexers,

    P. Cheben, P. J. Bock, J. H. Schmid, J. Lapointe, S. Janz, D.-X. Xu, A. Densmore, A. Delâge, B. Lamontagne, and T. J. Hall, “Refractive index engineering with subwavelength gratings for efficient microphotonic couplers and planar waveguide multiplexers,” Opt. Lett. 35, 2526-2528 (2010)

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    Subwavelength waveguide grating for mode conver sion and light coupling in integrated optics,

    P. Cheben, D.-X. Xu, S. Janz, and A. Densmore, “Subwavelength waveguide grating for mode conver sion and light coupling in integrated optics,” Opt. Express 14, 4695-4702 (2006)

    work page 2006

  28. [28]

    Subwavelength integrated photonics,

    P. Cheben, R. Halir, J. H. Schmid, H. A. Atwater, and D. R. Smith, “Subwavelength integrated photonics,” Nature 560, 565 -572 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Subwavelength-grating metamaterial structures for silicon photonic devices,

    R. Halir, A. Ortega-Moñux, D. Benedikovic, G. Z. Mashanovich, J. G. Wangüemert-Pérez, J. H. Schmid, Í. Molina-Fernández, and P. Cheben, “Subwavelength-grating metamaterial structures for silicon photonic devices,” Proc. IEEE 106, 2144-2157 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Tilted subwavelength gratings: controlling anisotropy in metamaterial nanophotonic waveguides,

    J. M. Luque-González, A. Herrero-Bermello, A. Ortega-Moñux, Í. Molina-Fernández, A. V. Velasco, P. Cheben, J. H. Schmid, S. Wang, and R. Halir, “Tilted subwavelength gratings: controlling anisotropy in metamaterial nanophotonic waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 43, 4691-4694 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Design of a Broadband Polarization Splitter Based on Anisotropy -Engineered Tilted Subwavelength Gratings,

    A. Herrero-Bermello, J. M. Luque-González, A. V. Velasco, A. Ortega-Moñux, P. Cheben and R. Halir, “Design of a Broadband Polarization Splitter Based on Anisotropy -Engineered Tilted Subwavelength Gratings,” IEEE Photon. J. 11, 6601508 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Waveguide sub - wavelength structures: a review of principles and applications,

    R. Halir, P. J. Bock, P. Cheben, A. Ortega -Moñux, C. Alonso- Ramos, J. H. Schmid, J. Lapointe, D.-X. Xu, J. G. Wangüemert- Pérez, Í. Molina -Fernández, and S. Janz, “Waveguide sub - wavelength structures: a review of principles and applications,” Laser Photon. Rev. 9, 25-49 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Evanescent field waveguide sensing with subwavelength grating structures in silicon-on-insulator,

    J. G. Wangüemert-Pérez, P. Cheben, A. Ortega-Moñux, C. Alonso- Ramos, D. Pérez-Galacho, R. Halir, I. Molina-Fernández, D.-X. Xu, and J. H. Schmid, “Evanescent field waveguide sensing with subwavelength grating structures in silicon-on-insulator,” Opt. Lett. 39, 4442-4445 (2014)

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    Design of narrowband Bragg spectral filters in subwavelength grating metamaterial waveguides,

    J. Čtyroký, J. G. Wangüemert-Pérez, P. Kwiecien, I. Richter, J. Litvik, J. H. Schmid, Í. Molina-Fernández, A. Ortega-Moñux, M. Dado, and P. Cheben, “Design of narrowband Bragg spectral filters in subwavelength grating metamaterial waveguides,” Opt. Express 26, 179-194 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Broadband polarization independent nanophotonic coupler for silicon waveguides with ultra-high efficiency,

    P. Cheben, J. H. Schmid, S. Wang, D.-X. Xu, M. Vachon, S. Janz, J. Lapointe, Y. Painchaud, and M. -J. Picard, “Broadband polarization independent nanophotonic coupler for silicon waveguides with ultra-high efficiency,” Opt. Express 23, 22553- 22563 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Subwavelength index engineered surface grating coupler with sub-decibel efficiency for 220-nm silicon-on- insulator waveguides,

    D. Benedikovic, P. Cheben, J. H. Schmid, D. -X. Xu, B. Lamontagne, S. Wang, J. Lapointe, R. Halir, A. Ortega-Moñux, S. Janz, and M. Dado, “Subwavelength index engineered surface grating coupler with sub-decibel efficiency for 220-nm silicon-on- insulator waveguides,” Opt. Express 23, 22628-22635 (2015)

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    Polarization splitter and rotator with subwavelength grating for enhanced fabrication tolerance,

    Y. Xiong, J. G. Wangüemert-Pérez, D.-X. Xu, J. H. Schmid, P. Cheben, and N. Y. Winnie, “Polarization splitter and rotator with subwavelength grating for enhanced fabrication tolerance,” Opt. Lett. 39, 6931-6934 (2014)

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    Colorless directional coupler with dispersion engineered sub- wavelength structure,

    R. Halir, A. Maese-Novo, A. Ortega-Moñux, I. Molina-Fernández, J. G. Wangüemert-Pérez, P. Cheben, D.-X. Xu, J. H. Schmid, and S. Janz, “Colorless directional coupler with dispersion engineered sub- wavelength structure,” Opt. Express 20, 13470-13477 (2012)

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    Ultra- broadband nanophotonic beamsplitter using an anisotropic sub- wavelength metamaterial,

    R. Halir, P. Cheben, J. M. Luque -González, J. D. Sarmiento- Merenguel, J. H. Schmid, J. G. Wangüemert-Pérez, D.-X. Xu, S. Wang, A. Ortega -Moñux, and Í. Molina -Fernández, “Ultra- broadband nanophotonic beamsplitter using an anisotropic sub- wavelength metamaterial,” Laser Photon. Rev. 10, 1039 -1046 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    Optical multi -mode interference devices based on self -imaging: principles and applications,

    L. B. Soldano and E. C. Pennings, “Optical multi -mode interference devices based on self -imaging: principles and applications,” J. Lightwave Technol. 13, 615-627 (1995)

    work page 1995

  41. [41]

    Infrared refractive indexes of silicon, germanium and modified selenium glass,

    C. D. Salzberg and J. J. Villa, “Infrared refractive indexes of silicon, germanium and modified selenium glass,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 47, 244- 246 (1957)

    work page 1957

  42. [42]

    Interspecimen comparison of the refractive index of fused silica,

    I. H. Malitson, “Interspecimen comparison of the refractive index of fused silica,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 1205-1208 (1965)

    work page 1965

  43. [43]

    FullWAVE and FemSIM

    “FullWAVE and FemSIM”, available from RSoft, https://www.synopsys. com/optical -solutions/rsoft/component- design.html

    work page

  44. [44]

    Disorder effects in subwavelength grating metamaterial waveguides,

    A. Ortega-Moñux, J. Čtyroký, P. Cheben, J. H. Schmid, S. Wang, Í. Molina-Fernández, and R. Halir, “Disorder effects in subwavelength grating metamaterial waveguides,” Opt. Express 25, 12222-12236 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Compact single-mode silicon hybrid rib/strip waveguide with adiabatic bends,

    W. Bogaerts and S. K. Selvaraja, “Compact single-mode silicon hybrid rib/strip waveguide with adiabatic bends,” IEEE Photon. J. 3, 422-432 (2011)

    work page 2011