REVIEW 1 cited by
Subsampling for Ridge Regression via Regularized Volume Sampling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Given $n$ vectors $\mathbf{x}_i\in \mathbb{R}^d$, we want to fit a linear regression model for noisy labels $y_i\in\mathbb{R}$. The ridge estimator is a classical solution to this problem. However, when labels are expensive, we are forced to select only a small subset of vectors $\mathbf{x}_i$ for which we obtain the labels $y_i$. We propose a new procedure for selecting the subset of vectors, such that the ridge estimator obtained from that subset offers strong statistical guarantees in terms of the mean squared prediction error over the entire dataset of $n$ labeled vectors. The number of labels needed is proportional to the statistical dimension of the problem which is often much smaller than $d$. Our method is an extension of a joint subsampling procedure called volume sampling. A second major contribution is that we speed up volume sampling so that it is essentially as efficient as leverage scores, which is the main i.i.d. subsampling procedure for this task. Finally, we show theoretically and experimentally that volume sampling has a clear advantage over any i.i.d. sampling when labels are expensive.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Strong Formulations and Algorithms for Regularized A-optimal Design
Regularized A-optimal design is NP-hard, and a new convex relaxation dominates previous ones with finite optimality gaps for every k, enabling faster exact and greedy solvers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.